green button Click the green + button to read more details on each candidate.

2026 U.S. Senate Incumbents

NameTermsStatePartyPositionLeadershipPosition ScoreVote ScoreLeadership ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose RoeVote [Zeldin Confirmation Vote (EPA Administrator)]Vote [Terminating the Sham Energy Emergency]Vote [Sustaining the Residential Clean Energy Tax Credit]Vote [Rolling Back the Methane Polluter Fee]
Booker, Cory2New JerseyDSenator Cory Booker understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Senator's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is a pressing economic and national security crisis that especially threatens coastal areas in New Jersey. By even conservative estimates, New Jersey can expect to see a foot and a half of sea-level rise by 2050 if no action is taken. In addition to posing serious problems to our country as a whole, the effects of climate change disparately affect more vulnerable, lower-income communities."Senator Booker has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. During the July 31st Democratic Debate, hosted by CNN, the Senator stated, "Climate change is not a separate issue. It must be the issue and the lens with which we view every issue." Senator Booker also makes prominent public statements on the issue. While campaigning in Iowa, the presidential candidate was asked a question regarding the practicality of the Green New Deal, in which he answered, "When the planet has been in peril in the past, who came forward to save Earth from the scourge of Nazism and totalitarian regimes? We came forward! Who came forward to save the planet, or continents, from financial ruin? We came forward with the Marshall Plan. Our history is standing up and saying, look, humanity is in crisis, America is going to be the light and the hope." The Senator makes climate change a top priority issue. On the Senator's presidential campaign website, it states, "Climate change is not some distant threat — we’re witnessing many of its effects today. And the immediate burden of much of the pollution causing climate change is disproportionately borne by low-income communities and communities of color." 100100100Senator Booker publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In an interview with the New York Times, when asked if he supported a carbon fee, he stated, "A federal price on carbon should be one part of a comprehensive response by the federal government to the threat of climate change. The proceeds should be paid out as a dividend in a progressive way that ensures that our climate policies are also reducing inequality and not burdening everyday families.” In 2015 the Senator voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.100100https://www.booker.senate.gov/?p=issue&id=70 https://twitter.com/CoryBooker/status/1164554913109688320 https://corybooker.com/issues/climate-change-environmental-justice/ https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/02/08/cory_booker_green_new_deal_is_like_defeating_the_nazis_or_going_to_the_moon.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/18/us/politics/climate-change-2020-democratic-candidates.html https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.booker.senate.gov/news/press/booker-statement-on-reported-draft-supreme-court-opinion-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoeN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Capito, Shelley1West VirginiaRSenator Shelley Capito does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2017 press release regarding the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Senator Capito stated, "Today, President Trump kept his promise to roll back one of the most harmful acts of overreach by the Obama administration – the so-called Clean Power Plan. If fully implemented, the Clean Power Plan would have completely decimated West Virginia’s vital coal industry while having no meaningful climate impact." On her, 'Energy and Environment.' page, it states, "Since 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has engaged in unprecedented rulemaking – without the consent of Congress – in an attempt to pick winners and losers and unilaterally disarm the American coal industry. In West Virginia, the attack on coal has reduced revenue for education programs, roads and other public services – impacting thousands of real peoples’ lies and putting thousands of coal miners out of work." Senator Capito demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 2500Senator Capito opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator was a co-sponsor of (S. Res 472) a 2016 resolution, which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States.2512.5https://www.capito.senate.gov/news/press-releases/capito-joins-president-trump-to-sign-measure-reversing-harmful-clean-power-plan- https://www.capito.senate.gov/about/issues/environment https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=88&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.capito.senate.gov/news/press-releases/capito-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-in-dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organizationOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Collins, Susan4MaineRSenator Susan Collins understands the importance of climate action but does not see it as a top priority issue. According to the Bangor Daily News, when discussing the impacts of climate change, the Senator, stated, "The federal government cannot afford the billions of dollars in additional funding that is going to be needed if we do not take into account and start acting on the serious consequences of climate change. Spending more than $300 billion each year, in response to severe weather events that are connected to warming waters and producing strong hurricanes, is simply not a solution.”The Senator was a co-sponsor of the International Climate Accountability Act (S.1743), which according to the Natural Resources Council of Maine, "would prevent the federal government from using any taxpayer resources to withdraw the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement." Senator Collins supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 752550Senator Collins opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2015 the Senator voted in favor of S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.2543.75https://bangordailynews.com/2017/10/25/politics/susan-collins-ignoring-climate-change-is-simply-not-a-solution/ https://congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/1743 https://www.nrcm.org/maine-environmental-news/collins-king-sponsor-bill-to-affirm-us-paris-climate-agreement/ https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.collins.senate.gov/newsroom/senators-collins-and-murkowski-introduce-bill-to-codify-supreme-court-decisions-on-reproductive-rights_roe-v-wade-and-planned-parenthood-v-casey https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/supreme-court-vote-shadows-maine-sen-susan-collins-in-her-first-race-after-abortion-rights-decisionSupports RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti Climate
Coons, Christopher2Delaware DSenator Chris Coons understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. On the Senator's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is one of the most important challenges facing our nation. To mitigate its impact, Senator Coons believes that we must act quickly to reduce the amount of global warming gases released into the atmosphere. At the same time, we must ensure that our efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions provide opportunities for economic growth and do not stifle investment, innovation, and job creation."Senator Coons has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2018 climate change speech on the Senate floor, the Senator stated, "We need to do more. Because in my small state, sea-level rise is happening at twice the national rate, and in about 100 years, everyone in Delaware will finally have a beach house. Just not the way they wanted. So let me conclude by saying we need to look forward, not backward when addressing climate change and sea-level rise. We need action, not reaction. We need policy, not politics. We should act today, not tomorrow." The Senator also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a March 2019 Facebook post, the Senator wrote, "The impacts of climate change – from extreme weather and drought to rising sea levels – are real, pressing, and will only become more extreme the longer we wait to take meaningful action... It's time for Congress to act on climate. Now." Senator Coons makes climate change a top priority issue. He is the co-chair and co-founder of the bipartisan climate caucus in the Senate. 100100100Senator Coons publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator introduced the Climate Action Rebate Act of 2019 (H.R 4051), which, "places an increasing price on carbon and other greenhouse gas emissions, designed to drive down pollution and encourage market-driven innovation in clean energy technologies." In 2015 the Senator voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.100100https://www.coons.senate.gov/issues/environment https://www.coons.senate.gov/news/press-releases/video-sen-coons-speech-on-climate-change https://www.facebook.com/senatorchriscoons/posts/2460104637336128 https://citizensclimatelobby.org/bipartisan-climate-working-group-forms-in-senate-led-by-sens-coons-braun/ https://www.coons.senate.gov/news/press-releases/sens-coons-and-feinstein-rep-panetta-introduce-bill-to-price-carbon-pollution-invest-in-infrastructure-randd-and-working-families https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051 https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.coons.senate.gov/issues/womens-rights/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cotton, Tom1ArkansasRSenator Tom Cotton disagrees with the scientific consensus that that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2014 speech at a lunchtime energy policy panel at the Clinton Library, the then Congressman stated, "The simple fact is that for the last 16 years the earth’s temperature has not warmed. That’s the facts…Now, there’s no doubt that the the temperature has risen over the past 150, 200 years. It’s most likely that human activity has contributed to some of that." In a March press release on the Green New Deal, the Senator stated, "The Green New Deal would force a transition in just 10 years, one decade, to 100% green energy, whatever that is...They claim these radical ideas are necessary to stop the threat of climate change. A threat so dire, the Democrats insist, so dire, that we will all be dead in 12 years-12 years-if we don't surrender totalitarian levels of power over our lives to central planners in Washington." Senator Cotton demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.000Senator Cotton opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. While serving in the House of Representatives, the Senator voted in support of a 2013 amendment by Rep. Scalise that would have required Congress's approval before passing a carbon tax (H. Amdt. 448 to H.R. 367). The Senator was a co-sponsor of (S. Res 472) a 2016 resolution, which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States.256.25https://arktimes.com/arkansas-blog/2014/09/25/cotton-on-climate-change-yes-its-probably-real-but-let-the-market-handle-it https://www.cotton.senate.gov/?p=speech&id=1090 http://congress.freedomworks.org/bills/house-bill-hr-367?keyvote=10697&tab=roll-call https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=88&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.cotton.senate.gov/news/speeches/cotton-defends-the-right-to-life/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hagerty, Bill1TennesseeRSenator Bill Hagerty does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to Cleanenergy.org, "Hagerty will “work to eliminate senseless EPA interference and fight to cut unnecessary regulations” according to the section on his website entitled 'Supporting Our Farmers.'”According to his campaign website, Senator Hagerty "will support the exploration and development of fossil fuels. Bill will work to repeal renewable fuels standards and scale back excessive environmental regulations on the development of new resources." A 2021 Fox 17 WZTV Nashville article states "The U.S. officially returned to the Paris climate accord on Friday, gaining support from leaders around the globe. But not everyone agrees it's the right move, including Hagerty, a Republican. He argues the United States can't afford to "shackle our economy" while still recovering from the pandemic." Senator Bill Hagerty demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.2500Senator Bill Hagerty has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://cleanenergy.org/blog/wtcs-bill-hagerty/ https://teamhagerty.com/the-issues/ https://fox17.com/news/local/tennessee-senator-responds-to-us-return-to-climate-fight-this-is-a-huge-mistake https://www.hagerty.senate.gov/press-releases/2022/06/24/hagerty-statement-on-u-s-supreme-courts-decision-properly-returning-abortion-authority-to-the-american-people/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hickenlooper, John1ColoradoDSenator John Hickenlooper understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the senator states "Our planet’s health, economic well-being, and national security are all at risk. It is imperative that we address the climate challenges we face with a fierce sense of urgency — human lives and livelihoods are at stake.Senator John Hickenlooper has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to a November 2021 press release on his website, "...U.S. Senator John Hickenlooper attended the 26th UN Climate Conference in Glasgow where he pushed for a price on carbon to be enacted globally and celebrated passage of the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, which invests in clean energy, climate change mitigation, and contains several Hickenlooper-authored provisions." Senator Hickenlooper also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to the senator's campaign website, "First and foremost, we are calling for a transition to a 100% renewable energy economy with net-zero emissions by 2050, with an interim goal of a 43% reduction below 2005 levels in greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 — exactly where many of the world’s leading scientists tell us we need to go." Senator Hickenlooper makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a July 2021 article from Empowering Colorado, "Hickenlooper is part of a bipartisan group writing the legislation for the $1.2 trillion infrastructure plan, which includes $7.5 billion to build a national network of 500,000 electric vehicle chargers. Hickenlooper believes so strongly in the need to clean up the climate — he called it 'the country’s agenda.'”100100100Senator John Hickenlooper publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. From an August 2021 Colorado Newsline article, “The thing I’d like more than anything is to get a price on carbon,” Hickenlooper said. 'It would be so much more efficient if there was some sort of a fee, and a dividend of some sort, that would allow us to incentivize and motivate all of these entrepreneurs all over the country … to find cleaner ways of delivering energy.'”100100https://hickenlooper.com/issues/climate/ https://www.hickenlooper.senate.gov/press-releases/icymi-hickenlooper-celebrates-infrastructure-bill-pushes-for-carbon-pricing-at-un-climate-conference/ https://empoweringcolorado.org/2021/07/12/sen-hickenlooper-hopes-to-drive-solutions-to-climate-change-as-summer-heat-drought-and-fires-fry-the-west/ https://coloradonewsline.com/2021/08/31/hickenlooper-carbon-pricing-democrats-budget-bill/ https://www.hickenlooper.senate.gov/press_releases/on-third-anniversary-of-dobbs-hickenlooper-bennet-colleagues-introduce-bill-to-restore-abortion-access-nationwide/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hyde-Smith, Cindy1Mississippi RSenator Cindy Hyde-Smith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to News Mississippi, when questioning then EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt at a Senate Interior Appropriations Subcommittee hearing, Senator Hyde-Smith stated, "I appreciate the direction the Trump administration EPA is taking to implement commonsense regulatory processes that are focused on results and not drawn-out punitive actions that stifle agricultural and industrial innovation.” According to Mississippi Today, during a Senatorial debate in 2018, the Senator dodged questions pertaining to climate change. Senator Hyde-Smith demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 2500Senator Hyde-Smith has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Senator was not in Congress to vote on S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.5018.75https://newsms.fm/hyde-smith-questions-head-of-epa/ https://mississippitoday.org/2018/11/01/hyde-smith-dodges-climate-change-question-touts-jobs-at-copiah-plant/ https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.hydesmith.senate.gov/issues/pro-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Luján, Ben Ray 1New MexicoDSenator Ben Ray Luján understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 tweet, the Senator Luján states that "Tackling the climate crisis — saving our Mother Earth — will create jobs, healthier communities, and lower energy costs for New Mexicans. Now is the time to act. Let’s get the job done."Senator Ben Ray Luján has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the Senator's website, "Recognizing that action on the climate crisis cannot wait another generation, Senator Luján has been a leading voice in the fight against climate change. He has developed bold, comprehensive legislation to put the United States on a path to net-zero carbon emissions to combat the climate crisis and grow the economy." According to the Santa Fe New Mexican, "The Climate Crisis Action Plan is a set of policy recommendations aimed at reducing carbon pollution “as quickly and aggressively as possible” while helping communities adapt to the impacts of a changing climate, all while creating a 'durable and equitable clean energy economy.'” The plan calls for net-zero emissions in the U.S. by 2050.The senator also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a March 2021 tweet, Senator Luján stated "It’s clear climate change has real world impacts; that's why I’m fighting for more investments and research in climate smart agriculture and clean energy." Senator Ben Ray Luján makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2020 American Progress article, "Sen.-elect and current Rep. Ben Ray Luján (D) has already taken bold steps on climate action in the U.S. House of Representatives as one of the lead sponsors on legislation for a federal clean electricity standard, alongside Sen. Tina Smith." 100100100Senator Ben Ray Luján has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://twitter.com/senatorlujan/status/1437552021142441992 https://www.lujan.senate.gov https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/local_news/new-mexico-must-combat-climate-crisis-luj-n-says/article_7d6d1238-e945-11ea-902b-4bcb292fedbb.html https://twitter.com/senatorlujan/status/1370486647154937868 https://americanprogress.org/article/state-climate-leadership-coming-nations-capital-2021/ https://www.lujan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/lujan-statement-on-four-years-since-scotus-overturned-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lummis, Cynthia1WyomingRSenator Cynthia Lummis disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. From a 2020 article from the Washington Examiner, "Those who say climate change is an existential threat are completely mistaken," Lummis said. "We do have time to address this. We should address it." She also insisted that fossil fuel use doesn't need to be reduced to address climate change adequately, a view shared by most Republicans that is at odds with what climate scientists recommend.In a 2021 article written by Senator Lummis for Fox News, the senator states "The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated just how important it is to produce key resources like energy here in the United States. Sadly, that is not the lesson that President Biden learned. In the name of environmentalism, he canceled the Keystone XL pipeline and banned new oil and gas drilling and leasing on federal lands." Later, Senator Cynthia Lummis states "...congressional Democrats are debating new ways to hamstring our economy in the name of their green agenda," and "Our traditional energy sources, coal, oil and natural gas, are some of the cleanest burning in the world." Senator Cynthia Lummis demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.000Senator Cynthia Lummis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5012.5https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/cynthia-lummis-bets-on-fossil-fuels-in-seeking-return-to-congress https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/biden-g20-summit-us-energy-crisis-sen-cynthia-lummis?fbclid=IwAR0Zu3_CnQNrlBycWTziTFsR9oB2xOmvGUQ1EhuGBorj1J0adK4gGaRIuLA https://www.lummis.senate.gov/press-releases/senator-lummis-addresses-supreme-court-abortion-case/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Markey, Ed2Massachusetts DSenator Ed Markey understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Under 'Priorities' the Senator's 'Climate Change' page, it says: "Global climate change presents one of the gravest threats to our planet’s health, and to America’s economy, national security, and public health. Landmark studies such as the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report and the U.S. National Climate Assessment Fourth Report have made it clear that we need bold action to avoid the worst impacts of climate change, and we may have as few as 12 years to achieve it." Senator Markey understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. The Senator is the chairman of the The Senate Climate Change Task Force. Senator Markey also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release introducing (S.2565) A bill to establish a Global Climate Change Resilience Strategy, to authorize the admission of climate-displaced persons, and for other purposes, he stated, "The climate crisis is fueling an humanitarian crisis around the world, and without intervention the crisis will become a catastrophe.” The Senator makes climate change a top priority issue. From his 'Energy & the Environment' page, "Most notably, Ed is the Senate co-author of the Green New Deal with Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 10-year mobilization to transform our economy and democracy, all while addressing climate change. It calls for a massive investment in 100 percent clean, renewable, zero-emitting energy; green transportation; and climate-resilient infrastructure, supporting the creation of millions of new jobs." He introduced A resolution recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal (S.Res.59). 100100100Senator Markey publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. An article in 'The World,' said, "The Post's Editorial Board recently laid out its own argument for a Green New Deal that, unlike the AOC-Markey plan, includes carbon pricing and stops short of broader progressive goals. Stephen Stromberg of the Post, who authored the editorial, expressed some surprise that the Green New Deal did not include carbon pricing, noting that in 2009, Sen. Markey co-sponsored a carbon-pricing bill that, at the time, was considered 'the premier global warming/climate change legislation of the Obama era.'” In 2015 the Senator voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.100100https://www.markey.senate.gov/priorities/climate https://www.edmarkey.com/tweets/climate-change-is-the-national-security-challenge-of-our-time-we-owe-it-to-our-veterans-and-servicemembers-to-stop-fighting-wars-in-the-middle-east-that-fuel-our-countrys-addiction-to-oil-and-fossi/ https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/congressional-climate-champions-applaud-local-action-on-display-at-the-global-climate-action-summit https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/2565/text https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-markey-introduces-first-of-its-kind-legislation-to-address-climate-refugee-crisis https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-resolution/59?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22green+new+deal%22%5D%7D&s=1&r=2 https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.pri.org/stories/2019-04-11/green-new-deal-doesnt-include-carbon-pricing-some-say-thats-big-mistake https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-markey-statement-on-anniversary-of-supreme-court-decision-overturningroe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Marshall, Roger1KansasRSenator Roger Marshall disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 article from Inside Climate News, "... Roger Marshall, a first-term Congressman and Trump loyalist, says he doesn’t believe climate change is occurring..."According to a 2021 press release on the senator's website, "U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. a member of the U.S. Senate Agriculture Committee, penned an OP-ED FOR THE WASHINGTON TIMES highlighting the productivity of the American farmer and their role in carbon capture. Additionally, Senator Marshall has signed on to the bipartisan Growing Climate Solutions Act, which will break down barriers for farmers interested in participating in carbon markets so they can be rewarded for climate-smart practices." Senator Roger Marshall does not oppose climate change. 0025Senator Roger Marshall opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. According to the 2020 Kansas Senate Candidate Guide from Civic Influencers, in the "CLIMATE CHANGE – Address as a top priority by taxing or limiting output of greenhouse gases?" section, the for Senator Roger Marshall, the Guide states "No. Voted for a resolution opposing a carbon tax." According to Vote Smart, Senator Marshall 'Voted in favor of H Con Res 119 - Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy.'" 06.25https://insideclimatenews.org/news/16092020/senate-2020-kansas-climage-change-roger-marshall-barbara-bollier/ https://www.marshall.senate.gov/press-releases/sen-marshall-op-ed-agriculture-should-be-in-the-drivers-seat-on-carbon-policy/ https://campuselect.org/voter-education/candidate-issue-guides/2020-kansas-senate-candidate-guide/ https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/172080/roger-marshall https://www.marshall.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/senator-marshall-stands-up-for-the-unborn-introduces-ultrasound-informed-consent-act/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Merkley, Jeff2OregonDSenator Jeff Merkley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue..On the Congressman's, 'Tackling Climate Change,' page, it states, "The carbon pollution in our atmosphere from burning fossil fuels like oil and coal is waging a direct and unchecked assault on our farming, fishing and forests – the cornerstones of Oregon’s rural economy... Congress needs to wake up. Climate change is real, and it’s bad for our economy and jobs, especially in rural Oregon and the places that most depend on our abundant natural resources." Senator Merkley has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release endorsing the findings of the 4th National Climate Assessment, the Senator stated, "The Trump Administration clearly wants to bury the findings of this new report, just like they want to bury their heads in the sand rather than acknowledge the truth about our climate. But we won’t let them." Senator Merkley also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a February 2019 speech on the Senate floor, the Senator stated, "...We see the impacts of carbon pollution and climate chaos in every single state...We see it through the more powerful forest fires, hotter, more acreage, more destruction." Senator Merkley makes climate change a top priority issue. In a press release on the Green New Deal, the Senator stated, "And while I and my colleagues will continue to press forward on federal policy to transition to 100% clean and renewable energy, there’s no reason that businesses, cities, or states need to wait. The time to act is now. And with a grassroots movement across America, we can drive the transition to 100% renewable and lead the world in a Green New Deal that saves our planet and our health, and rebuilds our middle class.”100100100Senator Merkley in the 115th Congress, introduced the 100 by 50 Act (S.987), which would have implemented, "a carbon fee to transition the commercial aviation, maritime transportation, and rail sectors away from fossil fuel usage. In 2015 the Senator voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax." 100100https://www.merkley.senate.gov/about/issues/tackling-climate-change https://www.merkley.senate.gov/news/press-releases/following-national-climate-assessment-merkley-and-colleagues-introduce-senate-resolution-endorsing-findings-of-recent-climate-change-reports-and-urging-immediate-action https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4780374/user-clip-jeff-merkley-climate-change https://www.merkley.senate.gov/news/press-releases/merkley-statement-on-green-new-deal-vote-2019 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/987 https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.merkley.senate.gov/on-3rd-anniversary-of-roe-being-overturned-merkley-and-wyden-join-bill-to-restore-abortion-access-nationwide/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Moody, Ashley1FloridaRSenator Ashley Moody does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She has opposed climate action, tweeting: "@JoeBiden’s EPA continues to push radical Green New Deal policies at a time when the infrastructure is not in place and Americans are struggling economically due to Biden-created inflation. Despite these concerns, Biden is trying to force a more than 60% increase in EV car sales over the next decade. We continue to fight Biden’s short-sighted and out-of-touch policies—taking legal action today to protect Americans from these outrageous emissions standards."Senator Ashley Moody demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. On Twitter, she stated: "Following my first 100 days in office, @POTUS signed my first piece of legislation into law that will roll back Green New Scam initiatives. When I took this oath of office, I promised to work hard on behalf of the people of Florida and undo the damage the previous administration inflicted on this nation. I was proud to take this fight head on—we are just getting started." In another tweet, she posted: "The Biden admin’s regulatory scheme prioritized the radical partisan agenda over the interests of the American people. Today, I led the fight to roll back a burdensome energy standard on commercial freezers and refrigerators. No longer will Americans pay the price for Biden’s green new SCAM."2500Senator Ashley Moody opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She strongly opposed a maritime carbon tax, saying: "The current proposal presents a direct threat to American interests. The proposed framework would impose a binding, escalating global carbon tax on maritime shipping through a system of increasingly strict emissions tiers and rising levies. Unlike the Paris Accord, the United States cannot opt out or decline to participate. Even if the U.S. chooses not to implement the tax domestically, it will be enforced by foreign ports of origin, destination and flag states. As a result, American exporters and importers will be required to pay the tax regardless of U.S. policy decisions."2512.5https://x.com/SenAshleyMoody/status/1781006576679096711 https://x.com/SenAshleyMoody/status/1920996722194440552 https://x.com/SenAshleyMoody/status/1917971468001878473 https://www.moody.senate.gov/press-releases/news-release-senator-moody-urges-trump-administration-to-protect-u-s-trade-and-national-security-by-continuing-efforts-to-block-harmful-imo-global-carbon-tax-proposal/ https://x.com/SenAshleyMoody/status/1540345606916423683Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ossoff, John1GeorgiaDSenator Jon Ossoff understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an August 2020 tweet, Senator Ossoff stated "Trust scientists, not corporate lobbyists: climate change is real." In an October 2020 tweet, the senator wrote "Tackling climate change is about our health and our prosperity — and we can't have one without the other."Senator Jon Ossoff has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to a November 2021 press release on his website, "Sen. Ossoff...introduced the Clean Energy for All Homes Act, which would help middle-class and lower-income families afford solar roof and other renewable energy technology installations by reducing the cost burden of installing these systems." Senator Ossoff also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to an April 2021 article from The Hill, 'America can and must lead the world in clean energy production, scientific and technological innovation, and environmental sustainability,” said Ossoff. “At stake are American competitiveness, security, and health, and humanity’s capacity to flourish without destroying our habitat..'" Senator Jon Ossoff makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a January 2021 Grist article, "Ossoff prefers a sweeping infrastructure plan that includes funding for clean energy, energy efficiency, and jobs in the renewable energy sector. He’s also a proponent of rejoining the Paris Agreement, reversing many of Trump’s environmental rollbacks, and instituting a ban on single-use plastics. At an Atlanta Press Club debate in October, Ossoff said Georgia could become 'the leading producer of renewable energy in the American Southeast.'”100100100Senator Jon Ossoff has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a June 2021 Politico article, "...Ossoff...said he won’t rule out mechanisms like carbon taxes or clean energy standards as possible climate policies."5062.75https://twitter.com/ossoff/status/1228333025680920581 https://twitter.com/ossoff/status/1315743657220284417 https://www.ossoff.senate.gov/press-releases/sen-ossoff-introduces-bill-to-make-energy-efficient-technology-more-affordable-for-georgia-families-lower-energy-bills/ https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/549850-senate-democrats-campaign-arm-taps-ossoff-to-chair-environmental-council https://grist.org/politics/what-the-georgia-senate-candidates-think-about-climate-change/ https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/01/jon-ossoff-climate-change-491505 https://www.ossoff.senate.gov/press-releases/sen-ossoff-on-roe-v-wade/Supports RoeN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Reed, Jack4Rhode IslandDSenator Reed understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Senator's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "He also recognizes that our environment is under constant stress from a changing climate. Warming temperatures and weather volatility pose a threat to our environment, economy, and national security, and Senator Reed believes that part of our mitigation strategy must include a national energy policy that limits carbon pollution, focuses on the development of clean, renewable energy sources that create jobs, and holds big polluters accountable. He also believes that communities must take action to better adapt to a changing climate. This includes the increase in resilience of our critical infrastructure and emergency preparedness."Senator Reed has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Along with Senator Brian Schatz, Senator Reed introduced the Requiring Every American Defense Installation to Nullify Environmental Stresses for Security (READINESS) Act of 2019 (S.1156), which would protect military bases from extreme weather events by requiring them to prepare for potential disasters and other risks posed by severe changes in environmental conditions. Senator Reed also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Senate floor speech, the Senator stated, "With increasing frequency in recent years, climate change has been commonly referred to as a threat multiplier. Simply put, climate change can and will exacerbate conditions in regions with already tenuous stability." Senator Reed makes climate change a top priority issue. In a January 2019 press release, the Senator stated, "Whether the Trump Administration wants to admit it or not, climate change is already costing the [Defense] Department significant amounts of taxpayer resources and impacting military readiness." 100100100Senator Reed supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. In 2015 the Senator voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.7593.75https://www.reed.senate.gov/issues/environment https://www.schatz.senate.gov/press-releases/schatz-moran-reed-introduce-bipartisan-legislation-to-protect-military-bases-from-extreme-weather https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/1156 https://www.reed.senate.gov/news/speeches/senator-reed-highlights-dangers-of-climate-change-on-senate-floor https://www.reed.senate.gov/news/releases/reed-statement-on-trump-administrations-inadequate-and-incomplete-climate-change-risk-assessment-report https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/reed-whitehouse-join-colleagues-to-introduce-legislation-to-restore-and-protect-americans-right-to-an-abortion-nationwide/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Ricketts, Pete1NebraskaRSenator Pete Ricketts disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He stated: "I believe it is far from clear — despite what the other side is saying — it is far from clear what is going on with our climate."Senator Rickets consistently opposes climate action. On Twitter, he wrote: "The Green New Deal is an extreme socialist wish list to ban gas vehicles, drastically restrict energy production, and provide government housing and healthcare to all." He expressed similar sentiments in another post: "Thank you to @RepBoebert and everyone who is stepping up to stop President Biden’s radical climate agenda and the 30 x 30 plan. It will take an all-hands-on-deck effort to stop the Biden-Harris Administration." Further, he is a supporter of fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Pete supports permitting reform that focuses on reliable and expeditious permitting for energy generation, transmission, and storage projects. He’s also pushing back on detached-from-reality government mandates. This includes expanded definitions under the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule and emissions mandates that would force a mass transition to electric vehicles." Senator Pete Ricketts demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.000Senator Pete Ricketts makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. On Twitter he wrote: "Dan Osborn’s 'Independent' act keeps falling apart. Osborn spoke to the Young Democrats at their national summit. At that same event, they pushed dangerous far-left policies. They backed abolishing ICE and voter ID laws. They pushed amnesty and taxing carbon for a Green New Deal."00https://web.archive.org/web/20190605232034/https://www.inquirer.com/columnists/attytood/nebraska-flooding-climate-change-republican-lawmakers-denial-green-new-deal-ocasio-cortez-20190328.html https://x.com/PeteRicketts/status/1819363752132718637 https://x.com/PeteRicketts/status/1390767663425724421 https://www.ricketts.senate.gov/issues/ensuring-energy-independence/ https://x.com/PeteRicketts/status/2107833330594902178 https://x.com/PeteRicketts/status/1527055148471795718Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Risch, Jim2IdahoRSenator Jim Risch does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Idaho State Journal, when asked about climate change, the Senator stated, “There’s no question there’s climate change. I mean, that’s … science. The pictures are there if you look at the pictures. The cause of it, there’s debate on that. I think the theory is a very valid theory, that it’s caused by human emissions. If that’s the case, I’ve read some of the stuff about that, and the world’s in a very precarious situation if that’s the case.”According to Boise State Public Radio Senator Risch was one of 22 Senators to send a letter to President Trump urging him to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. Senator Risch demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action 2500Senator Risch opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2015 the Senator voted in favor of S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax. 2512.5https://www.idahostatejournal.com/news/local/risch-on-climate-change-very-very-troubling/article_6f98feac-02e5-5f05-af39-0d7a3dc082e1.html https://www.boisestatepublicradio.org/post/idaho-senators-urged-trump-leave-paris-climate-deal https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.risch.senate.gov/news/press-releases/risch-statement-on-supreme-court-abortion-ruling/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Rounds, Mike1South DakotaRSenator Rounds agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release on the Green New Deal, the Senator stated, "When it comes to climate change, we agree that the climate is changing, just as it has since the dawn of time. However, I believe the best way to address the changing climate is through American innovation, not by unrealistic, unaffordable government mandates."In an October 2018 The Hill article on the 4th National Climate Assessment, Senator Rounds stated, "We ought to be talking about the things that we can do and still maintain a strong economy, because we’re not going to be able to address it unless we keep a strong economy.” Senator Rounds demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.000Senator Rounds makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2016 press release, the Senator stated, "The effect of a carbon tax – which will lead to higher taxes and increased energy costs– would be felt in every aspect of our lives. The Obama administration’s endless stream of new taxes and regulations is already limiting economic growth and stifling innovation. Our resolution would put a stop to efforts to create a national energy tax and further bog down our economy.” Senator Rounds was a co-sponsor of (S. Res 472) a 2016 resolution, which would have expressed the sense of the Senate that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the economy of the United States.00https://www.rounds.senate.gov/newsroom/weekly-column/green-new-deal-is-a-bad-deal-for-south-dakota https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/410871-gop-shrugs-off-dire-study-warning-of-global-warming https://www.rounds.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/rounds-cosponsors-resolution-to-protect-south-dakota-families-from-costly-new-energy-tax https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-resolution/472/cosponsors?r=88&s=1&searchResultViewType=expanded https://roundsforsenate.com/issues/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Sullivan, Dan1AlaskaRSenator Dan Sullivan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with C-SPAN, the Senator stated, "There is no doubt climate change is happening in Alaska, and, you know, it's opening up opportunities that you see in the Arctic, but it's also opening up significant challenges." In an interview with KTUU-TV, the Congressman advocated for exporting natural gas as a climate change solution, stating, "I always say one of the best ways you can work to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is ship clean, burning Alaska natural gas to Japan, to Korea, to Taiwan, to China. That would do more to help reduce greenhouse gas emissions than almost any other thing that we can do.” Congressman Sullivan demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.2500In 2015 the Senator voted in favor of S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.2512.5https://www.c-span.org/video/?448769-2/span-interviews-senator-dan-sullivan&start=827 https://www.ktuu.com/content/news/Sen-Sullivan-says-Alaskas-natural-gas-could-play-a-role-in-curbing-effects-of-climate-change-507281871.html https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.sullivan.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sullivan-reacts-to-supreme-court-dobbs-decision/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Warner, Mark2VirginiaDSenator Mark Warner understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a November 2018 Facebook post, the Senator wrote, "The threat of climate change, sea level rise, and recurrent flooding isn't another political football. It's a daily reality for folks in Hampton Roads and a serious national security challenge that this Administration ignores at our peril."On Senator Warner's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Senator Warner firmly believes that we need to reduce our dependence on foreign oil while investing in new technologies that reduce harmful emissions that contribute to climate change. He favors an "all of the above," portfolio approach that employs solar, wind, bio-fuels, nuclear energy, next generation battery technologies, and investment in research that focuses on using carbon capture technology so we can continue to use our domestic resources, such as coal, more responsibly." In a July 2019 Tweet, he wrote, "We ignore climate change at our own peril. Since the Republican Senate has utterly failed to address this threat, @SenateDems are holding our own climate hearing today with mayors from around the country who are on the front lines of this crisis." Senator Warner understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. 10010075Senator Warner supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. In 2015 the Senator voted against S.Amdt.928 to (S.Con.Res.11), which would have established a deficit-neutral reserve fund to protect the United States from an energy tax.7587.5https://www.facebook.com/MarkRWarner/posts/the-threat-of-climate-change-sea-level-rise-and-recurrent-flooding-isnt-another-/10156959585912853/ https://www.warner.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/energy-environment https://twitter.com/markwarner/status/1151507701500919809?lang=en https://www.congress.gov/amendment/114th-congress/senate-amendment/928?s=a&r=1 https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=114&session=1&vote=00103 https://www.warner.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/u-s-sen-mark-r-warner-on-senate-s-failure-to-advance-reproductive-freedom-for-women-act/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate

2026 U.S. Senate Challengers

NameStatePartyPositionPosition ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose Roe
Alme, KurtMontanaRKurt Alme does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Nice to see folks with the Montana Petroleum Association focused on creating Montana jobs and unleashing American energy. More energy means cheaper gas, cheaper groceries, and lower prices on every shelf."25Kurt Alme has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/KurtAlme/status/2094848796861902864 https://forwardmontana.org/young-voters-deserve-a-candidate-who-cares/Opposes Roe
Andrews, AnnieSouth CarolinaDAnnie Andrews understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On twitter, she posted: "Climate change is here. Charleston is underwater. Lindsey Graham doesn’t care because the fossil fuel industry helps him win elections." In another post, she wrote: "Climate. Action. Now." In a third tweet, she said: "Vote blue because gun violence. Vote blue because climate crisis. Vote blue because abortion access."100Annie Andrews has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/AnnieAndrewsMD/status/1959363340695736664 https://x.com/AnnieAndrewsMD/status/1702781316184301869 https://x.com/AnnieAndrewsMD/status/1840786437286879665 https://drannieandrews.com/issue/reproductive-freedom-trust-women/Supports Roe
Baisley, MarkColoradoRMark Baisley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like immigration.25Mark Baisley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://baisleyforsenate.com/issues/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/22298/race/8508/election/950?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Barr, AndyKentuckyRAndy Barr disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He stated: "Some say the science is settled, that's not true. There are scientists who dispute the level of warming, the extent to which humans are contributing to that." On his website, he writes: "My efforts to promote American energy independence and economic growth through energy dominance include: Adamantly and actively opposing the Green New Deal and the elimination of carbon-based fuels from our energy grid, which would jeopardize our national and economic security."0Andy Barr makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He is quoted as saying: “To say we are going to discriminate against fossil energy either through regulation or taxes is not good for our economy,”00https://web.archive.org/web/20190422161745/https://spectrumnews1.com/ky/louisville/pure-politics/2019/04/16/rep--andy-barr-speaks-on-green-energy-and-the-green-new-deal https://barr.house.gov/energy https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/policy/environment/climate/article222424225.html#storylink=cpy https://barr.house.gov/2022/6/barr-historic-victory-for-life-as-scotus-overturns-roe-v-wadeOpposes Roe
Bengs, BrianSouth DakotaIBrian Bengs understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "DoD has been considering & planning for the impact of climate change upon the national security environment over multiple presidential administrations. Unfortunately, politicians will happily ignore the evolving threat until it cannot be ignored." In another pos, he stated: "In 2008, Goldman Sachs labeled water 'the petroleum for the next century.' Since then China, Saudi Arabia, & others have been busy acquiring water rights across the globe & in the US. Climate change promises to increase conflict over water access."75Brian Bengs has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/BrianBengs/status/1481380088713256961 https://x.com/BrianBengs/status/1482781564064858114 https://hubcityradio.com/u-s-senate-candidate-brian-bengs-address-the-abortion-issue/Unclear Position on Roe
Bodnar, SethMontanaISeth Bodnar does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he states that he wants to: "Enact a true 'all of the above' energy strategy that unlocks the power of emerging technologies to ensure American energy independence, lower costs, and reduce emissions."25Seth Bodnar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.sethformontana.com/Platform https://www.sethformontana.com/news/reproductive-freedom-for-all-endorses-independent-seth-bodnar-for-us-senate-in-montanaSupports Roe
Booker, CharlesKentuckyDCharles Booker understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In the past, he has made strong statements on climate: On Twitter, he wrote: "I believe climate change is happening, and it is threatening the air we breathe and the water we drink. Another reason I fully support a Green New Deal." However, on his website, he states: "I will:... Support an all-of-the-above energy strategy that keeps Kentucky plants running, keeps power affordable and creates new energy jobs here at home."75Charles Booker has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/Booker4KY/status/1316559417719107584 https://charlesbookerky.org/policies#energy https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/charles-booker/positions/c2433ae7-80ac-40e3-bfc5-7d06d339318cSupports Roe
Bradshaw, MarquitaTennesseeDMarquita Bradshaw understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: "Marquita believes every community deserves clean air, safe drinking water, healthy neighborhoods, and protection from environmental hazards and extreme weather. She will support policies that reduce pollution, expand clean energy, conserve natural resources, and modernize infrastructure. Marquita will prioritize communities historically burdened by pollution and underinvestment, ensuring residents have a voice in decisions affecting their lives. By creating sustainable jobs, lowering energy costs, and strengthening climate resilience, she will work to protect Tennessee’s natural beauty and build a healthier, safer future for generations to come." Furthermore, on Twitter, she posted: "Dependency on fossil fuel/energy continues to be a matter of national security. This #inflation2022 & climate crisis is driven by greed of corporations who continue to surplus billions while some Americans are deciding to pay for food, gasoline, energy, or medicine."100Marquita Bradshaw has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.marquitabradshaw.com/issues/environmental-and-climate-justice https://x.com/BradshawforTN/status/1541759157199568896 https://x.com/BradshawforTN/status/1553017256468221952Supports Roe
Brown, SherrodOhioDSherrod Brown understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, Brown wrote: "I’m proud to continue working with @LCVoters to protect Ohioans from the effects of climate change we see every day in our communities." In 2021, Brown stated: "Pretty much every month we see new climate change-fueled catastrophes, from the wildfires ravaging the Western United States to the increasingly common coastal and river flooding... Investment we make now to shore up our infrastructure will both create jobs at home – jobs that can’t be sent overseas – and make our industries more competitive. And all the investments we make today will save taxpayers money in the future. It’s a lot cheaper to build a stronger bridge now than to repair it every other year. This committee oversees the stability of the economy, the homes Americans live in, and the transit systems that get people to work and school and doctors appointments. It’s our job to look at the risks that infrastructure faces – both the source of that risk, and the steps we must take to plan for it and prevent it. As we look at record high temperatures around the world, we should be worried that our grandchildren may look back at these times as 'the good old days.' We cannot continue on this path. Now is the time to tackle this problem, to protect our vital infrastructure and American competitiveness." However, Brown has moderated on climate since then, and is now focused on issues like affordability.75Sherrod Brown has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/SherrodBrown/status/1688676936388603907 https://www.banking.senate.gov/newsroom/majority/brown-as-climate-change-fuels-disasters-we-must-shore-up-our-nations-infrastructure https://www.sherrodbrown.com/our-fight/ https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sherrod-brown-abortion-access-ohio-senate-reelection/Supports Roe
Byrd, James W.WyomingDJames W. Byrd does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Byrd criticized his opponent for introducing legislation that would make it harder to sue fossil fuel companies for climate change, saying: "Big Oil wants a free pass from the Supreme Court. Harriet Hageman is helping them get it. Instead of standing up for Wyoming, she's siding with Washington lobbyists to make sure corporations never pay for their damages." On his website, hew writes: "James Byrd will fight to lower energy costs for everyday Wyomingites by supporting responsible domestic production, cutting the red tape that drives prices up, and ending the wasteful foreign wars that leave us footing the bill overseas instead of investing at home."25James W. Byrd has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/ByrdforSenate/status/2092835847691288726 https://www.byrdforsenate.com/blankUnclear Position on Roe
Collins, MikeGeorgiaRMike Collins disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he referred to climate change as the "Climate Hoax." In another tweet, he wrote: "Remember when we learned that Biden’s intel community was focused on the climate hoax while Hamas planned mass murder of Israelis?"0Mike Collins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/RepMikeCollins/status/1902734673245020503 https://x.com/RepMikeCollins/status/1726979472686264584 https://x.com/RepMikeCollins/status/1672627705446117378Opposes Roe
Colom, ScottMississippiDScott Colom does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues such as lowering costs.25Scott Colom has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://scottcolom.com/ https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/mississippi-election-democrats-fundraising-ec77cb8aUnclear Position on Roe
Cooper, RoyNorth CarolinaDRoy Cooper understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an interview with the New York Times, he stated: "We've seen in North Carolina the real effects of climate change and weather and that we have to be more resilient and more sustain able in order to be able to go forward in a successful way." Furthermore, on Twitter, he wrote: "Happy #EarthDay! North Carolinians deserve clean air and water—plain and simple. That's why Roy stood up to corporate polluters, protected our coast from offshore drilling, and is leading the charge in the fight against climate change."100Roy Cooper has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgHNGogoccs https://x.com/RoyCooperNC/status/1253026627912699910 https://governor.nc.gov/news/press-releases/2024/05/16/governor-cooper-vows-protect-womens-health-care-one-year-after-sb20Supports Roe
Davis, JamieLouisianaDJamie Davis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like affordability. On his website, he wrote: "Build the energy transition here — Louisiana energy workers should build what comes next, not be left out of it."25Jamie Davis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jamieforlouisiana.com/issues https://www.wrkf.org/politics/2026-06-24/q-a-louisiana-u-s-senate-candidates-sound-off-on-important-issues-ahead-of-primary-run-offSupports Roe
Deaton, JohnMassachusettsRJohn Deaton agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, he stated: "Listen, Massachusetts can’t solve climate change. I believe in climate change — I’m not a climate denier at all — but our annual carbon emissions are equal to less than two days of China’s. So, we can’t put an onus and a tax burden and punish our businesses in that area, as well as our taxpayers, by pretending that we can solve the climate issue." However, on his website, he writes: "As an independent voice, I will oppose extreme policies like the Green New Deal and support balanced solutions that lower energy costs, protect jobs, and move us toward cleaner, affordable American energy. That means an all-of-the-above energy transition, not a mandate that picks winners and losers by government fiat. I support building out solar, wind, geothermal, and hydro alongside a serious recommitment to nuclear power — including small modular reactors (SMRs), like the ones I've proposed for Brayton Point, paired with data center growth and backed by real ratepayer protections and community benefit agreements so host communities share in the upside."50John Deaton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.wgbh.org/news/local/2026-01-16/gop-senate-hopeful-john-deaton-on-mass-policy-debates-and-global-tensions https://www.johndeatonforsenate.com/issues https://x.com/DeatonforSenate/status/1841473838250381694Supports Roe
El-Sayed, AbdulMichiganDAbdul El-Sayed understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "The climate crisis is not a future threat. It’s here in the forms of historic storms battering Michigan farms, flooding that overwhelms Wayne County neighborhoods, and severe weather that has become the new normal across our state. Oil and gas dependence doesn’t just poison our air, it finances foreign entanglements and enriches the same corporations that have spent decades lying to us about what they knew. Michigan deserves better. That’s why I’ll fight for a pathway to 100% renewable energy. We will anchor it in massive investment in solar, wind, and battery storage, a modernized smart grid, and the energy efficiency upgrades that put money back in families’ pockets. Every step of that transition must be built on good union jobs because solving the climate crisis, rebuilding the American middle class, and providing reliable, affordable power are not competing goals–they are the same goal. I understand that we must remain open to emerging climate solutions as they develop, assessing them on safety, reliability, and community support." Further, on Twitter, he stated: "Young people have spent their entire lives being told that unaffordable healthcare, mass shootings, and a worsening climate crisis are simply the way things have to be. We can and must do better. I’m proud to stand alongside young leaders who are ready to take these challenges head-on and build something better."100Abdul El-Sayed has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://abdulforsenate.com/priority/money-out-of-politics/#h-environment-and-natural-resources https://x.com/AbdulElSayed/status/2100650105305014720 https://x.com/AbdulElSayed/status/1937570831581753713Supports Roe
Fetty Anderson, RachelWest VirginiaDRachel Fetty Anderson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she writes: "The government must encourage investment in sustainable energy sources that minimally affect the environment and utilize free natural resources such as solar, wind and water power. Energy sources that result in extreme and ongoing environmental harm or require the use of military operations to steal the resources of other countries are unsustainable, inhumane and cost-prohibitive. Coal powered plants are an essential part of America's energy portfolio, but must be managed in the cleanest possible manner with real costs accruing to companies and those managing the plants and production themselves."25Rachel Fetty Anderson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.fettyandersonforsenate.com/issues https://wvmetronews.com/2026/05/16/former-morgantown-elected-official-to-face-capito-in-the-fall/Supports Roe
Flanagan, PeggyMinnesotaDPeggy Flanagan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "We only have one planet, and we must ensure it’s livable for future generations and address climate change. The innovation, development, and deployment of renewables are critical to energy security in the 21st century and to mitigating the extreme weather impacting us all. Peggy has always been a champion for protecting Minnesota’s natural resources while recognizing the need for progress. During her term, Minnesota made major investments in climate and clean energy, while committing to achieve 100% carbon-free electricity by 2040. These investments also mean a new sector with high-paying, union jobs across the state. Peggy knows Minnesota is a place that innovates and is a national leader in regenerative agriculture practices, clean heat, and other ways to decarbonize. Peggy believes we need to take action to fight climate change, protect our planet, and invest in climate adaptation." In a press release, she stated: "Like so many parents, I wake up every day and worry about the future of the world my daughter will grow up in... We must do the work and take bold steps now to protect our future generations from the worst impacts of climate change."100Peggy Flanagan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://peggyflanagan.com/priorities/ https://mn.gov/governor/newsroom/press-releases/?id=1055-500332 https://bsky.app/profile/peggyflanagan.bsky.social/post/3mp26la4k4s2oSupports Roe
Graham, DarlineSouth CarolinaRDarline Graham does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign focuses on issues like border security.25Darline Graham has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.darlinegraham.com/issues https://www.darlinegraham.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Hageman, HarrietWyomingRHarriet Hageman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She tweeted: "The UN spent decades driving climate hysteria pushing countries to decarbonize, kill jobs, and embrace energy poverty. Now they are revising the projections that drove it all. Reality is finally seeping in and American energy is winning." In another post, she celebrated her proposed bill that would make it harder to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for climate change: "So called climate superfund laws are illegal and a direct threat to our way of life. No one state has the authority to drive the entire nation into energy poverty. Penalizing energy companies for lawful activities which make our lives better will raise prices on consumers, the very people these blue state governments are elected to protect. While New York's climate superfund law is the first to fall, my Stop Climate Shakedowns Act will put an end to this threat everywhere once and for all."25Harriet Hageman makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. She tweeted: "Blue cities cannot pass carbon taxes through their legislatures, so they are trying to pass penalties through the courts. My Stop Climate Shakedowns act protects American energy from these radical legal attacks on lawful productions."021.25https://x.com/RepHageman/status/2054323235383030263 https://x.com/RepHageman/status/2094817927195136105 https://x.com/RepHageman/status/2062968154788077752 https://x.com/RepHageman/status/1805296275702591885Opposes Roe
Hamilton, AdamKansasDAdam Hamilton agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a sermon titled "What Would Jesus Say About Climate Change?" Hamilton discusses the impact of agriculture on carbon emissions. However, he has also advocated for the use of fossil fuels, saying on his website: "Stop the war on domestic energy projects and restore energy production tax credits that increase our energy independence and create good-paying jobs. Adam supports all of the above energy production and believes Kansans should decide what happens on their land."50Adam Hamilton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avVByOUQySg&t=1246s https://hamiltonforkansas.com/issues/ https://www.christianpost.com/news/adam-hamilton-releases-pro-choice-anti-tariff-platform.htmlSupports Roe
Hern, KevinOklahomaRKevin Hern does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he posted: "Biden’s climate agenda wastes billions, and even the media can't cover it up." On his website, he wrote: " America is blessed with vast natural resources that are essential to human prosperity. We are the world leader in reducing emissions, and the same should be true for energy production. Together, we can unleash our country’s limitless potential."25Kevin Hern has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/repkevinhern/status/1795813972915974564 https://hern.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=813 https://hern.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=752Opposes Roe
Hinson, AshleyIowaRAshley Hinson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She has routinely criticized climate action and supported fossil fuel use while in the House of Representatives. On Twitter, she wrote: "No matter how Kamala twists it, she has always supported the radical Green New Deal & will impose a radical climate agenda that will kill American agriculture." In a press release, she stated: "But Iowa is only able to generate sufficient energy because we are an outlier: we view alternative energy as a supplement, not replacement, to our traditional energy generation methods. Unfortunately, this Administration is determined to make traditional energy the enemy. They have been discouraging fossil fuel energy production without considering how much we depend on these sources. We can't just pull the rug out from underneath our constituents."25Ashley Hinson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/hinsonashley/status/1818691352919474469 https://hinson.house.gov/media/press-releases/hinson-fights-reliable-energy-iowans-house-appropriations-committee https://hinson.house.gov/issues/defending-lifeOpposes Roe
Jackson, TroyMaineDTroy Jackson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "Climate change is a profound threat to our environment and economy. Mainers need a governor who will stand up to the corporate polluters and monied interests who profit from the dirty status quo." Further, in a questionnaire, he stated: "As Governor, you can count on me to continue Governor Mills’s resolve and ambition on climate and clean energy action. Our north star is correct, and I plan to keep us moving in that direction as a state. However, my administration will take a different path in at least three ways: 1) Tribal Sovereignty will be core to our climate work; 2) Including strong labor standards in all of our climate policies – if we want to make lasting progress as a state on climate, we’ve got to make sure the economy we’re building is fairer than the one we’re leaving behind; and 3) Tackling the energy affordability issue head-on because if we deliver clean energy that’s cheaper and more reliable Mainers will believe in strong climate policy."100Troy Jackson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/TroyJackson207/status/2046988818989867370 https://maineaudubon.org/2026-gubernatorial-candidate-survey/ https://www.jacksonformaine.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Katz, MichaelDelawareRMichael Katz agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In 2019, he tweeted: "I believe that restoring civility and respect is just the first step. The 5 core issues that I plan to address are the promise of civil rights for all, affordable healthcare, transforming our educational system, modernizing our workforce, and climate change." However, since then he has moved to the right on energy and climate.50Michael Katz 5050https://x.com/drmikekatz/status/1128730897031680000 https://drmikekatz.com/platform.html#economyUnclear Position on Roe
Letlow, JuliaLouisianaRJulia Letlow does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, she writes: "Louisiana is an energy state, and Julia believes we should act like it. She was proud to stand with President Trump to reverse Biden-era attacks on American energy and restore a policy agenda that puts Louisiana workers, producers, and consumers first. Julia will keep fighting for oil and gas, offshore production, refining, pipelines, LNG exports, and the Louisiana workers and communities who power our country. She knows energy policy is not just about production. It is about jobs, electricity costs, national security, and the future of Louisiana’s ports, plants, refineries, and working families."25Julia Letlow has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, during her time in the House of Representatives, Letlow did oppose a tax on natural gas.5028.75https://www.julialetlow.com/issues https://letlow.house.gov/media/press-releases/letlow-votes-repeal-bidens-energy-tax https://letlow.house.gov/issues/abortionOpposes Roe
Marker, LarryNew MexicoRLarry Marker does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Marker is a large proponent of fossil fuel use. He has a page on his website titled "Oil and Gas The Astonishing Key To Improving Our Lives." He writes: "Fossil fuels are an important part of our energy mix. They make our environment safer and cleaner. They help protect us against potential catastrophic climate disasters. They are a reliable and affordable source of energy, and their use has helped to improve living standards around the world."25Larry Marker has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Given his ardent support for fossil fuels, it is highly unlikely he would support a fee on carbon.5028.75https://larrymarker.com/oil-gas/ https://nmpoliticalreport.com/2022/08/05/guv-and-ag-file-motion-to-dismiss-lawsuit-challenging-new-mexicos-legal-abortion-status/Opposes Roe
McKay, RaymondRhode IslandRRaymond McKay does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Ray is committed to American energy independence getting colleagues on both sides of the aisle to work together for long-term strength and stability of our nuclear and fossil fuel industries and efficiently utilizing green energy solutions." Furthermore, on Twitter, he posted: "Electric rates going up ~ Part of the reason, green 'renewable' energy is NOT CHEAP energy, but @SenWhitehouse never shares that! U.S. government spends more money subsidizing green energy than any other. Your tax dollars!"25Raymond McKay has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.mckayforussenate.com/right-direction/ https://x.com/McKay_Senate/status/1709368792516538426Unclear Position on Roe
Mizusawa, BertVirginiaRBert Mizusawa does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He stated in a questionnaire: "The top polluters aren’t in the United States. Asia, Africa and South America all exceed the United States in annual CO2 emissions. China is the world champion of polluters, so they have to hold China accountable." On his website, he wrote: "Nuclear power is clean, cheap, reliable and safe. Today's nuclear technology is, as they say, not your father's technology. I support bringing new nuclear power on-line to slash the ever-increasing energy costs for American households."25Bert Mizusawa has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.pilotonline.com/2026/09/23/mizusawa-warner-senate-election/ https://bertforsenate.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Moore, BarryAlabamaRBarry Moore does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. While in the House of Representatives, he has consistently supported fossil fuel expansion. In a press release, he stated: "From the oil fields of Midland to the Gulf Coast of Alabama, we need to unleash American energy and rein in wasteful spending... This legislation helps bring back fiscal responsibility and allows us to tap into our own resources and create more jobs, lower energy costs, and pave the way for a more prosperous America."25Barry Moore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://barrymoore.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-barry-moore-supports-interior-and-environment-appropriations-bill https://x.com/BMooreSenate/status/2047409449287942379Opposes Roe
Murphy, JustinNew JerseyRJustin Murphy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, Murphy said that he disagreed with the statement "Man-made climate change is a global threat and requires urgent political action." In the same questionnaire, he wrote that "fossil fuels are the most reliable [energy source], and also nuclear power. America has an almost endless supply of fossil fuels and the energy infrastructure required to extract, process, and deliver fossil fuel derived energy products is well developed."25Justin Murphy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/80916/race/6803/election/1112?culture=en-us https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/80916/race/6803/election/1112?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Nixon, AngieFloridaDAngie Nixon understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "The climate crisis is an existential threat, and the fossil fuel industry has spent decades lying about it while cashing in. Angie rejects the false choice between good jobs and a livable planet. Angie will fight for: A bold, union-built transition to renewable energy, creating millions of good-paying, union jobs in wind, solar, and grid modernization, prioritizing the frontline communities that have borne the brunt of pollution for generations. Ending taxpayer subsidies for fossil fuel corporations and making polluters pay for the damage they’ve caused. Rebuilding and hardening the electric grid, so it’s resilient, affordable, and ready for a clean-energy future." On Twitter, she states: "Florida is on the front lines of the climate crisis. Pollution and rising costs hit working families first. Let's invest in clean energy and strengthen climate-resilient infrastructure to reduce environmental harm."100Angie Nixon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://angienixon.com/priorities/ https://x.com/AngieNixon/status/2046998862594715882 https://angienixon.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Osborn, DanNebraskaIDan Osborn does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "People are tired of higher health care costs, of data centers that drive up energy costs, and foreign wars that make gas more expensive."25Dan Osborn has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/osbornforne/status/2085802864421609890 https://www.ketv.com/article/dan-osborn-campaign-sends-cease-and-desist-letter-to-deb-fischer-campaign-super-pac/62457776Supports Roe
Pappas, ChrisNew HampshireDChris Pappas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "We should all work to leave our environment better than we found it by promoting clean energy, supporting environmental protection, and directly confronting the existential threat of climate change. As your Representative in Congress, I am committed to combating climate change and making sure that we protect our natural resources for generations to come. On the New Hampshire Executive Council, I worked to secure investments for solar, wind, biomass, hydro, and geothermal projects across New Hampshire. I am focused on maintaining clean energy incentives and tax credits to ensure that the Granite State leads the way in developing a robust clean energy economy. I strongly oppose pulling out of the Paris Climate Agreement, ending the Clean Power Plan, and rolling back protections for our water and air—which have undermined critical environmental protections. I believe it is critical that Congress develop and pass thoughtful, innovative solutions to the climate crisis before it’s too late to mitigate the worst effects of the catastrophic changes that are already upon us. We must act now to put our state and our nation on a pathway to a more sustainable future." On Twitter, he posted: "As extreme weather events increase due to climate change, we must continue to strengthen our climate resilience within our communities."100Chris Pappas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He is quoted saying: "[A carbon tax is] not an idea that I've signed on to at this point in time, but I think it needs to be part of the full discussion."5092.5https://pappas.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://x.com/RepChrisPappas/status/1814767235376029793 https://www.nhpr.org/politics/2019-09-05/pappas-weighs-in-on-gun-control-transportation-needs-and-climate-change https://chrispappas.org/priority/reproductive-freedom/Supports Roe
Paxton, KenTexasRKen Paxton does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Paxton heavily opposes action on climate change. He tweeted: "ANOTHER WIN: Biden's attempt to implement his climate change agenda was justly halted. A judge saw that not only is his action illegal, it would be detrimental to key states that rely on energy production." Paxton joined other state attorneys general in suing to stop New York's climate superfund act, saying: "New York’s law is nothing more than an unconstitutional shakedown of vital American energy industries that form the bedrock of our national economic independence. In return for keeping the lights on and fueling our manufacturing, energy producers are being targeted for destruction by the left-wing policies of New York radicals."25Ken Paxton makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Paxton opposed what he termed a "methane tax," saying: "Over the past four years I have opposed the Biden Administration more than 100 times to stop its radical attempts to undermine the law. I am positive this last-minute effort to harm the energy industry will be halted as well."021.25https://x.com/TXAG/status/1493723677875224577 https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-and-national-coalition-sue-new-york-stop-unconstitutional-attempt https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/news/releases/attorney-general-ken-paxton-sues-biden-administration-prevent-creation-unlawful-methane-tax-which https://x.com/KenPaxtonTX/status/1548036523060125696Opposes Roe
Peltola, MaryAlaskaDMary Peltola agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She wrote on Twitter: "For many of us, especially those of us from West Alaska, the effects of climate change are already on display for all to see. We need solutions to this critical issue. I’m dedicated to fighting for them." However, she is a supporter of continued fossil fuel use. In a press release, she stated: "I will stand up to anyone to increase Alaska energy production, create good-paying Alaska jobs and lower energy costs."50Mary Peltola has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://x.com/MaryPeltola/status/1772380782704664634 https://marypeltola.com/icymi-mary-peltola-champions-alaska-oil-and-gas-her-goal-is-to-cut-energy-costs-for-alaskans-as-quickly-as-possible/ https://x.com/MaryPeltola/status/1545980514191822848Supports Roe
Rogers, MikeMichiganRMike Rogers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He posted on Twitter: "Biden & Granholm are teaming up with the most extreme members of their party to kill American energy, eliminate jobs, raise prices, and empower our adversaries. America must regain energy independence!"25Mike Rogers makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted for a bill "expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy."021.25https://x.com/MikeRogersForMI/status/1750955167652999478 https://mikerogers.house.gov/voterecord/?Page=261 https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/30/us/politics/republican-senate-races-abortion.htmlOpposes Roe
Shoffner, HallieArkansasDHallie Shoffner understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. She wrote in an article: "Climate change. It threatens my business, my way of life and the legacy I will leave for my son: the farm. I am a sixth-generation farmer. I grew up on and farm the same land cultivated by my family for well over 100 years. I am proud of this history and committed to the good stewardship of the resource given to me. Emissions-driven climate change amplifies extreme weather events — longer droughts, more torrential rains and stronger storms. The devastating weather experienced in the last two farming years will be the new norm. Farmers like me will be able to count on more challenging seasons jeopardizing our ability to make a profitable crop." In an interview, she stated: "And it’s not that it’s extreme devastation in any one year. It certainly can be that. But climate change for farmers is more like getting a wound and never letting it heal." However, she does not mention climate change on her platform on her website.75Hallie Shoffner publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. She said in an article: "I joined Citizens’ Climate Lobby because this organization and its members support a solution as real and immediate as climate change itself, the Energy Innovation & Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). Introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives in 2018 with bipartisan support, this agriculture-friendly policy puts a fee on fossil fuels, starting low and growing over time. This will drive down carbon pollution because energy companies, leading industries and American consumers will move toward cleaner, cheaper options. The money collected from the carbon fee is allocated in equal shares every month to the American people to spend as they see fit. The bill now has 77 co-sponsors."10078.75https://web.archive.org/web/20251215015547/https://www.arkansasbusiness.com/article/this-is-how-i-will-change-my-sons-future-hallie-shoffner-commentary/ https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2024/11/meet-the-arkansas-farmer-trying-to-adapt-to-the-changing-climate/ https://www.hallieshoffner.com/platform https://web.archive.org/web/20251215015547/https://www.arkansasbusiness.com/article/this-is-how-i-will-change-my-sons-future-hallie-shoffner-commentary/ https://arkadelphian.com/2025/07/15/loss-of-family-farm-leads-shoffner-to-challenge-sen-cotton/Unclear Position on Roe
Smith, David BrockOregonRDavid Brock Smith agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He wrote: "Having been involved with the Oregon carbon conversation for a number of years; attending all of the workgroups during the ’17 interim and as a member of the House Energy & Environment Committee during the ’17 & ’18 Legislative Session, I believe we all can agree that there are changing climate conditions across our landscape. On the global scale, Oregon contributes less than one sixth of one percent of emissions, and so the question is, what do Oregonians do to further reduce their carbon emissions and at what cost to them?" However, Smith is often an opponent of climate action. In a press release, he stated: "Oregonians are paying the price—literally—for Governor Kotek’s so-called ‘innovative solutions’ to climate change. Her administration’s Climate Protection Program, coupled with her party’s extreme environmental policies, has driven up gas prices, made housing less affordable, increased energy costs, and made it more expensive for families and businesses to operate in Oregon." Further, in a tweet, he posted: "Oregon Democrat policies in the name of climate change are driving up consumer costs and putting people at risk. Elections matter and this November, we can bring balance to the legislature."50David Brock Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He has mostly opposed cap and trade policies.5050https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/smithd/Documents/Op%20Ed%202%2014%2019%20letterhead.pdf https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/senaterepublicans/Documents/2025-3-13%20Governor%20Koteks%20Climate%20Policies%20Are%20Driving%20Up%20Costs%20for%20Oregonians.pdf https://x.com/DavidBrockSmith/status/1797009421572407553 https://thetyee.ca/News/2021/05/14/How-Sell-Carbon-Tax/ https://ortlpac.org/oregon-right-to-life-pac-endorses-senator-david-brock-smith/Opposes Roe
Stratton, JulianaIllinoisDJuliana Stratton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "From water quality, climate change + flood mitigation, ensuring sustainable + safe use of water resources is a matter of equity. As Chair of the Rivers of Illinois Coordinating Council, I was proud to join the IL State Water Plan breakfast & learn more about this year's plan." In another post, she stated: "Climate change is here and it’s real. Illinois will continue to pave the way towards a climate safe future for all. Thank you @GovPritzker for your leadership on this global issue." In a third tweet, she stated: "As we continue to grapple with the consequences of climate change, our only way forward is together— at every level."100Juliana Stratton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/LtGovStratton/status/1648721928234975234 https://x.com/LtGovStratton/status/2103164180480352658 https://x.com/LtGovStratton/status/1857511616918741167 https://x.com/LtGovStratton/status/1937549300759675335Supports Roe
Sununu, John E.New HampshireRJohn E. Sununu does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "We need more domestic energy production, infrastructure, and permitting reform today!"25John E. Sununu has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/SununuSenator/status/2071671039600287966 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxyvsypUqtwOpposes Roe
Tafoya, MicheleMinnesotaRMichele Tafoya does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she writes: "The far left talks about 'affordability,' but they’ve spent decades at war against the sources of power that actually work. Our family budgets and national security depend on affordable, clean-burning American energy that doesn’t stop when the sun sets or the wind stops blowing. As our Senator, Michele will support all U.S. energy sources so Minnesotans can see lower utility bills and gas prices while continuing to protect our environment."25Michele Tafoya has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://micheletafoya.com/issues/ https://www.wdayradionow.com/news/local-news/minnesota-senate-candidate-michele-tafoya-explains-her-pro-choice-republican-stance/Unclear Position on Roe
Talarico, JamesTexasDJames Talarico understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Although initially running on a more progressive climate agenda, Talarico has moderated his positions on climate. On his website, he states: "If any state can figure out how to grow our economy, lower costs, and combat climate change, it’s Texas. We’re the energy leader of the world — and as Senator, I will work tirelessly to ensure our state not only maintains, but extends that innovative leadership for generations to come so that Texans always have access to reliable, affordable energy. If we invest in innovation, we can add to our hundreds of thousands of oil, gas, wind, solar, and battery jobs by creating new jobs in cutting-edge technologies like geothermal and hydrogen-fueled energy. We can pioneer innovative ways to streamline permitting processes without compromising the protection of our environment — so that Texas can lead in increasing energy supply and driving down costs." He is quotes as saying: "The idea that politicians in Washington think they can just eliminate [the fossil fuel] industry, eliminate these jobs — it’s something we’re gonna have to fight against, something we’re gonna have to fight against in our own party."75James Talarico has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://jamestalarico.com/issue/energy-environment/ https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/james-talarico-moderating-gender-climate-issues-his-competitive-senate-election https://jamestalarico.com/issue/freedom-family-faith/Supports Roe
Thomas, N'Kiyla "Jasmine"OklahomaDN'Kiyla "Jasmine" Thomas does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a tweet, she wrote that she supports: "Responsible energy development- Oklahoma can remain an energy leader while diversifying our energy portfolio and protecting our land, water and communities."25N'Kiyla "Jasmine" Thomas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/jasmineforok/status/2101817501713633570 https://www.jasmineforok.com/policiesSupports Roe
Tracy, DonIllinoisRDon Tracy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes that he wants to "Lower Energy and Utility Costs – Support a reasonable energy policy that uses available energy sources, protects reliability, and reduces household costs."25Don Tracy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://dontracyforil.com/lower-the-cost-of-living/ https://ipmnewsroom.org/gop-u-s-senate-candidate-don-tracy-talks-abortion-ice-shootings-and-iran-war-on-21st-show/Opposes Roe
Turek, JoshIowaDJosh Turek understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "Thank you to @SheldonforRI for co-hosting a conversation about the connection between extreme weather events and insurance prices. Climate change is jacking up insurance costs for homes and farms – we need a solution now, or working class people will keep paying the price."75Josh Turek has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/turek4iowa/status/2042588759904907589 https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2026/05/14/wahls-turek-spar-on-reproductive-healthcare-track-record-at-senate-primary-debate/Supports Roe
Wess, EverettAlabamaDEverett Wess does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues such as affordable healthcare.25Everett Wess has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://wessforsenate.com/f/voter-guide-qaUnclear Position on Roe
Whatley, MichaelNorth CarolinaRMichael Whatley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On twitter, he wrote: "By canceling the Keystone XL Pipeline and rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement, President Biden started his administration by siding with climate alarmists over American families, workers and small businesses. Not the unity we need." On his website, he states: "America’s economic strength depends on reliable, affordable energy and reining in Washington’s reckless spending."25Michael Whatley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/WhatleyNC/status/1352291561485316098 https://michaelwhatley.com/issues/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220624171236/https://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/article262848868.htmlOpposes Roe

2026 U.S. House Incumbents

NameStateDistrictPartyPositionPosition ScoreVote ScoreLeadershipLeadership ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose RoeVotes [Gutting Environmental Review and Public Input]Votes [Extending the Operation of Dirty, Expensive Power Plants]Votes [Fast-Tracking Fossil-Fuel Power over Clean Energy onto the Grid]Votes [Rolling Back the Methane Polluter Fee]
Adams, AlmaNorth Carolina12DCongresswoman Alma Adams understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "There is no denying that Climate Change and the rise in global temperatures results in extreme ecological changes. As a member of the Congressional Safe Climate Caucus, Congresswoman Adams is pushing for strong and proactive environmental policies that combat climate change, curb pollution, invest in renewable energy, and promote sustainable development solutions. She believes it’s time to start investing in more renewable energy sources and develop new green technologies. Investing in energy and the environment is effectively investing in the economy."100100Congresswoman Adams has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' The Congresswoman stated, "CLIMATE CHANGE ISN’T NEW. We’ve known the damaging impacts of it for years and we can’t afford to not take action. That’s why I’m proud to support the Energy Innovation & Carbon Dividend Act in order to put a #PriceOnPollution and reduce our carbon emissions by 90% by 2050." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release on a 2017 Executive Order that curtailed America's ability to tackle climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "This Executive Order lets companies off of the hook and shifts environmental cleanup costs onto American taxpayers who are expected to be charged as much as $58 Billion by 2030. The President’s actions roll back critical protections to our air and water supplies and significantly reduce our ability to effectively fight climate change. As long as this administration continues to put big business first, its American families who will pay the greatest price.” Rep. Adams makes climate change a priority issue as well. She demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. 100Congresswoman Adams publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://adams.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://adams.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/what-withdrawing-paris-climate-agreement-means https://twitter.com/repadams/status/1220786542182006785 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://adams.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/adams-decries-fundamentally-wrong-supreme-court-decision-abortionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Aderholt, RobertAlabama 4RCongressman Robert Aderholt disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2010 op-ed in The Daily Mountain Eagle, the Congressman flouted the science that underpins climate change blaming current warming on natural cycles, writing, "I fall into the second group of people who believe, as do many very credible scientists, that the earth is currently in a natural warming cycle rather than a man-made climate change. Many scientists believe that natural cycles of warming and cooling have existed since the beginning of Earth. If we take the current models of climate prediction and apply those same models to what actually happened in the last thirty years, the models are shown to be very flawed. In addition, what knowledge we do have of a warming period in the Middle Ages cannot be explained by current models which are focused on greenhouse gas reductions." 00In a 2013 press release on the economic climate the Congressman Aderholt stated, “While Obama's Organizing for Action is showing concern about the climate change debate, hardworking Alabamians and I are concerned with our nation’s dismal jobs climate... The biggest denial is that the Obama Administration’s burdensome EPA regulations that have increased the cost of manufacturing and doing business, that Obamacare driving up the cost of healthcare and crippling hiring, and catering to special interest groups like those that are stalling the Keystone Pipeline are not the root cause our nation’s dismal jobs climate.” Congressman Aderholt demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy and votes against climate action. 0Congressman Aderholt co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://aderholt.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/controversy-about-climate-change https://aderholt.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/aderholt-only-climate-we-should-be-talking-about-today-countrys-stalled https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Alabama%22%7D https://aderholt.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-aderholt-statement-leaked-supreme-court-decision-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Aguilar, PeteCalifornia33DCongressman Peter Aguilar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's website, Aguilar states "It is our responsibility to future generations to conserve our resources, protect our environment and do our best to mitigate effects the climate crisis has on our planet. For the past couple of years, we’ve seen unprecedented fire seasons, devastating hurricanes, extreme drought, rising sea levels and more devastate thousands of communities globally. We need to take immediate action, or soon it will be too late. Rep. Aguilar is committed to advancing a climate-forward agenda that promotes opportunity for Inland Empire workers, businesses and entrepreneurs and puts us on a path to win the economic competition of the 21st century."100100Congressman Aguilar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman passed two amendments to lower inland automobile emissions as part of the Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2), stating, "I was proud to help pass this bill because it will bring real investment to our region and create good-paying jobs in our community. This forward-thinking legislation will help us work our way out of the recession caused by the coronavirus pandemic and will allow us to modernize our crumbling infrastructure, reduce pollution and fight climate change.” Congressman Aguilar also makes prominent public statements on the issue. Rep. Aguilar's campaign website, states, "I take the effects of climate change and pollution very seriously and have worked in Congress to reduce our carbon footprint and prioritize the health and safety of our communities." Congressman Aguilar makes climate change a top priority issue. In a January 2022 tweet, the Congressman stated "I had a chance to talk about how the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act will help prevent wildfires. We know we must do more to combat climate change and we will — thanks to the @VP’s leadership."100Congressman Aguilar publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://aguilar.house.gov/issues/ https://aguilar.house.gov/sites/aguilar.house.gov/files/documents/Protecting%20the%20Environment%20and%20Fighting%20Climate%20Change.pdf https://aguilar.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/aguilar-amendments-lower-pollution-and-reduce-traffic-inland-empire-pass https://twitter.com/RepPeteAguilar/status/1484668636488941584 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://aguilar.house.gov/2022/05/03/rep-aguilar-statement-on-draft-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Alford, MarkMissouri4RCongressman Alford disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.00In a press release, Alford said “Since assuming his post as ‘climate czar’, John Kerry has done nothing but fly his private jets around the world and preach his radical gospel for the climate cult." He has also cosponsored anti-climate bills such as the Preventing Executive Climate Overreach Act, and H.R.6813, which would prevent the EPA from creating or enforcing regulations on emissions.0Congressman Burlison opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvyQ_XaMBMc https://alford.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=133 https://www.congress.gov/member/mark-alford/A000379?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepMarkAlford/status/1806423981597282461Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Allen, RickGeorgia12RCongressman Allen disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2014 election debate, when asked if he believed in man made climate change the Congressman said, "No." 00According to Politically Georgia, "Allen vehemently rejected the idea that warming is an established fact. “The science if definitely NOT settled,” he said in an email. “Limiting debate to one side is not the same as being conclusive… I am not convinced and I am certainly not ready to destroy jobs and whole industry sectors in order to tax industries liberals don’t like and send the money to sectors that they do like.” Rep. Allen opposed the Clean Power Plan, stating in a 2017 post of Rick's Weekly Report, stating "I believe the Clean Power Plan, one of the most drastic environmental regulations in history, did very little to help the environment, but instead, burdened families through reduced income, stifled economic growth and increased electricity costs." Congressman Allen demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Allen makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D56lBsT9WHk https://politics.myajc.com/news/state--regional-govt--politics/politicians-cool-global-warming/r6EaMO72xM6UqCofVLvp3H/ https://allen.house.gov/news/email/show.aspx?ID=QL2FAABJSRT6G https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://twitter.com/reprickallen/status/1217839299292475392Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Amo, GabeRhode Island1DCongressman Amo understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue.75100Congressman Amo has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. A press release read "'As the Ocean State, coastal management is essential to protecting our communities and our way of life from the existential threat of climate change,” said Amo. “That is why I am proud to have joined my colleagues in supporting the Aquidneck Land Trust in their quest to receive nearly $2 million in federal funding. This federal investment will help expand their island-wide approach to resilience and leverage nature-based solutions to fight the climate crisis.'”100 Congressman Amo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5081.25https://amo.house.gov/press-release/ri-delegation-announces-nearly-2-million-federal-grant-to-accelerate-resiliency-efforts-on-aquidneck-island https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/gabeamo/status/1720225876636246149Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Ansari, YassaminArizona3DRepresentative Yassamin Ansari understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, it states that "Rep. Ansari believes that the climate crisis is the defining issue of our generation. She came to Congress from climate advocacy, serving as the youngest climate policy advisor at the United Nations and helping to deliver the historic Paris Climate Accords. On the Phoenix City Council, she led the charge for clean air and water, created the first Office of Heat Response and Mitigation in the country, and helped pass the city’s landmark Climate Action Plan and Transportation Electrification Action Plan. Her work on the Phoenix City Council focused on reducing carbon emissions and improving the city’s air and water quality." In an interview with Living on Earth, Ansari was asked about President Trump leaving the Paris accords. "I don't want to understate how devastating that is to so many around the world. When he first pulled out, that's one of the reasons I was encouraged to ever think about running for public office, because I knew that local action would be more important than ever. We lose so much trust internationally when we make a commitment as a nation, only to revert back just a couple of years later. What we saw last time, I will say, is a lot of coalition building among cities, states, companies. There was a whole movement called the We Are Still In movement coalition that they said, look, even if the federal government is not sticking to its promises, we are going to stick to the promises and make sure that the United States abides by the commitments that it makes. I'm sure, and I hope we see the same this time from nonfederal actors. But I'm extremely disappointed, and I think it's a grave mistake."100100Representative Yassamin Ansari has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On her campaign website, she wrote: "The climate crisis is the defining issue of our time. As a climate policy expert, Yassamin has pushed for international solutions to climate change at the United Nations and led bold efforts to clean up our air and water in Phoenix. She passed the city’s landmark Climate Action Plan, created the first Office of Heat Response and Mitigation in the nation, and built a coalition on the city council to unanimously pass the city’s ambitious Transportation Electrification Action Plan, ushering in a clean energy future for Phoenix. She also spearheaded a plan to electrify Phoenix’s bus fleet by 2040, reducing our carbon emissions and improving air quality in the city. In Congress, Yassamin will lead and support policies that: Accelerate the transition from fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy; Increase investment into building resilience to climate impacts; Work directly with FEMA to declare heat as a natural disaster to unlock resource management capabilities to support our district; Stand up to Big Oil who have tried to stagnate and roll back President Biden’s climate policies, including the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill and the Inflation Reduction Act; Create new jobs that will help grow a greener economy and lead efforts for a 'just transition' for the millions of workers currently employed in the fossil fuel, manufacturing and automotive industries." Representative Ansari co-sponsored a bill to establish the Climate Financial Risk Committee and Climate Financial Risk Advisory Committee on the Financial Stability Oversight Council. Representative Ansari also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to the climate action campaign, she said "In the coming decades, Phoenix will be unlivable unless we curb fossil fuel emissions. Heatwaves kill too many of our citizens every year, mainly in environmental justice communities that also suffer disproportionately from pollution. Our power plants are leading culprits burning fossil fuels, as we are home to 3 of the top 100 most polluting power plants in the U.S. In 2020 the total emissions from our top 10 power plants were recorded at 30 million metric tons, which is equivalent to 6.5 million cars on the road for a year. We have to end greenhouse gases emanating from power plants. The EPA must require almost all existing and future coal and gas-fired power plants to cut or capture 100% of their CO2 emissions. America needs the strongest EPA regulations possible to curb emissions from these power plants." Representative Yassamin Ansari makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Yassamin Ansari has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://ansari.house.gov/issues/climate-change https://www.loe.org/shows/segments.html?programID=25-P13-00001&segmentID=1 https://web.archive.org/web/20240604160152/https://yassaminforcongress.com/issues-policy/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/7246/cosponsors https://www.actonclimate.com/person/yassamin-ansari/ https://yassaminforcongress.com/press/reproductive-freedom-for-all-endorses-yassamin-ansari-for-congress/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Auchincloss, JakeMassachusetts4DCongressman Jake Auchincloss understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to a July 2021 article from 'The Hill,' "At the event co-sponsored by Walmart and Environmental Defense Fund, Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D-Mass.), said he’s 'not really waiting another decade for Republicans to decide ‘yeah, maybe we should group together climate change with infrastructure.’” “You can get on board or you can not. But we’re going to do it, because it is pertinent and it is necessary,' said the first-term lawmaker..."100100Congressman Jake Auchincloss has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In an October 2020 interview with 'WCVB Channel 5 Boston,' when asked "What steps do you believe are the most necessary to deal with global climate change?" Congressman Auchincloss answered "We've got to invest in green R&D, green infrastructure, and green jobs. That means putting a price on carbon. That means asserting muscular federal oversight over protecting our clean water and our clean air provisions..." The congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a February 2020 interview with 'WCVB Channel 5 Boston,' Congressman Auchincloss stated "Climate change will steal this planet from the next generation. That’s not just a political and environmentally reality... We are talking any federal investment in infrastructure. Not transportation, we are missing an opportunity. Transportation is 40% of what drives climate change in Massachusetts. We put together a progressive plan to reinvent transportation in Massachusetts." The congressman makes climate change a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Congressman Auchincloss lists "Meet the climate crisis head-on" as a priority, where he states "Jake has a track record of delivering progressive solutions to address climate change. On the city council, he voted with Green Newton priorities 100% of the time."100Congressman Jake Auchincloss publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign website, to "Meet the climate crisis head-on," he includes "Tax[ing] carbon to curb the pollution that causes climate change." According to a 2021 New Boston Post article, "...in a Zoom event put together by the Foxborough Democratic Town Committee... Auchincloss said that he sees a carbon tax as essential to fighting climate change." In addition, Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://thehill.com/policy/equilibrium-sustainability/561253-democrats-say-theres-no-time-to-wait-on-including-climate https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3R22o6H0f4Q https://www.wcvb.com/article/on-the-record-congressional-candidate-jake-auchincloss-discusses-personal-climate-change-issue/31067118 https://www.jakeforma.com/priorities https://newbostonpost.com/2021/07/13/asked-about-the-ideal-tax-code-jake-auchincloss-advocates-for-carbon-tax-higher-death-tax/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Massachusetts%22%7D https://auchincloss.house.gov/media/press-releases/video-auchincloss-we-need-senate-step-and-make-roe-law-land Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Babin, BrianTexas36RCongressman Brian Babin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 Pacific Standard article, Congressman Babin, "...tried to suggest that, because scientists are still researching what caused the Little Ice Age, which extended from the 14th to the mid-19th century, perhaps they are unsure about the causes of climate change now. He also suggested some global warming can be beneficial at times. For people living during the Little Ice Age, he said, 'I would say it would have been more advantageous for the climate to be a little bit warmer.'" 00In a 2017 press release applauding the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Babin stated, "Furthermore, it would uniquely hurt the people of the 36th District of Texas by threatening the many good-paying jobs provided by our area’s petrochemical and refining facilities. While this decision will not sit well with out-of-touch liberal politicians and pro-U.N. globalists, President Trump was elected to put American workers first and turn back such bad deals that undermine U.S. competitiveness and jobs.” Congressman Babin demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Babin opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://psmag.com/news/the-house-science-committee-just-held-its-first-helpful-hearing-on-climate-science-in-years https://babin.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1314 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://babin.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=583Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Baird, JimIndiana4RCongressman Jim Baird does not take a position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 article by Science Magazine, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "I’ll have to look at their data once I start on the committee. I’m a data man, and we’ll just have to take a look at that.”250Congressman Baird supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. In a 2021 Pharos Tribune article, the Congressman states "There is real risk that climate change policy could create many challenges for the agriculture industry. Challenges that create incredible regulatory burden, that decrease efficiency or productivity, that impact that the stability of America’s food supply chain, and that ultimately could cost farmers their business and family legacy." However, Baird has also cosponsored bills such as the Growing Climate Solutions Act, and has worked with groups such as the Citizens Climate Lobby. In a 2021 address to the House Agriculture Committee, Baird spoke of the possibilities for climate change legislation to benefit agriculture.50Rep. Baird makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41). He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 018.75https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/01/one-indiana-s-new-congressmen-vietnam-veteran-farmer-and-scientist# https://insideclimatenews.org/news/13022019/congress-house-science-committee-climate-change-republicans-green-new-deal-niskanen https://www.indystar.com/story/opinion/columnists/2024/05/17/climate-change-should-be-top-priority-to-republicans-wooing-youth-vote/73525878007/ https://mobile.x.com/CCL_Indiana/status/1461699100743766022 https://www.pharostribune.com/opinion/article_7cf849b8-c968-11eb-ad19-f32f4c455aa6.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?pageSort=alphaByState&searchResultViewType=expanded&KWICView=false https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJjLB7Ip8_M https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/07/these-republicans-cheered-abortion-policy-going-states-they-are-also-sponsoring-federal-ban/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Balderson, TroyOhio12RCongressman Troy Balderson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250The Congressman supported the president's rollbacks of the Clean Power Plan, stating that President Trump's replacement, the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) rule, “allows everyone to win." Balderson joined the Conservative Climate Caucus, saying "Together, we will stand up for pragmatic climate solutions that embrace—not stifle—American ingenuity and fight back against job-killing, costly, window dressing from the left." Congressman Balderson does not oppose climate action.0Congressman Balderson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.dispatch.com/news/20190620/trump-moves-to-gut-obama-climate-policy-and-bolster-coal-industry https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://balderson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2147 https://twitter.com/RepBalderson/status/1540347973506371586Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Balint, BeccaVermont1DCongresswoman Balint understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote, "In Congress, Becca will support a Green New Deal to provide Vermont with the funding we need to create and sustain good-paying green jobs, combat the climate crisis, fight environmental injustice, and transition our state and our country to a clean energy economy."100100Congresswoman Balint has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a LCVAF press release, Balint said “Helping pass Vermont’s Global Warming Solutions Act is some of the most important work I’ve done as a Vermont Senator. The climate crisis is here now and every moment counts if we are going to preserve our environment and ensure a livable world for our children.” 100Congresswoman Balint has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-1) that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.beccabalint.com/issues https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.lcv.org/bio/becca-balint/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Barragán, Nanette California44DCongresswoman Barragán understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign page, it states that “Nanette understands that climate change is an urgent environmental problem and she intends to act accordingly. She will fight to combat climate change and work to transition us to clean, renewable energy.” 100100Congresswoman Barragán has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman is a co-chair of the United for Climate And Environmental Justice Congressional Task Force, which aims to reduce the impacts of climate change on minority and low-income communities. In a press release announcing the formation of the Task Force, the Congresswoman stated, “Issues like climate change and pollution disproportionately impact low-income communities and communities of color, a fact that must be considered in our work as lawmakers." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release opposing the U.S.-Mexico Trade Agreement, the Congresswoman stated, "Although there were labor and enforcement improvements made with the USMCA, climate change is a crisis that must be urgently addressed and accounted for in our trade agreements." Rep. Barragán makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Barragan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. 87). 7593.75https://barragan.house.gov/congresswoman-barragan-testifies-on-the-role-of-climate-change-in-wildfires/ https://mceachin.house.gov/media/press-releases/mceachin-barrag-n-jayapal-announced-united-climate-and-environmental-justice https://barragan.house.gov/congresswoman-barragan-releases-statement-on-house-resolution-5430-the-united-states-mexico-trade-agreement/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://barragan.house.gov/2022/07/15/rep-barragan-votes-to-protect-womens-access-to-abortion-protections-for-reproductive-health-freedom/ Supports RoePro ClimateN/APro ClimatePro Climate
Barrett, TomMichigan7RRepresentative Tom Barrett does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked by a constituent about climate, Barrett responded in a letter by saying: "Thank you for contacting me with your concerns about our climate. I appreciate you taking the time to share your thoughts with me. Like you, I believe that we must be good stewards of our public lands, wildlife, and environment. I am committed to working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to implement sensible policies that will actually get results when it comes to preventing pollution, reducing the risk of wildfire, and protecting our waterways. Since we are entrusted with only one planet, it is our responsibility to leave a healthy and sustainable environment for future generations." Further, Barrett wrote an op-ed in the Lansing State Journal about lowering energy costs. "We cut unnecessary regulations that limited production of reliable energy sources like oil and natural gas," Barrett wrote.250Representative Tom Barrett demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a press release, Barrett praised the One Big Beautiful Bill, especially praising its fast tracking of fossil fuel production, while speaking at oil facility. "We’re finally restoring American energy dominance and opening up the free market to encourage more competition, innovation, and energy production here at home. From lowering energy prices to eliminating tax on overtime for hard workers in the energy sector, the One Big Beautiful Bill is all about lowering costs for working families," stated Barrett. He also boasted of voting for the Protecting American Energy Production Act which "safeguard[s] American oil and natural gas production by preventing any president from unilaterally imposing a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing without congressional approval," according to a press release from his office. In 2023, Barrett wrote in a tweet: "In the Trump Administration, the U.S. was the largest producer of oil in the world. Today, the @JoeBiden Admin is punishing working class families by cutting production and raising prices. We can do better."0Representative Tom Barrett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.reddit.com/r/Michigan/comments/1j64nww/response_from_tom_barrett_mi7/ https://www.lansingstatejournal.com/story/opinion/contributors/2026/03/17/michigan-energy-costs-congressman-tom-barrett/89064378007/ https://barrett.house.gov/media/press-releases/barrett-touts-american-energy-dominance-one-big-beautiful-bill-stockbridge-oil https://barrett.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-tom-barrett-votes-unleash-american-energy-production https://x.com/tombarrettmi7/status/1688881365222109184 https://www.michiganpublic.org/politics-government/2022-05-06/as-abortion-takes-center-stage-2-michigan-congresspeople-of-different-parties-share-thoughtsOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Baumgartner, MichaelWashington5RRepresentative Michael Baumgartner disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to Komo News, at a debate, Baumgartner said "it is clear" that climate change is happening but it was unclear whether it was caused by mankind. He also opposes climate action, calling for Europe to "stop climate extremism" in a tweet from 2026.00Representative Baumgartner opposes climate action. In 2026, he asked Washington state leaders to halt the Climate Commitment Act (CCA). "Washingtonians are not just paying the price for Iran’s rogue behavior; they are paying a heavy premium driven by state policy... This climate change surcharge is little more than a vanity project designed to make people in downtown Seattle feel good about themselves, while severely penalizing working people across the rest of the state," said Baumgartner. He is also a supporter of the fossil fuel industry. In 2023, he tweeted: "The world would be a safer place if America maximized its oil production." Representative Michael Baumgartner demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Michael Baumgartner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, he opposed Washington's cap-and-invest program.5012.5https://komonews.com/news/local/cantwell-baumgartner-spar-in-senate-debate-11-21-2015 https://x.com/RepBaumgartner/status/2022654707001627068 https://baumgartner.house.gov/2026/03/09/congressman-baumgartner-urges-gov-ferguson-to-help-deliver-relief-at-the-pump/ https://x.com/VoteBaumgartner/status/1711472956420092176 https://www.krem.com/article/news/local/washington/baumgartner-urges-wa-governor-suspend-state-climate-act-lower-gas-prices/293-751d866d-8187-4cfc-837d-2cb532cb4d6e https://baumgartner.house.gov/issues/abortion/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bean, AaronFlorida4RCongressman Bean does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Bean demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In an interview, Bean said he wants to expand drilling leases and oil pipelines to reduce prices, and in a Tweet said that "It’s clear this administration is prioritizing their fringe climate agenda and the interests of Wall Street billionaires over the interests of hardworking Americans." In 2024 the Congressman sponsored a resolution expressing disapproval of the EPA's rule relating to “Reconsideration of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter''.0Congressman Bean opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.news4jax.com/voters-guide/2022/07/28/floridas-4th-congressional-district/ https://x.com/RepAaronBean/status/1637927911528468487 https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-joint-resolution/117/text?s=1&r=1Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Beatty, JoyceOhio3DCongresswoman Joyce Beatty understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "The consensus view of scientists about the impact that climate change poses to our planet is alarming. Rising temperatures are projected to devastate many of our planet’s precious ecosystems, increase coastal flooding to dangerous levels, disrupt our food systems, and increase extreme weather occurrences. These science-backed facts are why I support taking bold steps to invest in federal programs to address climate change, prevent spending cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), fully enforce the Clean Air Act, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, minimize our reliance on fossil fuels, and promote energy efficiency and conservation. I also support the Paris Climate Agreement and believe the United States should remain a full partner in the international effort to address climate change."100100In a 2017 tweet opposing President Trump's withdrawal from the agreement, she stated, "1. Syria. 2. Nicaragua 3. USA. The ONLY three countries to reject #ParisAccord. Talk about a list you don't want to be on! #ActOnClimate." Rep. Beatty in a press release opposed the Keystone Pipeline for climate reasons, stating, "We should focus on developing domestically produced energy as we transition away from energy sources that cause irreparable climate change and fail to create meaningful American jobs.” Congresswoman Betty's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congresswoman Beatty has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://beatty.house.gov/issues/climate-and-environment https://twitter.com/RepBeatty/status/870363347904069634 https://beatty.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/beatty-opposes-seriously-flawed-keystone-xl-legislation https://beatty.house.gov/issues/climate-and-environment https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://beatty.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/beatty-slams-roe-reversalSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateN/A
Begich III, NickAlaska1RRepresentative Nick Begich disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with the Alaska Beacon, Begich claimed that "Alaska faces minimal risk from climate-change-driven refugees. First, asylum claims do not cover those displaced by changes in the climate. Second, the idea that climate change will cause significant refugee movements directly to Alaska hasn’t been supported by the migration patterns of the more than 10 million migrants who have entered the nation over the past several years. While addressing the impact of a changing climate is important, framing the possibility of a climate refugee crisis specifically impacting Alaska does not seem likely." Further, at a gas industry forum, Begich stated “We look at how the left in this country has weaponized what I’m going to call the carbon lie, or the carbon economy, right? And they’ve weaponized it against everyone in this room... They’re trying to use these methodologies to shut us down.” In 2024, he tweeted: "One thing has been shown to be consistently true about dire climate predictions: they’ve all been wrong. A person could make a fortune by simply betting against climate alarmists."00Representative Begich is an opponent of climate action and promotes fossil fuel usage. In an op-ed, Begich argued for the expansion LNG and praised President Trump for loosening regulations. He writes that "Energy development in Alaska is no longer a domestic issue. It’s a powerful negotiating tool and one that we must wield wisely. By exporting LNG to our allies, we reduce their dependence on authoritarian regimes. By investing in projects like Alaska LNG, we create good-paying jobs at home and balance our trade relationships abroad. By reminding the world that Alaska is ready to lead, we send a clear message: American energy is back and it starts in the Last Frontier." Furthermore, in a 2025 tweet, he wrote: "Joe Biden is a son of a bitch. Hundreds of thousands of Alaskans rely on natural gas from the Cook Inlet to heat and electrify their homes, churches, schools, and workplaces. Actions like this should serve as a permanent reminder that the Democrat machine is more than happy to sacrifice us all in the name of their sanctimonious, socialist-driven, climate science™ religion." Representative Nick Begich demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Nick Begich makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a tweet, he stated "THE CLIMATE TAX. The COP28 Summit just wrapped up in Dubai, and the conclusion of the so called experts is that they need 2.8 Trillion dollars in new taxes every year to support a “just transition” away from traditional energy sources. How will this be funded? Conference leaders suggested a new global tax on all financial transactions, a tax when oil and gas is transported, and even a global travel tax! Let’s get real. Abandoning traditional energy, including nuclear, is the path to a diminished standard of living for everyone. The world needs affordable energy, and Alaskans deserve the way of life that comes with it. In Congress, I’ll push back against the green mafia, fight for Alaska’s working families, and work to keep our resource economy growing."00https://alaskabeacon.com/race-details/u-s-house-of-representatives-candidates-election-2024/ https://alaskabeacon.com/2024/08/28/u-s-house-candidates-seek-alaska-oil-and-gas-industry-support-in-forum/ https://x.com/NickforAlaska/status/1767772863233479143 https://begich.house.gov/media/op-eds/alaskas-energy-americas-leverage https://x.com/NickforAlaska/status/1875959539985522865 https://x.com/NickforAlaska/status/1732996375368053110 https://alaskabeacon.com/2024/09/11/in-alaskas-u-s-house-race-begich-supports-nationwide-abortion-limit-peltola-and-howe-oppose/ Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bell, WesleyMissouri1DRepresentative Wesley Bell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he writes: "Climate change is a crisis, and here in Missouri, the effects are already making an impact on our way of life and the safety of our most vulnerable communities, from extreme weather events to deteriorating air and water quality." In 2024, he posted multiple tweets underscoring his position on climate change. "Missourians, like millions of Americans across the country, have been feeling the heat — literally. We must continue tackling the climate crisis, which is resulting in more intense heat waves and causing harm to our health as well as our infrastructure," he wrote. Further, he stated: "We cannot ignore the reality of climate change and its impact on our daily lives. We are taking steps in the right direction, but the clock keeps ticking."100100Representative Wesley Bell has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his congressional website, he writes: "Climate change and energy affordability directly impact Missouri families, infrastructure, and public health... Congressman Bell supports: Lowering household energy costs, Expanding clean energy investment, Environmental remediation, Disaster resilience and preparedness, Modernizing infrastructure." Representative Wesley Bell also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On Twitter in 2025, he wrote: "The Trump administration’s plan to slash NOAA’s climate research by 75% is extremely dangerous for Missouri. We depend on NOAA for accurate flood forecasts, tornado warnings, and climate data that safeguard our communities and support our agriculture. I stand firmly against these reckless cuts and will fight to protect the vital services that keep our state safe and informed." Furthermore, Bell joined over 100 lawmakers in demanding President Trump and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum immediately cease any plans to open new offshore oil and gas leases in U.S. federal waters off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, in the Arctic Ocean and northern Bering Sea off of Alaska, and in the Eastern Gulf.100Representative Wesley Bell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://www.bell4mo.com/issues/ https://x.com/bell4mo/status/1805677087723753849 https://x.com/bell4mo/status/1792659602917728614 https://bell.house.gov/issues/environmental-justice https://x.com/RepWesleyBellMO/status/1911429446470369769 https://lofgren.house.gov/media/press-releases/lofgren-joins-over-100-lawmakers-demanding-trump-reverse-plan-open-new https://x.com/bell4mo/status/1837206566426042584 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bentz, Cliff Oregon2RCongressman Cliff Bentz agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an editorial from the Bulletin posted on the congressman's website, "Bentz’s concept is more circumspect, realistic and decentralized. He believes climate change is real. He wants innovation, sequestration and adaptation." 500Under 'Environment' on the 'issues' page of his campaign website, Congressman Bentz states "I applaud President Trump’s plan to update the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)." According to a 2021 'S&P Global' article, "Bentz has advocated other climate solutions, including carbon capture and sequestration and the development of solar energy, according to an August 2019 story by The Dalles Chronicle." From a June 2021 article from the 'Pacific Northwest AG Network,' "House Republicans launched the Conservative Climate Caucus. The caucus includes more than 50 representatives, including Oregon’s Cliff Bentz and Washington’s Dan Newhouse." The article says "The goal of the Conservative Climate Caucus is to bring members of the Republican party together to educate each other on climate policies that will make progress on reducing emissions through American innovation and resources." According to a Tweet on his page, "Rep.-elect Cliff Bentz, who led statehouse walkout, backs climate solutions people 'want to do.'" Congressman Cliff Bentz’s supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for effective policies. 50Congressman Cliff Bentz makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2021 'Oregon state senate Republicans who walked out during the state's 2019 legislative session to effectively block Gov. Kate Brown and the Democrat-majority legislature from passing a carbon tax bill."025https://cliffbentz.com/2020/10/editorial-cliff-bentz-for-congress/ https://cliffbentz.com/2020/03/environment/ https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/new-members-of-us-congress-include-climate-defenders-carbon-tax-opponents-61690160 https://www.pnwag.net/2021/06/30/republicans-launch-conservative-climate-caucus/ https://cliffbentz.com/2020/03/life/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bera, AmiCalifornia3DCongressman Ami Bera understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Bera's, 'Environment and Agriculture,' page, it states, "We must address the grave threat that climate change poses to our state of California and to future generations. The vast majority of qualified scientists agree that the data on climate change is clear. The evidence shows climate change is making our drought worse and could lead to future droughts. Climate change is expected to result in rising sea levels, which could damage the Sacramento delta and major coastal cities throughout the Bay Area. It could also mean more out-of-control forest fires and more dangerous storms, affecting our country’s agriculture and infrastructure."100100Congressman Ami Bera has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In 2019 Congressman Bera co-wrote an op-ed with Congresswoman Kim Schrier (D-WA), stating, "Climate change is one of the biggest public health threats facing our country and planet. From increased air pollution, to worsening extreme weather disasters, to greater risks for diseases, climate change impacts every aspect of our health and safety." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Facebook post, he wrote, "Climate change is a grave (and real) threat. We have an obligation to future generations to do whatever we can to address this crisis." Rep. Bera makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the '100% Clean Economy Act of 2019' (H.R.5221), legislation that "establishes requirements to... (achieve) a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050." 100Rep. Ami Bera has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Bera voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH) 7593.75https://bera.house.gov/environment#climatechange https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/447011-to-protect-our-health-we-must-act-on-climate https://www.facebook.com/RepAmiBera/posts/2512714255408323 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?r=3&s=3 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://bera.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-bera-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bergman, JackMichigan1RCongressman Jack Bergman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Bergman does not oppose climate action. When joining the Bipartisan Climate Caucus in 2017 Congressman Bergman was quoted by Climate Citizens Lobby stating, "Michigan’s First District is home to some of our nation’s most cherished natural resources and I’m proud to join my colleagues to examine ways to promote and protect these resources. Michiganders understand that our Great Lakes and natural resources are worth protecting—for our environment, for our economy, for our kids and grandkids, and for the future of the Great Lakes region.” 25Congressman Bergman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://citizensclimatelobby.org/rep-jack-bergman-congressman-climate-conscious-youth/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepJackBergman/status/1540347859626856450 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Beyer, DonVirginia8DCongressman Don Beyer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's climate change and the environment page, he states, "Stopping the harmful consequences of global climate change is the existential crisis of our generation. We cannot continue pumping pollutants into our air at no economic cost. Fourteen of the fifteen hottest years on record have been in this century. Global temperature changes are causing prolonged droughts, extreme weather events, and rising sea levels."100100Congressman Beyer has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 op-ed in The Hill, the Congressman stated, "The president’s recent decision to pull out of the Paris agreement, the international climate agreement by which each nation voluntarily committs to addressing climate change in their own country, is an intentional choice to bury his head in the sand. We can’t ignore reality, and we don’t have the luxury of just sitting this one out." Rep. Beyer also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release on infrastructure, the Congressman stated, “I’m proud to support this framework because I believe it is the roadmap we need to put people to work strengthening and modernizing our communities in a way that respects the environment and addresses the climate crisis. Congressman Beyer makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman is the Democrat Coalition Climate Change Task Force Co-Chair. 100Congressman Beyer supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. The Congressman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman supports the Healthy Climate and Family Security Act, which would, "cap the emissions of greenhouse gases through a requirement to purchase carbon permits, to distribute the proceeds of such purchases to eligible individuals, and for other purposes. 7593.75https://beyer.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15199 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4651 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4722 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1210 https://www.vanhollen.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Healthy%20Climate%20and%20Family%20Security%20Act.pdf https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5628Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bice, Stephanie Oklahoma5RCongresswoman Stephanie Bice does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, the congresswoman states "...I believe that Congress should enact a national strategy that ensures abundant, affordable energy for consumers, and creates more American jobs, all while reducing emissions. According to a 2020 'Washington Examiner' article, Bice stated, "Certainly, we should be mindful of the impact of oil and gas on our climate."250According to a 2020 'Washington Examiner' article, "...[Congresswoman Bice] says climate change is a problem that should be addressed by encouraging the private sector to produce innovative clean energy technologies." "'We need to be looking at all forms of energy,' she added, noting Oklahoma’s leading status in generating power from wind and, to a lesser extent, solar." However, in a May 2021 tweet, Congresswoman Bice writes "I am proud to join @RepArrington and 50+ of my colleagues in an effort to stand up for our oil and gas industry. It's important that we keep our energy workers employed and stand up for the families, farmers, and small businesses who rely on affordable energy." Congresswoman Stephanie Bice does not oppose climate action.25Congresswoman Bice opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://bice.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy/candidates-race-to-win-oil-industry-support-in-key-oklahoma-house-race https://twitter.com/repbice/status/1392977991337226243 https://bice.house.gov/media/press-releases/bice-applauds-reversal-roe-vs-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Biggs, SheriSouth Carolina3RRepresentative Sheri Biggs does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Instead, Biggs focuses on expanding American energy production. Her congressional website states: "American energy independence is a national security and economic security issue, and South Carolina's Third Congressional District has a robust, positive impact on energy production. Free market principles will pave the way for not only energy independence, but also energy dominance." She tweeted: "It was pleasure to meet with LC Hayes of Duke Energy recently, we discussed the future of energy production in South Carolina, strong job growth, and energy affordability for families in the Third District."250Representative Biggs' votes and actions oppose progress on climate change. In 2025, she toured an oil and gas facility in South Carolina. Biggs met with Duke Energy, writing on Twitter: "Energy costs, security, sustainability, and reliability are of great importance to South Carolinians and to me. I sat down with one of our energy providers, @DukeEnergy, to discuss the importance of reliable power, strong infrastructure, and affordable costs to keep the lights on for families across the Third District." Furthermore, Biggs publicly supported the One Big Beautiful Bill, which will increase emissions from fossil fuels. These actions, combined with votes against climate action, show opposition to climate progress. Representative Sheri Biggs demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Sheri Biggs has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://sheribiggs.house.gov/issues/energy https://x.com/RepSheriBiggs/status/2039054948629885174 https://www.facebook.com/southeastpropanealliance/posts/stringer-oil-lp-gas-and-friends-hosted-congresswoman-sheri-biggs-at-their-facili/725798456883668/ https://x.com/RepSheriBiggs/status/2021288047002951748 https://sheribiggs.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-sheri-biggs-votes-advance-president-trumps-agenda-protect-south https://x.com/RepSheriBiggs/status/1971222473078088122Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bilirakis, Gus M.Florida12RCongressman Bilirakis agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Congressman's 'Environment, Energy Production, and Infrastructure' page on his website, "Congressman Bilirakis believes that climate change is real and has been active in Congressional hearings focused on reducing carbon emissions, boosting renewable energy options, and modernizing the nation’s power generation. The Congressman wants clean air, clean water, and environmental protection..."500Congressman Bilirakis lacks leadership by advocating against the Paris Agreement. According to Politifact, the Congressman stated in an email that, "A study by the National Economics Research Association showed that the (Paris climate) deal could cost 2.7 million lost jobs in the U.S. by 2025 should our country adhere to the commitments made by the Obama Administration." Politifact deemed the study referred to as unreliable, stating, "The study is unreliable, using an extreme model that does not consider the possible benefits of carbon regulation and rules out investment, flexibility or technology that would lead to more jobs." According to the Congressman's 'Environment, Energy Production, and Infrastructure' page on his website, " Congressman Bilirakis firmly supports an “all of the above” energy strategy that includes increasing domestic production, providing incentives for the development of renewable resources, and promoting conservation. " Congressman Bilirakis demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Bilirakis makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).012.5https://bilirakis.house.gov/issues/energy-production http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2017/jun/21/gus-bilirakis/gus-bilirakis-cites-flawed-study-defend-us-wit/ https://bilirakis.house.gov/issues/energy-production https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://bilirakis.house.gov/media/press-releases/bilirakis-applauds-historic-scotus-decision-uphold-sanctity-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bishop Jr., Sanford D.Georgia2DCongressman Bishop understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a 2024 Tweet, Bishop said "Climate change is not a distant threat — it's happening now and it demands action. We need to implement policies that protect our planet and future generations."75100Congressman Bishop supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. According to a 2017 WMGT 41 article the Congressman was quoted on his disappointment over President Trump pulling out of the Paris Agreement, stating, “I think it’s very unfortunate. I’m very disappointed that the President does not see the need for people to work together across the globe to protect the earth on which we live.” On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page it states, "I have long supported the development and exploration of domestic energy sources which will revitalize our economy, create millions of new jobs, lower energy bills, and strengthen our national security. I am a strong supporter of the Keystone XL pipeline, increased exploration of energy sources on federal lands and offshore, renewable energy research, and promoting rural electric cooperatives and nuclear energy."50Congressman Bishop publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5068.75https://twitter.com/Bishop4Congress/status/1806365415683027050 https://www.41nbc.com/2017/06/01/congressman-bishop-disappointed-president-trumps-withdraw-paris-climate-agreement/ https://bishop.house.gov/legislative-work/fiscal-responsibility/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://bishop.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-bishop-statement-on-reported-draft-supreme-court-decision-toSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Boebert, LaurenColorado4RCongresswoman Lauren Boebert disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a tweet posted in August 2021 that seems to apply to her position on climate change, Congresswoman Boebert posts a picture of snow-covered hills and writes "Make America Warm Again."00In a 2020 tweet replying to Joe Biden, Congresswoman Lauren Boebert says "What’s your climate change solution that doesn’t include taxation and socialism? Oh wait..." In 2021, Congresswoman Boebert introduced a bill that "would prevent the U.S. from spending any money to rejoin the Paris Climate agreement unless the Senate ratifies the agreement," saying that "The Paris Agreement puts these jobs at risk and will increase energy costs." In a a 2021 editorial on her website, in opposition to the 30 x 30 initiative, the congresswoman stated "While I’m doubtful that the Earth’s temperature going up less than 2 degrees in the next century is an existential threat, I know that the 30 x 30 initiative is an existential threat to private property rights in this country.” Congresswoman Lauren Boebert demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Lauren Boebert makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. She said in reference to her opponent, in an article in 'The Daily Sentinel,' "Aspen Adam has told multiple media outlets that he supports eventually ending fossil fuels and transitioning to 100% renewable energy. He voted in support of a federal carbon tax to help kill off responsible oil and gas production."00https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1361513231911632900?lang=en https://twitter.com/laurenboebert/status/1264681491814141953?lang=en https://www.cpr.org/2021/01/22/rep-lauren-boebert-targets-bidens-paris-agreement-who-orders-with-first-bills/ https://boebert.house.gov/media/editorial/washington-examiner-enviromentalists-latest-land-grab-scheme-30-x-30-initiative https://www.gjsentinel.com/news/western_colorado/boebert-answers-three-questions-ahead-of-re-election-bid/article_c34cddb8-4b1a-11ed-8dee-0b6058d3f3f2.html https://www.newsweek.com/glory-god-lauren-boebert-celebrates-overturn-roe-v-wade-1718976Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bonamici, SuzanneOregon1DCongresswoman Suzanne Bonamici understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' it states, "In Northwest Oregon, we are facing the challenges of our inaction on climate change, whether it be more acidic oceans, rising sea levels, raging wildfires, changing agricultural conditions, and extreme weather events. Climate change and pollution also disproportionately affect our most vulnerable, and we must do more to protect the public of health of our communities. It is past time for Congress and the country to take action and address the growing threat of climate change and protect our environment. The United States has the ability and the obligation to lead the world’s efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and our dependence on fossil fuels, and transition to 100% clean energy. I will continue to work with my colleagues to implement adaptation and mitigation strategies as we fight to take meaningful action on climate change."100100Congresswoman Bonamici has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. During a 2019 Congressional hearing, the Congresswoman questioned Energy Secretary Rick Perry about the Department’s inaction on climate change and efforts to withhold federal funding for clean energy research and development, stating, "Climate change is an existential threat, and it requires the full attention of the federal government.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. As a member of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congresswoman helped release the committee's climate action plan, stating in a press release, "Our committee was charged with crafting a bold, science-based, comprehensive climate action plan to address the climate crisis and reach net-zero emissions no later than mid-century and net-negative thereafter." We included a focus on the needs of frontline communities, opportunities to accelerate our transition to a 100 percent clean energy economy, and ways to create good-paying jobs." Rep. Bonamici makes climate change a priority issue as well. She is also a cosponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congresswoman Bonamici has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee. on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://bonamici.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://bonamici.house.gov/media/press-releases/bonamici-challenges-energy-secretary-perry-climate-change-clean-energy https://bonamici.house.gov/ClimateActionPlan https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://bonamici.house.gov/media/press-releases/bonamici-condemns-scotus-abortion-decision https://bonamici.house.gov/press-release/congresswoman-bonamici-statement-42nd-anniversary-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Bost, MikeIllinois12RCongressman Mike Bost disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with St. Louis Public Radio, when the Congressman was asked if he believed in man made climate change, he stated, "I don’t. I don’t know that I do; no... Some scientists do; some scientists don’t."00On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page, it advocates for the continued development of fossil fuel resources stating, "In addition to new sources of oil and natural gas, the United States also possesses significant quantities of coal, enough to last us for over a hundred years. Southern Illinois contains significant coal deposits. In recent years, new technologies have been developed that make it possible to more efficiently produce energy from this coal with far fewer emissions of pollutants." Congressman Bost demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Bost makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). Congressman Bost also co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00http://news.stlpublicradio.org/post/illinois-12th-district-contenders-highlight-differences#stream/0 https://bost.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://bost.house.gov/2022/5/bost-statement-on-leaked-supreme-court-opinion-on-abortionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Boyle, BrendanPennsylvania2DCongressman Brendan Boyle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release condemning the President's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "With record-shattering temperatures and billions of dollars going toward natural disaster relief, the consequences of climate change are clearer than ever. But this is not a problem the United States can solve alone. Our atmosphere is everyone’s atmosphere, and only through international cooperation and compliance with the Paris Climate Agreement can we begin to tackle this monumental threat." 100100Congressman Boyle has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congressman included an amendment in the Fiscal Year 2020 Energy and Water Appropriations Act, which would prohibit the Trump administration from rejecting any grant application for using the term “global warming” or the term “climate change” in the application. In a press release on the amendment, the Congressman stated, “At a time when climate change and global warming pose an unparalleled threat to our national security and the safety of the planet, we must fight back against the Trump Administration’s codification of climate change denial." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. The Congressman discussed the reality of climate change at a 2019 town hall stating, "Climate change is not a hoax. It is a reality. This is a problem that is happening right now.” Rep. Boyle makes climate change a priority issue as well. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. 100Congressman Boyle has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5087.5https://boyle.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/boyle-amendment-included-landmark-climate-change-legislation-passed https://boyle.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/house-passes-boyle-amendment-counteract-trump-administration-climate https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://boyle.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/boyle-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Brecheen, JoshOklahoma2RCongressman Brecheen disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 00 Congressman Brecheen demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He has frequently criticized climate action and climate activists, such as in a Tweet where he said "Gas prices just reached a 4-month high, as President Biden continues to side with radical climate alarmists instead of hard-working families. We must END Biden’s war on American energy!" Brecheen has cosponsored anti-climate legislation such as the Stop Climate Hysteria in Diplomacy Act (H.R.6289) and the Preventing Executive Climate Overreach Act (H.R.3256).0Congressman Brecheen opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.okenergytoday.com/2024/07/climate-deniers-in-congress-include-oklahomans/ https://www.congress.gov/member/josh-brecheen/B001317?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://joshbrecheen.com/issues/#tab-1948Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bresnahan, RobPennsylvania8RRepresentative Rob Bresnahan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, he is a vocal supporter of fossil fuels and opposes climate action. On Twitter, he wrote: "Matt Cartwright had the opportunity to stand up for working men and women in the energy industry across Northeastern PA but decided to cowtail [sic] to Joe Biden and the climate crazies by voting to halt the exporting of LNG. When I am in Congress, I will always stand with PA oil and gas workers and for American energy independence!" He further underscored this position with another post on Twitter. "I am proud to be the only candidate in #PA08 endorsed by the Oil & Gas Workers Association. Congressman Cartwright’s Green New Deal policies are hurting us. They kill energy jobs and drive prices through the roof," wrote Bresnahan. 250Representative Bresnahan is an ally of the fossil fuel industry and opposes climate action. According to WHYY, Bresnahan called Biden-era rules a "nail in the coffin" for the state’s energy markets and the construction of new natural gas plants would be "virtually impossible" under current Biden environmental regulations. He is also heavily invested in Big Oil. His investment accounts include more than $30,000 worth of stock in Exxon Mobil and more than $1,000 of stock in each of at least 20 other oil and gas companies, including ConocoPhillips, Dominion Energy, Duke Energy, Occidental Petroleum, Pacific Gas & Electric, Phillips 66, Southern Company, and Valero, according to the Pennsylvania Independent. Furthermore, he tweeted: "Today I toured Invenergy Lackawanna Energy Center, natural gas facility in Jessup, right here in NEPA. This plant provides reliable energy to power over a million homes across our region." Representative Rob Bresnahan demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Rob Bresnahan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://x.com/Rob4PA/status/1765758772608213290 https://x.com/Rob4PA/status/1845153268474720602 https://whyy.org/articles/pennsylvania-republican-congressmen-applaud-trump-epa-rules-rollback/ https://pennsylvaniaindependent.com/politics/house-representatives-rob-bresnahan-matt-cartwright-fossil-fuels-climate-change-stocks/ https://x.com/RepBresnahan/status/1958614181781074057 https://americanjournalnews.com/u-s-house-candidate-rob-bresnahan-said-anti-abortion-ruling-did-what-it-should-do/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Brown, ShontelOhio11DShontel Brown understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an August 2022 tweet, she asserted, "there is no doubt that climate change is real. Acting as if it isn’t, is dangerous and will only harm us. Taking care of our environment is essential for our future because it affects everything we do." Additionally, she's committed to pushing the country toward a future with "net-zero emissions by 2050 and a carbon-free power sector by 2035."100100Congresswoman Shontel Brown has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She makes climate change a top priority issue and has climate action on her 'Priorities' page on her website, where she wrote, "I support the principles laid out in the Green New Deal and I am committed to aggressive action on climate change." The congresswoman makes prominent public statements on the issue. She's posted many tweets calling for climate action and provided amicus briefs defending the EPA's authority earlier this year.100Shontel Brown has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://twitter.com/RepShontelBrown/status/1554482793547272196 https://shontelbrown.com/priorities/ https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-markey-joins-190-congressional-democrats-in-amicus-brief-defending-epas-clean-air-act-authority https://shontelbrown.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-brown-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Budzinski, NikkiIllinois13DCongresswoman Budzinski understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. "I’m committed to addressing long standing environmental health and safety problems in the Metro East while also pushing Congress to do more to combat global climate change. I also believe that our transition to a clean energy economy can be an opportunity to create good-paying, 21st century union jobs in places like Central and Southern Illinois."750Congresswoman Budzinski's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. In Congress, she has become a member of the Sustainable Energy and Environment Coalition and pledges to dedicate money from the Inflation Reduction Act to combatting climate change and environmental issues in her district.75Congresswoman Budzinski has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5050https://nikkiforcongress.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Burchett, TimTennessee2RThe Congressman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2018 Tweet, the Congressman, referencing a snow storm, wrote, "Al Gore needs to scrape my dadgum windshield."00In a press release, Burchett discussed putting forward an amendment to a bill to withold funds from a Special Presidential Envoy for Climate, saying "This office doesn’t do anything except send John Kerry on private jets to fly around the world and push woke Green New Deal agendas." Congressman Burchett demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Burchett opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://twitter.com/timburchett/status/949267790049042432?lang=en https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://burchett.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-burchett-discusses-roe-v-wade-overturn-susan-b-anthony-pro-life-americaOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Burlison, EricMissouri7RCongressman Burlinson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and driven by human activity. In a Tweet, Burlison said "The Globalist Climate Change Left can eat crickets, but Missourians will stick with steak!"00Congressman Burlison demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a debate, Burlison said "The Green New Deal or the idea that we’re going to power the next century off of rainbows and unicorns isn’t going to work. We have got to stop hindering ourselves and and start exploring every resource that is in America that includes all of our gas. All of our oil reserves also allow for real exploration." Burlison has also supported anti-climate bills such as the No American Climate Corps Act, and H.R.6813, which would prevent the EPA from creating or enforcing regulations on emissions.0Congressman Burlison opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://twitter.com/RepEricBurlison/status/1729621833215868934 https://www.ozarksfirst.com/your-local-election-hq/august-2022-primary-election/missouri-7th-district-gop-debate-highlights/ https://www.congress.gov/member/eric-burlison/B001316?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepEricBurlison/status/1805253203895759074Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Bynum, JanelleOregon5DRepresentative Janelle Bynum understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her congressional website, she writes: "Climate change poses an existential threat to our environment, economy, and way of life. Congresswoman Bynum is committed to supporting science-based policies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, invest in clean energy, and build infrastructure to withstand the increasing frequency of natural disasters." Similarly, she stated on her campaign website: "The effects of climate change are felt close to home with brutal summers and the threat of wildfires year-round. Janelle knows it’s critical to tackle the climate crisis right away – for our environment, for our health, and for our economy. She is supporting efforts to generate more clean energy – which creates good jobs – transition away from fossil fuels, and protect our communities, property, and land from wildfires."100100Representative Bynum believes climate action is necessary, but often prioritizes other issues, like the economy and affordability. However, she did sign on to a letter with other representatives from Oregon calling for President Trump to rescind his executive order banning states from engaging in climate deception lawsuits that attempt to hold oil companies accountable. "As members of Oregon’s congressional delegation, we will not stand idly by while this Administration attempts to undercut efforts to combat climate chaos. Oregon has experienced the devastation of the climate crisis, including increased catastrophic wildfires and the deadly Pacific Northwest heat dome. Extreme weather events are already harming households across the country, and the impacts are only going to get worse. Trillions of dollars will be needed for our country to adapt to the climate future, as well as to help people rebuild in the face of natural disasters. The question is who is going to be responsible for paying those costs: taxpayers, or the oil and gas companies that have profited from the crisis?" the letter stated. While running for congress, she said: "As a rapidly growing community, responsible development is reliant on our efforts, as leaders, to address climate change quickly while ensuring that our economies are able to continue to grow and adapt to a changing climate... We know that climate change also disproportionately impacts underserved communities... It is important that we not only protect our environment, but that we create an economy that builds green infrastructure." Despite these statements, climate change does not in actuality seem to be a top priority for Bynum. Representative Janelle Bynum's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Representative Janelle Bynum has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5081.25https://bynum.house.gov/issues/environment https://www.janellebynum.com/issues/taking-climate-action https://climateintegrity.org/uploads/media/OrCongDelReplyEOClimate.pdf https://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/04/28/janelle-bynum-jamie-mcleod-skinner-democratic-primary-oregon-5th-congressional-district/73306194007/ https://www.janellebynum.com/issues/protecting-reproductive-rights?source=b753e10e-6aa1-47cd-835f-588503350b2cSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Calvert, KenCalifornia40RThe Congressman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, but according to 'Vice,' he "[v]oted in support of the Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011 (H.R. 910), which relied on climate change denial to prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating greenhouse gas emissions—additionally excluding carbon dioxide from the definition of "air pollutant"—as a means to prevent further global warming and harm to human health."250In a press release on the Green New Deal the Congressman stated, "Socialism disguised as radical environmentalism is still socialism. As Democrats admit, the Green New Deal seeks a ‘massive transformation’ of America... It would end air travel, force every homeowner to retrofit or tear down their home, and make small businesses plow any revenues into upgrading their stores. It even would kick us out of our cars, unless of course, you could afford an electric vehicle." Congressman Calvert demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Calvert makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87). In a 2019 press release opposing the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "The only conceivable way to fund the Democrat’s Green New Deal government-state is through tax increases on all Americans, including the middle-class. Green New Deal supporters acknowledge it will likely require a carbon tax and that even if they took the revenues of every billionaire and business in the country, it would not be sufficient to fund the plan [...] If Speaker Pelosi brings the Green New Deal to the House floor, I will proudly vote against this socialist fever dream."06.25https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/d7yekv/climate-deniers-congress-california https://calvert.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://calvert.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-calvert-statement-green-new-deal https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://calvert.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-calvert-statement-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-rulingOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cammack, Kat Florida3RCongresswoman Kat Cammack does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250On her campaign website, Congresswoman Kat Cammack states "I strongly support an 'all of the above' energy policy. Everything from the development of oil, liquid natural gas, clean coal, and other fossil fuels as well as alternative energy sources such as wind, solar, hydro-power, nuclear, geothermal, and biomass must be on the table." However, Congresswoman Cammack expressed in a 2021 tweet that "Re-entering the Paris Climate Accords undermines our economic growth and competitiveness with strict requirements, giving the upper hand to the #CCP who get off with just a warning." Congresswoman Kat Cammack demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Cammack opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.katforcongress.com/policy https://mobile.twitter.com/repkatcammack/status/1352073882405113859?lang=ar-x-fm https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://x.com/RepKatCammack/status/1352716243120377857Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Carbajal, SaludCalifornia24DCongressman Salud Carbajal understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Having raised my children on the Central Coast, I understand the importance that environmental preservation and energy efficiency has for our community. The Central Coast is already experiencing major climate change impacts like wildfires and drought. We can save lives, property, and money when we work to proactively mitigate these increasingly destructive events. I believe we cannot afford inaction on the most significant challenge of our time."100100Congressman Carbajal has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In 2018 the Congressman introduced the, Climate Change is Real Act (H.R.5552) which would have required EPA to reinstate the information about climate change that was removed from, or redacted on, the EPA's website during the period beginning on January 20, 2017." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing the Coastal State Climate Preparedness Act (H.R. 3541), the Congressman stated, “Climate change is real and we cannot wait another minute to tackle the problem from every angle. My Coastal State Climate Preparedness Act will help communities across the nation, especially ones like our Central Coast, that are vulnerable to climate disasters and need more help on the front lines of this crisis." Rep Carbajal makes climate change a top priority issue. From a June 2020 press release, "On Tuesday, the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis unveiled a comprehensive congressional climate action framework, which includes two of Congressman Carbajal’s bills: H.R. 2470, the Clean Water Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability Act and H.R. 2199, the Central Coast Heritage Protection Act.The Clean Water Infrastructure Resilience and Sustainability Act, establishes a competitive funding program at the Environmental Protection Agency for the development of innovative water-related infrastructure projects built with the threats of climate change in mind.In addition, the Central Coast Heritage Protection Act designates four new wilderness areas in the Carrizo Plain National Monument and expands nine existing wilderness areas in Los Padres National Forest. The wilderness designation is the highest form of protection the government can give to a public land and would prohibit any commercial development on the land, including oil and gas drilling."100Congressman Carbajal publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. Rep. Carbajal is also a co-sponsor of the 'MARKET CHOICE Act' (H.R.4520), legislation that intends to "(impose) a tax on the greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuels, certain industrial processes, and certain product uses." He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://carbajal.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15122 https://carbajal.house.gov/district/climate-change-is-real-act.htm https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/5552?s=1&r=3 https://carbajal.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=683 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4520/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://carbajal.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1190Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Carey, MikeOhio15RMike Carey does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Mike Carey demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He supports an all of the above solution, as evidenced on his campaign website where he states, "We must invest in new fossil fuel technologies as well as renewables because we need more electricity to run a 21st century economy, not less." Additionally, it says on his website, "Mike is fighting for American energy independence by co-sponsoring bills such as the Powering America Through Domestic Energy Act and the Keystone XL Pipeline Construction and Jobs Preservation Act."0Congressman Carey opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.careyforcongress.com/issues https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Carson, AndréIndiana7DThe Congressman understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview with Fox 59, condemning President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "I am deeply disappointed... It's disappointing because we have seen rising tides, globally... And next to China, America has the highest emission rates. So for us not to be an active player along with our global partners in addressing this issue is deeply disappointing." Climate change is not listed under the 'Issues' section of his website. Even on his 'Energy' page, there is no mention of the issue.75100Congressman Carson in a 2019 Facebook post supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "America has a moral obligation to lead on the global effort to stop #ClimateChange, which is harming our environment, our economy and public health in Indiana, across America and around the world -- particularly in low-income communities bearing the brunt of its negative effects. That's why it's imperative we pass H.R. 9, which helps create a clean energy economy that provides good-paying jobs, cleaner air for our children and a safer climate for future generations. I'll proudly vote for it when it comes to the House floor this week. #ClimateActionNow." Despite this, the Congressman supports an all of the above approach to energy, stating "Tackling our nation’s energy crisis will require a broad and comprehensive strategy that includes pursuing all forms of energy including wind, solar, nuclear, biofuels and coal."75Congressman Carson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). The Congressman co-sponsored the 2017 version of the America Wins Act (H.R. 4209), which would impose an excise tax on the carbon dioxide content of coal, petroleum, and petroleum products, but did not co-sponsor the 2019 version of the bill. 10087.5http://fox59.com/2017/06/04/in-focus-carson-on-climate-change-comey-hearing-next-week/ https://www.facebook.com/CongressmanAndreCarson/posts/america-has-a-moral-obligation-to-lead-on-the-global-effort-to-stop-climatechang/2395588163793613/ https://carson.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4209 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4209/cosponsors?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22John+Larson%22%5D%7D https://carson.house.gov/issues/womens-issuesSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Carter, JohnTexas31RCongressman John Carter disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an op-ed titled, "The Return of the Warmers," he states, "They were thoroughly discredited just last year in the international "Climategate" scandal. The United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and their pals from the East Anglia Climatic Research Unit in Great Britain were caught red-handed, through their own email communications, to have intentionally falsified the scientific data on which they claim that human activity is a leading cause of global warming. Further, they were found to have hidden their own research results that showed world temperature not rising, but actually falling over the past several years. The truth they tried to conceal from the world is that global temperature fluctuations are a normal earth cycle. We may or may not even be in a warming cycle. Even if we are, scientific evidence does not conclude that activity by man plays any significant role. The reason for the lies is because the goal of these people is not to protect the environment, it is to implement a socialistic one-world government that has dictatorial control over every human activity, led by tyrannical liberal elites."00On Congressman Carter's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "I believe in an 'all of the above' energy strategy...while maximizing our use of domestic fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) that will allow us to plan for our future needs while providing enough energy for today. While doing this we must also unlock new oil supplies. As US oil prices decrease, I will continue to fight against per-barrel or at-pump taxes that hit Texans in their wallets. These proposals negatively affect successful free markets and continue a trend that promotes the flawed notion that the federal government knows how to spend your money better than you." Congressman Carter demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Carter voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://carter.house.gov/opeds/the-return-of-the-warmers/ https://carter.house.gov/energy/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://carter.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14897Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Carter, TroyLouisiana2DTroy Carter understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. There is no mention of climate change anywhere on his campaign website. However, he "embraced Biden’s priorities on addressing climate change and pledged not to accept money from oil and gas interests."75100Congressman Carter does not oppose climate action. He has voted for many significant pieces of climate legislation, but does not display leadership by pushing for more climate action. Additionally, although he pledged to not take any money from oil and gas special interest groups, he "accepted $19,150 from oil and gas interests despite a campaign pledge to shun the industry's money, a national environmental nonprofit says."25Congressman Carter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5062.5https://troycarter4congress.com/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.nola.com/news/environment/article_47d6257a-8e6c-11eb-8bfe-bbef118f6a3b.html https://www.nola.com/news/environment/article_f6dea29e-a209-11eb-aacc-374672a77988.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9FoyhN56kwSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Casar, GregTexas37DCongressman Casar understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. Casar's official campaign website, it states, "Our planet is burning, flooding, and freezing all at the same time. Fighting the climate crisis must be a top priority for every country in the world. We can create good paying-union jobs while we become the global leader in renewable energy." 100100Congressman Casar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On the Congressman's website, he states "I’m a proud co-sponsor of the Green New Deal and similar legislation to create good union jobs in clean energy and protect communities harmed by pollution and natural disasters. Our country can and must take care of everyone along the way — from children to seniors to fossil fuel workers." In August 2023, the Congressman participated in a thirst strike on the steps of Capitol during a heat wave in order to protest workers' rights violations and pressure for climate action.100Congressman Casar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Casar voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-1) that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://www.casarforcongress.com/issues https://casar.house.gov/issues/climate https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/08/greg-casar-joe-biden-climate-emergency-progressives https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoeN/AN/APro ClimatePro Climate
Case, EdHawaii1DCongressman Ed Case understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Protecting our environment is one of my top priorities. As Hawai`i and the rest of the planet face the impacts of climate change, I believe we must take the full range of action to protect our natural heritage and ensure it will survive and prosper for generations to come."100100According to Court House News, during a Congressional hearing on the Green New Deal, Congressman Case discussed the transition from coal to renewables stating, "If the majority of Congress enacts policies that are purposefully designed to move us toward renewable energy at the expense of coal, and there is a tremendous consequence to those businesses and communities, the question is, how do we best transition them.” Congressman Case's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Case has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://case.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14893 https://www.courthousenews.com/green-new-deal-drives-a-wedge-at-house-energy-hearing/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://case.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=909Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Casten, SeanIllinois6DCongressman Sean Casten understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, "A former CEO of a clean energy company, Representative Casten has worked throughout his career to reduce greenhouse gas emissions profitably. In Congress, he is continuing this mission. The cost of inaction is enormous, but Representative Casten recognizes that addressing climate change is an opportunity to invest in the energy infrastructure of tomorrow, making our businesses more productive and our economy more competitive globally. "100100Congressman Casten has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release co-sponsoring the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the greatest existential threat to our species. It is also an unequivocal economic opportunity." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 article in the Northwest Herald, the Congressman stated, "The reason I’m in this job is because I am deeply concerned about climate change and the fact that that was a priority in my prior professional career, doesn’t mean it stops being a priority once I got into this line of work.” Congressman Casten makes climate change a top priority issue. Rep. Casten, along with Congressman Mike Doyle, announced the 'Industrial Efficiency Incentive Act,' legislation that will not only "reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the industrial sector and maximize the energy efficiency of industrial facilities in the United States, but it will also make these facilities more financially viable and lower their energy costs."100The Congressman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 tweet, on market mechanisms for reducing carbon emissions, the Congressman stated, "True, but important to note that an INCENTIVE [cap and trade] to reduce carbon is not the same as a PENALTY [carbon fee] to emit it. The incentive is much more important than the penalty and they are decidedly not equivalent, no matter how many academic economists may tell you otherwise." However, Rep. Casten voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://casten.house.gov/issues/climate-change https://casten.house.gov/media/in-the-news/rep-casten-discusses-his-work-combat-climate-change-state-issues https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/following-passage-hr-9-casten-delivers-floor-speech-demanding-continued-climate https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/representatives-casten-and-doyle-introduce-legislation-make-us-industry https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4230 https://twitter.com/SeanCasten/status/1090291212106559491 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/casten-responds-draft-scotus-opinion-overturning-roe-v-wade-headlines-445pm-ctSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Castor, KathyFlorida14DCongresswoman Kathy Castor understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 article published by the Guardian, regarding climate change, Congresswoman Castor states, 'We just don’t have any more time to waste,” the Florida congresswoman said in an interview with the Guardian ahead of crucial UN climate talks in Scotland. “We have got to act now or else we’re condemning our children and future generations to a really horrendous time.'”100100Congresswoman Castor has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman introduced the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, "Speaking as a Floridian who boarded up and fled my home with my family as Hurricane Irma spun its destructive winds and storm surge towards my hometown a year and a half ago, I understand we must act with urgency on the climate crisis.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. As the Chairwoman of the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, she released the "Solving the Climate Crisis” plan, stating in a 2020 WMNF article, "We are releasing a transformative roadmap for solving the climate crisis. We have a plan for building the 100% clean energy economy. And we are going to do it in an equitable and inclusive way. Our task is urgent. The last five years are the hottest on record. And it’s getting hotter." Rep. Castor makes climate change a top priority issue. During 2019 Hispanic Heritage Month, the Congresswoman rallied with the Sierra Club, Green Latinos, and Mom's Clean Task Force, stating, "Combating climate change means enacting solutions that work for all of us. Those who are most impacted by our rapidly changing climate are our frontline communities who can’t afford flood insurance, families who can’t pay higher electric bills or those who don’t have places to turn when disaster strikes." 100Congresswoman Castor has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).7593.75https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/oct/21/kathy-castor-interview-climate-crisis-democrats https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398936 https://www.wmnf.org/kathy-castor-announces-solving-the-climate-crisis-plan/ https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=403085 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://castor.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=403900Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Castro, JoaquinTexas20DCongressman Joaquin Castro understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release celebrating Earth Day, the Chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, said, "As we mark this Earth Day, I am hopeful of a better future for our children. While the Trump Administration has abdicated our global leadership on climate issues and rolled back critical environmental protections, local leaders and everyday Americans are doing their part to fight climate change and protect our land and water. Hispanic families and communities of color – who are disproportionately impacted by pollution and climate change – are working to combat environmental injustice and ensure their children can live healthy lives away from pollution...The time to act is now." In a 2021 'Twitter' post, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the defining crisis of our time — and its disruptive impacts are displacing people worldwide.”100100Congressman Castro’s website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. In an Earth Day Press Release, Congressman Castro said "The time to act is now. We must invest in an Infrastructure of Opportunity for our children to succeed. That includes healthy and safe communities, clean air and water, and a sustainable environment for them to thrive in. Congress must work to ensure the best possible future for our children. I hope all Americans will do their part today and recommit to changing their everyday actions to ensure a clean Earth for future generations." This pro-climate rhetoric is supported by a strong history of taking pro-climate action according to the LCV.75Congressman Castro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://castro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/chc-chairman-castro-statement-on-earth-day https://twitter.com/joaquincastrotx/status/1385294050534694916?lang=bg https://castro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/chc-chairman-castro-statement-on-earth-day https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/joaquin-castro https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://castro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-from-congressman-castro-on-the-supreme-courts-abortion-decision-in-dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organizationSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Chu, Judy California28DCongresswoman Judy Chu understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her energy and environment page, she states, "Our economy is inextricably intertwined with our long-term energy and conservation strategies. By investing in renewable energy and protecting our natural wonders, we can address climate change while modernizing our economy. I am committed to taking aggressive action to reverse the effects of climate change. That is why I am committed to reducing our reliance on fossil fuels, promoting policies that keep our air and water clean, supporting a marketplace where green energy technologies and jobs can thrive, protecting our environment through conservation, and connecting communities to the outdoors."100100Congresswoman Chu has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. She is a co-sponsor of the 'Climate Action Now Act' (H.R. 9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on climate change. In a 2019 press release introducing the Climate Resiliency Service Corps Act of 2019 (H.R. 5176) to establish a new AmeriCorps program to promote community adaptation, mitigation, preparedness, response, and recovery from the effects of climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is a national threat, affecting every region of the country. And it is one that demands immediate action." Rep. Chu makes climate change a top priority issue as well. According to a press release, "Today, Representatives Judy Chu (CA-27) and Jimmy Panetta (CA-20) introduced the National Climate Service Corps and Careers Network Act of 2021 to create a National Climate Service Corps within AmeriCorps. The corps would allow Americans to serve their communities through public service projects focused on community adaptation, mitigation, and resiliency."100Congresswoman Chu publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman/woman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).100100https://chu.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9/cosponsors https://chu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-chu-bill-would-establish-americorps-program-address-climate-change https://chu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-judy-chu-introduces-legislation-create-national-climate-service https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://chu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-chu-s-statement-her-arrest-following-protests-decision-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Ciscomani, JuanArizona6RCongressman Ciscomani does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, he said "Keeping Arizona and our world protected, especially our air and water, are important [...] We should be able to responsibly care for our environment and our beautiful state while simultaneously supporting the economic growth of our booming economy." However, Ciscomani fails to take a position on climate change.250Congressman Ciscomani demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He has a poor record with the League of Conservation Voters, demonstrating a history of voting against climate action. Ciscomani has cosponsored bills such as the Natural Gas Tax Repeal Act, which would remove incentives for petroleum and natural gas systems to reduce emissions.0Congressman Ciscomani opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/07/09/arizona-6th-congressional-district-election-candidates/74130198007/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/juan-ciscomani https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/1141/cosponsors?s=8&r=4 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://juanciscomani.com/prioritiesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cisneros, GilCalifornia31DRepresentative Gil Cisneros understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2024, he wrote in a tweet: "Thankful for the courage and dedication of Cal Fire and all of the first responders who are handling the wildfire in the San Gabriel Mountains. We must get serious about climate change to prevent further harm to our environment and daily lives." On his campaign website he writes that he "understands the need for urgent action to protect our communities from climate disasters and supports legislation that invests in infrastructure that supports clean energy, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, and ensures a sustainable future for our planet."100100In 2025, Representative Cisneros signed a letter to the EPA calling on the agency to maintain its Endangerment Finding for greenhouse gases. The Endangerment Finding, signed in 2009, establishes that greenhouse gas emissions are a main driver of climate pollution, acknowledges the dangers of climate change, and is the legal foundation that allows the EPA to fulfill its mission to protect human health and the environment. In 2019, when asked about finding bipartisan solution to climate change in congress, Cisneros replied "I think eventually. That’s a slow process. There have been some Republicans who have started to acknowledge that climate change is a problem. I was co-sponsor on a resolution that passed in congress to re-enter the Paris Climate Accords. I am part of the Sustainable Energy Environment Caucus, and a member of the Environmental Justice Caucus." However, Cisneros purchased tens of thousands of dollars worth of Exxon Mobil and Chevron stock in 2026. Representative Gil Cisneros does not oppose climate action.25Representative Gil Cisneros supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. While in congrees the first time in 2019, he was a cosponsor on the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act, which proposed a "fee on the carbon content of fuels, including crude oil, natural gas, coal, or any other product derived from those fuels that will be used so as to emit greenhouse gases into the atmosphere."7575https://x.com/gilsonthehill/status/1833300298804388153 https://www.gilonthehill.com/on-the-issues/ https://levin.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mike-levin-leads-california-democratic-congressional-delegation-in-urging-epa-to-maintain-policy-to-combat-climate-pollution https://fullertonobserver.com/2019/09/06/congress-member-gil-cisneros-holds-town-hall-meeting/ https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/gilbert-cisneros-makes-significant-stock-transactions-in-alibaba-and-exxon-mobil-93CH-4553144 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors https://www.latimes.com/socal/daily-pilot/opinion/tn-dpt-me-climate-change-orange-county-commentary-20190605-story.html https://x.com/RepGilCisneros/status/2069831842140758431Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Clark, KatherineMassachussetts5DCongresswoman Katherine Clark understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Climate Change' page, it states, "There’s no question that the climate crisis is the existential threat of our time. The devastating realities of climate change have been felt across the globe, wreaking their harshest impacts on our most vulnerable communities. As the Representative of a coastal community, I have seen firsthand how a changing climate directly threatens Massachusetts. And as a mother of three, I recognize that we are running out of time to do right by future generations. This moment demands an unprecedented, all-hands-on-deck response."100100Congresswoman Clark has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman is a member of the Safe Climate Caucus. Rep. Clark also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a Facebook post, the Congresswoman states, "#Climatechange is a challenge fit for America: seemingly impossible but solvable with ingenuity and determination. We can transform our country and economy with a Green New Deal. Let's get to work! #ChangeTheDebate." Congresswoman Clark along with Senator Ed Markey hosted a town hall on climate change and the Green New Deal. The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue.100The Congresswoman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://katherineclark.house.gov/environment https://safeclimatecaucus-lowenthal.house.gov/members https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=2582504311764920 https://framinghamsource.com/index.php/2019/08/09/congresswoman-clark-sen-markey-hosting-town-hall-on-climate-change-and-green-new-deal-in-framingham/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://clarke.house.gov/congresswoman-clarke-issues-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/#:~:text=%E2%80%9CToday%20stands%20among%20the%20darkest,will%20not%20stand%20for%20it. Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Clarke, Yvette D.New York9DCongresswoman Yvette Clarke understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. As Vice Chair of the Energy and Commerce committee, she has introduced various bills to help "tackle the progression of the climate crisis," as stated on her website. During a press conference announcing her efforts to reintroduce climate legislation at the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Rep. Clarke said, "climate change is a crisis, [O]ur duty in Congress is to take bold action to tackle climate-warming emissions and protect the American public from future climate impacts." 100100Congresswoman Clarke has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She is the sponsor of the Climate Justice Act of 2021, legislation that "requires the President to establish a Climate Justice Working Group that must advise federal entities on a just and equitable transition towards a clean, climate-resilient, and zero-emission economy." Rep. Clarke also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release supporting the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis action plan, which highlighted several of the Congresswoman's bills, she stated, "I am proud to see my colleagues in the House come together to take meaningful action on the critical issue of climate change and environmental protection. My bills that have been highlighted in the Climate Crisis Action have the potential to be invaluable tools in ensuring our environment is preserved for future generations.” Congresswoman Clarke makes climate change a top priority issue. She is the sponsor of the FEMA Climate Change Preparedness Act of 2019, a bill that would require "the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to revise its 2018-2022 Strategic Plan to ensure that the plan explicitly mentions climate change and addresses the implications of climate change."100Congresswoman Clarke publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She also voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://clarke.house.gov/climatecrisisreport/ https://clarke.house.gov/clarke-introduces-legislation-to-combat-the-impacts-of-climate-change/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2394?s=1&r=4 https://clarke.house.gov/climatecrisisreport/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4823?s=1&r=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors https://clarke.house.gov/congresswoman-clarke-issues-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cleaver, EmanuelMissouri5DCongressman Emanual Cleaver understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Cleaver's energy page it states, "As early as 1859, British scientist John Tyndall discovered that carbon dioxide (CO2) can trap heat. Since Charles Keeling began measuring atmospheric CO2 in the late 1950s, scientists have accumulated a wealth of evidence documenting the increase of greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere, the rise of global average temperature and the influence of human activities on the Earth’s climate."100100Congressman Cleaver has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2021 article from the Martin City Telegraph, detailing an "an online meeting of the South Kansas City Alliance on Sept. 13," it stated, "The energy-themed meeting began with a pre-recorded talk by U.S. Rep. Emanuel Cleaver II, who announced he would be working in the next 90 days with the Kansas City Area Transportation Authority to launch an ambitious program to provide free rides on electric buses in three 21st century corridors. The corridors (which are yet to be determined) would provide charging stations for electric vehicles. “It will be no emissions and no admissions,” he quipped. 'This will be a major part of what I’m doing in the next session of Congress as a response to climate change.'" The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet regarding the climate impact on black communities, he stated, "It’s no secret that #ClimateChange affects communities of color the hardest. That’s why @TheBlackCaucus is working hard to ensure these communities are protected from the consequences that will come with a warming climate." Rep. Cleaver makes climate change a top priority issue. As chairman of the Financial Services Subcommittee on National Security, International Development, and Monetary Policy, the Congressman held a hearing on how Climate Change is already impacting America’s economy and national security, as well as the extraordinary costs that are expected to arise as the planet’s climate continues to warm.100Congressman Cleaver publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://cleaver.house.gov/issues/energy https://martincitytelegraph.com/2021/09/27/rep-cleaver-addresses-climate-change-at-the-local-level/ https://twitter.com/repcleaver/status/1181264877190631424 https://cleaver.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-cleaver-holds-subcommittee-hearing-to-shed-light-on-economic-costs https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://cleaver.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-cleavers-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cline, BenVirginia6RCongressman Ben Cline disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 News Leader article, "Cline also referenced the world stage when discussing climate change, a topic that constituents brought up several times. He agreed that humans contribute to climate change but disputed with the crowd how much was due to manmade reasons."00In a 2019 Weekly Newsletter posted on Congressman Cline's website, he wrote about energy independence, stating, "In my remarks against this legislation on the House Floor, I spoke about my visit earlier this spring to the Gulf of Mexico off the coast of Louisiana, where I was able to see firsthand the great strides that have been made in energy exploration, technology, and innovation. The amazing developments in ensuring that energy resources can be explored and extracted safely, with minimal impact to our environment, demonstrated to me that similar efforts can be achieved back home in the waters off the coast of Virginia. These new developments would ensure that our environmentally sensitive areas can be protected for future generations while we lower energy costs for residents and businesses across the Commonwealth." Congressman Cline demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Cline makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to a 2019 Roll Call article, "Riggleman and Cline both said they support free-market innovations to combat climate change and incentives to spur those innovations, but opposes taxes on carbon." Congressman Cline was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.newsleader.com/story/news/2020/01/07/rep-ben-cline-discusses-questions-and-concerns-during-staunton-town-hall/2833759001/ https://iqconnect.lmhostediq.com/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?id=193654&c=VA06BC https://www.rollcall.com/2019/10/09/virginia-gop-representatives-town-hall-heavy-on-policy-light-on-impeachment/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/repbencline/status/1540374854582652929Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cloud, MichaelTexas27RCongressman Michael Cloud does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 2525Congressman Cloud demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In an interview with Right Voices, Cloud said "It’s crazy because a lot of the supposed stated initiatives of the Left, especially with Green New Deal-type policies, are having a reversed effect than the goals that they’re meant to have." He later questioned the value of national climate legislation, saying "If there is a climate emergency, it’s not a national one–it’s not like the environment stops at our borders— it’s a global one so we’ve got to look at a larger perspective on these sorts of things. The answer is really taking our responsibly-made goods and products and having them take up more of the world’s market."0Congressman Cloud opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://cloud.house.gov/posts/congressman-cloud-statement-on-scotus-repeal-of-roe-v-wade https://c3newsmag.com/congressman-michael-cloud-explains-role-of-american-innovation-in-driving-environmental-progress/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Clyburn, James E.South Carolina6DCongressman James Clyburn understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 Tweet, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is real and its evidence is all around us. The Paris Agreement was an important first step toward holding countries accountable and we cannot allow this president to remove us from it. #ClimateActionNow #HR9." 100100According to the League of Conservation Voters, Congressman Clyburn has a strong record of voting in favor of climate action. Congressman Clyburn supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Clyburn has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7581.25https://twitter.com/WhipClyburn/status/1124007260013965314 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/james-e-clyburn https://www.majoritywhip.gov/media-center/press-releases/majority-whip-clyburn-statement-supreme-court-overturning-abortionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Clyde, AndrewGeorgia9RCongressman Andrew Clyde disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. A 2020 article from the 'Associated Press' detailing a debate, the congressman stated "I will hold court with those scientists who don’t believe in man-made climate change. You know, we have four seasons of the year, the climate changes every year, four times.”00When asked about climate action in Congress in a questionnaire from the Atlanta Journal-Consitutution in 2020, Congressman Andrew Clyde stated that "It is not the federal government’s responsibility to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, or any aspect of our environment for that matter. The (Environmental Protection Agency) is an unconstitutional agency and should be dissolved. Climate change is fake news." Congressman Clyde demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Clyde makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He cosponsored and voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 00https://apnews.com/article/business-georgia-climate-change-elections-athens-bfe5820602da1f78a17f4d5d18d9d02f https://www.ajc.com/issues-house-9-republican-runoff/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPK8v1v9FOEOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Cole, TomOklahoma4RCongressman Tom Cole agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, the Congressman states, "While I believe climate change is real and needs to be addressed, it should be done in such a way that is collaborative with Congress and results in internationally equitable terms."500Congressman Cole supported President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating, "Paris, on the other hand, was negotiated by President Obama in a way that was clearly in the best interest of China, India, and Europe. His agreement forced the United States to make sharper reductions in our greenhouse emissions than our European allies, it committed the United States to picking up far more than our fair share of the expenses associated with compliance, and it allowed China and India to actually increase their emissions until 2030." In addition, Rep. Cole opposed funding for the study of climate change by the Central Intelligence Agency, stating in a press release that, "I believe that common sense solutions that promote clean air and water are very important. But I do not believe that our nation's intelligence dollars should be redirected from gathering information that has kept our country safe from another attack to studying climate change." Congressman Cole demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Cole makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). In a 2009 article, Rep. Cole stated his opposition to a carbon price: "In these uncertain times, policies like cap and trade are exactly the wrong way to proceed. Raising taxes and energy costs and putting Americans out of work are not the answer to our economic challenges."012.5https://cole.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/cole-statement-on-US-reentering-paris-climate-agreement https://cole.house.gov/media-center/weekly-columns/after-paris-climate-accord-america-will-continue-lead https://cole.house.gov/press-release/cole-opposes-cuts-critical-intelligence-funding https://cole.house.gov/cap-and-trade-costly-experiment https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://okcfox.com/news/local/roe-wade-supreme-court-overturned-dobbs-mississippi-oklahoma-reaction-abortion-reproductive-rights-pro-life-choice-samuel-alito-mullin-mccall-tom-cole-great-treat?fbclid=IwAR374VdYU-ix2bkL0ttDcg38b0nnHEm417SSzjZRKztPjdznWziNo6v0vWQOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Coleman Radewagen, AmataAmerican Samoa1RRepresentative Amata Coleman Radewagen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She has taken a stance on some environmental issues, like opposing seabed mining.250Representative Radewagen mostly focuses on advocating for lower energy prices. She tweeted: "Our people live on wages that are among the lowest anywhere in the U.S., with high rates of U.S. military families and veterans, and we need to bring costs down for them, including groceries, travel, and every product impacted by energy costs and inflation." Representative Amata Coleman Radewagen does not oppose climate action.25Representative Amata Coleman Radewagen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5033.3333https://radewagen.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/amata-s-igia-message-highlights-american-samoa-s-opposition-seabed https://x.com/RepAmata/status/1652331796342665218 https://radewagen.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/supreme-court-ruling-affirms-states-and-territories-decide-themselvesUnclear Position on RoeN/AN/AN/AN/A
Comer, James Kentucky1RThe Congressman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2015 WFPL article, Congressman Comer stated on climate change, “I do not believe in global warming. I’m the one person whose business and livelihood depends on Mother Nature, so I understand weather patterns... We’ve had a very severe winter this year with 12-inch snows, so there is no global warming.”00In a 2017 article by WKMS, the Congressman was quoted supporting the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement stating, “I support President Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris Accord. It’s something that was holding America back. The deal was not a good one for the United States, and with this move, President Trump continues to look out for working Kentuckians in coal country.” In a 2020 interview found on Facebook, when asked if climate change is the greatest threat to mankind, the Congressman responded, "Absolutely not. I don't know any serious credible scientific organization that makes such claims. It is not even our most severe environmental problem... I don't think there is any evidence that climate change is our most serious environmental problem." Congressman Comer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Comer opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://wfpl.org/a-look-at-kentucky-gubernatorial-candidate-comers-climate-change-remarks-and-agriculture/ http://wkms.org/post/congressman-comer-speaks-paris-climate-accord-decision https://www.facebook.com/CongressmanComer/videos/571690400194562/?v=571690400194562 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/james-comerOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Conaway, HerbNew Jersey3DRepresentative Herb Conaway understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2025, he posted on Twitter: "Addressing climate change and building a more sustainable future for the next generation are top priorities for me in Congress." Upon winning the Democratic primary for his district in 2024, Conaway underscored his belief that climate is a priority, saying: "This election is the most consequential of our lifetime because the fate of our democracy will be on the ballot this November. Women’s reproductive rights will be on the ballot. Protecting our environment and tackling climate change will be on the ballot."1000Representative Herb Conaway has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. While in the New Jersey legislature, Conaway sponsored a resolution that urged the governor to support the goals of the Paris Climate Accord. The resolution includes the following: "This House urges the Governor of New Jersey to take a leadership role in protecting the citizens of New Jersey and the United States, the environment, and the planet from the devastating effects of climate change by continuing to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and supporting the goals of the Paris Climate Accord." Representative Herb Conaway also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 op-ed discussing electric vehicles and climate, Conaway writes: "These are the investments New Jersey needs if we are going to cut dangerous pollution from cars and trucks, while fighting climate change in the process...This pollution is... driving climate change, with devastating consequences for our state. From 2010 to 2020, New Jersey experienced 23 extreme weather events, costing our state up to $50 billion in damages. We see the impacts of climate change every day, and our state is experiencing the fastest sea-level rise on the East Coast." Representative Herb Conaway makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Herb Conaway has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://x.com/herbconaway/status/1916173778347757752 https://www.insidernj.com/conaway-victorious/ https://pub.njleg.gov/bills/2016/AR/267_I1.DOCX https://www.njspotlightnews.org/2021/08/nj-electric-vehicles-air-pollution-climate-change-better-public-health/ https://x.com/herbconaway/status/1806341790368399827Supports RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Correa, LouCalifornia46DCongressman Correa understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. While his website has an "Environment" section, it does not mention climate change. In a 2019 Tweet, Correa said "Climate change is real. As the greatest economy in the world, we need to lead by example and show that strong climate rules do not mean weak economies." 7550Congressman Correa has demonstrated leadership on climate change by voting in favor of legislation that promotes climate action and making some public statements, such as in a Tweet where he lauded the climate investments of the Build Back Better Bill. Despite this, the Congressman does not mention climate change on his Congressional or campaign sites. Congressman Correa supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it.50Congressman Correa publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).10081.25https://correa.house.gov/about/issues https://twitter.com/RepLouCorrea/status/1191475359922958336 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepLouCorrea/status/1465722062534852610 https://correa.house.gov/news/press-releases/rep-correa-statement-on-supreme-courts-draft-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro Climate
Costa, JimCalifornia21DCongressman Jim Costa understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 Weekly Newsletter, the Congressman stated, "The wildfires raging in Australia remind us all too well of the threat we face in California as we deal with drought and horrific fires among the many growing impacts of climate change. We can do more to improve air quality, transportation and water, all affected by climate change."10075According to a press release on his website in 2021, "Congressman Jim Costa (AC-16) and the Problem Solvers Caucus endorsed the Growing Climate Solutions Act, which aims to remove barriers for farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners to participate in the voluntary carbon credit marketplace. As producers look to reduce their environmental footprint, they often look to the carbon credit marketplace to offset their emissions." Congressman Costa website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Costa has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://costa.house.gov/news/weekly-newsletters/weekly-newsletters/weekly-newsletter-01062020 https://costa.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/costa-problem-solvers-caucus-endorse-growing-climate-solutions-act https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://costa.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/costa-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Courtney, JoeConnecticut 2DCongressman Joe Courtney understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the President's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The United States is the second largest carbon emitter in the world, and the Paris Climate Accord proved that our nation, and the global community as a whole, has recognized that a zero-emissions, clean energy economy is the only path forward for a sustainable, sound future. In Connecticut, we’ve taken this to heart: over half of all electric power generation jobs are in the solar sector—more than natural gas or any other fuel. These jobs are not only going to dominate our economy in the future – they are already a major part of our economy today. Turning our back on the Paris Climate Accord leaves our nation without a seat at the table as the world determines climate and clean energy policies, raises troubling questions about whether our nation stands by its commitments, and undermines states like Connecticut that have longstanding commitments to reducing our greenhouse gas emissions.”100100In a 2017 tweet, Congressman Joe Courtney referred to a video melting arctic ice since 1979, writing, "Check out how much Arctic ice has melted since 1979. Climate change is NOT an #AlternativeFact. #DefendScience." The Congressman is also a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. Congressman Joe Courtney's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congressman Courtney has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://courtney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/courtney-backing-out-paris-climate-accord-puts-country-wrong-side https://twitter.com/RepJoeCourtney/status/824648100337774593 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Connecticut%22%7D https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://courtney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/courtney-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoeN/AN/APro ClimatePro Climate
Crane, EliArizona2RRepresentative Crane disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, Crane said "It does feel like things are getting warmer. It does feel like things are getting drier, but that could be because I'm getting older [...] Climate change could play a role in that but think the earth goes through cycles."00In 2023, Representative Crane signed onto a letter encouraging the EPA to reconsider air quality standards for Arizona. Rep. Crane has cosponsored bills such as the No American Climate Corps Act (H.R.6215) and Preventing Executive Climate Overreach Act (H.R.3256). Representative Crane demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Crane opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.tucsonsentinel.com/local/report/062524_smith_cd2_debate/jack-smith-makes-case-gop-primary-challenge-us-rep-eli-crane/ https://lesko.house.gov/2023/7/lesko-leads-delegation-letter-to-epa-about-change-to-air-quality-standards https://www.congress.gov/member/elijah-crane/C001132?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://eliforarizona.com/eli-crane-statement-on-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Crank, JeffColorado5RRepresentative Jeff Crank disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a tweet from 2022 he wrote: "Sorry Timmy. Earth was warmer during the time of Christ than it is now. Was that from carbon emissions? Climate change is your extremist religion."00According to a press release, Representative Crank wrote a letter to the House Appropriations Committee saying that any legislation passed to address California wildfires should "include provisions repealing the California Air Review Board’s (CARB) Clean Air Act (CAA) waivers granted under the Biden Administration that the state has used to prioritize harmful climate policies over responsible wildfire management." When asked by Colorado Public Radio about oil and gas production on public lands, Crank replied: "The federal government should loosen restrictions on oil and gas production on public lands... Public lands are not public so they can be locked away only to be used by certain members of the public. They are to be used for the public good and the energy industry proves every day that they can extract oil and natural gas from the earth in an environmentally friendly way." Representative Jeff Crank demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Representative Jeff Crank has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, Crank opposes policies that make fossil fuels more expensive.5012.5https://x.com/jeffcrank/status/1503172783202729985 https://crank.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-crank-requests-common-sense-conditions-california-spending https://www.cpr.org/2024/10/14/vg-2024-5th-congressional-district-jeff-crank/ https://krdo.b-cdn.net/2024/10/Jeff-Crank-Nov.-Transcript-.pdf https://www.instagram.com/p/DLS5-2jyONU/ Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Crawford, RickArkansas1RCongressman Rick Crawford disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2024 press release, the Congressman stated “Earth Day is a nice concept, but in practice it typically turns into an annual bashing of humans as spoiling the planet, with bigger government, higher taxes, and less freedom for Americans being the alleged solutions." According to a 2013 article in Talk Business & Politics the Congressman stated, "There's not sound science to support some of the initiatives that the President, I think, is committed to [...] supported by scientific data, but more supported by political agendas."00Congressman Crawford demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a 2017 interview with KUAF Morning Edition the Congressman when asked about the Paris Agreement stated, "President Obama did not have the authority to commit the United States to the Paris Accord... If this is a non-binding agreement what's the point of being apart of it...Other nations want us to do everything to fix the environment and don't want to participate at the same level that we do." In January 2021, the Congressman states in a tweet that "I’ve always supported an “all-the-above” energy approach because we have to ensure availability of energy and it’s affordability. This first action of cancelling #KeystoneXL will start to reduce available sources of energy, and with it, affordable energy..." Crawford furthermore has a poor voting history with climate action legislation, receiving a lifetime score of 4% from the LCV.0Congressman Crawford opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://crawford.house.gov/posts/rep-crawfords-earth-day-statement https://talkbusiness.net/2013/01/cong-crawford-wants-permanent-spending-controls/ https://crawford.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=350654 http://kuaf.com/post/crawford-talks-comey-hearings-cuba-climate-change#stream/0 http://congress.freedomworks.org/legislators/rick-a-crawford https://twitter.com/reprickcrawford/status/1355180400235130884 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/rick-crawford https://crawford.house.gov/posts/rep-crawford-responds-to-scotus-overturning-of-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Crow, JasonColorado6DCongressman Jason Crow understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states, "Climate change is a severe threat to the planet, people, and our nation. Congress must act to reduce carbon pollution and other emissions to protect against further impacts of climate change, but it must also work to help communities adapt to an already changing climate. It is essential that Congress act to address climate change because, as we have seen, presidential action alone may be undone quickly under a future administration." 100100Congressman Crow has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In 2019 the Congressman hosted a forum on the impact of climate change on public health, stating in a press release, "Community conversations like this are vital to finding solutions to the threats that climate change poses. It’s time for Congress to lead on climate change and pass legislation that will protect our communities and children.” Congressman Crow also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release announcing a provision to the National Defense Authorization Act, which would require large military installations to include assessments of climate change and mitigation efforts in their master plans, the Congressman stated, "Our military has seen firsthand the impact of climate change on national security and the first step of countering any threat is to create a baseline understanding of what we’re up against. My provision will ensure we understand the threat so we can improve our military's resiliency to global warming and the dangerous impacts of extreme weather.” Rep. Crow makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 Facebook post, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is affecting extreme weather events, public health, and our national security. It’s time for America to be a global leader and work to address climate change and reduce our carbon footprint. We need #ClimateActionNow."100Congressman Crow publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://jasoncrowforcongress.com/environment-and-energy-policy-for-americas-future/ https://crow.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-crow-hosts-forum-impact-climate-change-public-health https://crow.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-jason-crow-secures-provision-ndaa-address-national-security-threats-posed https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.facebook.com/RepJasonCrow/photos/a.2006826719432464/2704174986364297/?type=3&theater https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://crow.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-crow-votes-codify-access-reproductive-healthcare-0Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Cuellar, HenryTexas28DCongressman Henry Cuellar agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a press release supporting the Natural Gas (LEADING) Act of 2019 (H.R. 3828), the Congressman stated, "We need an economically sensible solution to reducing greenhouse emissions and fighting climate change in the United States. Carbon capture has been shown to be the best way to properly mitigate the effects of climate change, create more reliable, affordable energy, and increase economic growth." Vote Climate U.S. PAC supports several forms of Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR), not including carbon capture and sequestration, because we believe that method perpetuates the fossil fuel economy. It is not clear what form of CDR the Congressman is referring to here. 500Congressman Cuellar's website's 'Energy and Environment' page does not mention climate change. Instead it says, "The 28th Congressional District of Texas, is both the 6th largest oil producing and 4th largest natural gas producing district in the state. It includes a large portion of the Eagle Ford Shale reserves; one of the most productive natural gas fields in the country. In order to support this production, last year, Congressmen Cuellar helped secure $13 million in federal funding towards the Corpus Christi Ship Channel Improvement Project (CIP). CIP is a USACE project to expand the Port’s ship channels, allowing vessels to navigate the channel safely, meeting surging global demand for U.S. produced oil and natural gas. The Port of Corpus Christi is the largest export port of U.S. produced crude oil and is a major export hub for U.S. energy products." Congressman Cuellar demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements supporting the fossil fuel industry. 0Congressman Cuellar voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2543.75https://cuellar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404563 https://cuellar.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=3998 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.npr.org/2022/07/10/1110723295/texas-rep-henry-cuellar-is-one-democrat-who-opposes-abortion-rightsOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Davids, ShariceKansas3DCongresswoman Sharice Davids understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I agree with the overwhelming majority of scientists who recognize that climate change is real, and that we must take action now to protect our planet for future generations. According to the Weather Channel, the Kansas City-area is the fifth most vulnerable U.S. city to the dangers of climate change. We need innovative solutions to combat this crisis, grow our economy, and leave behind a healthier world for our children."100100Congressman Davids co-sponsored the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) stating, "Protecting our environment and natural resources is necessary for both our planet and our economy." in a 2021 tweet, the Congresswoman wrote "We aren't coastal or desert, but climate change & extreme weather is our reality in #KS03. It does not have to be the reality for future generations. Joining my colleagues to urge investment in clean energy, so we can leave a planet AND an economy that works for our grandkids." Congresswoman Sharice David's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Davids has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://davids.house.gov/issues/energy https://davids.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-davids-statement-passage-hr-9-climate-action-now-act https://twitter.com/RepDavids/status/1442923638211055616 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://davids.house.gov/media/in-the-news/here-s-what-kansas-city-area-elected-officials-say-about-potential-overturn-roe-vSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Davidson, WarrenOhio8RCongressman Warren Davidson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2017 town hall reported on by the Journal-News, the Congressman was quoted on climate change, stating, "And while I’m not indifferent to climate change, I’m not saying it’s a total falsity and I’m not saying it’s a certainty."00In a 2019 tweet mocking the severity of climate change, the Congressman wrote, "Manmade climate change is real. Humans are destroying America’s political climate. Mob rule is no way to defend the republic. #DefendFreedom." Congressman Davidson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Davidson makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.journal-news.com/news/davidson-isis-more-threat-than-climate-change/gSD89FAxoXGtDUu20ThJAK/ https://twitter.com/WarrenDavidson/status/1176666085963313153 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://davidson.house.gov/pro-life-and-family-issuesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Davis, DonNorth Carolina1DCongressman Davis understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Davis says "Air and water pollution and the impacts of the climate crisis often disproportionately impact our poorest families, working-class communities, and communities of color, who are more likely to live in areas where air and water pollution exceed national standards. Don will fight for eastern North Carolina's right to live in safe and healthy communities."7525Congressman Davis supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Davis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5050https://votedondavis.com/priorities/Supports RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro Climate
De La Cruz, MonicaTexas15RCongresswoman De La Cruz does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congresswoman De La Cruz demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. She has promised to "Reject radical socialist Green New Deal policies" and in a Tweet said "Socialist Radicals like AOC and Vin-Cent Gonzalez want to move to ONLY renewable energy! This WILL eliminate THOUSANDS of OIL FIELD JOBS in our district!! Say NO to unemployment and radical thinking!!"0Congresswoman De La Cruz opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2516.6667https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/188292/monica-de-la-cruzOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Dean, MadeleinePennsylvania4DCongresswoman Madeleine Dean understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her website's environment page, it states, "[She] supports legislation to boost America’s investments in renewable energy, fund green infrastructure, and reengage in global agreements to combat climate change." In a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' the Congresswoman stated, "Action on climate change is long overdue. The longer we wait, the more irreversible damage is done to our planet."75100The Congresswoman supports the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) stating in a press release, “When everyone from the Pope to the Pentagon warns us that we are in peril, it is time to act. The climate crisis is the existential threat of our time, and it is essential that we deliver thoughtful and innovative action to protect public health, advance our economy and global preeminence in green technology, and defend our national security.” Congresswoman Dean's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congresswoman Dean publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 10087.5https://dean.house.gov/issues/environment https://twitter.com/repdean/status/1301322556272717824?lang=en https://dean.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-madeleine-dean-votes-pass-climate-action-now-act https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://dean.house.gov/2022/6/congresswoman-dean-s-statement-on-the-supreme-court-s-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organization-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DeLauro, Rosa L.Connecticut3DCongresswoman DeLauro understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congresswoman stated, "The facts are clear, and there should be no debate: climate change is real. It is an urgent problem. And our country must address it. The Paris Agreement set out an ambitious plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and the United States should not withdraw from it. Left unchecked, climate change will continue to have disastrous effects on our environment, our public health, our food safety, our economy, and our national security. We cannot allow climate-deniers to set the legislative agenda any longer. The time to act is now.” In a 2024 Tweet, DeLauro said "I will continue to fight to protect our nation's environment, fight climate change, & always put people over polluters. #EarthDay."100100In a Tweet, DeLauro criticized a bill cutting funding to the EPA saying "When it comes to caring for the environment – ensuring our air is safe to breathe, our water is safe to drink, and we are resilient in a changing climate – House Republican's Environment and Interior bill takes the side of the most egregious polluters and climate-deniers." Congresswoman DeLauro's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue.75Congresswoman DeLauro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).5081.25https://delauro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/delauro-votes-block-trump-withdrawing-us-paris-climate-agreement https://x.com/rosadelauro/status/1782471283663380737 https://delauro.house.gov/issues/energy https://x.com/rosadelauro/status/1720473259219554409 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://delauro.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/delauro-votes-defend-reproductive-freedomSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DelBene, SuzanWashington1DCongresswomen Suzan DelBene understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is a serious threat to our way of life, our economy, our children, and the future of our planet and we need to address it now. Congress must do more to combat this growing and urgent existential threat. We need to continue making new investments in a green America." Congresswoman DelBene continues on, stating, "Protecting our natural resources is not only good for our environment but good for our economy as well. Here in the Northwest, sea levels are rising, our oceans are becoming more acidic and we are seeing an increase in insect outbreaks and tree diseases. This endangers our local economy – potentially costing us thousands of jobs – and threatens a way of life that is uniquely Northwest. In order to protect our environment, we must address the challenge that climate change poses without delay. Without a doubt, climate change is a serious threat to our way of life, our economy, and our children – not to mention the future of our planet – and we need to address it now. Congress can and must do more to combat this growing and urgent threat."100100Congresswoman DelBene expresses her belief in the importance of climate action, stating on her campaign website, "I believe that climate change is one of the most serious threats we face, and that we need to take the necessary steps to build a new economy based on clean and renewable energy sources and reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and foreign oil." In a 2017 press release the Congresswoman supported staying in the Paris Agreement, stating, "If President Trump withdraws from the Paris Climate Accord, it would endanger our children’s health, their futures and the planet. This reckless decision would also harm the reputation of our country, jeopardizing our role as a global leader on combating climate change." The Congresswoman also sent a tweet in 2019 on climate change, stating, "Climate change is real and without action its consequences will greatly alter our way of life." Congresswoman DelBene's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman DelBene has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://delbene.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14888 https://delbene.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1205 https://www.delbeneforcongress.com/issues/environment/ https://delbene.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1107 https://twitter.com/RepDelBene/status/1173705968443674624 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://delbene.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3160Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Deluzio, ChrisPennsylvania17DCongressman Deluzio understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the Congressman states "...to meet our climate goals to reduce carbon emissions, we need to invest in the clean energy sources of the future, protecting and creating union jobs in places like western Pennsylvania...And to get to the future where the world is free of greenhouse gas emissions – which we must do for the sake of humanity...fight for tougher environmental standards around natural gas (like methane emissions controls)... but we need natural gas in our electrical grid to provide reliable baseload power while we build out capacity for non-fossil fuel sources..."7575Congressman Deluzio's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. In a press release, Deluzio announced federal funds for climate resiliency, saying "Every Pennsylvanian should have clean air and water, period. That's why I am proud this federal grant will fund the infrastructure projects and environmental clean-ups we need to better protect the health of Western Pennsylvanians." The Congressman has a 97% lifetime score with the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a history of voting for pro-climate legislation.75 Congressman Deluzio has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5068.75https://chrisforpa.com/core-values/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/chris-deluzio https://deluzio.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-deluzio-announces-new-federal-funds-improve-public-health-climateSupports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DeSaulnier, MarkCalifornia10DCongressman Mark DeSaulnier understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his 'Energy and the Environment' page, he writes, "Congressman DeSaulnier recognizes climate change for the existential threat that it is and, beginning with his time as a member of the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), he has been a proud champion of policies that promote sustainability, protect the environment, and mitigate the harmful effects of climate change. He is a firm believer that the challenges of climate change also present enormous opportunity and strong, forward-looking energy and environmental policy will be a key driver of growth, innovation, and competitiveness. While fueling economic growth, rigorous environmental protections will protect the health of all Californians."100100Congressman DeSaulnier has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2021 press release, the Congressman introduced the 'Jobs for a Carbon Free Transportation System Act' (H.R. 5896), "landmark legislation to help transition our economy off fossil fuels to cleaner, renewable energy while simultaneously supporting workers, communities, and state and local governments." Congressman DeSaulnier also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2019 Lamorinda Weekly article, the Congressman hosted a climate change town hall, where he stated, "The costs of not responding to climate change must be approached from an economic standpoint. We must not weaken our goals to slow down climate change, but aspire to save the planet for future generations." Rep. DeSaulnier makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal. The Green New Deal is a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congressman DeSaulnier publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2018 version of the DeSaulnier's Digest, regarding the anti-carbon tax resolution in the U.S. House, the Congressman stated, “A carbon tax has the potential to be an important tool for fighting climate change, and the Republican resolution is counterproductive." The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 100100https://desaulnier.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://desaulnier.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-desaulnier-introduces-landmark-legislation-support-workers https://www.lamorindaweekly.com/archive/issue1314/DeSaulnier-discusses-climate-change-and-environment-at-Town-Hall.html https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://desaulnier.house.gov/media-center/desaulnier-digest/update-mark-s-trip-us-mexico-border https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://desaulnier.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-desaulnier-host-virtual-town-hall-fight-protectSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
DesJarlais, ScottTennessee4RCongressman Scott DesJarlais does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman DesJarlais demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. On the Congressman's website's 'Energy and Infrastructure section, DesJarlais states, "In Congress, I have voted to permit new pipeline construction, authorize international gas exports, and protect dependable energy, such as coal and nuclear, so important to Tennessee. Supplying our allies with American-made energy helps cement alliances." In a press release with other House Republicans, DesJarlais said "Domestic energy, manufacturing jobs, economic growth and optimism are finally returning because of tax cuts and lighter regulation. We cannot allow an extreme, far-left agenda to destroy the progress this country is making.”0Congressman DesJarlais opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://desjarlais.house.gov/issues/energy-infrastructure https://desjarlais.house.gov/2019/5/rep-scott-desjarlais-fights-socialist-agenda-in-congress https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Dexter, MaxineOregon3DRepresentative Maxine Dexter understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "The climate crisis is fueling an onslaught of dirty air, and it's making our communities sick. As the first and only lung doctor in Congress, I know we can't separate climate policy from public health. The climate crisis is a public health emergency." On Dexter's congressional website, she states: "The climate crisis is an existential threat. Oregonians know all too well how climate-fueled disasters can wreak havoc on our communities, from deadly wildfires to extreme freezes."100100Representative Maxine Dexter has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In Congress, she introduced a bill that would require the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to declare climate change a public health emergency. "As a mother, I’ve seen the escalating anxiety my children have lived with and internalized as they grow up on an increasingly unlivable planet... Every child deserves clean air, clean water, and the promise of a safe future. The climate crisis is not a distant threat—it’s a public health emergency, and it demands a full-scale, whole-of-government response. The first step is telling the truth about what we’re facing," Dexter said in a press release announcing the bill. Representative Maxine Dexter also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On her campaign website, she laid out her plans to fight climate change, including: "Pass a Green New Deal to create more high-quality, good-paying jobs for Oregonians. Transition to 100% clean electricity nationwide to decarbonize our economy. Invest immediately in the development of 'smart' transmission grids, especially in areas where renewable energy is being created to move green energy to places where it’s needed... Rapidly expand the availability of electric vehicle charging stations. Ban new development of fossil fuel infrastructure both on public lands and offshore." Furthermore, Dexter strongly opposed the rescission of the EPA's greenhouse gas endangerment finding, saying: "The endangerment finding is basically saying that these greenhouse gases that were named in this settlement impact people’s health. They endanger their health. And based upon that, we can regulate greenhouse gas emissions, even though it’s not the particulate matter, soot, that used to be what was regulated. Taking that away eliminates most of the enforcement that we can have on industry, polluters across this nation. It is the largest sweeping undermining of environmental protection law that has ever happened in this country." Representative Maxine Dexter makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Maxine Dexter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://x.com/RepDexterOR/status/2078116520467599855 https://dexter.house.gov/issues https://dexter.house.gov/media/press-releases/dexter-champions-landmark-legislation-declare-climate-crisis-public-health https://maxinefororegon.com/issue/fight-climate-change-and-protect-our-environment/ https://www.opb.org/article/2026/02/13/maxine-dexter-immigration-policy-detention-climate-policy/ https://x.com/doctormaxine/status/1801721277993955701Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Diaz-Balart, MarioFlorida26RCongressman Mario Diaz-Balart disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2017 E&E article, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "It's more of a religion... on both sides of the issue. I don't play that game. My issue is, 'All right, what is the problem that you're trying to solve?' and 'Does it solve it?'"00Congressman Diaz-Balart was an advocate of the Keystone XL pipeline, stating, "The House has once again acted on a bipartisan basis to pass legislation to approve the Keystone XL Pipeline, which will create thousands of jobs, move the United States closer to energy independence and strengthen our national security. This project will contribute billions of dollars to communities across the nation and bolster our economy." In a 2023 press conference, Diaz-Balart said that "there simply is no justification for spending billions more on a failing, inflated, and economically harmful climate change agenda led by clueless bureaucrats at the United Nations.” Congressman Diaz-Balart demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Diaz-Balart opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060054524 https://mariodiazbalart.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/diaz-balart-votes-to-approve-keystone-pipeline https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mariodiazbalart.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/diaz-balart-statement-scotus-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Dingell, DebbieMichigan6DCongresswoman Dingell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her 'Environment & Climate Change' page, the Congresswoman said "For decades, the science and our understanding of climate change has been growing, but it is clear, it is an urgent, existential threat we all face. Sea levels are rising, temperatures are warming, and extreme weather is intensifying and becoming more frequent. The time to act on climate change is now and strong US leadership on the world’s stage is needed."100100Congresswoman Dingell has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "The time is now – not tomorrow, not next year – to address climate change. The Paris Agreement takes real steps to slow down our changing climate and ensures the United States stays a leader in addressing one of our most critical global threats,” Rep. Dingell also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 speech on the House floor, the Congresswoman stated, "Weather events are getting more severe. Hurricanes and wildfires cause more damage each year, and extreme cold and heat waves more common. Climate change is changing the world around us causing mass displacement and global health crises caused by continuing sea-level rise and increasing annual temperatures." Rep. Dingell makes climate change a top priority issue. In December 2019, the Congresswoman introduced The National Climate Bank Act of 2019, which would publicly finance and stimulate private investment in clean, renewable energy and emissions reduction projects. 100Congresswoman Dingell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://debbiedingell.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=16223 https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1708 https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1985 https://debbiedingell.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2024 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2022/05/14/congresswomen-dingell-stabenow-speak-abortion-rally-university-michigan/9751811002/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Downing, TroyMontana2RRepresentative Troy Downing does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He does not say whether or not he believes in climate change, but he is a staunch advocate for the fossil fuel industry, and in particular, coal. On his website, he writes that he "support[s] an all-of-the-above energy approach, but fossil fuels are an abundant and cost-efficient energy source. Coal-fired power plants provide the largest share of electricity generation in Montana. Reliable and cheap energy means more money in the pockets of hardworking Montanans." In 2025, Downing even brought a piece of coal to the white house, writing on Twitter: "President Trump brought coal to the @WhiteHouse and so did I! Pulled this out of the ground myself at Signal Peak two weeks ago."250Representative Troy Downing demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Representative Downing introduced a resolution disapproving and removing the Bureau of Land Management’s 2024 Miles City Resource Management Plan Amendment (RMPA). In a press release, he said: "Montana’s Second Congressional District keeps the lights on in the Treasure State... Under the Biden Administration, Montana energy production took a direct hit when an outright ban on coal leasing in the Powder River Basin went into effect. I’m proud to lead this CRA in the House to reverse this disastrous management plan amendment that threatens access to affordable, reliable energy and investment in the communities I represent." In response to the Department of Interior’s approval of the mining plan modification for the Bull Mountains coal mine, Downing said in a press release: "Since my first day in office, I have been fighting to protect Montana’s Beautiful Clean Coal industry... I applaud Secretary Burgum for taking swift action to unleash the Treasure State’s energy production and provide certainty for my constituents. Looking forward, I will continue to advocate for passage of the Crow Revenue Act to ensure Bull Mountains’ future is not left to the progressive whims of activist judges or future administrations."0Representative Troy Downing has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://downing.house.gov/issues/energy https://x.com/RepTroyDowning/status/1909723656365711437 https://downing.house.gov/media/press-releases/downing-daines-sheehy-zinke-introduce-bicameral-resolution-removing-harmful https://downing.house.gov/media/press-releases/downing-applauds-approval-bull-mountains-mining-plan-modification https://x.com/RepTroyDowning/status/2069883789413621886Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Elfreth, SarahMaryland3DRepresentative Sarah Elfreth understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In April of 2026, Elfreth posted on Facebook: "Since coming to Washington and the House Natural Resources Committee, I have fought for our planet, our Bay, and (of course) our blue crabs each and every day. I’m committed to working with my colleagues to protect our beautiful natural treasures, pass science-backed legislation, and tackle climate change head-on." On her website, she writes: "As the Vice Ranking Member of the Natural Resources Committee, Congresswoman Elfreth is determined to combat the climate crisis by leading meaningful action in environmental restoration and protection and moving America toward a clean energy economy."100100Representative Sarah Elfreth has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Elfreth vocally opposed FEMA cuts to grants for climate resilient infrastructure. "When we talk about government cuts to environmental programs, I will caution that rising seas don’t care who is in the White House. The water doesn’t care how a small town that experiences 90 days of flooding or more a year voted in the last election. Flooding will continue to devastate communities, even if the President does not believe in climate change," said Elfreth. Representative Sarah Elfreth also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In 2025, on Twitter she wrote: "In the midst of increasingly extreme weather events, the need for Environmental Protection Agency guidance is more important than ever. President Trump’s EPA is prioritizing the monetary gain of fossil fuels over the health and safety of our communities. The devastating effects of climate change can't be ignored, which is why I’ll continue to fight for environmental protection and preservation for #MD03 and beyond." She also joined other Maryland Democrats in writing a letter to the EPA to keep its 2009 greenhouse gas endangerment finding. The letter states: "We are deeply concerned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposal to eliminate the 2009 Endangerment Finding and what that will mean for Maryland and our constituents’ health and safety. The Endangerment Finding requires the EPA to protect people from the pollution that causes climate change. Denying the danger cannot change the facts: greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels are heating our planet and endangering us all." Representative Sarah Elfreth makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Sarah Elfreth has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://www.facebook.com/SarahforMD/posts/happy-earth-day-md03-since-coming-to-washington-and-the-house-natural-resources-/1331550055453985/ https://elfreth.house.gov/issues/environment https://elfreth.house.gov/media/press-releases/elfreth-calls-out-elimination-femas-building-resilient-infrastructure-and https://x.com/RepSarahElfreth/status/1900233905397260456 https://elfreth.house.gov/media/press-releases/elfreth-joins-maryland-delegation-urging-epa-not-abandon-efforts-combat https://elfreth.house.gov/issues/reproductive-freedomsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Ellzey, JakeTexas6RCongressman Jake Ellzey does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Jake Ellzey demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to the League of Conservation Voters, Ellzey has continuously voted against bills that promote climate action.0Congressman Ellzey opposes or vote against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/jake-ellzey https://www.ellzeyfortexas.com/issues https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/147592/jake-ellzey/2/abortion https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Emmer, TomMinnesota6RCongressman Emmer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 SC Times article, at a town hall, "Another [voter] asked Emmer whether the GOP would acknowledge climate change and do something about it. 'Why don't we agree we should leave this place in as good a condition as we found it,'" Emmer said, and mentioned proposals to clean plastic from waterways and plant a trillion trees."250In a 2019 press release supporting President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Emmer stated, "While other nations like China and India are increasing emissions, the United States has shouldered the burden of increased energy costs and the loss of American jobs by their participation in this agreement. America, and especially my home state of Minnesota has been leading the way to reduce emissions... I applaud President Trump and his Administration for officially withdrawing, and for responsibly advancing America's interests." According to a 2020 SC Times article, at a town hall, "When asked about supporting renewable energy, Emmer said 'all energy sources are important,'" and we should use any that make economic sense." Congressman Emmer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Emmer makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Congressman Emmer co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://www.sctimes.com/story/news/2020/02/21/military-trump-and-climate-change-put-rep-tom-emmer-foley-town-hall/4799098002/ https://emmer.house.gov/2019/11/au-revoir-paris-climate-accord https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.mprnews.org/story/2022/10/05/voter-guide-see-6th-district-candidates-stances-on-guns-abortion-more Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Escobar, VeronicaTexas16DCongresswoman Veronica Escobar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a January 2020 Tweet, the Congresswoman wrote, "Climate change is an urgent global crisis that demands a strong and swift response. As Congress continues to push for ambitious climate action, we must also ensure we harness foreign policy to combat this threat and protect our planet for future generations."100100Congresswoman Escobar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the Congresswoman's website, she states, "I was proud to sponsor the Department of Defense Climate Resiliency and Readiness Act to ensure that one of the largest producers of greenhouse gasses prioritizes necessary developments in renewable technologies, builds on the success of NetZero pilots, and makes judicious use of taxpayer dollars. I also introduced the Targeting Environmental and Climate Recklessness Act (TECRA), to modernize the use of sanctions - a key foreign policy tool - to meet one of our most pressing global challenges: climate change." Congresswoman Escobar also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Tweet, the Congresswoman wrote, "This is the consequence of climate change—and our shameful unwillingness to make the sacrifices and changes necessary to slow it down. Too late to stop it, but never too late to act to try to slow it down some. Oh, what tragedy our children have inherited." Rep. Escobar makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2019 press release, "Congresswoman Escobar successfully added two amendments to the NDAA that will make our military more adept at mitigating climate change." 100Congresswoman Escobar publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Escobar co-sponsored the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R. 763). The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://twitter.com/RepEscobar/status/1217942440264585216 https://escobar.house.gov/issues/energy/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/2759 https://twitter.com/vgescobar/status/939644562368118784 https://escobar.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-veronica-escobar-applauds-passage-ndaa-securing-wins-el-paso https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://escobar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=952Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Estes, RonKansas4RThe Congressman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In a 2019 press release on the Paris Agreement and the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "Both the Paris Agreement and Green New Deal would cost our country trillions of dollars and impact millions of American jobs... The Green New Deal is projected to cost $93 trillion." Congressman Estes demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Estes opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke which expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://estes.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1867 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://estes.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3534Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Evans, GabeColorado8RRepresentative Gabe Evans does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He does not clearly state whether or not he believes in man-made climate change, and argues for "supporting oil, gas, nuclear, renewables, and new technologies to better the entirety of American energy production," according to his website.250Representative Gabe Evans demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Evans took a hard stance against lawsuits attempting to hold oil and gas companies accountable for climate change, saying: "These lawsuits and regulations aren't just attacks on oil and gas companies — they're attacks on Colorado jobs, American energy independence and every family already struggling with higher costs." Furthermore, Evans argues for an all of the above approach to energy, particularly focusing on Colorado's oil and gas production. In an op-ed, he writes "Colorado is the fourth largest oil-producing state, accounting for nearly 4% of U.S. crude, and the eighth largest natural gas producer, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Weld County alone accounts for about 83% of Colorado’s oil production and over half of the state’s gas. We’re a traditional energy leader, and we’re proud of it."0Representative Gabe Evans has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://gabeevans.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop-urges-scotus-reject-war-american-energy-say-would-hit-families-wallets https://gabeevans.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-evans-op-ed-makes-case-colorado-be-national-example-american https://www.axios.com/local/denver/2024/10/09/abortion-gabe-evans-yadira-caraveo-colorado-8th-district Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ezell, MikeMississippi4RCongressman Ezell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Ezell demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Ezell advocates for increased domestic fuel production and supports cutting oil industry regulations. 0Congressman Ezell opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://www.mikeezell.ms/issues/protect-our-unborn-children https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/277/mike-ezell/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fallon, PatTexas4RCongressman Pat Fallon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In an April 2021 tweet posted in 2021, Congressman Fallon wrote "@AOC claims fossil fuel infrastructure and "climate-denying politicians" in Texas caused the 2021 power crisis. But according to @DallasFed, electricity generation started to fail when AOC's beloved wind turbines froze. Stop lying about Texas @AOC." In another April 2021 tweet, the congressman wrote "Democrats across the country say their definition of "infrastructure" includes: -Universal Pre-K -Climate Action -Climate Justice -Eradicating Right to Work Environments -Caregiving -Affordable Housing -Police Accountability -Paid Leave THIS AIN’T INFRASTRUCTURE!" Congressman Pat Fallon demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Fallon opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://twitter.com/RepPatFallon/status/1385345746954825732 https://twitter.com/reppatfallon/status/1385029338496741381 https://fallon.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-fallon-issues-statement-supreme-court-decision https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fedorchak, JulieNorth Dakota1RRepresentative Julie Fedorchak disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2025 virtual town hall, Fedorchak was asked if she believed in climate change. According to the Grand Forks Herald, Fedorchak replied that the climate "has been changing since the beginning of time," but acknowledged rising carbon dioxide emissions. The answer lies in policy that protects North Dakota's energy industries, like coal production, Fedorchak said. She is also a prominent supporter of continued fossil fuel use. In 2024, she tweeted: "Americans often take abundant energy resources for granted, but the industry is far from easy. Local companies in North Dakota’s oil and gas sector showcase the courage, innovation, and resourcefulness behind it all. Had great visits with WellPro, Chord, and GO Wireline this week."00Representative Fedorchak has consistently opposed climate action. Fedorchak joined House Republicans in passing three Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolutions to reverse Biden administration regulations on American energy production. In a press release, she stated: "These rules are yet another example of the Biden administration putting radical climate ideology ahead of American energy security, manufacturing jobs, and families trying to make ends meet... I voted to reverse this regulatory overreach and help lower costs, protect American jobs, and make sure our energy producers can power our country without unnecessary red tape." In a tweet, she wrote: "@HouseGOP is slamming the brakes on the Biden administration's dangerous and expensive energy agenda. Importantly, the One Big Beautiful Bill repeals over $500 BILLION in radical Green New Deal style spending." Fedorchak made her support for fossil fuels a large part of her campaign, saying on her website that she has supported "Standing up to the Obama Administration Over the Dakota Access Pipeline" and "Fighting Against Over-Regulation of the Coal Industry From the Biden Administration." In a speech addressing the North Dakota State House, Fedorchak said: "AI requires vast computing power, which means it requires abundant, reliable, and affordable energy. North Dakota should lead these efforts. We have more gas in the Bakken than we can use. Let’s turn it into electricity, power AI computing at sites near the gas source, and make more room in our pipelines for additional gas production. This will grow our production, solve our gas challenge, create a new industry, and help America lead in AI. I’m leading a working group in the House to focus on the energy needs of AI," according to a press release. Representative Julie Fedorchak demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Julie Fedorchak makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Fedorchak opposed a methane emissions tax, saying: "This tax hurts energy producers who are already doing it right. American energy is the cleanest in the world, and we’re leading the way in emissions reductions through innovation, technology, and free-market principles—not heavy-handed federal mandates. American energy solutions are clean energy solutions, proving that we don’t have to choose between unleashing production and a clean environment—we can have both."00https://web.archive.org/web/20250326034836/https:/www.grandforksherald.com/news/north-dakota/rep-julie-fedorchak-says-trump-is-doing-what-north-dakota-elected-him-to-do-in-virtual-town-hall https://x.com/fedorchak4ND/status/1844046958379577770 https://fedorchak.house.gov/media/press-releases/fedorchak-supports-three-cras-overturn-biden-administrations-extreme-energy https://x.com/RepFedorchak/status/1937535185551065170 https://fedorchaknd.com/ https://fedorchak.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-julie-fedorchak-challenges-north-dakota-lead-ai-revolution https://fedorchak.house.gov/media/press-releases/fedorchak-votes-overturn-punitive-natural-gas-tax-north-dakotas-energy https://northdakotamonitor.com/2024/04/04/fedorchak-voices-support-for-federal-abortion-ban-as-she-campaigns-for-us-house/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fields, CleoLouisiana6DRepresentative Cleo Fields does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Representative Fields does not publicly state whether or not he believes in man-made climate change, often focusing on resiliency and disaster relief. In response to Trump administration plans to cut AmeriCorps funding, Fields wrote in a press release: "The communities of Louisiana—and indeed the nation—rely on AmeriCorps to strengthen civic engagement, reduce poverty, and respond to disasters. Now more than ever, we cannot afford to abandon this mission or the thousands of members who have pledged to serve."25100Representative Cleo Fields does not oppose climate action. However, he supports continued production of fossil fuels. Representative Fields visited an oil rig with Representative Steve Scalise and other Republicans, and said: "This rig must operate in a prudent and economically, environmentally responsible way, and no one should back up on that. I'm certainly not. But we also have to be realistic; the production of oil and natural gas is a necessity for our communities." While he was a state senator, Fields proposed multible bills that rewuired greater pollution monitoring from petrochemical plants, saying that "[p]eople have a right to know what they breathe.” Fields has also supported greater funding for climate resiliency and relief. After reports that President Trump was going to cut funding for FEMA, Fields wrote in a press release: "FEMA is on the ground for every hurricane in Louisiana. Cuts to the organization would devastate the most vulnerable people in our state during some of the worse moments in their life. Congress, across party lines, needs to do everything in our power to protect FEMA funding."25Representative Cleo Fields has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://fields.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-cleo-fields-and-rep-troy-carter-write-president-trump-doge-eliminating https://www.wdsu.com/article/louisiana-steve-scalise-politicians-tour-oil-rig-energy-challenges/71003975 https://www.nola.com/news/environment/air-pollution-monitoring-bill-advances-in-louisiana-senate/article_14d8862a-e461-11ed-b103-1f709cb355aa.html https://fields.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-fields-and-rep-carter-lead-response-reports-trump-administration-seekingUnclear Position on RoeN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Figures, ShomariAlabama2DCongressman Shomari Figures agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to Inside Climate News, Figures did not focus on climate in his campaign, but did say that he would support limited action to address climate change. "Climate change is real... I think the people down in Florida can certainly vouch for it... These storms are becoming more frequent, they are becoming more powerful, they are causing more damage and our policies have to reflect the reality of that and the human contribution to climate change. And so, I think at the end of the day it’s important that we stand up for it and there’s a way to do it that is responsible, that is informed and that is narrowly tailored to address the concerns," stated Figures during a debate. However, Figures prioritizes other issues, like healthcare and education over climate action, and does not mention climate change on his campaign website.50100Congressman Shomari Figures does not oppose climate action. According to a press release from his congressional office, Figures introduced the The Offshore Parity Act which "would extend the boundaries of Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi to nine nautical miles, providing greater access to energy and marine resources and increasing state-level control." According to the act, the energy in question is "oil, gas and other energy activities." However, Figures did vote pro-climate on the four highlighted votes.25Congressman Shomari Figures has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5056.25https://insideclimatenews.org/news/09112024/climate-champions-set-to-enter-congress/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRns32CYMDI?t=51m27s https://www.figuresforcongress.com/issues https://figures.house.gov/media/press-releases/figures-ezell-carter-higgins-introduce-bipartisan-offshore-parity-act-expand https://ezell.house.gov/uploadedfiles/ezell_offshore_parity_act.pdf https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/caroleene-dobson-shomari-figures-clash-health-care-economy-montgomery-debateSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Fine, RandyFlorida6RRepresentative Randy Fine disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, he has consistently opposed climate action. In 2021, while in the Florida legislature, he said: "The fact of the matter is that climate has changed for billions of years. Florida used to be underwater. We (Florida) are less than 1% of the entire world’s carbon emissions."250Representative Fine has worked against meaningful action on climate change. On Twitter, he wrote: "Democrats fight for DEI and woke climate ideology. Republicans fight for lowering your taxes and the price of gas. We are not the same." In another post, he stated: "The Working Family Tax Cut delivers on President @realDonaldTrump’s America First agenda. This Bill:... ❌Repeals the Green New Scam." On his congressional website, he says: "End the Green New Scam: Stop Democrats’ radical climate agenda that destroys jobs and instead give the Department of Homeland Security the resources it needs to secure our border and carry out the deportations Americans voted for." Representative Randy Fine demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Randy Fine has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://floridapolitics.com/archives/410233-florida-house-panel-moves-two-sea-level-rise-measures-but-not-without-debate/ https://x.com/RepFine/status/2071995648526692599 https://x.com/RepFine/status/1963652950829490200 https://fine.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14891 https://cbs12.com/news/local/abortion-debate-heating-up-in-floridaOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AN/A
Finstad, BradMinnesota1RCongressman Brad Finstad does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about climate change in an interview with a local newspaper, he addressed agricultural problems without mentioning climate change a single time.250Congressman Finstad does not oppose climate action. Congressman Finstad supports an all of the above climate strategy plan. In an opinion piece, he wrote, "We need an “all of the above” strategy for energy solutions. I’m proud to say as a family farmer from New Ulm the agricultural community has been on the forefront of this effort through ethanol and biofuels production."25Congressman Finstad opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 esolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2527https://www.dglobe.com/news/local/district-1-congressional-candidates-weigh-in-on-everything-from-roe-v-wade-to-immigration-and-climate-change https://www.postbulletin.com/opinion/letters/brad-finstad-we-need-to-address-the-energy-crisis https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fischbach, Michelle Minnesota7RCongresswoman Michelle Fischbach does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250According to a February 2021 press release, "Fischbach, a member of the House Agriculture Committee, plans to voice support for ethanol and soy diesel during discussions about climate change, she said. “Those are sources we’re already using; we have to make sure that we don’t neglect those in favor of solar and wind,” Fischbach said." In an April 2021 press release, "Fischbach said she hopes to hear more from farmers and work on issues directly important to them, as opposed to broader issues like climate change." Later in the press release, Congresswoman Michelle Fischbach stated 'If we are going to do these things with climate change and make these changes, I don’t want to see us doing things like the California emissions standards,'” Fischbach said. Other measures like biofuels need to be supported as part of the solution, she said." Congresswoman Fischbach demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Fischbach opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://fischbach.house.gov/in-the-news?ContentRecord_id=059891B1-66CD-4C7B-88A2-4BD412AF71F8 https://fischbach.house.gov/in-the-news?ContentRecord_id=AD38A3C7-D61C-4614-9B4D-1AAFD6717141 https://fischbach.house.gov/2022/6/rep-fischbach-reacts-to-supreme-court-decision-on-dobbs-v-jackson https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fitzgerald, Scott Wisconsin5RCongressman Scott Fitzgerald does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the 'Milwaukee Journal Sentinel' in 2019, "Asked if climate change was a significant global threat, Fitzgerald said the issue 'deserves a lot more scrutiny.' 'I know that certainly the scientific community has said there are indicators, definitely something going on. But at this point, I don't know if we can draw any hard conclusions on the issue,' he said."250In 2021, Congressman Fitzgerald voted in favor of the Keystone XL Pipeline Construction and Jobs Preservation Act, "a bill to authorize the Keystone XL Pipeline. Congressman Scott Fitzgerald demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Fitzgerald opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2019/09/17/longtime-state-senate-leader-scott-fitzgerald-announces-bid-congress/2346564001/ https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1299297 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepFitzgerald/status/1131739311941009408 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fitzpatrick, BrianPennsylvania1RCongressman Brian Fitzpatrick understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to the Congressman's website, he states, "Climate change and the irresponsible management of our resources put a strain on the health of our communities—and our children...That is why I have been fighting hard for these priorities during my time in Congress." It continues, "Congress can and must do more to combat climate change and rebuild our crumbling infrastructure. We don’t need to choose between clean energy and economic growth, or between combating climate change and creating jobs. We can and should do both." 7575Congressman Fitzpatrick has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a Philadelphia Inquirer op-ed written in 2020 on bipartisan action on climate change, the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is already costing our economy through increased flooding, more severe storms, and devastating droughts. Delaware and Pennsylvania’s 1st Congressional district are about 40 miles apart, but they both border the Delaware River and are home to communities, including Levittown and Wilmington, that are at significant risk of damaging floods in the near future." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 speech on the House floor on climate change, the Congressman stated, "It is critical in order to preserve public health the reality is climate change is real and humans are a contributing factor Congress must take serious and reasonable steps to combat it." Rep. Fitzpatrick makes climate change a top priority issue as well. The Congressman condemned the President's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, stating, "Every nation will be affected by climate change, which is why nearly every country agreed to work to reduce carbon emissions in the Paris Climate Accords. The people in my district remain committed to pursuing bipartisan solutions to address climate change and protect our environment which is why I voted yes on HR 9."100Congressman Fitzpatrick publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). The Congressman introduced the Modernizing America with Rebuilding to Kickstart the Economy of the Twenty-first Century with a Historic Infrastructure-Centered Expansion (MARKET) Act (H.R. 4520), which imposes a tax on the greenhouse gas emissions of fossil fuels, certain industrial processes, and certain product uses.10079.5https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/2021/5/reps-fitzpatrick-carbajal-re-introduce-market-choice-act https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/op-ed-it-s-time-bipartisan-support-combating-climate-change-and-rebuilding https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vaBKEfRURRU https://fitzpatrick.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/fitzpatrick-statement-paris-climate-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4520 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.buckscountycouriertimes.com/story/news/local/2022/06/24/roe-v-wade-abortion-pennsylvania-bucks-county-congressman-brian-fitzpatrick-ashley-ehasz/65363272007/Opposes RoePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Fleischmann, ChuckTennessee3RCongressman Chuck Fleischmann does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250On Congressman Fleischmann's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "The United States possesses immense oil and natural gas reserves that are completely unused. Increasing our energy independence can and should be done in a responsible manner that will not unnecessarily drive up energy costs or jeopardize economic growth." Congressman Fleischmann demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Fleischmann opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://fleischmann.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://fleischmann.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-fleischmann-statement-on-us-supreme-court-s-decision-in-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health-organizationOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Flood, MikeNebraska1RRepresentative Mike Flood does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Representative Mike Flood demonstrates a lack of leadership with the lack of public statements, advocacy and vetoing of pro climate bills. On his website, he touts his achievements in paving "the way for state approval of the Keystone XL pipeline, helping secure America's energy future and defeating the left-wing, environmentalist radicals who fought to stop it in the Legislature."0Congressman Flood opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://mikefloodfornebraska.com/about/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fong, VinceCalifornia20RRepresentative Fong does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Representative Fong demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Fong, along with Rep. David Valadao, signed a letter to Governor Newsom asking he rethink his plan to phase out oil extraction in California by 2045. He also has a history of voting against climate action, with an 8% 2023 score by the California Environment Voters.0Representative Fong has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5025https://www.bakersfield.com/news/valadao-fong-sign-letter-calling-on-newsom-to-back-off-oil-industry/article_5c8b027e-4a25-11ef-90ce-13cd01f27488.html https://envirovoters.org/scorecard/representative/vince-fong/ https://www.kget.com/news/local-news/local-lawmakers-and-leaders-respond-to-roe-v-wade-decision/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Foster, BillIllinois11DCongressman Foster understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "We know that climate change is real and largely man-made. While some politicians claim it’s a hoax, most experts believe we will begin to see very significant economic, political, and social consequences from climate change if we do not act now. I support sound economic policies that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and protect our environment for the next generation."100100Congressman Foster has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to Naperville Community Television, in 2019 the Congressman hosted a climate change forum, where he was quoted stating, "The time for action is now. That we’ve spent decades debating this, we’ve been spending decades lowering the scientific uncertainty to the point where it’s absolutely clear that it’s passed time to take action.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On his campaign website, the Congressman states, "We must aggressively combat climate change, reduce our dependence on foreign oil and promote cleaner and more economical sources of energy. In the near term we must do what we can, within the bounds of what is economically sensible and technically feasible, to begin making progress in these efforts. In the longer term, we must develop new energy technologies that have the best chance of succeeding in the market place." Rep. Foster makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release regarding the U.S. decision to re-join the Paris Climate Agreement, the Congressman stated, "I applaud President Biden acting on Day One to rejoin the historic Paris Climate Agreement. This sends a clear message to the world that American leadership is back. We will not abdicate our responsibility to help protect the planet for future generations, and we will employ our nation’s scientific infrastructure to tackle the challenge of climate change.”"100Congressman Foster has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://foster.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://foster.house.gov/media/in-the-news/representatives-host-climate-change-forum https://billfoster.com/issue/energy-that-is-safe-secure-and-affordable/ https://foster.house.gov/media/press-releases/foster-statement-on-rejoining-paris-climate-agreement https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://foster.house.gov/media/press-releases/foster-statement-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Foushee, ValerieNorth Carolina4DCongresswoman Foushee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, Foushee said "The climate crisis is one of the most pressing issues of our lifetime—and it disproportionately impacts the most vulnerable among us." On her campaign website, it said "Valerie believes that we must do more to protect our planet for our children and the generations to come. She supports increased environmental regulations and funding for the EPA and increased investments into green transit. She knows that we must reduce our dependence on coal and oil and prioritize more sustainable alternatives like solar and wind energy."100100Congresswoman Foushee has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On her campaign website she voices support for creating a Green New Deal, which she also called for in cosponsoring H.Res.319. In a Tweet, Foushee said "Modernizing the federal procurement process to consider climate-related risks is long overdue. At yesterday’s @HouseScience Investigations and Oversight Subcommittee Hearing, I discussed the importance of greenhouse gas emissions transparency for federal contractors."100Congresswoman Foushee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://valeriefoushee.com/issues https://twitter.com/ValerieFoushee/status/1649129531746181121 https://www.congress.gov/member/valerie-foushee/F000477?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://twitter.com/ValerieFoushee/status/1704940802361655563 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Foxx, VirginiaNorth Carolina5RCongresswoman Virginia Foxx disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Foxx criticized climate activists who “think that we, human beings, have more impact on the climate and the world than God does.”00IRep. Foxx was a supporter of the Keystone Pipeline, and spoke out against the Paris Climate Accord. In a 2019 interview, she said "The Paris climate accord doesn’t do anything to move us in the right direction globally." According to the League of Conservation Voters, Foxx has a dismal lifetime climate score, extremely rarely making a pro-environment vote. Congresswoman Foxx demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congresswoman Foxx opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.huffpost.com/entry/climate-change-facts-myths_n_846255 https://foxx.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398625 https://www.mtairynews.com/news/73652/foxx-defends-climate-vote-at-outdoor-event https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://foxx.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=400077 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/virginia-foxxOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Frankel, LoisFlorida23DCongresswoman Lois Frankel understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website it states, "Climate change is the most immediate and pressing challenge globally, nationally, and locally right here in South Florida. We are already seeing the consequences with stronger hurricanes, higher temperatures, more frequent flooding, and beach erosion."100100As a member of the Energy & Water Appropriations subcommittee, the Congresswoman fought for $250 million in funding for Everglades Restoration, stating in a 2019 press release, "This bill will also increase the funding for renewable and energy efficiency programs critical to fighting climate change and reducing our carbon emissions as we strive to make our nation carbon neutral by 2050." In a 2019 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, "If we don’t do something about #climatechange, extreme weather will have an impact on every Floridian. On our public health, our agriculture, our unique environment & wildlife." Rep. Frankel makes climate change a top priority issue as well. Her website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Frankel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://frankel.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=574 https://frankel.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3145 https://twitter.com/reploisfrankel/status/1100863141250883585?lang=bg https://loisfrankelforcongress.com/environment/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://frankel.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3456Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Franklin, ScottFlorida18RCongressman Scott Franklin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. A 2020 article from 'The Ledger' states that "Franklin said the climate seems to be changing, but he said he isn’t convinced human activity is the driving factor."00In the 2020 Candidate Questionnaire from the Florida Conference of Catholic Bishops, Congressman Scott Franklin wrote "I believe American innovation and entrepreneurship will help us solve the environmental and climate challenges we face. I am concerned about investing taxpayer dollars in specific businesses or research initiatives tied to renewable energy. The U.S. government should not be in the business of picking winners and losers. We must let the free market determine what solutions are effective, efficient and affordable." Congressman Scott Franklin does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Franklin opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://www.theledger.com/in-depth/news/politics/elections/2020/10/18/election-2020-franklin-cohn-battle-long-red-district-15/3670575001/ https://www.flaccb.org/documents/2020/10/franklin_scott.pdf https://franklin.house.gov/issues/agriculture https://franklin.house.gov/media/press-releases/franklin-defends-lives-unborn-votes-no-abortion-demand-until-birth-act https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Friedman, LauraCalifornia30DRepresentative Laura Friedman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. While attending COP26, Friedman was asked about the conference, saying "It's a group of the UN members who are here to negotiate with each other on a national level about how they're going to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and try to keep the world from roasting due to global warming, and of course I think all of us are hoping that they enact the strictest type of agreements that they have. Agreements that are enforceable in some way and that they have a real road map to getting us to be under two and to saving the planet, quite literally." In a tweet from 2026, Friedman writes "As Los Angeles experiences intense heat and extreme weather, it was good to be at @ClimateResolve's event alongside climate champions and brave local leaders working to advance climate resilience in our region. In Congress, I’m continuing my work to prioritize and protect our community from the impacts of climate change."100100Representative Laura Friedman has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. While in the California legislature, Friedman co-authored a bill that would have established the Polluters Pay Climate Cost Recovery Program to be administered by the California Environmental Protection Agency to require fossil fuel polluters to pay their fair share of the damage caused by the sale of their products during the time period between the 2000 and 2020 calendar years, inclusive, to relieve a portion of the burden from climate harms that is borne by California taxpayers. Representative Friedman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a tweet from 2024, Friedman wrote "I am proud of my track record on environmental issues in California. Climate Change is one of the largest challenges we face in the coming decades. There is no choice. It is a fight we must win." Representative Friedman makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Representative Laura Friedman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzlw2-xKs7A https://x.com/RepFriedmanCA/status/2045607947879800991 https://calmatters.digitaldemocracy.org/bills/ca_202320240sb1497 https://x.com/RepFriedmanCA/status/1753475124517564595 https://friedman.house.gov/standing-our-values Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Frost, MaxwellFlorida10DCongressman Frost understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, the Congressman said "The greatest challenge facing our country and the world is the climate crisis. The effects of climate disasters are compounded by already existing inequalities of class and race. Frankly, the continuity of the species depends on whether or not we transition from a carbon-dependent economy to one which is powered by green technologies and green jobs. If there is a future, it is a green future. We cannot hesitate and we cannot let big-oil, big-business, and the 1% decide our fates for us."100100The Congressman lists on his websites actions that need to be taken to tackle climate change, such as passing a Green New Deal and establishing a civilian climate corps. Frost has also taken climate action such as cosponsoring H.Con.Res.37 which expresses the sense of Congress that there is a climate emergency, and H.Res.319 calling on the creation of a Green New Deal.100Congressman Frost has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. (EXAMPLES). He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.frostforcongress.com/issues#environmentaljustice https://www.congress.gov/member/maxwell-frost/F000476?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://frost.house.gov/know-your-reproductive-rights https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Fry, RussellSouth Carolina7RCongressman Fry does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Fry opposes climate action. On his website, he voices support for an "all of the above" energy strategy. An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions.25Congressman Fry opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://russellfrysc.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RussellFrySC/status/1540342304795463682Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fulcher, RussIdaho1RCongressman Russ Fulcher disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to The Spokesman-Review, during a 2018 debate, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated that he believes, "in the cycle that’s happened since the beginning of time.” 00During a 2019 speech on the House Floor about the Green New Deal, Congressman Fulcher stated, "Over the next ten years it would eliminate the use of fossil fuels and nuclear power. This mean our gasoline-powered vehicles and instruments would be useless and there would be no air travel... The architects fail to explain how they would rebuild the economy they would decimate." Congressman Fulcher demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Rep. Fulcher makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2018/oct/29/medicaid-immigration-climate-top-idaho-1st-distric/ https://twitter.com/RepRussFulcher/status/1100463418614652930 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://fulcher.house.gov/2020/1/rep-fulcher-op-ed-after-47-years-it-s-time-congress-recognize-victims-of-abortionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Fuller, ClayGeorgia14RRepresentative Clay Fuller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, he has often opposed climate action and the green new deal. On Twitter, he wrote: "Republican leadership brought 300,000+ manufacturing jobs back to our shores in 18 months and trillions in new investments. Democrats want the Green New Deal—a catastrophe that would gut American factories. We build. They destroy."250Representative Clay Fuller opposes climate action. "Just stayed at a hotel in Maryland for work. Turns out their AC units shut off while you sleep as part of some new woke Green New Deal nonsense. It's a terrible policy that's making their state like Europe," stated Fuller on Twitter. In another post, he expressed a similar sentiment: "Heat advisories across America this week? No sweat. While Europeans roast in their government mandated green energy hell with no AC, America will remain the Land of the Free, and home of the Air Conditioned!" Representative Clay Fuller demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Clay Fuller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, he has pledged to not raise taxes while in congress.5025https://x.com/Clay4MainStreet/status/2100016431295271018 https://x.com/Clay4MainStreet/status/2045940494409052490 https://x.com/Clay4MainStreet/status/2072142054566613132 https://atr.org/clay-fuller-makes-no-new-taxes-promise-to-georgia-voters-in-us-congress/ https://x.com/Clay4MainStreet/status/1541528588335341575Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/A
Gallagher, JamesCalifornia1RRepresentative James Gallagher agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Time for bold leadership on California’s climate goals. Our plan will harden the utility grid, create healthy forests and help stop these catastrophic fires that are obliterating the state’s carbon reduction goals. Best of all, we do it without raising your PG&E bill!"500Representative Gallagher has been a consistent opponent of climate action. Gallagher introduced resolutions to make it harder to regulate emissions of ocean-going vessels. On his website, he writes that he wants to: "Expand energy production to bring prices down." Gallagher opposes a transition to clean energy, instead blaming forest fires for emissions. "Patrick Brown is saying the quiet part out loud - liberals are cherry-picking data to fit an agenda and push radical policies that drive up the cost of living. Climate change is Democrats’ excuse to avoid blame for turning our forests into tinderboxes," tweeted Gallagher. Representative James Gallagher demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative James Gallagher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5033.3333https://x.com/J_Gallagher4CA/status/1194320288021807104 https://www.djournal.com/news/national/u-s-house-advances-california-climate-recissions/article_2feaf6d2-9172-5aed-bffe-f8efce0786bc.html https://electjamesgallagher.com/ https://x.com/J_Gallagher4CA/status/1700526809115455577 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/66228Opposes RoeN/AN/AN/AN/A
Garamendi, JohnCalifornia8DCongressman Garamendi understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2022 press release for Earth Day, he stated, “There is no Planet B. On this Earth Day, I am recommitting myself to doing everything in my power to protect our air, water, and ecosystems for this generation and those to come. 2020 was tied for the hottest year on record, and recent climate reports paint a grim picture for the future of our planet if we don’t act now,” Garamendi said. “Mother nature is crying out for help, and we must all heed her warning and answer the call before the climate crisis permanently upends our lives and our world. As a public servant, I have and will continue to spend my career fighting to address the existential threat of climate change" 100100Congressman John Garamendi has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "America must take the climate crisis seriously. Congressman Garamendi is a passionate advocate for investments in clean energy, building weatherization, public transit, and biking amenities, because these are the key ways we can lower our carbon footprint." The congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a speech on the House floor, he stated, “Global warming is real. Take a look at California. We are in the midst of the fourth year of a very severe drought. You can debate whether this drought is or is not the result of climate change, but you cannot debate the fact that CO2 in our atmosphere is approaching 400 parts per million – highest it’s ever been in over 800,000 years. You cannot debate the fact that it’s a heck of a lot warmer in California in the last decade than it’s ever been in recorded time. You cannot debate the fact the snow level in California is rapidly rising up the Sierra Nevada and the Siskiyou Mountains leaving us with an ever smaller snow reservoir." Congressman Garamendi makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2022 press release announcing his support and vote for the 'Inflation Reduction Act,' he stated, "This historic legislation provides over $369 billion—the single largest investment ever—to tackle the climate crisis. With the clean energy programs funded in this bill, we will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030. This critically important funding will make the air we breathe and the water we drink cleaner and spur a once-in-a-generation investment in research and technology to mitigate the risks posed by climate change" 100Congressman Garamendi publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. Rep. Garamendi voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-garamendi-s-statement-earth-day https://garamendi.house.gov/legislative-work/issues/environment https://garamendi.house.gov/press-release/garamendi-calls-congress-address-climate-change https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/garamendi-applauds-inflation-reduction-act-s-introduction-us-senate-deliver https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://garamendi.house.gov/media/press-releases/garamendi-s-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Garbarino, AndrewNew York2RCongressman Andrew Garbarino agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote, "I believe we can address our changing climate while also protecting the economic prosperity of the United States."500Congressman Garbarino does not oppose climate action. He supports an all of the above solution, as indicated in a June 2022 tweet: "As Long Islanders continue to pay the price for Biden’s Energy Crisis, I recently traveled to Houston, TX to learn more about domestic oil and gas production and see firsthand the potential of America's energy sector. We can and must produce the energy we need here at home."25Congressman Garbarino opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2525https://garbarino.house.gov/issues/environment https://twitter.com/repgarbarino/status/1532067132032229377 https://dccc.org/vulnerable-rep-andrew-garbarino-is-complicit-in-continued-threat-to-abortion-rights/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Garcia, RobertCalifornia42DCongressman Garcia understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. His Congressional website states, "He knows that climate change is an existential threat to the safety and wellbeing of the entire global community—and that we must push to reduce our emissions and dependence on fossil fuels."100100Congressman Garcia has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He introduced the Clean Shipping Act of 2023 (H.R.4024) which would "set a path to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions from all ocean shipping companies that do business with the United States." The Congressman also cosponsored H.Res.319, calling on the federal government to create a Green New Deal. 100Congressman Garcia has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.congress.gov/member/robert-garcia/G000598?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://robertgarcia.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-robert-garcia-introduces-clean-shipping-act-address-port-pollution https://robertgarcia.house.gov/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Garcia, SylviaTexas29DCongresswoman Sylvia Garcia understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, Congresswoman Garcia states, “To mark the start of hurricane season, I introduced the Climate Change and Hurricane Correlation and Strategy Act. We know that climate change isn’t just warming the Earth, but also changing weather patterns around the globe. While we must prepare for worse hurricanes in the future, we also need to be planning on how to reduce greenhouse gases that drive climate change and ultimately greater storm intensity,”100100Congresswoman Sylvia Garcia has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to Congresswoman Garcia's website, "Congresswoman Sylvia Garcia (TX-29) issued the following statement to mark the first day of the Atlantic hurricane season and the introduction of the Climate Change and Hurricane Correlation and Strategy Act. This bill requires the Administration to produce a report to Congress every 5 years on how the United States plans to combat the increasing hurricane activity due to climate change. These reports will lay out a strategic plan on how the nation can address the causes of climate change and weather intensification. The legislation also prohibits the use of nuclear weapons for weather modification." Congresswoman Garcia makes climate change a top priority issue.100Congresswoman Garcia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://sylviagarcia.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-sylvia-garcia-issues-statement-start-hurricane-season-introduces https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sylviagarcia.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-garcias-statement-roe-v-wade-decisionSupports RoePro ClimateN/APro ClimatePro Climate
Gill, BrandonTexas26RRepresentative Brandon Gill does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Gill is a vocal opponent of climate action. He told iVoterGuide: "Forcing Americans to buy products they don't want and spending billions of dollars on green energy companies that are not profitable isn't saving the planet. It's corporate cronyism. It also makes absolutely no sense to make demands of Americans while we allow nations with much larger populations like China and India to open up new coal burning factories." In 2025, he tweeted: "It’s been a terrible day for drug cartels, pronoun tyrants, race hustlers, illegal aliens, Hamas supporters, climate alarmists, foreign enemies, useless bureaucrats, and America-hating Leftists."250Representative Gill is staunchly against climate action. Gill introduced introduced a bill to abolish the Office of Clean Energy Demonstrations (OCED), saying in a press release: "President Trump has called for an end to the Green New Scam and the globalist climate agenda that has thrived for the past four years under Democrat rule... Now, in the Golden Age, we are unleashing American energy production. OCED is a wasteful, ineffective office that has squandered billions, which is why I’m introducing legislation that would permanently shut it down." Gill is also a supporter of the fossil fuel industry. On Twitter, he wrote: "I’m proud to have the endorsement of the Oil and Gas workers Association! Drill Baby Drill!" In a congressional hearing, Gill stated: "While phasing these [Inflation Reduction Act] subsidies out, I think is a great start, I think ideally we'd repeal these immediately. We ran on repealing the Green New Deal. Every single Republican ran on repealing the Green New Deal. I think it's about time that we actually execute on that promise." Representative Brandon Gill demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Brandon Gill has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, it is unlikely that he would support a carbon fee due to his opposition to climate action.5018.75https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/78323/race/6584/election/1079 https://x.com/RepBrandonGill/status/1881744555151921556 https://gill.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-gill-bill-abolishes-globalist-climate-organization https://x.com/realBrandonGill/status/1757085017304453161 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPA1m_nVLWM https://x.com/realBrandonGill/status/1540339553386598400Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gillen, LauraNew York4DRepresentative Laura Gillen understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In 2022, she tweeted: "From more intense storms to increased flooding, the adverse effects of climate change & global warming are being felt on LI. We will invest in climate resiliency projects to protect our communities & more renewable energy to deliver reliable & affordable power. #ClimateCrisis." Also in 2022, she posted on Twitter: "I fought everyday to make our environment a priority in the Town of Hempstead & will fight even harder in Congress. Despite what many politicians still think, #GlobalWarming is reality & we need bold action to tackle the climate crisis." However, she does not make climate a priority, not writing about it on her campaign or house website.7575Representative Laura Gillen supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. Instead of focusing on climate change, her environmental policy focuses on issues like water infrastructure and weather research. She supported the Water Resources Development Act of 2026, saying: "Hurricane Sandy devastated Long Island and our communities in New York's fourth congressional district, causing billions of dollars worth of damage. As we deal with rising sea levels and stronger, more frequent storms, we must provide the coastal communities I represent with the federal resources we need to enhance our resiliency and protect our residents and our property." She also introduced two amendments to the bipartisan Weather Act Reauthorization Act, stating "I was proud to support bipartisan legislation to help improve America’s weather forecasting and strengthen emergency preparedness for coastal communities, including the South Shore of Long Island... My commonsense amendments will help coastal communities on Long Island respond to rip currents and keep America’s travelers safe in our skies. I’ll continue to work with my Science, Space and Technology colleagues on bipartisan solutions to the pressing issues we face." Although she is not a strong advocate, she did vote pro-climate in 3 of the 4 listed votes.50Representative Laura Gillen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5062.5https://x.com/LauraAGillen/status/1557777595596476416 https://x.com/LauraAGillen/status/1555328332694175745 https://gillen.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-gillen-secures-major-wins-advances-125-million-funding-long-island https://gillen.house.gov/media/press-releases/gillen-led-amendments-included-bipartisan-weather-act https://x.com/LauraAGillen/status/1830054415778156849Supports RoePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Gimenez, Carlos Florida28RCongressman Carlos Gimenez understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. Speaking about climate change in 2017 during his 'State of the County' address , the congressman said "It's not a theory. It's a fact. We live it every day." In a 2021 'Orlando Sentinel' article, Congressman Gimenez wrote "Now more than ever, it is incumbent upon all of us to invest instead in clean energy and resiliency solutions to deal with the impacts we have created and prevent the worse ones coming down the pipeline."750On his website, Congressman Gimenez states "I support an all-of-the-above approach to domestic energy production with a focus on research, and deployment of new, clean energy technologies that ensures all Americans have access to affordable and reliable energy sources." Despite claiming to understand climate change as a threat, Gimenez has consistently acted to block or spoken against climate action, including voting against numerous bipartisan climate bills. Congressman Gimenez demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Gimenez opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2525https://www.governing.com/archive/tns-miami-climate-change-gimenez.html https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/guest-commentary/os-op-carlos-gimenez-hurricane-insurance-invading-sea-20210528-fi4mw4bfnrbldcwmnnqes3lbay-story.html https://gimenez.house.gov/2024/3/rep-carlos-gimenez-issues-statement-on-further-consolidated-appropriations-act-2024 https://twitter.com/TheLeadCNN/status/1469426355720839170 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://gimenez.house.gov/2022/6/gimenez-statement-on-the-supreme-court-s-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie Washington3DCongresswoman Gluesenkamp understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. The Congresswoman's website states that "Marie believes that climate change is real and is man-made. She also believes that increasingly severe weather events caused by climate change disproportionately affect the working class. Marie has also championed tax-rebates for energy efficiency upgrades for working class families, like weather skirting for mobile homes.7525Congresswoman Gluesenkamp Perez's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Gluesenkamp Perez opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2550https://marieforcongress.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Goldman, CraigTexas12RRepresentative Craig Goldman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, Goldman has criticized climate action. "The Biden administration’s climate agenda restricted Americans’ freedoms and wasted billions in taxpayer dollars. Repeal the rules. Rescind the funding," wrote Goldman on Twitter in 2025. He also said that he was "Proud to join @SteveScalise and 101 of my @HouseGOP colleagues in calling on the Supreme Court to stop extreme climate lawsuits against domestic energy companies," in another Twitter post.250Representative Goldman's actions consistently oppose progress on climate change. While in Congress, he introduced a bill to codify President Trump's energy deregulation efforts, and defended these actions in an op-ed in The Hill. "The consequences of not deregulating energy production are clear. In pursuit of aggressive climate goals, the Biden administration imposed policies that constrained the energy sector by preventing offshore oil and gas drilling, blocking oil drilling on federal lands, halting liquefied natural gas exports, attempting to end fracking, and imposing a natural gas tax... Predictably, many American energy companies canceled projects, which tightened energy supply, resulting in higher prices for consumers," wrote Goldman. According to Fort Worth Report, Goldman in referred to California’s goal to rely solely on wind and solar energy and other forms of clean electricity by 2045 as an inefficient milestone. “It’s just not going to happen,” said Goldman. He is also an ardent supporter of the fossil fuel industry, tweeting: "✅ More pipelines ✅ More oil production ✅ More gas production." Representative Craig Goldman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Craig Goldman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, Goldman opposes climate action, therefore it is unlikely he would support a carbon fee.5018.75https://x.com/RepCraigGoldman/status/1949832533564133433 https://x.com/RepCraigGoldman/status/1976725721008517165 https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/5766366-federal-red-tape-energy/ https://fortworthreport.org/2025/11/17/energy-for-the-world-north-texas-leaders-talk-oil-gas-growing-nuclear-industry-at-conference/ https://x.com/RepCraigGoldman/status/1887526852014621151 https://ballotpedia.org/Craig_GoldmanOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gomez, JimmyCalifornia34DCongressman Jimmy Gomez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his House website, Gomez says "We’ve reached a turning point with regards to the environment. Not only must we protect our public lands and tackle this climate crisis, we need to ensure access to the beautiful environment that surrounds us [...] Our nation is facing a climate emergency, which is why I support the Green New Deal -- a jobs and justice-centered plan to decarbonize the U.S. economy within ten years and focuses on creating the maximum amount of prosperity for working people and marginalized communities in the process."100100Congressman Gomez has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. Congressman Gomez introduced the Climate Solutions Act of 2019 (H.R. 2958), which would require 100 percent of electricity sold in the United States be generated from renewable sources by 2035, stating in a press release, “The Climate Solutions Act of 2019 will shift our country away from the inaction and cowardice that have come to define this administration’s approach to environmental justice and towards an aggressive strategy that supports strong renewable energy standards, forcefully targets greenhouse gasses, and establishes a bold national energy efficiency standard." Congressman Gomez also makes notable public statements supporting climate action, such as in a Tweet where he touted the benefits of the Inflation Reduction Act.100Congressman Gomez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Gomez voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).7593.75https://gomez.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=493 https://gomez.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=438 https://www.facebook.com/RepJimmyGomez/photos/a.172532199956354/363344207541818/?type=1&theater https://twitter.com/RepJimmyGomez/status/1588340493871894528 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/JimmyGomezCA/status/1540417701960630272Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Gonzalez, VicenteTexas34DCongressman Vicente Gonzalez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.2525On Congressman Gonzalez's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Congressman Gonzalez supports an all-the-above approach to energy and understands the importance of American energy not only to power our cars and homes, but also as a national security issue and a job creator. The 15th District is home to the Eagle Ford Shale, one of the largest oil production areas in the state, creating more than 3.8 million jobs and generating $473 billion in gross domestic product. The Congressman has seen firsthand the effects of a thriving oil and gas industry." Congressman Gonzalez does not oppose climate action, instead supporting an 'all-of-the-above' energy plan, which does not go far enough to completely eliminate the use of fossil fuels. 25Congressman Gonzalez opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2543.75https://gonzalez.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/166483/vicente-gonzalezSupports RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti Climate
Gooden, LanceTexas5RCongressman Gooden disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When responding to a 2017 voter survey guide by The Dallas Morning News, the Congressman stated, "Climate science is imprecise and so are the consequences of any legislative action we take to address the issue. We can never be so arrogant to believe we can predict with certainty the impacts that will follow specific regulations about emissions, not only for the environment but also for our economy." In a 2021 post on 'Twitter,' the congressman stated, "Climate change is not the reason for the boarder crisis. Joe Biden is."00In a 2019 editorial on climate solutions, Congressman Gooden says, "I offer another solution – one that utilizes the creative power of the American economy. By sponsoring developments in carbon capture, natural gas extraction and nuclear power, Republicans have found a way to allow the genius of American innovation to solve the problems we face. We can’t regulate our way out of this mess as the Obama administration attempted. The future of clean energy and reducing emissions lies in new technologies like small-scale, advanced nuclear power plants and solid-state batteries. The only way to access those solutions is for the American economy to be unleashed." Congressman Gooden demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Gooden opposes or vote against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5012.5https://voterguide.dallasnews.com/2018-general/candidates/469/ https://twitter.com/lancegooden/status/1383929296767504385 https://gooden.house.gov/media/editorials/republican-solutions-climate-crisis https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://iqconnect.house.gov/iqextranet/view_newsletter.aspx?id=101216&c=TX05LGOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Goodlander, MaggieNew Hampshire2DRepresentative Maggie Goodlander understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the priorities page on her campaign website, it states: "The fight for a fair deal also means combating climate change, standing up to Big Oil, and working to make America the world’s clean energy superpower. Maggie believes deeply in advancing environmental justice... In Congress, Maggie will be on the frontlines of the fight against our climate crisis and work to close the tax loopholes that have allowed Big Oil to make record profits while hardworking people are facing record prices at the pumps." In a debate in 2024, Goodlander said: "I take the climate crisis very seriously. It's not enough in 2024 to just acknowledge that climate change is real. This is an existential crisis."100100Representative Maggie Goodlander has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Goodlander joined in signing a letter to the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Forest Service opposing the proposed reorganization of the U.S. Forest Service, which would close New Hampshire’s Bartlett Experimental Forest and put other facilities, including those at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, at risk. "The decision to relocate the agency’s headquarters and eliminate its world-class research program undermines our efforts to confront the dual crises of climate change and catastrophic wildfires while worsening the already severe loss of staff and expertise since the start of President Trump’s second term... This reorganization proposal would close 57 of the agency’s 77 research stations across 31 states, including stations that study wildfire, drought, pests, and climate change—all of which pose immediate and growing threats to our national forests and nearby communities—and threaten to take decades of staff expertise with them," the letter argued. Representative Maggie Goodlander also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2024 interview with New Hampshire Public Radio, she said "we're seeing these flood events. It's biblical times, and part of the driver of all this, of course, is the climate crisis. And so I want to be a leader on this on day one. We have a lot of work to do. The Department of Defense has been saying for the last 10 years that climate change is a national security threat. It's a threat to all of our communities. And I want to be a part of making the United States of America a clean energy superpower of the world. It's going to create jobs. It's going to help our communities. It's going to lower costs. But we've got to address the climate crisis at its core, and I hope that we'll be able to look back two years from now and see that the Inflation Reduction Act, the bipartisan infrastructure law, all these important pieces of legislation that have been signed into law during the Biden-Harris administration were initial small steps towards a clean energy future and a protected planet that's going to help us prevent the damage that we're seeing every day in our communities." In an interview with Granite State News Collaborative, she stated: "It's an existential crisis. When we say, even the words 'climate change,' it fails to describe the problem. 'Crisis' comes closer, but it's like our language fails us in describing just the stakes of the challenge." Representative Maggie Goodlander makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Representative Maggie Goodlander has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://maggiefornh.com/priorities/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfs3eM_6AJM https://goodlander.house.gov/media/press-releases/goodlander-pappas-raise-concerns-over-forest-service-reorganization-call-for-efforts-to-be-halted/ https://www.nhpr.org/politics/2024-08-15/conversations-with-the-candidates-in-nhs-2nd-congressional-district-race-maggie-goodlander https://www.collaborativenh.org/know-your-vote-articles/2024/10/21/maggie-goodlander-on-the-issues-an-interview-with-the-democratic-2nd-cd-candidate https://maggiefornh.com/reproductive-freedom/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Gosar, Paul A.Arizona9RCongressman Paul Gosar disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 Tweet, Gosar said in a Tweet "On some bills I vote no, not because of the infrastructure, but because Pelosi and the radical left includes crap like climate change and other nonsense." In another Tweet, Gosar said "The left is afflicted with group hysteria about Covid, the “insurrection”, Ashli Babbitt, the multi-millennia climate fluctuations and a host of other issues."00Congressman Gosar demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Gosar regularly votes against climate action, and is given a lifetime score of 4% by the LCV. In 2017, Gosar called on the United States to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement, saying "This liberal pipedream abdicates our sovereignty in favor of a global redistribution of wealth."0Congressman Gosar makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 press release on the Green New Deal, Congressman Gosar stated, "Democrat socialists made clear today that they want to use climate change as a means to abolish capitalism and implement massive taxation, expropriation and government control." In a 2014 op-ed for the Arizona Republic on President Obama's Clean Power Plan, he stated, "Knowing he can’t lawfully enact a carbon-dioxide tax plan, Obama is unlawfully directing his EPA to impose strict limits on carbon emissions from existing coal and gas-fired facilities." Congressman Gosar was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://twitter.com/repgosar/status/1578477023235694592 https://twitter.com/DrPaulGosar/status/1410031441421881351 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/paul-gosar https://gosar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1480 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://gosar.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2241Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Gottheimer, JoshNew Jersey5DCongressman Gottheimer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a statement regarding President Biden's executive order to rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement, he stated, "Withdrawing the United States from the historic Paris Agreement on climate change was a mistake, an abdication of American leadership on the world stage, and a setback for the united effort needed to keep our air and water clean. We must prioritize addressing the threat of climate change and work to mitigate the harm to our environment, our economy, and our communities. When it comes to clean air and water and a healthy environment, we cannot afford to look the other way."100100In a press release discussing his advocacy for new climate protections, Rep. Gottheimer stated, "We are in the middle of a major climate crisis. It’s not something we can just ignore and hope will get better. When you talk about fighting climate change, at first it seems like an insurmountable task. But then you dig into it, and you realize we can take immediate steps now that will have both an immediate and long term impact on our lives-on our health, on our economy, on our planet. The cost of inaction on climate change is incalculable." He is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." Congressman Gottheimer's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Gottheimer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://gottheimer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2329 https://gottheimer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2352 https://gottheimer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2771 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?s=1&r=8 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Gray, AdamCalifornia13DRepresentative Adam Gray understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. As Whip of the centrist Blue Dog Coalition, Gray has emphasized water infrastructure, agriculture, and energy costs in the Central Valley, supporting an all-of-the-above approach that includes continued oil and gas production alongside conservation measures. In an op-ed in The Sacramento Bee from 2025, he wrote that “[c]limate change is not going to wait for us to get our act together, and infrastructure projects cannot be built overnight. Without action today, our farms, wildlife refuges and communities throughout California will be insufficiently prepared to meet our water needs.” In a tweet, he wrote: "Great conversation with @FresnoBee Editor @josephkieta and opinion editor @TadWeber about importance of hydro power in fighting climate change. We need to recognize hydro's value."7533.33Representative Adam Gray supports an "all-of-the-above" approach to energy. In 2025, he tweeted: "The Central Valley requires an all-of-the-above approach to our energy resources. In today’s Natural Resources Committee meeting, I called for hydroelectric development to power our farms and communities." An “all-of-the-above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. As a Blue Dog Democrat representing an agricultural swing district he was the lone Democrat on a committee to vote for a budget bill that proposed increased fossil fuel production. However, in 2022, Gray proposed a bill in the California Assembly to ban the use of fossil fuel powered trains by the California High Speed Rail Authority. Representative Adam Gray does not oppose climate action.25Representative Adam Gray has no known or an inconsistent public position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, in 2017 he was asked about California Governor Jerry Brown’s Cap and Trade program, stating that “[e]very single dollar that’s been taken out of the community should be put back into the community.”5045.8325https://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/article311628029.html https://fox40.com/news/your-local-election-headquarters/california-13th-congressional-district-debate-john-duarte-adam-gray/ https://x.com/AdamGrayCA/status/1166882993035571200 https://x.com/RepAdamGrayCA/status/1917669812911620380 https://www.yahoo.com/news/house-republicans-advance-budget-bill-165106183.html https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/2022-assembly-bill-823-gray-adam-high-speed-rail-authority-trains-powered-fossil-fuel-combustion https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article158975044.html https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/california-elections/article292574779.html Supports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Griffith, MorganVirginia9RAccording to the Briston Herald Courrier, Congressman Griffith stated, "The climate is changing. Any plan of action must reflect the reality that most countries in the world will continue to use fossil fuels. Our goal as a worldwide leader and energy exporter should be to develop cleaner, more efficient ways to utilize the wealth of energy resources our country possesses." In an op-ed to the 'Roanoke Times,' posted on his website, the Congressman says, "The America of the Green New Deal is no leader. That plan expects us to dismantle our economy and fundamentally alter our lifestyle to cut carbon emissions." On his 'Energy and Environment' page he says, "We need to increase current coal production..." 00According to Congressman Morgan Griffith's website's 'Energy and Environment' page, Griffith states, "I support coal use and production. Coal is a vital component of the American economy, with a third of the nation’s electricity being generated from it. We need to increase current coal production and eliminate overly burdensome regulations that hurt the industry with little to no environmental gains. I also support research into technologies to burn coal more efficiently." The page is also headed with a large image displaying a piece of coal. Congressman Griffith demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Griffith makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://www.heraldcourier.com/news/local/rep-morgan-griffith-named-to-committee-on-climate-change/article_53d4b3a6-3c1a-11e9-a117-c3c4bf8b360c.html https://morgangriffith.house.gov/spotlight/ https://morgangriffith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398741 https://morgangriffith.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=44643 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://morgangriffith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=402684Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Grijalva, AdelitaArizona7DRepresentative Adelita Grijalva understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "Arizona is in crisis. I’ll fight for real climate solutions — because without water, there’s no future." In another post, she underscored her position: "While Arizona faces record heat and worsening drought, Trump’s EPA is pretending greenhouse gases don’t harm us. Let’s be clear: it’s our elders, kids, and working families who pay the price. I won’t let corporate polluters write our future."100100Representative Adelita Grijalva has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On her website, she writes: "Protect Arizona’s water supply, communities, agriculture, and Tribal water rights. Recognizes that climate change and drought continue to jeopardize the Colorado River and Arizona’s drinking water supply." She joined with the Sierra Club to highlight climate changes effects on the Colorado River, saying: "We cannot let this lifeline run dry." Representative Adelita Grijalva also makes prominent public statements on the issue. She helped launch the People’s Environmental Justice Caucus, which is "focused on advancing policies that center community leadership and address environmental harms disproportionately impacting frontline communities across the United States—all in collaboration with advocates and community organizers. Grassroots coalitions include Climate Justice Alliance (CJA), the Environmental Justice Leadership Forum (EJLF) hosted by WE ACT for Environmental Justice, and the Platform for a Just Climate (formerly known as the Equitable & Just National Climate Platform)." Representative Adelita Grijalva makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Adelita Grijalva has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://x.com/AdelitaForAZ/status/1960533939153723866 https://x.com/AdelitaForAZ/status/1948420626743771303 https://www.adelitaforcongress.com/issues https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/arizona-environment/2025/10/28/adelita-grijalva-sierra-club-urge-environmental-protections-colorado-river-water/86937006007/ https://grijalva.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-grijalva-to-launch-first-ever-congressional-environmental-justice-caucus https://x.com/AdelitaForAZ/status/1929735400077381741Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimateN/AN/A
Grothman, GlennWisconsin6RCongressman Glenn Grothman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2014 interview with Right Wing Watch, the Congressman stated, "This is this environmental stuff, this is the idea that is driven by this global warming thing. Global warming is not man-made and there is barely any global warming at all. There's been no global warming for the last twelve or thirteen years. I see a shortage of Republicans stepping up to the plate and saying, 'look, this global warming stuff is not going on.' It's ridiculous for the United States, of all the countries in the world, to be putting extra regulations on our business while the Chinese, the Indians, whatever are building new factories all the time. And our factories are stuck saying, 'you can't do this, you can't do this,' because you've got to reign in this global warming which doesn't exist anyway."00In a 2017 op-ed supporting the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman wrote, "The Paris climate agreement was a bad deal for all Americans, but would have hit Wisconsin’s Sixth District particularly hard... At best, the climate agreement was a wealth redistribution program that imposed hefty costs on American families, and focused far more on handouts to other countries than actually protecting the environment." During a 2017 Town Hall the Congressman fielded a question on climate change, responding, "In general, I'm old enough to remember the 1970s when they talked about global cooling." Congressman Grothman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Grothman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEDiN_CNTCs https://grothman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=332 https://www.postcrescent.com/story/news/local/2017/04/30/grothman-town-hall-draws-angry-raucous-crowd/101066122/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://grothman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3034Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Guest, MichaelMississippi3RCongressman Michael Guest does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In a March 2022 tweet, the Congressman wrote "America can run on AMERICAN energy," attaching a picture of an oil rig and the words 'Unleash American Energy Independence." In a press release, the Congressman criticized the Democrats' focus on addressing climate change. Congressman Guest demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Guest opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 esolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://twitter.com/RepMichaelGuest/status/1504558980319924225 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://guest.house.gov/media/press-releases/guest-criticizes-democrats-focus-climate-change-over-border-security https://guest.house.gov/media/press-releases/guest-speaks-pro-life-rally-following-opening-statements-supreme-court-hearingOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Guthrie, S. BrettKentucky 2RCongressman Brett Guthrie agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page it states, "Climate change is a real and serious threat, but I do not believe that radical solutions proposed in the Democrats’ “Green New Deal” are the solution. The Green New Deal is projected to cost up to $93 trillion over ten years, at an estimated cost of over $60,000 per year per household. I believe that we need innovative and market-based solutions to combat climate change."500Congressman Guthrie demonstrates a lack of leadership by voicing his support for the Keystone Pipeline and advocating against President Obama's climate change plan. According to WFPL, the Congressman stated, “As President Obama prepares to roll out an agenda on climate change, I hope he will also address our nation’s energy needs... While claiming to support an all-of-the-above energy program, President Obama has yet to approve the Keystone XL pipeline and the EPA continues its attempt to regulate the coal industry out of business.” According to Impact2020, "A spokeswoman for Rep. Brett Guthrie, R-Bowling Green, said he shared concerns about climate change, but that he’s 'mindful of the costs associated with over-regulation that hurt our economy.'" Congressman Guthrie demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Guthrie makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 012.5https://guthrie.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=71998 https://guthrie.house.gov/latest-news/guthrie-new-epa-rules-could-cripple-kentuckys-economy/ https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/policy/environment/climate/article222424225.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://guthrie.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=387748Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hageman, Harriet Wyoming1RCongresswoman Hageman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. "For the Biden administration and many Democrats in Congress, there is no higher authority than the climate change god."250Congresswoman Hageman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a press release, Hageman said "With the cost of energy weighing on Americans, a GOP-led House panel considered a bill Tuesday that takes aim at the Biden administration’s green energy agenda, blaming it for rising energy costs."0Congresswoman Hageman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://hageman.house.gov/media/in-the-news/hageman-says-bidens-radical-climate-agenda-reason-americans-cant-access https://x.com/HagemanforWY/status/1540342014604038144Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hamadeh, AbrahamArizona8RRep. Abraham Hamadeh disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Hamadeh re-tweeted a post from Vivek Ramaswamy that said: "It turns out that the 'scientists' who denied the Covid-19 lab origin knew their claims were false. The exact same thing is happening right now as so-called 'scientists' lie about facts relating to climate change. Accountability is coming." Hamadeh has not publicly disputed climate science, but he opposes Green New Deal-style climate policies. In an interview with azcentral.com, he stated that “[w]ith American families struggling to get by already with the high cost of living, the last thing Washington needs to do is further burden them with high energy costs from failed New Green deal energy policies. These policies never produce their desired outcomes and result in nothing more than negatively affecting energy reliability and costs. Working Americans cannot afford to have the failed energy policies of places like California across the country.”00Representative Hamadeh opposes action on climate change. According to the LA Times, in a 2022 debate Hamadeh said: "We don’t have time to tackle climate change." Furthermore, in 2023, he tweeted: "West coast drought map 2022 vs 2023. Stop the climate hysteria." In another tweet, he wrote: "My opponent wants to fight climate change, I want to fight criminals." Representative Abraham Hamadeh demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Rep. Hamadeh has no known or an inconsistent public position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He has not made public statements specifically addressing carbon pricing.5012.5https://x.com/abrahamhamadeh/status/1683135140061642755 https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/09/06/8th-congressional-district-election-abe-hamadeh-greg-whitten/75064208007/ https://www.abeforaz.com/our-issues https://www.latimes.com/environment/newsletter/2022-11-17/republicans-won-the-house-for-climate-action-look-to-cities-and-states-boiling-point https://x.com/AbrahamHamadeh/status/1699123731665404388 https://x.com/AbrahamHamadeh/status/1576226094860013568 https://x.com/AbrahamHamadeh/status/1521290592730292231Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Harder, JoshCalifornia9DCongressman Josh Harder understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states "Josh believes climate change is an existential threat to our way of life. Catastrophic wildfires. Historic droughts. Polluted air and water. That’s why Josh introduced the FARM Act, a landmark climate change bill that supports Valley farmers in the fight against climate change. The bill is one of the only bills in Congress backed by both the leading environmental and agricultural groups." 100100In a 2019 press release advocating for the needs of farmers on the front line of climate change, the Congressman stated, "Farmers are on the front lines of the climate crisis, but they’re often treated like a part of the problem rather than a part of the solution.” The Congressman introduced the Future of Agricultural Resiliency and Modernization (FARM) Act which would help farmers across the country to more effectively fight climate change. In a 2022 tweet, Congressman Josh Harder stated "There's no more time to speculate — climate change is impacting our health, our farms, our jobs, our food, and our economy. We have to take real action now." Congressman Harder website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Harder has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The congressman did not vote on a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5081.25https://harderforcongress.com/issues/ https://harder.house.gov/media/press-releases/harder-urges-climate-change-committee-include-farmers-needs-environmental https://harder.house.gov/media/press-releases/harder-introduces-farm-act-support-agriculture-efforts-fight-climate-change https://twitter.com/JoshHarder/status/1480584689672929296 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://harder.house.gov/media/press-releases/harder-votes-to-pass-of-pair-of-bills-ensuring-women-s-access-to-health-careSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Haridopolos, MikeFlorida8RRepresentative Mike Haridopolos does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, Haridopolos supports increased fossil fuel production. He praised The Protecting American Energy Production Act, which prevents any president from unilaterally banning hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Of the Act, he said: "Over the last four years, the Biden administration waged a war on American energy, driving up costs and forcing us to rely on foreign oil and gas from communist dictatorships like Venezuela... With the passage of Rep. Pfluger’s Protecting American Energy Production Act, House Republicans are fighting to unleash our energy wealth and ensure American energy dominance."250Representative Mike Haridopolos demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a hearing in 2026, Haridopolos said: "[The Biden Administration] were against fracking until they're trying to win Pennsylvania. Oil leases delayed. And the great news is that... we're actually expanding our potential energy footprint so that we have more supply." In another hearing from 2026, Haridopolos again expressed his view that the US should increase fossil fuel production. "We got rid of the Keystone pipeline just a few years ago. That would have lowered gas prices... We also got rid of 40% of our strategic oil reserve because we were playing politics during the previous administration... We all hate high gas prices. We all hate high interest rates... The way that you reduce prices is not by playing politics. It’s by increasing the supply of oil," he stated.0Representative Mike Haridopolos has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://haridopolos.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-mike-haridopolos-votes-yes-protecting-american-energy-production https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ckX_pRJ_y4Q https://flvoicenews.com/haridopolos-blames-biden-era-overspending-energy-policies-for-inflation/ https://x.com/RepHaridopolos/status/1882932725956698591Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Harrigan, PatNorth Carolina10RRepresentative Pat Harrigan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He told the Charlotte Observer that "[t]o the extent that human behavior is contributing to climate change, we should see it as an economic opportunity to grow new jobs in North Carolina through renewable energy sources." While this statement is not outright climate denial, it comes close by implying that much of climate change is not man-made. Harrigan also boasted about forcing climatologist Michael Mann to step down, saying in a press release that it was "a first step, but universities and policymakers should stop pretending Michael Mann ever represented science. What he represents is everything that has corroded public trust in higher education: bias, dishonesty, and contempt for the people he claims to serve.”250Representative Harrigan has been a vocal opponent of climate action. He wrote about his opposition to the 2009 greenhouse gas endangerment finding on Twitter: "The endangerment finding gave federal agencies sweeping power to reshape the economy without a single vote in Congress. Revoking it is a major step toward restoring democratic accountability and reining in runaway climate regulation!" Harrigan further underscored his opposition to climate action, tweeting: "Make no mistake, while we talk 'climate-action', Communist China's primary goal is undermining America. Our future leadership on the world stage depends on how we respond now. We need an assertive and strategic foreign policy to protect our interests and set the right direction." Harrigan is also a vocal advocate for continued fossil fuel production. "President Biden’s recent decision to pause natural gas exports under the guise of climate change priorities is yet another blow to hardworking American families already hurting from his disastrous economic policies. This action, coupled with his day-one cancellation of the Keystone XL pipeline, which immediately left thousands jobless, exemplifies a presidency more committed to a radical, divisive agenda than to the welfare of everyday citizens," Harrigan posted on Twitter. Representative Pat Harrigan demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Pat Harrigan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, given his opposition to climate action and his support for fossil fuels, it is very unlikely that he supports a carbon fee.5018.75https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/election/voter-guide/article260985592.html https://harrigan.house.gov/media/in-the-news/washington-reporter-exclusive-pressure-rep-pat-harrigan-led-controversial-climate https://x.com/RepPatHarrigan/status/1951029035578032551 https://x.com/PatHarriganNC/status/1684009066459168769 https://x.com/PatHarriganNC/status/1750913054546543045 https://www.wfae.org/politics/2022-05-26/nc-congressional-candidate-pat-harrigan-looks-to-win-back-charlotte-republicansOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Harris, AndyMaryland1RCongressman Andy Harris disagrees with statured scientists that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2018 Baltimore Sun article, when asked if he was concerned about a U.N. climate report, the Congressman, responded stating, "there are many different projections for the pace of climate change” and "differing analysis for the degree of causality assigned to types of emissions.” 00In a 2017 press release on the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Harris stated, "Under the Paris Accord, the United States would pay trillions of dollars in economic costs and lose millions of jobs, while China is permitted to increase its emissions through 2030. President Obama made a bad deal, and President Trump can do better. Any new international climate agreement should be ratified by the U.S. Senate, as outlined in the Constitution.” Congressman Harris demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Harris opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.baltimoresun.com/opinion/columnists/dan-rodricks/bs-md-rodricks-column-1021-story.html https://harris.house.gov/media/press-releases/paris-accord-bad-deal-american-people https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.wmdt.com/2022/06/lawmakers-react-to-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Harris, MarkNorth Carolina8RRepresentative Mark Harris disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.. According to Spectrum Local News, Harris said: "While I do agree that the earth is warming, I do not necessarily buy into the fact that as humans we are creating the issue." Harris also opposes the Green New Deal, tweeting in 2025: "End the Green New Scam!"00Representative Harris has consistently opposed climate action and support the expansion of fossil fuel production. In 2025, he tweeted: "The US has the most untapped oil reserves in the world! It's time for us to put our God-given resources to use—Drill Baby Drill!" Harris also met with the American Petroleum Institute, and tweeted: "American oil and natural gas play a critical role in creating jobs, strengthening our economy, and securing American energy dominance." In another tweet, he voiced his opposition to climate action, saying: "Taxpayers shouldn't have to foot the bill for the Green New Scam." Representative Mark Harris demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Mark Harris has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Although he has not clearly stated his position on a carbon fee, he did sign a pledge to oppose any new taxes, and generally opposes climate action.5012.5https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nc/charlotte/news/2018/11/02/north-carolina-gop-candidates-embrace-climate-change-say-humans-are-playing-a-role https://x.com/RepMarkHarrisNC/status/1937482086899753303 https://x.com/RepMarkHarrisNC/status/1887869269653717368 https://x.com/RepMarkHarrisNC/status/2054649735789895786 https://x.com/RepMarkHarrisNC/status/1942624704717595025 https://atr.org/mark-harris-makes-no-new-taxes-promise-to-voters-in-nc-08-race/ https://markharrisforcongress.org/issuesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Harshbarger, Diana Tennessee1RCongresswoman Diana Harshbarger does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In a 2020 interview with the 'Bristol Herald Courier,' "Harshbarger said she believes America is doing a lot to address climate change with efforts like emissions reduction. She said China and India are the countries that need to do more. “It’s other countries that need to step up and do their part in order to diminish the climate change from happening,” Harshbarger said. Congresswoman Diana Harshbarger does not oppose climate action.25Congresswoman Diana Harshbarger opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://heraldcourier.com/elections/candidates-discuss-their-stances-on-issues/article_09b55219-806f-550b-a5e7-51b823b581cf.html https://www.votediana.com/issues https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hayes, JahanaConnecticut5DCongresswoman Jahana Hayes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Hayes says "Climate change is both an environmental issue and a civil rights, economic, and public health issue. Stopping and reversing climate change, protecting public lands and waters, reducing air pollution, transitioning to green energy supplies, and investing in sustainable agriculture is a top priority of mine as your representative."100100Congresswoman Hayes has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congresswoman stated, "Like the overwhelming majority of Americans, I understand that climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time. If we do not adhere to the promises we made as a nation in the Paris Climate Agreement, our children and grandchildren will pay the price." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release on the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis's recommending the Clean School Bus Act, a bill the Congresswoman introduced, she stated, "“Climate change has been threatening the lives of our children and the health of our environment for decades. COVID-19, which directly threatens our respiratory health, has made it crystal clear that we need to address air pollution caused by our school bus fleet immediately.” Rep. Hayes makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 tweet, the Congresswoman stated "The negative effects of climate change are happening in real time all over the country. We must take real action now." 100Congresswoman Hayes publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://jahanahayes.com/issues/environment/ https://hayes.house.gov/media/blog-posts/hayes-cosponsored-and-voted-hr-9-climate-action-now-act https://hayes.house.gov/media/press-releases/hayes-clean-school-bus-legislation-recommended-address-climate-change-select https://twitter.com/repjahanahayes/status/1306257430242885637?lang=en https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2021369 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2021385 https://hayes.house.gov/press-releases?ID=2E188817-CEF9-46FE-A423-1A580933045E Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Higgins, ClayLouisiana3RCongressman Higgins disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2017 interview with PBS News Hour, the Congressman Higgins stated, "I certainly do not disagree with the fact that climate change happens, but I do think it is reasonable to question very carefully the science that has used models, which has sometimes come under fire for having been sort of fraudulently manipulated in order to produce a result... Climate change has existed for well before human history. So the question is not whether or not our climate changes across the planet, nor is it really a question that the human race does have some sort of impact upon climate change..." 00The Congressman ignored the true causes of coastal erosion. On his campaign page, instead of correctly blaming sea level rise and oil spills, he claimed that coastal erosion was caused by decreased sediment, stating, "Throughout history, the Louisiana marshland was replenished by river sediments – land-building deposits derived from the Mississippi River overflowing its banks. But in the early 1900s, a decision was made to levee the river as we know it today. So for the last 80 or 90 years, south Louisiana has been lacking that natural re-building process." In a 2022 Press Release, Higgins criticized climate action, the Green New Deal, and activist Raya Salter saying "Her opening statement was delivered with seething vitriolic hate. She was trembling, unhinged with Green New Deal madness [...] Congressman Higgins made her look inept, because that’s what happens when Democrats are faced with hard truth." Congressman Higgins demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0The Congressman makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In an interview on PBS News Hour the Congressman stated, "When we talk about spending the people's treasure, and the very concept that we can fix climate change with some sort of a tax, is something that I certainly take very seriously with regards to having an intelligent debate about." Congressman Higgins voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). He did not sign the Americans for Prosperity “No Climate Tax” pledge.00https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/watch-louisiana-rep-clay-higgins-skepticism-human-caused-climate-change http://captainhiggins.com/issues/ https://clayhiggins.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://clayhiggins.house.gov/2022/09/18/higgins-battles-radical-climate-activism-congressional-oversight-hearing/ https://clayhiggins.house.gov/media/press-releases/higgins-supreme-court-ruling-major-victory-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hill, FrenchArkansas2RCongressman French Hill agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release opposing the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, “Climate change is real, but the proposals put forward by Democrats, like the Green New Deal, are fiction. The reality is, America is already a global leader in pursuing cleaner production of energy and reducing carbon emissions–to the tune of approximately 10% over the past decade. Addressing climate change should include investing in longer battery life technologies, lowering barriers for solar cell innovation, and pursuing cleaner more cost-effective methods to use nuclear energy. I believe that we need to continue pursuing an ‘all of the above’ energy strategy that leads to a cleaner, less carbon dependent future without forcing Arkansas families to bear the burden of the flawed Paris Climate Accord."500Congressman Hill spoke against the World Bank's climate mission saying it should not focus on combatting climate change, and instead only on reducing poverty and an all-of-the-above energy strategy. Hill has also criticized climate action attempted by Democratic members of Congress, calling it "fiction." Congressman Hill demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Hill opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://hill.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5690 https://www.devex.com/news/us-rep-french-hill-calls-for-a-rethink-of-world-bank-s-climate-mission-107164 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.thv11.com/article/news/politics/rep-french-hill-climate-change-is-real-green-new-deal-is-fiction/91-3facb77e-16f9-411a-94ff-96524eecd730 https://katv.com/news/local/arkansas-lawmakers-praise-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade-united-states-governor-asa-hutchinson-senator-tom-cotton-john-boozman-lieutenant-tim-griffin-attorney-general-leslie-rutledge-representative-french-hill-bruce-westerman-rick-crawfordOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Himes, JimConnecticut4DCongressman Jim Himes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and environment,' page it states, "Climate change is here, and it’s affecting more Americans every day. The increasingly severe storms associated with climate change, like Hurricane Ida and Superstorm Sandy, are damaging Connecticut’s coastal communities, causing severe flooding, closing roads, and downing power lines. The price of inaction will be far greater than if we made meaningful and drastic changes to our energy and environmental policies." 100100 In a 2021 press release from Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont, regarding an "offshore wind proposal awarded $500,000," the Congressman stated 'Catastrophic and deadly weather events will only continue to worsen unless we face the climate crisis head on,” Congressman Jim Himes said. “Connecticut stands ready to do its part by shifting to wind and other renewable energy sources.'" Himes has made other press releases supporting the passage of climate action bills, such as the Inflation Reduction Act. Congressman Hime's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Himes publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).10093.75https://himes.house.gov/energy-and-environment-depth https://portal.ct.gov/Office-of-the-Governor/News/Press-Releases/2021/12-2021/Governor-Lamont-Announces-Connecticut-Offshore-Wind-Proposal-Awarded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://himes.house.gov/press-releases?ID=2A07B459-DB29-4D09-9572-6FF1F3D2F85FSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Horsford, StevenNevada4DCongressman Steve Horsford understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release discussing the House's Climate Crisis Action plan, he stated, "Climate change is an existential crisis that threatens our children’s futures, and the futures of our children’s children. As a member of the House Natural Resources Committee, I’m working to push Congress to take up the bold action that’s needed to address the ever-growing threat of climate change and ameliorate the effects of human emissions and pollution."100100Congressman Horsford has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of H.Res.755, a bill that expresses "support for the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow and reaffirm(s) the United States commitment to international cooperation (in) combating climate change." Congressman Horsford also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 press release discussing the need for climate action via Build Back Better and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal, he stated, "The historic drought at Lake Mead is a shocking example of the threat climate change poses to the West...I’m grateful to Vice President Harris for coming to Nevada to see our water crisis firsthand, and I look forward to working with the White House to pass the urgent climate investments in the Build Back Better Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Deal. Together, these bills will create jobs, invest in Nevada’s clean energy economy, and protect our environment for generations to come.” Congressman Horsford makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050."100Congressman Horsford has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://horsford.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-climate-crisis-action-plan-highlights-congressman-steven-horsford-s-geo https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-resolution/755?s=1&r=2 https://horsford.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-horsford-joins-vice-president-harris-push-climate-action-through https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=6&r=10 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Houchin, ErinIndiana9RCongresswoman Houchin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congresswoman Houchin demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. She cosponsored H.J.Res.117 which opposes EPA regulations, and in a press release criticized President Biden's "climate-obsessed agenda."0Congresswoman Houchin opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://houchin.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-erin-houchin-introduces-resolution-stop-fdic-climate-rule https://www.congress.gov/member/erin-houchin/H001093?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/149614/erin-houchin https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Houlahan, ChrissyPennsylvania6DCongresswoman Chrissy Houlahan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to her website's 'Energy and Environment' page, Congresswoman Chrissy states, "As an engineer and a scientist, I understand the grave threat that climate change poses to America and the world at large. Let’s be clear: climate change is real, and human behavior is making it worse. The adverse effects will impact not only the natural environment but also our national security and our economic vitality. I am committed to fighting for binding legislation with actionable measures to mitigate these negative impacts and stop climate change in its tracks."100100Congresswoman Houlahan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release supporting The Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is happening. And we are causing it. Inaction on this threat harms our economy, national security, and health. I refuse to stand by and do nothing. This is a fight for our country, for our children, and for humanity." Rep. Houlahan also makes prominent public statements on the issue. Congresswoman Houlahan penned a 2019 op-ed for the Daily Loca, where she wrote, "Let us be frank: Climate change is happening. The effects will be disastrous. And it’s caused by human activity. But this recognition cannot be reserved to one day a year. We need to be acting every day from here on out to combat climate change and reverse the negative impacts it has had on our world and will continue to have if we don’t take aggressive action quickly." Rep. Houlahan makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congresswoman proposed an amendment to The Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) which, "encourages the United States to go above and beyond the requirements outlined in the Paris Agreement and aggressively employ diplomacy to work with our partners around the world to take swift and decisive action to combat climate change."100Congresswoman Houlahan publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman co-sponsored the Climate Action Rebate Act of 2019 (H.R. 4051), which imposes a carbon fee on the use, sale, or transfer of certain fossil fuels and fluorinated gases that emit greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Rep. Houlahan voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1335 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1120 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1152 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1115 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://houlahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2792Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hoyle, ValOregon4DCongresswoman Hoyle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states "Climate change and environmental degradation isn’t a future threat: it is an immediate emergency that we are experiencing today in the form of wildfires, extreme heat, drought, contaminated water, and more. In the legislature, Val helped expand Oregon’s Clean Fuels program to reduce carbon emissions, worked to move Oregon off of coal power, and increased renewable energy standards for utilities. In Congress, she will work to reestablish the United States as a global leader in addressing climate change, fight for clean air and water, and protect Oregon’s natural treasures. Val’s plan to tackle the climate crisis includes: Moving America to a 100% Clean Electricity standard. Fighting for a just transition to a renewable energy future that provides good jobs for Oregonians and protects families from high energy costs. Halting new fossil fuel leasing on our federal public lands. Pushing for the federal investments necessary to make Oregon a leader in renewable energy generation."100100Congresswoman Hoyle has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a Tweet, the Congresswoman said "Tackling the climate crisis requires bold investments that put our communities first. $197 million from the Inflation Reduction Act is headed to Oregon to help us reach our carbon emissions targets, bringing us a step closer to cleaner air and a healthier climate." Hoyle has also cosponsored climate legislation such as H.Con.Res.37, expressing the sense that there is a climate emergency, and the Clean Water Act of 2023.100Congresswoman Hoyle has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://hoyle.house.gov/media/press-releases/hoyle-statement-on-the-dobbs-decision-anniversary https://www.congress.gov/member/val-hoyle/H001094?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://www.lorichavezderemer.com/issues https://x.com/RepValHoyle/status/1815774346473877914Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Hudson, RichardNorth Carolina9RRichard Hudson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. A 2021 statement from his website states "The science is clear — humans are contributing to it, and time is running out to address it."750Richard Hudson does not oppose climate action. In 2021, he joined the Conservative Climate Caucus. However, he's advocated for production of "more of America's own energy resources, including wind, solar, clean coal, hydropower, biofuels, nuclear energy, as well as oil and natural gas."25Congressman Hudson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2531.25https://hudson.house.gov/media/in-the-news/column-count-on-rep-hudson-to-deliver-climate-solutions https://www.fayobserver.com/story/opinion/2021/07/25/letter-hudson-showing-leadership-environment/8059383002/ https://hudson.house.gov/press-releases/hudson-releases-statement-on-dobbs-v-jackson https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Huffman, JaredCalifornia2DCongressman Huffman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Climate Action,Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Addressing climate change is the greatest imperative of our time. The stakes are enormous for our environment, our economy, and our planet. Confronting climate change will require major investments in infrastructure, new technologies, well-paying jobs, and energy independence. Pursuing these projects will not only make progress on climate change- they will also make our country stronger, healthier, and more prosperous. As a climate leader and an original cosponsor of the Green New Deal resolution, these priorities are front and center in all my work for California’s Second District."100100Congressman Huffman has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release introducing Resources for Workforce Investments, not Drilling Act (ReWIND Act) he stated, "The Trump administration has proven time and again that it cannot be trusted to act in the country’s -- or the planet’s -- best interests. Any large allocation of money invites misuse, and Congress must take the necessary precautions to ensure that Trump doesn’t use taxpayer money to provide handouts to the fossil fuel industry.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), Rep. Huffman stated, "It’s time to draw a line against the Trump administration’s attempts to take us backward, worsen the climate crisis, and make the United States an international laughing stock." Congressman Huffman makes climate change a top priority issue. In an op-ed co-written with Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, the Congressman writes, "Denial is no longer an option; mockery of the Green New Deal is not a constructive answer. It is time for serious action." 100Congressman Huffman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2015 the Congressman introduced the Gas Replacement Act, which according to his site would, "Replace the chronically-underperforming federal gas tax with a life-cycle assessment-based carbon tax on gasoline and diesel fuels that will accurately reflect the carbon emissions of the fuel." The Congressman co-sponsored the Climate Action (H.R. 4209) which would place a tax on carbon pollution to raise money for infrastructure projects. Congressman Huffman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).100100https://huffman.house.gov/policy-issues/climate-action-energy-and-environment https://huffman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rewind-act-prohibits-bailout-of-fossil-fuel-industry-with-cares-act-funds-during-public-health-crisis https://huffman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-huffman-votes-to-pass-hr-9-new-legislation-to-keep-the-us-in-the-paris-climate-agreement https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/green-new-deal-vote-shows-republicans-would-rather-mock-climate-ncna987486 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://patch.com/california/sanrafael/marin-congressman-jared-huffman-blasts-roe-rulingSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Huizenga, BillMichigan4RCongressman Bill Huizenga disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article in 'Vice," he is referred to as a "climate denier," and quoted there saying, "I do not believe that further congressional action is needed to address climate change...Today's global warming doomsayers simply lack the scientific evidence to support their claims. A host of leaders in the scientific community have recognized that the argument for drastic anthropogenic global warming is no longer based on science, but is being driven by irrational fanaticism."00In a 2022 press release, the Congressman stated "The SEC is engaging in these rulemakings to advance the Biden Administration’s environmental agenda. The intellectual foundation for these rulemakings leaves little doubt that the purpose of these rulemakings is not truly an attempt to provide financially material information to investors for all companies; the real intent is to fight climate change. Congress, however, has not passed any securities-related law that would allow for that to be a legitimate aim of Commission rulemaking. If and until that happens, the Commission must act consistently within its historical bounds, or rulemakings like these should and likely will be thrown out in federal court." Congressman Huizenga demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Huizenga makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).00https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/d7bxvj/michigans-climate-change-deniers https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://huizenga.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=401479 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Hurd, JeffColorado3RRepresentative Jeff Hurd agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with Colorado Public Radio, Hurd stated "I do believe climate change is real and I do believe it presents challenges. I know that here in the Western Slope, for example, where I'm from, and at home, and where I'm raising my kids, we do have a changing hydrology and the climate is drying. And we need to make sure that whatever we're doing to address this issue takes into account that it is a global issue and there are emissions that are coming from other countries that have a much higher carbon intensity than what we're doing in Colorado." However, Hurd advocates for an all-of the-above approach to energy, saying to Citizens for Responsible Energy Solutions "Colorado’s Third District embodies America’s energy potential, including fossil fuels, renewables, and emerging technologies. An all of the above energy approach means putting these resources to work to deliver energy that is affordable, reliable, secure, and export ready. This is not abstract. It is about real jobs, strong supply chains, and stable communities." 500Representative Jeff Hurd demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Although he claims to support an all-of-the-above strategy, this usually means advocating for increased oil and gas production. In the same interview with Colorado Public Radio that he said he believed in climate change, Hurd said "if you genuinely care about reducing global greenhouse gas emissions, then you ought to support getting as much energy out of Colorado as possible. That includes not only the clean coal that we have, but also natural gas." Furthermore, Hurd visited a coal mine and tweeted that it was "[g]reat to meet the miners of West Elk Mine which produces high-energy/low mercury/low sulphur coal that powers the local economy and key US industries." In an op-ed in the Washington Times, he wrote "Colorado’s 3rd District has the resources to lead. Oil. Gas. Uranium. Geothermal. High-quality coal."0Representative Jeff Hurd has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, he does advocate against climate policies that make energy more expensive.5025https://www.cpr.org/2024/09/09/interview-jeff-hurd-colorado-3rd-congressional-district/ https://cresenergy.com/press-releases/icymi-cres-qa-with-rep-jeff-hurd-r-colo-all-of-the-above-energy-in-colorado/ https://www.cpr.org/2024/09/09/interview-jeff-hurd-colorado-3rd-congressional-district/ https://x.com/jeff4colorado/status/1779960044810862856 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2025/apr/28/cant-afford-high-cost-energy-instability/ https://hurd.house.gov/media/op-eds/making-life-less-affordable-one-hidden-tax-time https://krdo.com/news/2024/09/30/adam-frisch-and-jeff-hurd-take-part-in-final-debate-in-pueblo-for-congressional-district-3/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ivey, GlennMaryland4DCongressman Ivey understands the importance of climate change as a top priority issue. He states in his campaign website that "Our country and the world are now in the midst of a crisis. Increased severe weather events are only one indication of the effects of the changing climate caused by the use of fossil fuels [...] Fundamental changes are required, and it will take a multi-pronged approach that will involve everyone. That is why I support the concept of the Green New Deal; we have no time to spare, and our future depends on its success." Furthermore, on his house.gov website, he states that "We urgently need to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions in order to avoid some of the worst consequences of climate change."100100Congressman Ivey has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action as a top priority issue. He has co-sponsored house resolutions such as H.Con.Res.56, which "expresses the sense of Congress that climate change caused by human activities constitutes a climate emergency, which demands the President use existing authorities and emergency powers to mitigate and prepare for the consequences of the emergency." Furthermore, his campaign manager stated that "Glenn Ivey knows that climate change is the most pressing crisis facing humankind, and he knows it will be necessary to call for and mandate difficult sacrifices." 100Congressman Ivey has no known position on a carbon fee. 5087.5https://ballotpedia.org/Glenn_Ivey https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/37?s=1&r=6 https://ivey.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.eenews.net/articles/donna-edwards-leans-on-climate-record-in-tough-house-bid/ https://twitter.com/RepGlennIvey/status/1749448076962513312Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Jack, BrianGeorgia3RRepresentative Brian Jack does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Jack does not clearly state what he believes, but supports increased US production of oil and gas. "If we want to reduce carbon emissions, let's start building stuff back at home again. When you're shipping things across the Pacific and across the Atlantic to our communities, that's an enormous carbon footprint. Let's bring manufacturing back to our country. Let's incentivize companies to build things in America because that's when our country was great. And I want to pursue policies that unleash American energy potential at home. I want us to develop oil and gas here at home," Jack said at a debate in 2024. 250Representative Brian Jack demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. On his website, he writes: "Lowering taxes and expanding President Trump’s middle class tax cuts, reducing spending and working towards a balanced budget, and unleashing American energy including oil and natural gas, will put us on a path to recovery and deliver needed relief for Georgia taxpayers." Further at a 2014 debate, Jack defended and advocated for the first Trump administration's energy policy. "We should also look at unleashing America's energy potential. One of the things i was really proud of doing in the Trump Administration was working with President Trump to ensure that we had accelerated permitting approval, that we built more pipelines and enabled energy producers to drill, drill, drill," Jack said. 0Representative Brian Jack has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5018.75https://www.pbs.org/video/apc-congressional-district-three-debate-10-13-24-flfjyl/ https://brianjack.com/issues/ https://www.pbs.org/video/apc-congressional-district-three-debate-10-13-24-flfjyl/ https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2024/04/28/republicans-seeking-georgia-congressional-seat-debate-limits-on-abortion-and-immigration/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Jackson, JonathanIllinois1DCongressman Jackson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He recognizes that climate change is real, and on his House website acknowledges the importance of addressing climate change.75100The congressman has a high score with the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a history of voting for climate action. Congressman Jackson's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Jackson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5075https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/294/jonathan-jackson/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/jonathan-jackson https://news.wttw.com/elections/voters-guide/2024-primary/jonathan-jackson https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Jackson, Ronny Texas13RCongressman Ronny Jackson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an April 2020 tweet, Congressman Jackson wrote "Under the guise of the pseudo-threat called 'climate change,' Democrats want to destroy American industry, and put millions of Americans on unemployment."00On his campaign website, Congressman Jackson writes "While the radical left pushes bad energy policies...which would decimate our ability to produce vital resources—I will always support legislation that protects the energy industry, and its impact on our local economy. Maintaining America’s energy independence and Texas’s position as the nation’s leading oil and gas producer is an important priority to me, and I will be an active voice in standing up to the Biden Administration’s war on energy." Congressman Ronny Jackson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Jackson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://twitter.com/RonnyJacksonTX/status/1252354737074130953?s=20 https://jackson.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=10177 https://jackson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=427 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Jacobs, SaraCalifornia51DCongresswoman Sara Jacobs understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Jacobs states, "Climate change is one of the biggest threats faced by humanity, and we need to do far more to stop it." Jacobs recognizes the "the value and urgency of the Paris Climate Agreement and will push to re-enter it."100100On her campaign website, Congresswoman Jacobs states that "Congress must also maintain, establish, and fully enforce environmental regulations that protect our ecosystems, natural resources, and public health." In a 2020 interview with the 'San Diego Union-Tribune,' the congresswoman stated that "As the climate crisis worsens, it is my sincere hope that more Republicans will rejoin the efforts to address climate change with the urgency it deserves, and I will gladly work with them to that end." In a tweet posted in 2020, Congresswoman Jacobs said "Climate change is one of the biggest threats we face, but Washington has failed to act & our young people will be forced to live with the consequences. We need to send a new generation of leaders to Congress who will address climate change with the urgency it requires." The Congresswoman's website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. 100Congresswoman Sara Jacobs publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://sarajacobsforca.com/environment https://sarajacobs.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=184 https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/commentary/story/2020-09-24/sara-jacobs-53rd-congressional-district https://twitter.com/sarajacobsca/status/1252974148093194241 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sarajacobs.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=565Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Jayapal, PramilaWashington7DCongresswoman Pramila Jayapal understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website, it states, "Pramila is standing up to climate change deniers in Congress and fighting for immediate action on climate change — pushing to reduce carbon emissions in the U.S. and around the world. She is a proud co-sponsor of the "100 by '50" Act, which lays out a road map to achieve 100 percent renewable energy by 2050, including a just transition for workers in the fossil fuel industry. Pramila understands the dire consequences any further delay will have on our environment, public health, and local fishing and tourism industries."100100Congresswoman Jayapal has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman brought a climate scientist as her guest to the 2019 State of the Union, stating in a press release, "Climate change is creating refugees, claiming lives and costing taxpayers billions of dollars. The Trump administration continues to push our planet down a path of destruction. Instead of tackling the problem head-on, President Trump is burying his head in the sand and handing out favors to his friends in the coal industry.” Congresswoman Jayapal also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 Twitter post, the Congresswoman stated, Boldly taking on climate change isn’t something we can compromise on — the fate of our communities and our planet is at stake." Rep. Jayapal makes climate change a top priority issue as well. She demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congresswoman Jayapal publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 E&E News article, the Congresswoman claimed the progressive movement had been, "a little bit all over the place," on carbon taxes and that, "No one wants to take it off the table... And at the same time, we want to recognize that there are some challenges inherent to each of these methods." The Congresswoman was also a supporter of Washington Initiative 1631, a 2018 ballot initiative in Washington state, which would have implemented a fee on carbon. Congresswoman Jayapal voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.pramilaforcongress.com/energy-and-the-environment https://twitter.com/RepJayapal/status/908796614654935040 https://twitter.com/pramilajayapal/status/1304965786273021953 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060118143 https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2018/09/19/32586929/washington-states-carbon-fee-will-make-history-unless-big-oil-can-stop-it https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://jayapal.house.gov/2022/06/24/jayapal-chair-of-the-congressional-progressive-caucus-on-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Jeffries, HakeemNew York8DCongressman Jeffries understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a statement of support for President Biden’s Build Back Better Framework, he stated, “We will confront the climate crisis with the fierce urgency of now by making the largest federal investment ever in combating climate change. “100100Congressman Jeffries is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act, legislation that would require the President “to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change.” In a Tweet, Jeffries said "House Dems will continue to confront the climate crisis with the fierce urgency of now. And do everything in our power to save the planet from catastrophe." The Congressman’s website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. 100Congressman Jeffries has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://www.dems.gov/newsroom/press-releases/chairman-jeffries-statement-of-support-for-president-bidens-build-back-better-framework https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?r=10&s=1 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://jeffries.house.gov/2022/06/24/rep-jeffries-statement-on-the-extreme-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Johnson Jr., Henry C.Georgia4DCongressman Johnson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "We cannot achieve or maintain a high standard of living if our environment is severely degraded or damaged. The window of opportunity to secure our natural environment against existential threats produced by human activity is rapidly closing. Humans are in large part responsible for climate change, a potentially devastating threat to our security and health that must immediately be addressed."100100Congressman Johnson has demonstrated leadership on climate change through advocating for climate action. In a 2018 press release being recognized for his 100% environmental voting record by Environment Georgia, the Congressman stated, "Protection of our imperiled planet is the central challenge of our time. Climate change is real and threatens our health, the environment, national security and our economy, and I’m committed to working with anyone on Capitol Hill, the White House and the Fourth District to invest in clean-energy technologies and jobs.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 meeting with Climate Climate Lobby volunteers, the Congressman stated, "Every American and indeed every person on this planet is affected by this public health crisis, but yet, in these times of isolation, self-reflection, and fervent politicking, it is all the more important that we take a step back and acknowledge the effect we are having on our planet." Rep. Johnson makes climate change a top priority issue as well. In a 2022 press release, "Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) criticized Shell for a 2020 company statement, saying that its operating plans, outlooks, budgets and pricing assumptions “do not reflect” its emission reduction targets. 'How can we take Shell’s climate mitigation goals seriously when they do not even consider these goals in their current budgets, outlooks and prices?” he asked.'" 100Congressman Johnson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He also voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://hankjohnson.house.gov/issues/environment https://hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-johnson-recognized-100-environmental-voting-record https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=280636796428603 https://hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/democrats-go-after-big-oil-climate-pledges-calling-them-insufficient https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Georgia%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://hankjohnson.house.gov/media-center/e-newsletters/roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Johnson, MikeLouisiana4RCongressman Mike Johnson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2017 USA Today posted a video of the Congressman, stating, "I am not a big proponent of climate change data because I have seen data on the other side... The climate is changing. But the question is, is the climate changing because of natural cycles in the atmosphere... or is it changing because we drive SUVs."00Congressman Johnson demonstrates a lack of leadership by supporting President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. In a 2017 op-ed in the Shreveport Times, the Congressman wrote, "President Donald Trump did us all a service this month by removing our country from the lopsided Paris climate agreement... Fourth, and very importantly, the Paris agreement accomplished almost nothing in exchange for all those extraordinary costs. Even the most optimistic studies projected that if all its conditions were met, the agreement would reduce global temperatures by only 0.2 degree Celsius. That’s a far cry from 'saving the planet.'" Congressman Johnson is a supporter of oil and gas exploration, stating in a press release, that, "The Trump administration’s decision to allow enhanced exploration, leasing and development within the Outer Continental Shelf, previously closed to such activities, prioritizes home-grown energy production and puts the United States one step closer to achieving energy dominance." Congressman Johnson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Johnson makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 00https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/2017/05/31/u.s.-rep.-mike-johnson-and-climate-change/102355868/ https://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/opinion/2017/06/08/rep-johnson-paris-climate-deal-bad-u-s/381772001/ https://mikejohnson.house.gov/media/press-releases/johnson-statement-trump-administration-s-proposed-oil-and-gas-leasing-program https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://mikejohnson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1155Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Jordan, JimOhio4RCongressman Jim Jordan disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to an article by 'MIC,' "Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, who has taken a cool $200,000 from fossil fuel firms, said 'God bless Chevron' for their plans to increase oil production rather than shrink their carbon emissions."00Congressman Jordan supported the president's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating in a 2017 press release, "The Paris accord is a treaty that should have had a vote in the Senate. President Trump did the right thing by withdrawing us from an agreement that was not properly ratified. The Paris treaty would hurt American companies and American workers by depressing economic output, keep companies from creating jobs and drive millions more out of the country." He has also opposed the Green New Deal, stating, "The Green New Deal is not new, but it is devastating.” Congressman Jordan demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Jordan makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). In 2008, Rep. Jordan was the first to sign Americans for Prosperity No Climate Tax Pledge. He has also said that "[He] will oppose any legislation relating to climate change that includes a net increase in government revenue."00https://www.mic.com/impact/house-oversight-committee-shell-exxon-executives-hearing https://jordan.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=4563 https://jordan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398131 https://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ny-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-jim-jordan-climate-deniers-climate-change-20190409-fca3h7mj65g7xmjz264fo45qvi-story.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/03/us/politics/republican-leaders-climate-change.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86-ThC1_iQ0Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Joyce, DavidOhio14RCongressman David Joyce does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250 Congressman Joyce joined the Conservative Climate Caucus, saying "I’m proud to be among those launching the Conservative Climate Caucus today. Republicans need to have a voice in creating practical solutions to address climate change." On the Congressman's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "The United States must take an 'all of the above' approach that utilizes all available energy sources, including coal, oil, natural gas, and wind. This will help keep energy costs low for consumers. During my time in Congress, I have supported efforts which promote and prioritize the domestic production of energy sources and feel strongly that we must reduce our dependence on foreign energy." An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. 25Congressman Joyce opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2525.75https://joyce.house.gov/energy/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://joyce.house.gov/posts/joyce-issues-statement-on-scotus-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Joyce, JohnPennsylvania13RCongressman Joyce does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release touting Natural Gas, the Congressman stated, "Congress must support an ‘all of the above’ strategy to ensure Americans’ access to affordable and efficient energy. A leader in our nation’s natural gas production, Pennsylvania’s natural gas reserves have tripled between 2011 and 2017 thanks to the development of the Marcellus Shale. Not only has the development of natural gas in Pennsylvania expanded economic opportunities, but it also is driving declining carbon dioxide emissions in the U.S. power sector. As a physician, I believe it is critical that we utilize clean-burning natural gas as a key component of our energy economy.”250In a 2019 press release advocating against the Paris Agreement, Congressman Joyce stated, "“When President Obama signed the Paris Agreement, he clearly did not understand the harm it would do to the manufacturers of south central Pennsylvania. The workers of the 13th District overwhelmingly elected President Trump to remove them from bad deals that hurt their businesses and eliminate their jobs, and I do not support reentering this lopsided pact that is unfair to my constituents.” Congressman Joyce demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Joyce opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://johnjoyce.house.gov/media/press-releases/joyce-clean-natural-gas-key-component-america-s-energy-economy https://johnjoyce.house.gov/media/press-releases/joyce-votes-shield-13th-district-workers-unfair-climate-deal https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kamlager-Dove, SydneyCalifornia37DCongresswoman Kamlager-Dove understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release, she said "I was proud to commemorate Earth Day by introducing this resolution highlighting the need to take immediate action to address the climate crisis for the sake of our children and young people. Children and youth have the greatest stake in and will be the greatest beneficiaries of global progress toward combating climate change. At the same time, it is the younger generations that will suffer the most from a failure of the international community to act urgently on climate adaptation and mitigation."100100Congresswoman Kamlager-Dove has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a Tweet, she said "What can you do TODAY to end carbon in our atmosphere (bike vs. drive)? When planning purchases (electric vs. gas stove)? I rise up with Sierra Club in an all-out attack on climate catastrophe. Make your plan. Do your part. Let’s save our planet, y’all." Congresswoman Kamlager-Dove has cosponsored climate legislation calling on the creation of a Green New Deal (H.Res.319).100Congresswoman Kamlager-Dove has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.congress.gov/member/sydney-kamlager-dove/K000400?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://twitter.com/sydneykamlager/status/1354186826576093185 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://kamlager-dove.house.gov/media/press-releases/kamlager-dove-titus-introduce-resolution-threat-climate-change-poses-children https://kamlager-dove.house.gov/media/press-releases/kamlager-dove-statement-anniversary-landmark-roe-v-wade-rulingSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kaptur, MarcyOhio9DCongresswoman Marcy Kaptur understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the President's climate change Executive Orders, the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is not an abstract issue for many Ohioans. Its impacts can be felt all along the shoreline of Lake Erie where warmer water can exacerbate problems such as harmful algal blooms. The effects of climate change are far and wide and impact our land, our water and our air – let the science be our guide, Mr. President.” 100100Congresswoman Kaptur has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman supported the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, "Families in Northern Ohio know the climate crisis is real and poses an existential threat to our future. Tackling climate change to protect public health, the air we breathe, and the water we drink must be among our highest priorities." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. As the Chairwoman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, the Congresswoman hosted a 2019 hearing on climate change, stating, "Climate change is the global issue of our time and a challenge to our ability to sustain life on Earth. Our responsibility in Congress is to support efforts that meet that challenge head on." Congresswoman Kaptur makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2019, she hosted a roundtable on Dept. of Energy's role in fighting climate change. In her opening statement she stated, "We are here to discuss the topic of climate change – a global issue that challenges our ability to sustain life on earth. Our job in Congress is to frame the magnitude of this challenge and provide a practical pathway forward that is regionally sensitive."100Congresswoman Kaptur has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).7593.75https://kaptur.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/kaptur-statement-trump-executive-orders-climate-change https://kaptur.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/kaptur-votes-keep-us-paris-climate-accord https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1060433344348518 https://kaptur.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/kaptur-hosts-hearing-department-energy-s-role-addressing-climate-change https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.wkyc.com/article/news/politics/ohio-leaders-react-supreme-court-draft-ruling-roe-v-wade-abortion-marcy-kaptur-sherrod-brown-tim-ryan/95-6b340037-7ed5-4ae1-a442-f7de77059788Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kean Jr., ThomasNew Jersey7RCongressman Kean Jr. understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an article he wrote for northjersey.com, Kean said "Climate change is real and both political parties in Washington D.C. need to step up and be more earnest in their approaches [...] Republican elected officials need to acknowledge that our children’s futures are at stake, climate change is real, and global industrial activity is a contributing factor."750Congressman Kean Jr. does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Kean Jr. opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2531.25https://www.northjersey.com/story/opinion/2020/09/03/tom-kean-jr-climate-change-demands-bipartisan-combat/5702903002/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Keating, BillMassachussetts9DCongressman Bill Keating understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. During his opening statement of an April 2019 hearing on the threats of climate change to national security, the Congressman stated, "What does our warming globe actually look like? Intensifying food and water insecurity; population flows related to migration, displacement, and planned relocation; the inability of fragile states to anticipate and mitigate the impacts of climate change; increased need for disaster relief and humanitarian assistance; great power competition resulting from the diminishment of arctic sea ice; and heightened conflict with and among states. These are problems that would generally demand the full focus of American foreign policy. You’d think that getting at the root cause of such an alarming list of issues would be a major priority."100100Congressman Keating’s 'Environment' page states, "Bill has long been a champion for environmental conservation. In the face of a changing climate, he believes is critical to invest in both conservation and coastal restoration initiatives." He was also quoted in The Hill, stating, "Our generation has failed to adequately address the climate crisis.” Congressman Keating’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Keating has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://foreignaffairs.house.gov/2019/4/keating-opening-statement-at-climate-change-hearing https://keating.house.gov/policy-work/issues/environment https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/461977-climate-activist-greta-thunberg-implores-lawmakers-to-listen-to-the https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/bill-keating Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kelly, MikePennsylvania16RCongressman Mike Kelly disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2013 press release responding to a speech President Obama gave on climate change, the Congressman stated, “In spite of serious, ongoing crises in trouble spots around the world, President Obama recently flew abroad to name climate change, of all things, the ‘global threat of our time.’ Despite the thousands of jobs that the Keystone XL pipeline is guaranteed to create and the vast public support it enjoys, the president refuses to approve it. Despite the hundreds of thousands of jobs derived from our nation’s coal industry – including more than 40,000 jobs in Pennsylvania – and the affordable energy it provides our communities, the White House’s climate advisor has shockingly declared that ‘a war on coal is exactly what’s needed.'" 00In a 2017 press release supporting the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "Today’s announcement is great news for the American people. It is a victory for our economy, our sovereignty, and our Constitution. The Paris Agreement – which should have been considered a treaty from the very beginning – was written with Americans and their elected representatives as an afterthought. It would result in unfair domestic harm for American workers, taxpayers, consumers, manufacturers, and energy producers. We would shoulder most of the cost and gain no measurable reward. There’s a reason President Obama never submitted this accord to the Senate for proper approval: it would have been rejected as a very bad deal for America, and rightly so." Congressman Kelly demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Kelly makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://kelly.house.gov/press-release/rep-kelly-responds-president-obama%E2%80%99s-climate-change-speech https://kelly.house.gov/press-release/rep-kelly-applauds-president-trump%E2%80%99s-announcement-paris-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/119/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kelly, TrentMississippi1RCongressman Trent does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250On Congressman Trent's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "I support an all-of-the above energy strategy. Americans deserve access to reliable and affordable energy, and the federal government does not need to be in the business of picking winners and losers. Technological advances in extracting oil and natural gas from shale, specifically a technique known as fracking, has increased our GDP, reduced prices for consumers, expanded investment in the energy sector, created jobs, and is the leading contributing factor for improvements in the economy." Congressman Trent does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Trent makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41).012.5https://trentkelly.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14933 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://trentkelly.house.gov/newsroom/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5512Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kennedy, MikeUtah4RRepresentative Mike Kennedy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In 2018, Kennedy was asked about climate change by the Park Record. Referencing Summit County’s Electric Xpress bus line, he said technology and more efficient transportation could help mitigate climate change’s effects, such as the Salt Lake Valley’s inversions. He said that could be achieved with or without global cooperation. “When it comes to ‘America First,’ what’s good for America is good for the whole world,” Kennedy said. However, since then his stance on climate change seems to have changed. In 2026, Kennedy wrote on Twitter that he voted against a spending bill in part because it included funding for "alarmist climate change research."250Representative Kennedy has consistently opposed action on climate change. Kennedy claims to support an "all-of-the-above" energy approach, but in actuality he is most vocal in supporting continued fossil fuel reliance. He introduce a bill called the "License to Drill Act" which fast tracks permitting for energy projects. This action was praise by the Utah Petroleum Association in a press release. His cozy ties with the fossil fuel industry are further evidenced by his visit to a Chevron refinery. He tweeted: "Last week, I toured the Chevron Refinery to discuss their operations and their role in advancing American Energy Dominance. The refinery produces gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel, with 30% of its oil sourced locally in Utah. I remain committed to supporting America’s growing energy demands." He is also a vocal supporter of coal. "For generations, coal has fueled American industry and powered progress. Today, as we continue to innovate, it remains vital to our energy security and prosperity. I’ve introduced a resolution to designate this week as ‘Coal Week’ to honor the industry and the workers who keep our lights on and our nation strong," wrote Kennedy on Twitter. Representative Mike Kennedy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Mike Kennedy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://www.parkrecord.com/2018/06/16/senate-candidate-mike-kennedy-talks-daca-climate-change-and-donald-trump-in-park-city/ https://x.com/RepMikeKennedy/status/2009369667693891978 https://mikekennedy.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-kennedy-leads-bill-keep-american-energy-permitting-track https://x.com/RepMikeKennedy/status/1961209071190905235 https://x.com/RepMikeKennedy/status/1981081352763052070 https://www.moabtimes.com/articles/5-republicans-vie-for-utahs-empty-seat-in-congress-here-are-their-views-on-abortion-immigration-and-water/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kennedy, TimNew York26DCongressman Kennedy understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his former campaign website, he said "New Yorkers are already experiencing climate change. Statewide, there are 159,337 clean energy workers who continue to advance sustainability methods and promote clean production. Let’s BUILD BACK America’s workforce to reflect a green future today."75100Congressman Kennedy does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Kennedy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He was not in Congress to vote for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5083.3333https://kennedyforuscongress.com/issues/ https://www.timkennedyforsenate.com/build-back-nySupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Khanna, RoCalifornia17DCongressman Ro Khanna understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment and Climate,' page, Khanna states we must have "the sources of energy to bring back manufacturing while having a moonshot in renewable energy and energy efficiency to create jobs, lower costs, end our dependence on petrostate authoritarians, and tackle the climate crisis [...] It is our responsibility to leave the planet healthy and safe for our children and future generations. This requires preserving open spaces, developing sustainable communities, achieving energy efficiency and water conservation, and investing in alternative energy sources. I will fight for protective measures against the harmful effects of climate change and hold local polluters accountable."100100Congressman Khanna has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congressman makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed on California's climate progress in the Sacramento Bee, the Congressman wrote, "We have been pushing for our state to lead in the fight against runaway climate change for years now, and together we’ve achieved a lot. We’re on our way to running on 100 percent clean energy by 2045 – one of the most ambitious targets in the nation. California is showing concrete results in achieving the vision of a Green New Deal while fostering economic growth. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s latest budget commits California to becoming “carbon-neutral” by 2045." Rep. Khanna makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 San Jose Spotlight article, The Congressman in a 2021 tweet stated, "The UN’s climate change report confirms we've already warmed the globe and must act immediately to prevent it from worsening. Global warming is causing heat waves, stronger storms, flooding, and droughts. The stakes are clear for the infrastructure bill. No climate no deal.” 100Congressman Khanna supports a U.S. fee on carbon but does not advocate for it. According to Science Magazine Rep. Khanna has stated his support for a carbon fee stating, "I’m obviously in favor of a carbon tax.” Congressman Khanna voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://khanna.house.gov/issues/environment-climate https://khanna.house.gov/media/editorials/climate-crisis-needs-courage-change-here-s-what-gov-newsom-needs-do https://twitter.com/RepRoKhanna/status/1424842631083925508 http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/12/special-series-new-congress-meet-ro-khanna-representing-heart-silicon-valley https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://khanna.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-khanna-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Kiggans, Jen Virginia2VACongresswoman Kiggans does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congresswoman Kiggans does not oppose climate action. Kiggans is the co-chair of the Conservative Climate Caucus, which seeks to address climate change from a conservative position. However, on her website, Kiggans advocates for an all of the above approach to energy. An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions.25Congresswoman Kiggans opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.13newsnow.com/article/news/politics/elaine-luria-jen-kiggans-react-supreme-court-ruling-overturning-roe-v-wade/291-8cf4eb42-5903-4c1d-8db0-f268152b2af9 https://kiggans.house.gov/resources/energyOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kiley, KevinCalifornia6RCongressman Kiley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he recognized that climate change plays a roll in California's wildfires, he fails to recognize the role of humans and fossil fuel emissions in driving it.250Congressman Kiley supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. Kiley said to the Sacramento Bee "I joined the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus to work in a bipartisan way to preserve both our environment and economic opportunity and to prepare for the impacts of a changing climate. I have also actively supported investments in clean energy."50Congressman Kiley opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2525https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/voter-guide/article284816431.html#storylink=cpy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-08-19/republican-recall-hopefuls-seek-to-differentiate-themselves-in-san-francisco-debateOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kim, Young California40RCongresswoman Young Kim agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 Tweet, Young said "We all know that the climate is changing, and that it’s time to seek innovative and clean energy solutions to lower emissions."500Congresswoman Young Kim is a co-sponsor of the Trillion Trees Act (H.R 2639), which will "conserve, restore and grow 1 trillion trees worldwide globally to grow our forest resiliency and reduce emissions." Congresswoman Kim expressed in a tweet posted in February 2021 that "We can address climate change, grow our economy and ensure reliable, affordable energy for consumers. I’m looking forward to promoting free-market climate solutions on @housesciencegop." Congresswoman Kim supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congresswoman Young opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congresswoman Young voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).2534.75https://twitter.com/RepYoungKim/status/1515356790950703110 https://youngkim.house.gov/issues/wildfires https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2639/cosponsors?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22trillion+trees%22%5D%7D https://twitter.com/repyoungkim/status/1359224144496328714 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://youngkim.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-young-kim-fights-protect-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
King-Hinds, KimberlynNorthern Mariana Islands1RKimberlyn King-Hinds understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a statement, King-Hinds said "“Climate change is real. No one knows how to solve the problem without having unintended consequences and the best we can do is do our part [...] We also hope to realize some savings from policies and procedures that make us less reliant on non-green energy sources."7500Kimberlyn King-Hinds has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.saipantribune.com/news/local/cpa-targets-zero-greenhouse-gas-emissions-by-2050/article_694eb41b-07ad-540a-af98-d1ca6ab86427.htmlUnclear Position on RoeN/AN/AN/AN/A
Knott, BradNorth Carolina13RRepresentative Brad Knott disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Knott told iVoter Guide: "The climate has changed continually during the history of the Earth. Man’s activity likely has some influence on climate but the extent is not clear. Many scientific scholars who believe that man’s activity is causing warming nevertheless reject the notion that there is a climate crisis or emergency. They advise that net-zero policies won’t work and will hurt both the developed and the developing world." In a tweet from 2026, Knott characterized government climate spending as "[w]aste, fraud, and abuse."00Representative Knott advocates against climate action and promotes expansion of reliance on fossil fuels. He wrote on Twitter in 2025: "Despite broad unpopularity from the American people, the Biden-Harris administration tried to ram through Green New Deal programs. In this year’s reconciliation process, @TransportGOP's proposal eliminates SEVEN unnecessary and costly GND initiatives. All in, we managed to find and cut more than $10 billion in reckless spending, and this is just the start." Further, in an interview with CBS 17, Knott said that "fossil fuels are not a bad thing. They are essential. The United States is leading the world, but we need to continue to lead the world, and we can take care of our own supply." Representative Brad Knott demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Brad Knott makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a tweet from 2025, referencing a Wall Street Journal article about a UN Climate Tax, he wrote: "This is a hard no. Once again, the overly ambitious UN has overstepped its role and authority. Its new illegal global climate tax would: ❌ Hike prices on American households, ❌ Redistribute wealth away from the U.S., ❌ Grossly increase the UN's power. I stand with @POTUS against this nonsense."00https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/78079/race/1745/election/1090 https://x.com/RepKnott/status/2054267393707274465 https://x.com/RepKnott/status/1919801311790293137 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNjb8fazfnM https://x.com/RepKnott/status/1978460055314767907 https://www.bradknott.com/prioritiesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Kustoff, DavidTennessee8RCongressman David Kustoff does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250On Congressman Kuster's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "H.R. 2910, the Promoting Interagency Coordination for Review of Natural Gas Pipelines Act: This legislation increases transparency and accountability and promotes better coordination among agencies involved when reviewing interstate natural gas pipelines," as well as, "H.R. 2883, the Promoting Cross-Border Energy Infrastructure Act: This bill establishes a predictable and transparent process to permit the construction of cross-border pipelines and electric facilities." Congressman Kuster demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Kustoff opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://kustoff.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://kustoff.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-kustoff-issues-statement-supreme-court-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
LaHood, DarinIllinois16RCongressman LaHood does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2017 Town Hall the Congressman was asked his stance on climate change, in which he answered, "I agree, the climate is changing. I believe that humans play a role in that, there's no doubt about that. The question is, at what level do they play a role? Is it 51% is it 35% what is that?"250In a 2016 Facebook Post the Congressman wrote, "What happened in Paris won't stay in Paris. How did President Obama circumvent Congress during the climate change conference?" In a hearing in the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology Rep. Lahood made the following statement on the social cost of carbon. "Last year I was pleased to cosponsor H.R. 5668, Transparency and Honesty in Energy Regulation Act. Or THERA. This legislation is aimed at prohibiting the Department of Energy and the Environmental Protection Agency from considering the Social Cost of Carbon as part of any cost benefit analysis unless specifically authorized by law. If passed the DOE and EPA would no longer rely on manipulated and fabricated economic benefits to justify or support new job-killing environmental regulations. The Social Cost of Carbon is nothing but a political tool lacking scientific integrity and transparency conceived and utilized by an administration pushing a green agenda to the detriment of the American taxpayers. Perhaps a better measurement of the Social Cost of Carbon is not the net damages that result from a 1-metric ton increase in carbon dioxide emissions in a given year but the damage inflicted on domestic industries by the environmental regulations justified by this flawed calculation." Congressman Lahood demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Lahood opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5http://www.week.com/story/35194619/darin-lahood-in-town-for-first-town-hall https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1568524306804354 https://science.house.gov/sites/republicans.science.house.gov/files/documents/HHRG-115-SY18-WState-LaHood-20170228_0.pdf https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://lahood.house.gov/2022/6/lahood-statement-on-dobbs-v-jackson-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
LaLota, NickNew York1RCongressman LaLota does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his House website he said "We need to work in a serious and bipartisan manner to tackle pollution and mitigate mankind’s negative effect on our environment. However, he fails to acknowledge the role of emissions on climate change.250Congressman LaLota demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Although he is a member of the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, he has voiced support for the expansion of oil drilling and pipelines, and opposes the Green New Deal. Furthermore, LaLota has a low score with the League of Conservation Voters, demonstrating a record of voting against climate action legislation.0Congressman LaLota opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/267/nicholas-j-lalota/ https://lalota.house.gov/media/press-releases/climatesolutions https://scorecard.lcv.org/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220809180750/https:/www.nicklalota.com/protecting-life https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Landsman, GregOhio1DCongressman Landsman understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he said "We must take action to address the threat of climate change and pass down a sustainable, safe world to our children."75100Congressman Landsman supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. On his website, Landsman said "In Congress, Greg is fighting to protect access to clean air and water and hold polluters accountable. He is also working to return federal investments, made possible by the Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Investment Act, that support renewable energy, sustainability, and environmental restoration in Southwest Ohio."50Congressman Landsman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5068.75https://www.landsmanforcongress.com/the-issues-1 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Langworthy, NickNew York23RCongressman Langworthy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Langworthy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Langworthy has expressed support for removing restrictions on fracking, restarting the Keystone Pipeline, and increasing fossil fuels production. He also has a low record with the LCV indicating a history of voting against climate action.0Congressman Langworthy opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/259/nicholas-a-langworthy/ https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/nick-langworthy https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/23rd-congressional-candidates-differ-on-overturn-of-roe-v-wade/article_f32ca65c-7cd2-5fee-b832-5bf55a14156a.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Larsen, RickWashington2DCongressman Rick Larsen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Scientific evidence leaves no doubt that the global climate is changing as a result of greenhouse gas emissions produced by human activity. The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s leading organization in assessing climate change, has found that greenhouse gas emissions have risen to unprecedented levels. I am committed to protecting Washington state’s environment and mitigating the devastating effects of climate change." 100100Congressman Larsen has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman supported the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, “Congress must take concrete steps to address the threats of climate change. Since the beginning of the 116th Congress, Democrats in the House of Representatives have made addressing climate change a priority." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. The Congressman also introduced National Evaluation of Aviation and Aerospace Solutions to Climate Change Act (H.R. 5977), stating in a press release, "Climate change threatens life on Earth, and addressing this threat is one of my top priorities in Congress... This bill will help catalog those efforts, identify barriers to the adoption of mitigation efforts and serve as a roadmap for the steps the aviation and aerospace sector must take to achieve a 100 percent clean economy by 2050.” Rep. Larsen makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman voted to direct the United States Coast Guard to submit a report on the vulnerabilities of Coast Guard installations and requirements from climate change over the next 20 years, stating in a 2019 press release, "Congress must take concrete steps to protect U.S. Coast Guard installations at risk due to the effects of climate change, including rising sea levels, flooding, drought and wildfires.”100Congressman Larsen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://larsen.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14892 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1513 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2345 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1500 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://larsen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2672Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Latimer, GeorgeNew York16DRepresentative George Latimer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he wrote: "Climate change is an urgent threat with long-term repercussions, which demands immediate and decisive action to safeguard our future... As George believes it is our shared responsibility to preserve the planet for future generations, he will support passing a Green New Deal to enact comprehensive policies that address environmental degradation, promote conservation efforts, and mitigate the impacts of climate change on communities across the nation." In 2025, he wrote on Twitter: "Climate change is real and urgent. We ignore it at our own peril. These rollbacks on climate and health protections like safe drinking water and clean air, will hurt millions of Americans while padding polluters’ profits. The EPA’s job is to protect us—gutting protections is a betrayal. More disasters, more disease—that’s the cost. Outraged doesn’t even begin to cover it."100100Representative George Latimer has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Latimer strongly opposed the Republican led budget, saying: "People will get sicker. Kids will go hungry. Families will pay more for gas and home electric bills while our world continues to warm due to climate change. No matter how you spin it, everyday Americans will suffer." Representative George Latimer also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In response to the Trump Administration's rescinding of the 2009 greenhouse gas endangerment finding, Latimer wrote on Twitter: "The Trump Administration’s plan to revoke the EPA’s 2009 finding that greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health, flies in the face of science and our fight against climate change. Alongside other decisions made by this administration, this rollback has the most lasting repercussions in the fight for our children’s futures and environment." Furthermore, while he was Westchester County Executive, Latimer championed clean energy and emissions reductions. While in office, Westchester County was designated as a Bronze Certified Climate Smart Community by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. "When we talk about how we are going fight Climate Change, every one of us can do our share. There are things within our power as a County government – those are things we ought to do – and when there are things that fall outside of our authority, we will advocate for them," said Latimer. Representative George Latimer makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Representative George Latimer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://latimerforny.com/priorities/ https://x.com/RepGLatimer/status/1900264538697613695 https://latimer.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-latimer-republican-budget-americas-worst-budget-ever-no-matter-how-you https://x.com/RepGLatimer/status/1950548925171007625 https://www.westchestercountyny.gov/all-press-releases/june-21-county-executive-george-latimer-gives-westchester-weekly-update https://x.com/RepGLatimer/status/2069850168573259890Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Latta, Robert E.Ohio5RCongressman Robert Latta does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a statement made to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, Energy and Research Hearing on Climate Change Legislation, he stated, "It is time for Congress to take a strong look at climate change legislation and the effects it will have on our economy, especially how hard it will affect the Midwestern states that rely heavily on agriculture, manufacturing, and small businesses." 250Congressman Robert Latta does not take a clear position on climate change. According to a a 2015 press release, Congressman Latta stated, "Despite the lofty rhetoric we heard at this afternoon’s press conference, these new rules are more about this President looking to build a legacy than build a better future. The rules, released under the guise of ‘Climate Change prevention’, will directly impact hardworking families all across Ohio with job losses, and increased energy costs – dramatic increases in some cases." Congressman Latta demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Latta makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2012 press release opposing a fee on carbon, the Congressman stated, "During a time when many families and local manufacturers are already facing financial hardships, we cannot impose a tax increase that will result in higher energy prices.” Congressman Latta was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 06.25https://latta.house.gov/blog/?postid=157726 https://latta.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398046 https://latta.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=315306 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://lattaforcongress.com/ (Listed on main page)Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lawler, MikeNew York17RCongressman Lawler disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Tweet, Lawler said "Considering NYS was once a glacier, it's clear we've had climate change for a very long time, not just in the last 20 years."1000Congressman Lawler demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Lawler has accepted money from the oil and gas industry, such as from PACS for Exxon and Chevron. Lawler is also a cosponsor of the Energy Choice Act, which would prevent the transition away from fossil fuels.0Congressman Lawler opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2531.25https://www.foodandwateraction.org/democracy/mike-lawler-climate-environment/ https://x.com/ny17org/status/1681757303534411777 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.lohud.com/story/opinion/2022/10/06/mike-lawler-ny-17-these-are-my-positions-on-abortion/69524466007/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lee, LaurelFlorida15RCongresswoman Lee does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, avoiding answering the question when asked in a debate.250Congresswoman Lee does not oppose climate action. In a debate, the Congresswoman voiced support for sustainable growth and rebuilding, as well as protecting existing green spaces. However, she has also called for "reviving" the Keystone pipeline while opposing expanding drilling off the coast of Florida. 25Congresswoman Lee opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://floridapolitics.com/archives/565536-alan-cohn-laurel-lee-spar-on-abortion-immigration-as-accusations-fly/ https://www.theledger.com/story/news/politics/elections/congressional/2022/10/24/democrat-alan-cohn-faces-republican-laurel-lee-congressional-district-15-seat/10561153002/ https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/300/laurel-lee/#_edn40 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lee, SummerPennsylvania12DCongresswoman Lee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the Congresswoman writes "In Congress I will fight for a Green New Deal to transition to a 100% clean and renewable energy economy. This includes ending fracking, which poses a disproportionate threat to communities like ours. The Green New Deal centers frontline and marginalized communities facing the brunt of environmental racism - communities with poisoned water, high rates of asthma, etc - communities like ours." In a 2022 interview with Teen Vogue, Congresswoman Lee states "There is no future in fossil fuels, not for our planet and not for any industry. No matter how much planet-destroying drilling and fracking you do, those fossil fuels will run out. We can either be leaders in the movement toward 100% renewable energy, pass a Green New Deal, and create millions of green union jobs and infrastructure investment here — or we can be left behind again."100100Congresswoman Lee has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release, she said "I’m so proud to deliver over $44M in funding to cut methane emissions in my district. In regions like Western Pennsylvania, where the legacy of oil and gas extraction is deeply felt, this investment is not just about reducing emissions; it’s about justice and health for our communities [...] unchecked methane emissions contribute to climate change and pose serious health risks, especially in marginalized areas. This is a big step towards correcting historical neglect and ensuring a cleaner, healthier future for all.” The Congresswoman has cosponsored pro climate legislation such as the Climate Resilience Workforce Act.100Congresswoman Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://summerforpa.com/issues/ https://www.teenvogue.com/story/summer-lee-congress-pennsylvania-interview https://summerlee.house.gov/posts/congresswoman-summer-lee-announces-over-44m-in-funding-to-cut-methane-emissions-from-wells-and-support-environmental-restoration-of-well-sites https://www.congress.gov/member/summer-lee/L000602?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lee, SusieNevada3DCongresswoman Susie Lee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2022 virtual town hall, Rep. Lee discussed the need for urgent climate action, saying, "As federal leaders, we owe it to our communities to act with urgency to deliver on climate action that meets this moment at the scale that science and justice demand. I am proud to work alongside the Nevada Conservation League and environmental advocates to help secure a better climate future."100100On Congresswoman Lee's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "I will be a leader in Congress when it comes to energy independence and combating climate change." The Congresswoman is a cosponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." Congresswoman Lee’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congresswoman Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 esolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://nevadaconservationleague.org/icymi-congresswoman-susie-lee-joins-environmental-advocates-to-discuss-federal-climate-action/ https://susieleeforcongress.com/environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?s=1&r=4 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Leger Fernandez, Teresa New Mexico3DCongresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 interview with 'NM Political Report,' the Congresswoman Leger Fernandez states, "Some of the science and data that I’ve read places very dire consequences if we don’t address climate change. If you read the book by William duBuys, 'A Great Aridness,' he summarizes a lot of that research, where they discuss that New Mexico may face a future of being like the Sonoran desert. The desertification of New Mexico is very scary, which is why I believe that addressing climate change and doing this transition is an urgent need." In a tweet posted in October 2021, Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez writes "We need bold climate action now."100100Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a tweet posted in September 2021, Congresswoman Leger Fernandez writes "The climate crisis is already here. It's past time to act. It's time to pass a clean energy standard. #BuildBackBetter." The congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In an endorsement interview with 'Yucca Action,' Congresswoman Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandez states "We must seriously and intentionally listen to climate scientists and address climate change. In Congress, I will advocate for bold action to meet or exceed carbon reductions of 50% of 2005 levels by 2030." Congresswoman Legar Fernandez makes climate change a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the congresswoman writes, "And we know that climate change is an existential crisis. We must reduce carbon pollution, rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement, and invest in renewable energy resources like wind and solar, as well as clean energy tax incentives."100Congresswoman Teresa Leger Fernandezhas no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://nmpoliticalreport.com/2020/10/07/candidate-qa-teresa-leger-fernandez-on-environmental-issues/ https://twitter.com/RepTeresaLF/status/1450141247549710341?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet https://twitter.com/TeresaForNM/status/1441118934678192131 https://www.yuccaaction.org/teresa https://www.teresaforall.com/sustainability https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Levin, MikeCalifornia49DCongressman Mike Levin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. The Congressman's, 'Climate Change & Natural Resources,' page, it states, "Rep. Levin knows that the climate crisis is the defining issue of our time. With California experiencing worsening droughts, heat waves, and rising sea levels, Rep. Levin believes we must take aggressive action now to limit the worst effects on our planet and preserve our natural resources for future generations. Rep. Levin is proud to serve on the House Natural Resources Committee and the Select Committee on the Climate Crisis. He knows that we can grow our economy, create new jobs in America, and combat the climate crisis at the same time, and he has introduced a number of bills to achieve those goals."100100Congressman Mike Levin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 op-ed published in The Hill on pressing the Interior Secretary on climate change, the Congressman wrote, "Climate change is a defining issue of our time, and if we don’t take bold action to address this crisis, our children and grandchildren will suffer the worst consequences." Congressman Levin also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a Q&A with the San Diego Union Tribune, the Congressman when asked about climate change, stated, "I think that the fossil fuel industry had an opportunity to invest in technology and innovation and to change their business model but instead they decided to invest in politicians. And that’s what they’ve done. And I’ve got colleagues, I don’t want to name them but smart, Republican colleagues who their own districts are facing climate change today." Rep. Levin makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2021 press release, "U.S. Representative Mike Levin (CA-49) led a letter signed by 133 House Members calling on President Biden to ensure infrastructure legislation includes robust investments to combat the climate crisis."100The Congressman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Levin is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://levin.house.gov/issues/climate-change-natural-resources-0 https://mikelevin.house.gov/media/in-the-news/hill-rep-mike-levin-op-ed-congress-must-press-interior-secretary-act-climate https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/story/2019-08-21/interview-with-rep-mike-levin https://mikelevin.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mike-levin-leads-letter-with-133-house-members-calling-for-strong-climate-action-in-infrastructure-package https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mikelevin.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mike-levin-statement-on-draft-supreme-court-decision-on-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Liccardo, SamCalifornia16DRepresentative Sam Liccardo understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. “We have grave threats facing Pacifica — and those grave threats are the same threats facing our country,” said Liccardo during a press conference along Pacifica’s scenic shoreline. “Unfortunately, we have a president of the United States who is unwilling to stand with communities like Pacifica. These threats — coastal erosion, climate change, wildfires — are real.” While Mayor of San Jose in 2022, Liccardo was a speaker at COP27. He is quoted as saying “San Jose continues to be a global leader for climate action, through innovative solutions that green the grid, and electrify buildings and transit, as our residents and businesses move aggressively towards our carbon neutral by 2030 goal."100100Representative Sam Liccardo has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. While in his first term, according to his website, he "launched two major regional initiatives—the Wildfire Resilience Partnership and the Partnership for the Coastside’s Future—to strengthen federal, state, and local coordination as our region confronts the inevitable impacts of climate change.” As mayor of San Jose, Sam Liccardo pledged to make the city carbon neutral by the end of the decade, becoming one of the largest cities in the United States to have set the goal of carbon neutrality by 2030, according to the United States Conference of Mayors. Representative Sam Liccardo also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In an interview with San Jose Spotlight in 2024, Liccardo said: "I am passionate about the need to accelerate our transition from fossil fuels to renewables to confront climate change. During my tenure as mayor, San Jose demonstrated the most ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction efforts in the nation. We made San Jose the largest city in the nation to launch a community choice energy program; today, San Jose Clean Energy provides 95% GHG-free energy to 1 million residents, resulting in the reduction ocommunity-wide GHG emissions by 36% between 2009 and 2021." Representative Sam Liccardo makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Representative Sam Liccardo publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In an interview with San Jose Spotlight in 2024, Liccardo stated that he supports "a carbon dividend + fee border adjustment, a halt on fracking and offshore drilling, and an elimination of subsidies for oil and gas production" in order to accelerate the transition away from Fossil Fuels.100100https://liccardo.house.gov/media/in-the-news/rep-sam-liccardo-pushes-back-against-trump-cuts-after-50-million-loss-threatens https://icleiusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/COP27-Speaker-Profiles_Mayor-Sam-Liccardo.pdf https://liccardo.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-sam-liccardos-first-term-defined-bipartisanship-and-focus-local-priorities https://www.usmayors.org/2022/04/22/earth-day-americas-mayors-are-leading-the-way-on-climate-change/ https://sanjosespotlight.com/on-the-record-congressional-candidate-sam-liccardo/ https://www.facebook.com/repliccardo/posts/medical-decisions-belong-to-patients-and-their-doctors-not-politicians-four-year/122166955940708246/ https://calmatters.org/environment/2019/03/green-buildings/Supports RoeN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lieu, TedCalifornia36DCongressman Lieu understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Lieu's House website, he says "it's clear to me that to solve climate change, we need America to do what California has done, and then for America to get other countries to do what California has done." In a press release, Lieu said "Climate Change is the greatest existential threat to humanity. We must act now and act fast to protect our planet and future generations from the impacts of climate change. Across the world, we’ve seen more and more extreme weather events, including the recent wildfire on Maui and the floods in Libya, which have resulted in thousands of deaths. At home in my congressional district, my constituents have seen wildfires, landslides, and other natural disasters that have destroyed homes and livelihoods. Unless we take extreme action now, it will only get worse."100100Congressman Lieu has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. Congressman Lieu introduced the Climate Solutions Act of 2019 (H.R. 2958), which would require 100 percent of electricity sold in the United States be generated from renewable sources by 2035, stating in a press release, "There is no threat greater to our nation’s security than climate change. Failing to protect our planet will endanger the lives of millions, hurt our economy and jeopardize our children’s future. The wildfires in my district were worsened by drought conditions and are a sliver of what is in store if we fail to act." Rep. Lieu also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed in the Brentwood Residents Association Newsletter, the Congressman wrote, "When it comes to our future, there is no greater threat than climate change. I believe that strong federal action is necessary to protect the air we breathe, the water we drink, and the world our children will inherit. Having a clean environment should not be a partisan issue." Congressman Lieu makes climate change a top priority issue as well. According to a March 2021 article from 'The Hill,' "Speaking at The Hill’s “The Loss of Nature: A Global Threat” event, Lieu said climate change has prompted an upheaval in biodiversity, with policies needed at the state, federal and international to address the problem. “Climate change is an existential threat, not just to California or America, but to the entire world. And the way that we solve this is we get the rest of America to do what California did and the rest of the world to do what America hopefully will do soon," Lieu told The Hill’s Steve Clemons.“The good news is a number of countries are taking climate change seriously. I think they can all do more, but we’ve shifted in just a decade or so from a bunch of people denying that climate change even is happening to now people who are acknowledging it and that’s a very good first step,” said Lieu, a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee."100Congressman Lieu publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. In a press release condemning a resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise, which opposed a carbon fee, he stated, "A majority of the American people and even ExxonMobil support a carbon fee. I call on my House Republican colleagues to stop the shenanigans and work across the aisle to help solve our climate crisis.” He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).100100https://lieu.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-lieu-reintroduces-bold-climate-change-bill-0 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/544881-ted-lieu-raises-alarm-biodiversity-climate-change https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-lieu-statement-opposing-house-vote-condemning-carbon-tax https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://lieu.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-lieu-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lofgren, ZoeCalifornia18DCongresswoman Lofgren understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment page,' it states, "Climate change is the most serious environmental issue facing our nation and our planet. Today we see the negative impacts of climate change as heat-trapping emissions increase global temperatures, melt once permanent ice caps and glaciers, and raise our sea levels leading to greater threats from erratic weather. The pace of climate change threatens habitats and food production as well as public health."100100Congresswoman Lofgren has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman introduced The Clean Energy Victory Bonds Act of 2019 (H.R. 4041), which according to her press release would, spur investment in clean energy projects, create jobs, and help communities fight the climate crisis. In her press release, the Congresswoman stated, "We all benefit as Americans when we invest in the future of our country. I am pleased to reintroduce the Clean Energy Victory Bonds Act for the fourth time, as momentum builds in California and across the country for aggressive action on climate change.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "Our oil dependency also undermines our national security and worsens the threat of climate change. That's why Zoe has supported efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase efficiency standards for cars, trucks, and buildings. By increasing efficiency, we can reduce overall consumption and slow emissions that lead to climate change." Rep. Lofgren makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Lofgren has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).7593.75https://lofgren.house.gov/energy-environment-issues/environment.htm https://lofgren.house.gov/media/press-releases/clean-energy-victory-bonds https://lofgren.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment/energy https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepZoeLofgren/status/1525176800447451136Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Lucas, FrankOklahoma3RCongressman Frank Lucas agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2021 article in the 'Tulsa World News,' Congressman Lucas states, "Fossil fuel use isn’t incompatible with emissions reductions," Lucas wrote. "We don’t have to repeat Europe’s mistake and choose between reliable, affordable energy and clean energy. My Republican colleagues and I acknowledge that climate change is real, but the way we succeed isn’t by weaponizing financial regulators and shunning the energy companies that are essential to meet our energy needs. If we do that, we are cutting off the industry that is making essential investments in the new technologies necessary to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and climate-related risks."500In a press release criticizing the Paris Accords, Congressman Lucas stated, "It will be fascinating to see how the EPA responds to this concept of sending U.S.employees out to enforce agreements that the Senate has not yet approved.” According to a 2019 E&E News article, the Congressman who is the ranking member of the House Science, Space and Technology Committee, wants to better understand the complex relationship between climate change and weather. According to a spokeswoman, "As a rancher who represents a large community of agricultural producers, Ranking Member Lucas wants to better understand the complex relationship between climate change and weather... He's interested in how we can help communities increase preparedness for weather events and help businesses benefit from better short-term weather prediction." Congressman Lucas demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Lucas makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2019 interview with Axios, when asked about climate change regulations the Congressman stated, "A lot of folks I work with advocate carbon taxes, rules and regulations — all sorts of ways to compel consumers to do things that are at least in the short- and medium-term not in their best economic interest. ... I just fundamentally believe that’s not the direction that will ultimately get to where we and the world wants to go.” Congressman Lucas voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).012.5https://tulsaworld.com/news/state-and-regional/govt-and-politics/d-c-digest-lucas-challenges-limitations-placed-on-energy-companies-to-combat-climate-change/article_1f2580da-4325-11ec-844f-4b38ce9fd8e9.html https://lucas.house.gov/press-release/lucas-questions-epa%E2%80%99s-role-international-climate-agreement https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060120401 https://www.axios.com/republican-bill-double-science-funding-climate-change-b734c787-257a-49c3-87bb-0f9ff762d906.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.kjrh.com/news/local-news/oklahoma-lawmakers-react-to-roe-v-wade-overturnOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Luna, Anna PaulinaFlorida13RCongresswoman Luna does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congresswoman Luna demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. On the Congresswoman's website, she says "Anna believes the American people have the right to use American oil from American soil. She will continue to lead the charge in Congress for American energy independence by restoring oil and gas leases, reinstating the Keystone XL pipeline, and fighting the Left’s radical Green New Deal regulations." In 2024 the Congresswoman cosponsored a bill which would repeal recent emission regulations put on cars sold in D.C.0Congresswoman Luna opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://twitter.com/VoteAPL/status/1540342614897172483?s=20&t=HEfstmdHcGD3ehrzU5k33w https://luna.house.gov/energy-independence https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7526/text?s=9&r=1 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Lynch, Stephen F.Massachussetts8DCongressman Stephen Lynch understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "The seminal Fourth National Climate Assessment, recently released by the federal U.S. Global Change Research Program, only reinforced the current and potential impact of climate change on U.S. national security. According to the report, produced by thirteen federal agencies: “[c]limate change and extremes increase the risk to national security through direct impacts on U.S. military infrastructure and by affecting factors, including food and water availability, that can exacerbate conflict outside U.S. borders.” Moreover, climate change is already affecting our defense readiness by “damaging roads, runways, and waterfront infrastructure.” 100100Congressman Lynch has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman introduced the Climate Change National Security Strategy Act of 2019 (H.R. 1201), which, "calls on the Federal Government to step up and lead the fight against the greatest global threat facing the earth," according to a press release announcing an earlier version of the bill. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release condemning President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, stating, "President Trump risks irreparably damaging America’s future generations by abandoning the Paris Climate Agreement." Rep. Lynch makes climate change a top priority issue. In a December 2018 Tweet, the Congressman announced his support for a Green New Deal, writing, "I am happy to support the Resolution for a Standing Committee on a #GreenNewDeal."100Congressman Lynch publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Lynch is a co-sponsor of the America Wins Act (H.R. 4142), which would implement a fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://lynch.house.gov/issue/energy-environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1201/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22S.+1238%22%5D%7D https://lynch.house.gov/press-release/rep-lynch-introduces-climate-change-national-security-strategy-act https://lynch.house.gov/press-release/rep-lynch-statement-response-president-trump-abandoning-paris-climate-agreement https://twitter.com/RepStephenLynch/status/1075516895875489792?fbclid=IwAR0i6nDCNyuGZ31xgJ-c1FIPppbsXdWH9oSeBsBHX5NWqOhKeDK0IS8qzgk https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4142/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/repstephenlynch/status/1521574188968034309?lang=enSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Mackenzie, RyanPennsylvania7RRepresentative Ryan Mackenzie disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Of climate change, he has said that "the science is all over the place." In an older version of his campaign website, he refers to climate action as a "radical climate agenda."00Representative Mackenzie prioritizes expansion of fossil fuels over any climate action. He toured a natural gas facility, and thanked the American Petroleum Institute on Twitter: "Had the opportunity to visit Buckeye Partners — a natural gas distributor — for a tour of their Allentown headquarters and roundtable with people creating energy jobs right here in Pennsylvania. Unleashing the full potential of our state’s massive energy supply is essential to reducing prices, creating jobs, and growing our local economy. Thank you to @APIenergy for bringing together local energy leaders who are working to make use of the abundant resources right under our feet." On his congressional website, he writes: "We need to get control again. That starts with eliminating some of the worst culprits from President Biden’s multitrillion dollar legislative agenda, and it continues with new efforts to eliminate waste in the federal bureaucracy. We can also finally embrace American energy — unleashing our domestic energy supply, including right here in Pennsylvania, and delivering real savings to families." Representative Ryan Mackenzie demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Ryan Mackenzie makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. On a since updated version of his campaign website, he wrote that he will "[s]upport energy independence by encouraging American energy exploration, extraction, and production. Oppose cap-and-tax schemes that prioritize a radical climate agenda over the realities of safe, clean, affordable American energy."00https://armchairlehighvalley.substack.com/p/ryan-mackenzie-touts-his-conservative https://web.archive.org/web/20240416014753/https://www.mackenzieforcongress.com/issues https://x.com/RepMackenzie/status/1928150154424512619 https://mackenzie.house.gov/media/in-the-news/your-view-rep-ryan-mackenzie-outlines-his-priorities-2025 https://web.archive.org/web/20240416014753/https://www.mackenzieforcongress.com/issues https://keystonenewsroom.com/news/politics/ryan-mackenzie-scrubs-anti-abortion-language-from-website-in-race-against-susan-wild/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Magaziner, SethRhode Island2DCongressman Magaziner understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, it states, "too many Rhode Islanders are making difficult choices between paying for gas and groceries, while billion-dollar energy companies are making record profits and climate change remains an immediate threat to our way of life."100100Congressman Magaziner has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his campaign website, it promises "In Congress, Seth will continue his work to lower the cost of energy by suspending the federal gas tax, holding billionaire oil companies accountable for price gouging and investing in affordable clean energy." In a press release, Magaziner announced funding for a coastal storm risk management project, saying "“Sea level rise, coastal erosion and more frequent flooding threaten Rhode Island and our way of life, and we need to invest in long-lasting solutions that will protect homes, schools, businesses and critical infrastructure from the effects of climate change."100Congressman Magaziner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://magaziner.house.gov/ https://sethmagaziner.com/issue/protecting-the-environment-and-combating-climate-change/ https://magaziner.house.gov/media/press-releases/magaziner-clinches-wins-climate-resiliency-efforts-rhode-island https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Malliotakis, NicoleNew York11RNicole Malliotakis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Nicole Malliotakis does not oppose climate action. In a statement, she said "In Congress, I will continue to fight for commonsense solutions that protect our environment while empowering America’s energy industries to reach their full potential in producing clean, inexpensive energy for our nation’s consumers."25Congresswoman Malliotakis opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://nicolemalliotakis.com/congresswoman-nicole-malliotakis-endorsed-by-citizens-for-responsible-energy-solution/ https://www.silive.com/politics/2022/05/malliotakis-dodges-roe-v-wade-discussion-this-is-a-decision-for-the-courts-not-politicians.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Maloy, CelesteUtah3RCeleste Maloy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Representative Maloy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. She has co-sponsored several resolutions condemning pro-climate regulations created by the EPA, Fish & Wildlife Services, and National Marine Fisheries Service.0Representative Maloy opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.celesteforutah.com/issues https://www.congress.gov/member/celeste-maloy/M001228?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22Celeste+Maloy%22%2C%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7DOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mann, Tracey Kansas1RCongressman Tracey Mann disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the 'High Plains Public Radio,' Congressman Mann said "scientific data shows that the 'climate is changing' and 'scientific data that says it’s not.'" Mann does not believe that climate action needs to be taken. “I hear stories about smog and various things, the climate and how it was decades ago, and is getting much better,” Man stated.”00In a 2021 Kansas Reflector article detailing a policy hearing, Congressman Mann stated, “We need to highlight climate solutions that are produced by agriculture...” Congressman Tracey Mann does not oppose climate action. 25Congressman Tracey Mann makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Mann co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://www.hppr.org/hppr-news/2020-07-06/a-look-at-the-sizable-pool-of-candidates-hoping-to-represent-kansas-big-1st https://kansasreflector.com/2021/02/27/u-s-house-agriculture-panel-to-key-in-on-climate-change-and-farming/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Kansas%22%7D https://mann.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mann-reacts-us-supreme-court-ruling-dobbs-v-jacksonOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mannion, JohnNew York22DRepresentative John Mannion understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he writes that he "will pursue policies that build a healthier, cleaner, and more sustainable future for our children and grandchildren. His priorities include: Combating Climate Change: Continuing American leadership in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and protecting communities from severe weather events." However, Mannion focuses more on other issues like affordability and "voted to eliminate the state tax on gasoline," according to his campaign website.7575In 2022, Representative Mannion wrote o Twitter: "Central New York is doing its part to meet the state's ambitious climate and green energy goals. I was at Nine Mile Point today to talk about affordability, reliability, clean hydrogen technologies, and the state investments that are making a green energy future possible." However, while in Congress, Mannion has not been a strong advocate for climate action. Furthermore, he has supported policies that could increase greenhouse gas emissions, like suspending New York's gas tax. "I have a strong record of lowering costs: I delivered property tax relief, suspended the gas tax, expanded universal pre-k, expanded universal school meals, and passed the NYS Child Tax Credit," he wrote on Twitter in 2024. Representative John Mannion supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it.50Representative John Mannion has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5062.5https://www.mannionforny.com/on-the-issues/the-environment/ https://www.mannionforny.com/on-the-issues/affordability/ https://x.com/JohnMannionNY22/status/1575170763879223296 https://x.com/MannionforNY/status/1848869670201491685 https://www.mannionforny.com/on-the-issues/reproductive-rights-freedoms/Supports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Mast, BrianFlorida21RCongressman Brian Mast understands the importance of climate action but does not see it as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting the Environment,' page, it states, "Our community has felt the social and economic consequences of environmental disaster firsthand [...] As research tools have become more robust, scientists have developed a more comprehensive understanding of our planet’s changing climate. Their research has made clear that we must do more to protect our Earth and air quality. That’s why I’m proud to be a member of the Bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus. The Caucus is an important tool to educate members on economically-viable options to reduce climate risk and protect our nation’s economy, security, infrastructure and environment. Together, we can find a path forward to protect our planet for future generations."750In a 2017 article in The Atlantic, Congressman Mast was quoted stating, "It’s important that we take climate change very, very seriously because the threats that are posed by that are very serious. I’m just not a person that believes we should be turning a blind eye to it." According to a 2017 Florida Politics article, the Congressman advocated for climate change innovation, stating, "Treasure Coast residents know all too well about the crippling impact on both the quality-of-life and economy when environmental disaster strikes. We must act now to find economically-viable solutions to address the risk of climate change.” Congressman Mast's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Mast opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2547.25https://mast.house.gov/environment?page=14 https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/03/house-republicans-climate-change-global-warming-trump/518430/ http://floridapolitics.com/archives/234006-brian-mast-carlos-curbelo-call-american-innovation-climate-change https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mast.house.gov/2022/6/victory-for-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Matsui, DorisCalifornia7DCongresswoman Doris Matsui understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's environment page, it states, "Enacting policies that assist in our ongoing efforts to reverse the effects of a changing climate, while protecting our air, water, lands, oceans, and wildlife remains a priority of the Congresswoman’s."75100Congressman Matsui has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a press release advocating for the Moving Forward Act (H.R. 2) which addresses provisions related to federal-aid highway and transit, the Congresswoman stated, "The Moving Forward Act provides a roadmap that will prioritize resiliency, combat climate change, and create economic opportunities across the Sacramento region.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet the Congresswoman wrote, "As climate change worsens, today’s @UN #ClimateAction Summit marks a turning point in our efforts to reverse climate change and build a healthier planet for years to come. We must support the Paris Agreement and create actionable solutions to combat this global climate crisis." Rep. Matsui makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 tweet, the congresswoman stated "Proud to support the #BuildBackBetter Act, which combats #ClimateChange by: ·funding a Clean Electricity Performance Program that will help meet climate goals ·supporting equitable EV infrastructure & clean transportation ·investing 40% of the funds in underserved communities"100Rep. Matusi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Congresswoman Matsui voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 7587.5https://matsui.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14897 https://twitter.com/DorisMatsui/status/1176243885359751171 https://matsui.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1971 https://twitter.com/dorismatsui/status/1437929160031281159 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://matsui.house.gov/media/press-releases/matsui-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McBath, LucyGeorgia6DCongresswoman Lucy McBath understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Congresswoman McBath believes we must address climate change while securing a sustainable energy future. The Congresswoman supports increased investment in sustainable energy and increasing subsidies for homeowners who utilize solar or other forms of renewable energy."100100In a 2019 Facebook post supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman wrote, "Climate change poses a real threat not only to our planet, but to our nation’s economy. We must remain in the Paris Climate Agreement, and we need a concrete plan to meet our environmental goals. Today, I was proud to vote YES for H.R. 9 to take #ClimateActionNow." Congresswoman McBath's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman McBath publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. Shevoted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 10093.75https://mcbath.house.gov/energy-environment https://www.facebook.com/replucymcbath/videos/climate-change-poses-a-real-threat-not-only-to-our-planet-but-to-our-nations-eco/430887874374864/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mcbath.house.gov/press-releases?ID=3CAF7930-0A63-4390-AF41-3CAAD9173885Supports RoeN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McBride, SarahDelaware1DRepresentative Sarah McBride understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Climate change poses an urgent threat to both our planet and our home, Delaware, the nation’s lowest-lying state. President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act was the single largest investment in green infrastructure and the most profound attempt to rescue our climate in history. Building on that progress must be a top priority for Delaware’s sole member of Congress. In the House, I’ll fight to increase investment in renewable energy, make green technologies affordable and accessible for consumers and businesses, and ensure that the sustainable industries of the future employ a local and unionized workforce. In order to achieve net-zero emissions as soon as possible, the United States must demonstrate commitment to both domestic action and global investment." Representative McBride gave an interview with CoastTV News in 2024 where she addressed climate. "In order to actually address the global crisis of climate change we need federal action and federal solutions. And so after several years in the legislature where we've been able to make historic progress showing that small states can do big things, I'm running for congress now because we need federal action and of course we need people to deliver that federal action who know how to make change and have a proven record of making change, and I believe I'm that candidate," McBride said.100100Representative McBride has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In response to President Trump and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s final repeal of the Endangerment Finding and proposals to rollback critical clean vehicle and power plant pollution standards, McBride took a strong stance. "Delaware has warmed by roughly two degrees over the last century. Summers are hotter and longer, with heat waves placing seniors, children, and outdoor workers at higher risk of heat illness and straining our electric grid. Heavy rainfall is overwhelming stormwater systems and flooding neighborhoods, while more intense storms increase the chance of levee breaches and infrastructure failures... Delawareans are resilient, but resilience alone is not enough. We cannot tell families already living with chronic flooding, dangerous heat, and rising insurance rates that the science is ‘unduly pessimistic.’ The cost of inaction is too high for our homes, our economy, and our way of life. Climate change is here, and in Delaware, we know the stakes could not be clearer," McBride wrote. Representative Sarah McBride also makes prominent public statements on the issue. She gave the keynote address at the opening ceremony of Delaware's climate week, saying "Climate change is not abstract for Delaware, it’s real and it’s existential... As the lowest-lying state in the nation, we understand that it is not just some moral responsibility—but an immediate need. It is not too late for us to meet this moment and turn this crisis into opportunity. If we invest in energy here at home, we not only save lives and the planet, but we create jobs right now." Representative Sarah McBride makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Sarah McBride has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://sarahmcbride.com/priority/climate-change-sustainability/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIjpGdTc9qI https://mcbride.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mcbride-condemns-trumps-biggest-rollback-environmental-protections https://mcbride.house.gov/media/press-releases/photo-release-rep-mcbride-highlights-climate-action-workforce-development-and https://sarahmcbride.com/priority/protect-reproductive-health-care/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McClain Delaney, AprilMaryland6DRepresentative April McClain Delaney understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an interview with Bethesda Magazine, McClain Delaney wrote: "Climate change poses an existential threat to our planet’s future. The climate crisis is a threat to national security, our economic prosperity, the world’s species and our environmental stability. The Inflation Reduction Act was transformative – it needs to be protected – but more needs to be done. Congress should increase basic research in climate science, price carbon, create new incentives to drive technological/scaling investments in industries that need to be decarbonized and bolster regulation. In Congress, I will work for a low carbon future and protect Clean Air and Clean Water Acts." In a 2024 press release, McClain Delaney stated: "Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time. Across the 6th District there are extraordinary resources that need our protection – ranging from the Potomac River and its Basin to Deep Creek Lake, to the Catoctin Mountain Park."100100Representative April McClain Delaney has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In an interview with Maryland Matters, she wrote: "While Congress has taken important steps on clean energy, much more must be done to tackle the climate crisis and secure Maryland’s role in the green economy. We need to accelerate innovation and investment in renewable energy, and in Congress, I will work to expand clean energy, decarbonize key industries, and build sustainable infrastructure for a greener future." Representative April McClain Delaney also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On Twitter in 2026, she wrote: "Climate change is not an opinion. It is a fact – and it hurts all of us.

President Trump’s denial of climate change and repeal of the endangerment finding threaten public health and our planet — undermining the EPA’s core mission to protect us from dangerous air pollution." Representative April McClain Delaney makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Representative April McClain Delaney publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On her campaign website, she wrote that she "believes climate change poses an existential threat to our planet’s future. The climate crisis is a threat to national security, our economic prosperity, the world’s species and our environmental stability. The Inflation Reduction Act was transformative – it needs to be protected – but more needs to be done. Congress should increase basic research in climate science, price carbon, create new incentives to drive technological/scaling investments in industries that need to be decarbonized and address regulatory gaps."100100https://bethesdamagazine.com/voters-guide/6th-congressional-district/april-mcclain-delaney/ https://www.aprilmcclaindelaneyforcongress.com/2024/07/18/sierra-club-endorses-april-mcclain-delaney-in-marylands-6th-congressional-district/ https://marylandmatters.org/race-details/u-s-house-6th-district/ https://x.com/RepAprilDelaney/status/2022082462713807237 https://www.aprilmcclaindelaneyforcongress.com/on-the-issues/addressing-the-climate-crisis-and-environmental-stewardship/ https://www.aprilmcclaindelaneyforcongress.com/on-the-issues/protecting-and-restoring-reproductive-rights/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McClain, LisaMichigan9RLisa McClain does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Lisa McClain demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In August 2022, she tweeted "Less than 1% of people named climate change as the most important issue facing America. Why then is it the 100% focus of the Democrats agenda?" In a 2024 Tweet, McClain criticized President Biden for hurting the economy and listening to caving to "radical climate activists." She has not advocated for any form of climate action.0Congresswoman McClain opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 esolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://twitter.com/RepLisaMcClain/status/1555603791642238977 https://twitter.com/RepLisaMcClain/status/1761080730912965071 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mcclain.house.gov/2022/1/congresswoman-lisa-mcclain-speaks-house-floor-49th-anniversary-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McClellan, JenniferVirginia4DRepresentative McClellan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, it says "Jenn recognizes that climate change is an environmental issue, an economic issue, a health issue and a racial justice issue that we must take action to address [...] Jenn knows we are at a critical point in the fight against climate change."100100Representative McClellan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She has sponsored or co-sponsored several pro-climate pieces of legislation such as H.Res.1375 and the A. Donald McEachin Environmental Justice For All Act (H.R. 1705), and has publicly advocated the importance of taking action.100Jennifer McClellan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://jennifermcclellan.com/issues/ https://www.eesi.org/podcasts/view/7.4-representative-jennifer-mcclellan-talks-climate-resilience-and-environmental-justice-in-the-commonwealth https://www.congress.gov/member/jennifer-mcclellan/M001227?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%22Jennifer+McClellan%22%2C%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7DSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McClintock, TomCalifornia5RCongressman Tom McClintock disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an op-ed published in the Tahoe Daily Tribune, titled, 'Tom McClintock column: On climate change — the sky is not falling (opinion),' the Congressman wrote, "And despite what we are told, there is a vigorous debate within the scientific community over how much human activity influences climate compared with vastly more powerful natural forces that have driven climate change for 4.5 billion years. As Chicken Little belatedly discovered, there is a big difference between an acorn and the sky." McClintock repeats this sentiment in speaking to The Valley Citizen saying "The Earth’s climate is constantly changing and has been since the planet formed over four billion years ago [...] I firmly believe that the United States should not hamstring its economy in an attempt to combat climate change."00According to The Sacramento Bee, In a 2018 Congressional debate, Congressman McClintock, when asked about climate change, stated, "The planet’s been warming on and off since the last Ice Age... The climate has been changing for 4.5 billion years. The extent to which human activity has a role to play is being hotly debated right now.” He added that “there’s a lot we still don’t know about the feedback mechanisms within or climates.” Congressman McClintock demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman McClintock makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://www.tahoedailytribune.com/news/opinion/tom-mcclintock-column-the-sky-is-not-falling-opinion/ https://thevalleycitizen.com/congressman-tom-mcclintocks-deadly-denial-of-global-warming/ https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article218767065.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://sbaprolife.org/representative/tom-mcclintockOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McCollum, BettyMinnesota4DCongresswoman Betty McCollum understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Today, our planet is in peril because of climate change, which is already affecting Minnesotans and Americans. As the Chair of the Interior-Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, I am a strong supporter of action on climate change and strongly oppose efforts to undermine our international commitments and turn the United States into an environmental rogue nation."100100Congresswoman McCollum has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. While attending the United Nations Foundation Climate Change (UNFCC) Conference of Parties (COP) 25 in Madrid, the Congresswoman stated, "So, we’re here to say that we're still in it. We're still working in Congress to reduce emissions, to build green infrastructure. And as you know, our Twin Cities are doing everything they can do to combat climate change, as well as many other cities.” The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. During a 2019 House floor debate on congressional spending, Rep. McCollum stated, "I believe we have a moral obligation to future generations to leave this planet better than we found it. Limiting pollution from power plants is part of an overall strategy to protect us from the worst impacts of climate change. We owe it to the next generation.” Congresswoman McCollum makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 Star Tribune article, the Congresswoman was quoted, saying 'Confronting the consequences of climate change on the environment, biodiversity, and human health is the most significant scientific and policy challenge of this generation.'"100Congresswoman McCollum has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://mccollum.house.gov/issues/environment-energy https://www.mprnews.org/story/2019/12/02/minnesota-rep-mccollum-at-madrid-climate-meeting-were-still-in-it https://www.rollcall.com/news/congress/democrats-weave-climate-messages-into-spending-bills https://www.startribune.com/new-u-climate-center-is-a-win-for-region/600104278/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mccollum.house.gov/media/press-releases/mccollum-statement-reported-draft-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McCormick, RichGeorgia7RCongressman McCormick disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. McCormick said “How much money would you be willing to spend for that? And how much impact is it really going to have? I’m not denying there’s global warming or global cooling. I’m just saying, how much money are we going to spend on something that really isn’t affecting that process?” However, he goes on to imply humans are driving global cooling and that climate change is merely part of a millennia long process. In a Tweet McCormick said "scientists also failed to answer how humans are producing climate change which I guess shouldn’t surprise us after all."00In a Tweet, McCormick voiced opposition to climate action saying "Newsflash for all of the climate change alarmists out there. No amount of money or time will ever be able to fix the carbon dioxide and methane emissions problem you claim is causing our earth to heat. Start trusting the science and recognize that the earth is just going through its natural cycle right now."0Congressman McCormick opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://www.eenews.net/articles/quiz-show-gop-deploys-new-climate-messaging-tactic/ https://twitter.com/RepMcCormick/status/1710313335009202661 https://twitter.com/RepMcCormick/status/1786869393193873542 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.richmccormick.us/dr-rich-mccormick-applauds-supreme-courts-draft-majority-opinion-overturning-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McDonald Rivet, KristenMichigan8DRepresentative Kristen McDonald Rivet understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. McDonald Rivet does not mention climate change on her campaign website nor her congressional website. However, she has made statements showing her belief in man-made climate change. In 2023, she wrote on Twitter: "Addressing climate change by prioritizing clean energy sources is smart economics, offers increased reliability for consumers, and is vital for a sustainable future. Proud to be one of the bill sponsors in @MISenDems' Clean Energy Future Plan." Further, she wrote that "[w]e can… ✅ address climate change ✅ help economic development ✅ add jobs in energy & construction ✅ lower carbon footprints ✅ lower costs...while using private capital & market forces to drive these goals," on Twitter in 2023.7575Representative Kristen McDonald Rivet supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. McDonald RIvet voted with Republicans to repeal the Environmental Protection Agency’s waivers for California’s vehicle emission standards, saying in a press release: "I can’t tell our farmers, our construction workers, or even the families that live next door to me that they will be required to for these vehicles that are, right now, are really expensive." According to the press release, "[t]he mandate requires zero-emission cars to account for 35% of car sales in 2026, 51% by 2028, and 100% by 2035." However, McDonald Rivet, along with two other representatives, introduced the Conservation and Regenerative Optimization Practices for Farming Act, which, among other things, supports lower emissions farming. In the press release, McDonald Rivet said: "The success of our farmers and protecting the environment go hand in hand... I hear from farmers all the time whose families have worked their land for generations and who want to conserve that same land for future generations. Through the CROP Farming Act, I am working with both parties to make that easier to achieve." While in the Michigan legislature in 2023, McDonald Rivet introduced a bill that supported solar energy for farmers. However, Representative McDonald Rivet focused more on the financial impact than the potential climate benefits, saying: "If you put solar on your farmland, it provides a really substantial income stream for our family farms. A lot of them don’t want to do that. But the ones that do should have the option. It’s their property and it also protects this heritage land for future generations."50Representative Kristen McDonald Rivet has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5062.5https://x.com/McdonaldRivet/status/1649807441154961409 https://x.com/McdonaldRivet/status/1673772531520622593 https://mcdonaldrivet.house.gov/media/in-the-news/wnem-michigan-congresswoman-republicans-vote-down-ev-mandate https://lawler.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4482 https://www.michiganpublic.org/environment-climate-change/2023-09-26/farm-solar-bill-passes-state-senate https://michiganadvance.com/2024/10/13/mcdonald-rivet-and-junge-face-off-for-open-michigan-seat-thats-key-to-us-house-control/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateAnti Climate
McDowell, AddisonNorth Carolina6RRepresentative Addison McDowell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He does not clearly state whether or not he believes in climate change, but he has consistently opposed the Green New Deal. On Twitter in 2025, he wrote: "The Green New Scam is bankrolled by the CCP. The far left would rather bow to Beijing than drill in Texas. The 'environmental groups' Democrats are cozying up to are CCP-backed ops waging economic war on America." He repeated his use of the term "Green New Scam" in another tweet from 2025. "When Linden says “revenue,” he means higher taxes to fund DEI, Green New Scam, and liberal pet projects," wrote McDowell.250Representative McDowell has consistently opposed climate action as well as supported measures that increase greenhouse gas emissions. McDowell was a vocal supporter of the One Big Beautiful Bill, which will increase greenhouse gas emissions. In a press release, he said: "The One Big Beautiful Bill Act locks in permanent tax cuts for families, ends the tax on tips, supercharges American energy, and gives our Border Patrol agents the tools they’ve been begging for to get the job done." Furthermore, in an op-ed with Real Clear Energy, McDowell laid out how he views energy and climate. "Energy impacts nearly all facets of our economy, which is why the previous administration’s deliberate policy decision to focus on climate activism rather than economic reality was so harmful to working families... Under President Trump, the United States became the world’s top energy producer. We had low costs, stable supply, and a booming economy. But in just four years, the Biden Administration reversed that progress through a policy agenda rooted in radical environmentalism. The Green New Deal philosophy – or 'Green New Scam' as I like to call it – resulted in canceled pipelines, frozen leases, and projects buried in red tape. The consequences have been devastating for working families and small businesses, especially in communities like mine in central North Carolina," wrote McDowell. Representative Addison McDowell demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Addison McDowell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. It is likely that he opposes it due to his opposition to climate action.5018.75https://x.com/RepMcDowell/status/1932829309640847792 https://x.com/RepMcDowell/status/1920475797514555703 https://mcdowell.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-addison-mcdowell-applauds-house-passage-one-big-beautiful-bill-act https://www.realclearenergy.org/articles/2025/06/17/a_beautiful_bill_for_a_brighter_future_powering_america_with_american_energy_1116975.html https://x.com/RepMcDowell/status/2069813159821504710Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McGarvey, MorganKentucky3DCongressman McGarvey understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, McGarvey said "I am running to address the existential threat of climate change so that future generations have a livable planet and aren’t constantly dealing with natural disasters like last December’s tornadoes that devastated entire communities in Western Kentucky or regular extreme flooding in Eastern Kentucky. We must act now."100100 Congressman McGarvey has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On the Congressman's campaign website, he expresses support for climate action such as investment into EV infrastructure, federal clean energy standards, and dramatically expanding renewable energy buildout. He has co-sponsored legislation such as H.Res.319 calling for the creation of a Green New Deal, and the Clean Water Act of 2023.100Congressman McGarvey has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5083.3333https://www.morganmcgarvey.com/issues/climate-change https://www.morganmcgarvey.com/issues/reproductive-rights#:~:text=I%20will%20be%20a%20vote,state%20legislatures%20across%20the%20country. https://www.congress.gov/member/morgan-mcgarvey/M001220?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McGovern, JamesMassachussetts2DCongressman James McGovern understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment page,' it states, "Our climate is changing. Our children's future depends on investing in clean, sustainable energy sources -- and taking bold steps to address the damage we have already done to our fragile planet. I will continue to fight for big, bold solutions to the climate crisis that will usher in a healthier, more equitable, and more resilient economy for everyone."100100Congressman McGovern has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In September 2019, the Congressman gave a speech at a climate strike in front of the Capitol Building. Rep. McGovern also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a March 2019 interview with the Daily Hampshire Gazette, the Congressman was quoted stating, "The amount of young people that are engaged on this issue is amazing to me. Middle, high school kids, and college students — they are so articulate, and they are so motivated. I think climate change is this generation’s Vietnam.” The Congressman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to the Boston Globe, while discussing his support for the Green New Deal, Congressman McGovern stated, "We need to listen to the scientists more than the corporate executives who run fossil fuel companies, and more than these people who peddle conspiracy theories. The bottom line is that what is at stake is the future of our planet.”100Congressman McGovern publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://mcgovern.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=120518 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2gObn_ZJyo https://www.gazettenet.com/McGovern-discusses-Trump-budget-leadership-of-rules-committee-24220831 https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2019/11/03/markey-and-mcgovern-talk-climate-change-raucous-worcester-forum/dcePDc55MupgqkjSYaZ1rO/story.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a40410841/supreme-court-roe-v-wade-jim-mcgovern/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
McGuire, JohnVirginia5RRepresentative John McGuire disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a video posted to YouTube by the Richmond Times-Dispatch, McGuire is asked about if he believes in climate change. McGuire responds that "if someone can show me proof I'd like to look at it, but I haven't seen it." McGuire also opposed climate initiatives, calling them "wasteful spending" in a post on Twitter.00Representative McGuire is an opponent of climate action. He loudly supported the One Big Beautiful Bill, noting that it "[r]everses Biden's radical Green New Deal," in a press release. He expanded on this in a tweet, saying: "The One Big Beautiful Bill gives our energy sector the push it needs and makes the US energy dominant by:

➡️ ensuring robust onshore and offshore oil, gas, and coal leasing nationwide.
➡️ lowering oil, gas, and coal royalty rates, incentivizing production and reducing costs.
➡️ streamlining federal permitting and delivers certain environmental review documents in one year or less.
➡️ increasing America’s energy security by beginning to refill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve." Furthermore, in a tweet, he wrote: "President Donald J. Trump promised to restore common sense. In his first 100 Days, DEI is out of the military, men are out of women’s sports, and the Green New Scam is out of American Pockets." Representative John McGuire demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative John McGuire has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Given his opposition to climate action, it is unlikely he would support a carbon fee.5012.5https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_0_-vgypQCU https://x.com/JohnMcGuire4VA/status/1946340756555268300 https://mcguire.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mcguire-votes-final-passage-one-big-beautiful-bill-advance-america-first https://x.com/RepJohnMcGuire/status/1958273969557053714 https://x.com/RepJohnMcGuire/status/1917273929854443529 https://x.com/RepJohnMcGuire/status/1937644330329489633Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
McIver, LaMonicaNew Jersey10DRepresentative LaMonica McIver understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her congressional website, she wrote: "Climate change is and will continue to affect our District and communities all across the globe. From the devastation of coastal communities, to extreme weather events, extreme heat, dangerous pollution and threats to our food system, we cannot ignore the impact of climate change and we cannot wait to act. I firmly support efforts to expand environmental protections, hold polluters accountable and create a more sustainable economy, both with legislation and through federal funding." Furhtermore, on Twitter she stated: "Today—and every day—we must recommit to protecting our planet for future generations. From clean energy to climate justice, the work continues. Let’s plant seeds of change together."100100Representative LaMonica McIver has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. "As attacks on our climate and democracy continue, I’ll keep fighting in Congress to protect clean energy, environmental justice, public lands, and the rights of our communities," wrote McIver on Twitter. On LinkedIn, she underscored these ideas: "I’m proud to stand alongside the advocates and organizers at Climate Revolution Action Network as we continue the fight for environmental justice, clean energy, and a healthier future for our communities. As powerful interests continue to put profits over people and our planet, we know real change only happens when we organize together and uplift the voices of everyday people—that’s exactly who I’ll keep fighting for every single day alongside CRAN." Representative LaMonica McIver also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On her campaign website, she writes: "Environmental injustices disproportionately impact low-income communities and communities of color. We need policies that address environmental racism, promote clean air and water, invest in renewable energy, and ensure that frontline communities in our district have a seat at the table in the decision-making process. We must invest in building resilient communities that are prepared for the impacts of climate change and environmental hazards. Through disaster preparedness, green infrastructure, and equitable access to resources, we can ensure that our communities can withstand and recover from environmental challenges." Representative LaMonica McIver makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative LaMonica McIver has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://mciver.house.gov/issue/environment https://x.com/RepLaMonica/status/1914675863129383193 https://x.com/RepLaMonica/status/2031799624822853948 https://www.linkedin.com/posts/lamonica-mciver-a8438a39_im-proud-to-stand-alongside-the-advocates-share-7462172395735347201-yEr7/ https://www.lamonicaforcongress.com/protecting-our-environment https://www.lamonicaforcongress.com/preserving-reproductive-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Meeks, Gregory W.New York5DCongressman Gregory Meeks understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's Health Issues webpage, "Climate change and other environmental issues pose an enormous threat to global public health. Extreme weather, crop destruction, changes to ecosystems, and the mere presence of air and water pollutants are all serious threats to people’s well-being across the globe. We must fight climate change and protect the environment like our lives depend on it, because they very much do."100100Congressman Meeks has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is a co-sponsor of 'Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal' (H.Res.332) bill, legislation that "calls for the creation of a Green New Deal." The Green New Deal aims to invest in fighting climate change and reducing GHG emissions while also creating new jobs in the American economy. Rep. Meeks also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In an Op-ed for The Hill, he states, "While the people who have historically inhabited the Western Hemisphere...are among the most vulnerable to the climate crisis, they are also the key to its survival. It is the responsibility of those in power — including myself as chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee — to make systemic change that empowers those at the forefront of climate change to be at the core of its solution." Congressman Meeks makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050."100Congressman Meeks publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://meeks.house.gov/issues/health https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22New+York%22%7D https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/583934-those-on-the-front-lines-of-climate-change-should-be/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221/cosponsors?r=8&s=1 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://meeks.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-meeks-statement-scotus-decision-strip-away-right-abortionSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Mejia, AnaliliaNew Jersey11DRepresentative Analilia Mejia understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an article, she wrote: "If people weren’t convinced before, they must be now. By merely trusting our senses it becomes clear: the climate crisis is here and it’s going to impact us all." Further, on Twitter she stated: "As climate change brings more extreme weather and raises flood risks, we can't wait until after the next disaster to act. The bipartisan Water Resources Development Act invests in projects that reduce flooding, improve our waterways, and make communities like ours more resilient."1000Representative Analilia Mejia website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. On her congressional website, she said: "Flooding is one of the greatest natural threats to families and businesses across New Jersey—it is something our communities have experienced again and again. I fought to make sure that the voices of our communities were heard and that these initiatives moved forward... These projects will help us better prepare for flooding, protect our waterways, and give local communities more tools to build the resilient infrastructure they need, before disaster strikes. I will continue working to make sure New Jersey gets its fair share of federal support as we confront the growing impacts of climate change." However, she does not mention climate on her campaign website, and is focused on issues like universal healthcare and childcare.75Representative Analilia Mejia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5075https://inequality.org/article/climate-crisis-gender-inequality/ https://x.com/RepAnalilia/status/2102163520280273017 https://mejia.house.gov/media/press-releases/mejia-secures-six-new-jersey-water-infrastructure-priorities-in-house-passed-bill https://www.foodandwateraction.org/climate/national-environmental-groups-endorse-analilia-mejia-for-congress-in-new-jersey-11/ https://www.essence.com/health-and-wellness/abortion-rights/Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/A
Menefee, ChristianTexas18DRepresentative Christian Menefee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "The EPA’s job is to protect people, and our air, water, and land. But Trump wants to gut it to help polluters and block future action. We should be doing more to stop climate change, not less. Our lives, and our kids’ futures, depend on it." In another tweet, he emphasized this position: "This will be harmful to Texans. @TCEQ refuses to address climate change, which disproportionately impacts low income communities of color. Congress empowered the @EPA to help places like Houston (the energy capital of the world), and #SCOTUS just took that power away."1000Representative Christian Menefee has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He condemned cuts to climate research funding, saying: "Hurricane Harvey alone caused $125 billion in damage and dumped more than 60 inches of rain in parts of Texas... That is not bad luck. That is a warning. The science is clear, these storms are getting stronger, and we cannot afford to cut the research that helps keep Houstonians safe." Representative Christian Menefee also makes prominent public statements on the issue. While he was Harris County Attorney, he stated: "Make no mistake—this is not about electric vehicles. This is about the EPA flat-out refusing to do its job to protect us from climate pollution. Today's proposal represents a complete abdication of the federal government's responsibility to safeguard public health and welfare from the climate crisis. The Endangerment Finding is the cornerstone that drives all EPA regulation of greenhouse gases. If this finding is rescinded, it will be disastrous for climate change regulation and will strip away the legal authority that has protected Americans for more than a decade. We are already witnessing the catastrophic effects of climate change here in Harris County and across the country, from historic flooding and heat waves to extreme weather events that we know are made worse by climate change. Now, this administration wants to roll back the very regulations designed to address these threats. This reckless action won't just impact our lives today, but it will hand future generations a more dangerous and unstable climate." Representative Christian Menefee makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Representative Christian Menefee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5083.3333https://x.com/CDMenefee/status/1948011506408304832 https://x.com/CDMenefee/status/1542513547011231744 https://menefee.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-menefee-condemns-cuts-to-research-that-keeps-houston-communities-safe-from-flooding https://cao.harriscountytx.gov/Connect/Newsroom/harris-county-attorney-christian-menefee-condemns-epa-move-to-roll-back-climate-protections https://x.com/CDMenefee/status/1937575666775454037Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/A
Menendez Jr., Robert New Jersey8DOn Congressman Menendez's website it states, "Climate change is here and has had severe impacts on our area, hurting underrepresented, marginalized groups the most. I think every day about the world we are leaving to the next generation." Congressman Menendez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue.100100On his website, Menendez says "I fought to secure millions in environmental justice grants for the residents of our District. I am also a cosponsor of the COAST Anti-Drilling Act and the Clean Water Act to reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and establish standards of protection for wetlands, streams, and other water bodies" and pledges to fight to climate justice. The Congressman has also received a score of 100% from the League of Conservation Voters, demonstrating a record of voting pro-climate.100Congressman Menendez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Casar voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-1) that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://www.robmenendez.com/issues/climate-change/ https://menendez.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-menendez-receives-100-rating-league-conservation-voters-national https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://menendez.house.gov/issues/womens-health-and-reproductive-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Meng, GraceNew York6DCongresswoman Meng understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Recent disasters such as Hurricane Sandy have highlighted how vulnerable our coastline is to climate change. The only response to this crisis is to proactively reduce carbon emissions and invest in programs that promote energy efficiency. I support an energy plan that has a balanced approach, helps consumers now, boosts production of energy from alternative sources, draws from a diverse energy supply, stresses conservation, and protects the environment. Addressing America’s reliance on fossil fuels by investing in renewable-energy sources is essential for protecting our environment and ensuring our nation’s energy security."100100Congresswoman Meng has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. As part of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman included an amendment that stresses the critical link between climate change and food security. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 article by Queens County Politics, the Congresswoman was quoted the importance of climate change education, stating, "The magnitude of climate change will continue to grow and challenge how we live. That is why it is imperative that we bring the issue into our schools.” Meng makes climate change a top priority issue. She is a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries." 100Congresswoman Meng publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://meng.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://meng.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/meng-measure-stressing-link-between-climate-change-and-food-security https://www.queenscountypolitics.com/2019/09/20/climate-change-education-necessary-congresswoman-grace-meng/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22New+York%22%7D https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepGraceMeng/status/1498484051077959688Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Messmer, MarkIndiana8RRepresentative Mark Messmer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an EPA press release, Messmer praised the decision to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding that greenhouse gases threaten public health and welfare, saying "The Endangerment Finding has long been a Democrat tool to issue burdensome regulations that ignore commonsense science in pursuit of radical Green New Deal aligned agendas." Messmer also supports increased fossil fuel production, saying on Twitter "Just voted to pass @RepPfluger's Protecting American Energy Production Act. It’s time to unleash our country’s independent energy potential and lower prices for Hoosiers in IN-08 and all Americans!" The Protecting American Energy Production Act is legislation that prevents the President from unilaterally declaring a moratorium on fracking unless explicitly authorized by Congress.00Representative Mark Messmer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Messmer praised the Trump administration's dereg ulation of coal emissions, stating in an EPA press release: "It is so refreshing to have a President in office who understands how to make America an energy dominant country again... We should never ignore readily available sources of energy, which if left untapped, force us to become dependent upon our enemies to fill in the gaps. The repeal of the 2024 MATS amendments revives an industry crucial to making energy affordable again and allows Americans to keep more of their hard-earned money.” Further, at a hearing in 2026, Messmer said: "In December, the Trump administration ordered a temporary halt to the planned shutdowns of two coal burning power plants in Indiana. This announcement and President Trump's executive order to reinvigorate America's clean coal industry are examples of his administration commitment to lowering America's cost of living and restoring US global energy dominance."0Representative Mark Messmer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5012.5https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-releases-proposal-rescind-obama-era-endangerment-finding-regulations-paved-way https://x.com/RepMessmer/status/1887894498774016457 https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-continues-reverse-democrats-war-beautiful-clean-coal-finalizes-repeal-costly https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxqfPkSYdg0&t=3s https://x.com/RepMessmer/status/1980718786878861590Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Meuser, Dan Pennsylvania9RCongressman Dan Meuser does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In a 2019 speech on the House floor condemning the Paris Agreement, Congressman Meuser stated, "We need to harness American talent not squander them with bogus plans like the Green New Deal or ineffective climate plans. We need access to affordable, reliable, clean energy sources including natural gas, nuclear, oil, and clean coal." Congressman Meuser demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Meuser makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 41).06.25https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4795923/user-clip-congressman-dan-meuser-speaking-forcing-us-2015-paris-agreement-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?pageSort=alphaByState&searchResultViewType=expanded&KWICView=false https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/pennsylvania/read-pa-s-elected-leaders-react-to-scotus-abortion-ruling/article_efffa90c-f3cd-11ec-83a0-ab0b70132776.html (Unclear on Roe but considers himself Pro-Life)Unclear Position on RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mfume, Kweisi Maryland7DCongressman Kweisi Mfume understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2020 interview with 'The Baltimore Sun,' Congressman Mfume stated "On a forward-looking basis, America must take bold steps to avert the catastrophic effects of climate change. These steps include incentivizing personal choices, motivating corporations to make better choices (either by the carrot, the stick or both), helping to lead the way towards an increasingly green economy, and reestablishing our role as a global leader on climate issues. Establishing benchmarks and regularly measuring our progress in the fight against greenhouse gas emissions and ozone depletion, for example, should be a way of life across the globe." 100100According to a 2020 'Fox News' article, "During his short term, Mfume said he voted to combat the impacts of climate change..." In a 2020 interview with 'The Baltimore Sun,' the congressman said, "As an initial matter, the federal government must reaffirm its commitment to enforcing existing environmental laws. This work includes ensuring existing laws are not weakened by regulations or administrative interpretations." On his campaign website, Congressman Mfume lists "Work to protect the environment and combat climate change" as a 'priority' on his website. Congressman Kweisi Mfume's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Kweisi Mfume has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 5081.25https://www.baltimoresun.com/politics/elections/voter-guide/bs-voter-guide-d07-kweisi-mfume-20200106-maqinkka4jhwravcdr5frzyfmi-story.html https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kweisi-mfume-maryland-congressman-kim-klacik-baltimore https://mfumeforcongress.com https://mfume.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-kweisi-mfume-statement-on-the-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Miller-Meeks, MariannetteIowa1RCongresswoman Mariannette Miller-Meeks agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article on her congressional website, Congresswoman Miller-Meeks states that "scientists almost universally warn that climate change is poised to cause disastrous effects across the globe, largely caused by the burning of fossil fuels like gasoline and coal."500Congresswoman Miller-Meeks supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. . In an October 2020 interview with the Iowa Capital Dispatch, the congresswoman agreed with Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accords while simultaneously arguing that "incentives for farmers could be a key tool in fighting climate change". Congresswoman Miller-Meeks advocates for a market-focused approach to climate action, saying that "we know that the market works, we know that economic freedom and innovation go hand in hand and that when we’re talking about emissions, and talking about a cleaner, healthier planet".According to her congressional website, Congresswoman Miller-Meeks supported Biden's move to allow the sale of E15 during the summer in 2022, saying that it "makes sense for agriculture-heavy states like Iowa".50Congresswoman Miller-Meeks opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2531.25https://millermeeks.house.gov/media/in-the-news/rep-mariannette-miller-meeks-highlights-conservation-efforts-young-americans https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2020/10/27/2nd-district-candidates-debate-climate-change-environmental-regulations/ https://c3newsmag.com/mariannette-miller-meeks-iowa-climate-solutions/ https://iowacapitaldispatch.com/2022/09/26/miller-meeks-bohannan-trade-barbs-over-abortion-in-1st-district-debate/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Miller, CarolWest Virginia1RCongresswoman Carol Miller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250On the Congresswoman's campaign website she describes herself as, "Pro Coal," and one her priorities as, "Protecting Coal and Gas." The Congresswoman was also quoted in a 2019 E&E News article calling coal, "clean." Congresswoman Miller demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congresswoman Miller makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a press release in March 2019 about her selection to the House Select Committee on Climate Crisis, she said, "I hope that my colleagues will join me in prioritizing innovation, not taxation or over-regulation, in our energy industry to maximize efficiency, cut costs, protect and create jobs in West Virginia, and care for our earth for generations to come.” The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).06.25https://www.electcarolmiller.com/ https://www.eenews.net/stories/1060122761 https://miller.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-miller-s-statement-selection-house-select-committee-climate https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://miller.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-miller-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Miller, MaryIllinois15RCongresswoman Mary Miller disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels, saying "The farmers in my district recognize climate change as summer, winter, spring, and fall” and frequently criticizing climate change as a scam.250Congresswoman Mary Miller demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a 2021 interview with the 'Chicago Tribune,' the congresswoman states she "will fight to protect rural residents by opposing radical ideas like the Green New Deal and other extreme environmental legislation." 0Congresswoman Miller makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. She cosponsored voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 06.25https://www.marymillerforcongress.com/issues https://twitter.com/patriot_savvy/status/1707156686845165582 https://twitter.com/RepMaryMiller/status/1758162361637130345 https://www.chicagotribune.com/opinion/editorials/ct-who-is-mary-miller-15th-congressional-district-candidate-20200228-qdc257smdbevdfxvpt5sfepcg4-story.html https://www.npr.org/2022/06/26/1107710215/roe-overturned-mary-miller-historic-victory-for-white-life https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Miller, MaxOhio7RCongressman Miller disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2022 tweet, the candidate said "Democrats pushing "climate emergency" hysteria won't rest until gas is $10 a gallon. This won't work for families, rural areas, or farmers. Biden's policies aren't just hurting Ohio’s economy—they’re weakening America."00 Congressman Miller demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He has cosponsored anti-climate legislation such as H.J.Res.136, which disapproves of EPA regulations. Miller also has a 0% lifetime score with the LCV, indicating a history of anti-climate action.0Congressman Miller opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://twitter.com/MaxMillerOH/status/1552051657948762112 https://twitter.com/MaxMillerOH/status/1540415272179630080 https://www.congress.gov/member/max-miller/M001222?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/max-miller https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Mills, CoryFlorida7RCongressman Mills does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he said climate change has "existed with or without Americans", he used that as a reason to oppose climate action.250Congressman Mills demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Mills has advocated for increased domestic fossil fuel production, and in a Tweet said that "The Green World Order plan is a DISASTER." 0Congressman Mills opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/303/cory-mills/ https://twitter.com/CoryMillsFL/status/1550583458610794496 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Min, DaveCalifornia47DRepresentative Dave Min understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2025, he tweeted: "Amidst all the chaos of the Trump administration, one thing remains constant: climate change is accelerating at a rapid rate, and we must act now if we want to turn the tide." On his website, he writes that the "science is clear: we are facing tectonic changes to our basic way of life unless we begin to aggressively reduce our reliance on fossil fuels and turn the tide on carbon emissions, and the longer we wait, the more terrifying the consequences."100100Representative Dave Min has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Min introduced a bill to track how climate change is affecting aquatic life, saying to The Orange County Register: "We know that right now, we’re facing extinction crises in a lot of different biomes across the world because of the rapid and aggressive changes in climate... It’s good to start understanding how bad this crisis is, where we’re at risk and maybe get a sense of what we can do about it.” Representative Min also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In an interview with The Hill, he stated that "what has happened is that climate change has dried out our foliage, our flora." Min said in an interview with the Orange County Register: "I just came back from Climate Week in New York City, where the country’s leading experts and advocates on addressing climate change gather each year to discuss next steps. There is great concern right now about the sharp policy reversals that the Trump administration and its Republican allies in Congress have pushed onto our economy. By eliminating the clean energy tax credits that have spurred hundreds of billions of dollars in clean energy investmnent [sic] — including in manufacturing — here in the U.S., President Trump is not simply shifting policy, he is also signaling to investors that they cannot rely on the U.S. government to honor its commitments." Representative Dave Min makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Dave Min has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://x.com/CongressMin/status/1917284249821995426 https://www.davemin.com/issues/climate-action-environmental-justice https://www.ocregister.com/2025/02/13/rep-dave-min-introduces-his-first-legislation-in-congress-and-its-climate-related/ https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/5081312-california-wildfires-climate-change/ https://www.ocregister.com/2025/10/21/rep-dave-min-answers-questions-about-clean-energy-and-working-with-huntington-beach-leaders/ https://min.house.gov/issues/reproductive-rights-0Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Moolenaar, JohnMichigan2RCongressman John Moolenaar disagrees with the scientific consensus that that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Daily News, during a 2017 town hall, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "When we breathe, we emit our own carbon dioxide.” 00During a 2017 town hall when receiving questions on regulatory rollbacks of the Environmental Protection Agency, Congressman Moolenaar stated, "I believe in sound science, in good science. I believe the federal government has an important role in funding good science. I also have seen how, sometimes, agencies like the EPA get off track in their mission and pursue... I believe science, science moves forward... when people challenge a theory." Congressman Moolenaar demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Moolenaar opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 esolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://thedailynews.cc/articles/congressman-moolenaar-hosts-raucous-listening-session-at-cmu/ https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2017/05/climate-concerns-raised-at-many-town-halls/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.themorningsun.com/2022/06/24/moolenaar-praises-end-of-roe-others-blast-decision/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Moore, Blake Utah2RCongressman Blake Moore understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. According to a 2021 'Park Record' article, "First Congressional District Republican Rep. Blake Moore, who represents Summit County in Congress, says the Republican Party cannot sit on the sidelines of the climate change debate and stressed the need for the GOP to 'change that narrative' as the United States explores ways to lower carbon emissions."750According to a 2021 article from 'C3 News Magazine,' "Moore has indeed offered unique and principled conservative perspectives, including... engaging in issues of climate and the environment by joining the Conservative Climate Caucus this summer." According to a 2021 'Park Record' article, "Moore said in his first few months in Congress he has joined the Natural Resources Committee as well as the bipartisan wildfire caucus and others dedicated to addressing climate change from several angles." In the article, the congressman also stated, "If we want to make progress on climate issues we have to focus on our shared goals and start our discussions from a point of mutual understanding.” “Beginning with where we disagree dooms conversations.” Congressman Blake Moore supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congressman Moore opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2541https://www.parkrecord.com/news/rep-blake-moore-calls-for-gop-to-change-the-narrative-around-climate-change/ https://c3newsmag.com/utahs-blake-moore-joins-c3-solutions-on-right-voices-series/ https://blakemoore.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-blake-moores-statement-supreme-courts-decision-overturn-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Moore, GwenWisconsin4DCongresswoman Moore understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 House floor speech on climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "If we give up the fight against climate change, we are giving up the fight for our future, and the future of our children. But I'm a fighter, so I took to the House floor to demand action from the Administration on climate change."100100Congresswoman Moore has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman cited climate change as her reason for supporting the Coastal and Great Lakes Communities Enhancement Act (H.R. 729), stating in a 2019 press release, "I am proud to support the Coastal and Great Lakes Communities Enhancement Act, which ensure coastal communities have the resources to properly respond to the effects of climate change." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 speech published to her campaign website, Moore states, “Climate change is an issue we must address now through meaningful policies. This important report details sweeping actions and legislation our country needs, including legislation that I have introduced. Rather than running away from the challenges posed by combatting climate change, as this Administration has done, this report reaffirms that the federal government must lead both domestically and internationally to achieve meaningful change." Rep. Moore makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Congressman Moore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=386515005606738 https://gwenmoore.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4412 https://gwenmoore.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4600 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://gwenmoore.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=5042Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Moore, RileyWest Virginia2RRepresentative Riley Moore disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the New York Times, in 2022, Moore said: "The climate has been changing in the world since Earth was created... Whether these greenhouse gas emissions are contributing to the warming of the globe, I’m not sure I necessarily agree with that." Furthermore, in 2024, he tweeted: "The climate crisis is a hoax. Carbon mandates are there as a system of control over us!"00Representative Moore opposes action on climate change and supports the fossil fuel industry. In an op-ed supporting the One Big Beautiful Bill, he wrote: "Energy is the lifeblood of the Mountain State, and with the One Big Beautiful Bill, we’ll unleash our natural resources like never before. Instead of demonizing fossil fuels to appease radical climate change activists, this bill embraces the precious resources under our feet to power America’s new Golden Age." Moore also praised the rescinding of the EPA greenhouse gas endangerment finding, saying: "By rolling back the Obama-era Endangerment Finding, the Trump Administration has delivered the largest deregulatory action in U.S. history—undoing the climate crisis hoax that drove up prices and cost hard-working West Virginian coal miners their jobs. A massive win for American families, American workers, and American energy dominance." Further, in 2025, he tweeted: "'Net-zero' climate policies have drastically driven up the cost of energy in the West. This is threatening critical industries, w/ the latest victim being steel production in the UK. I will never allow these extremists to threaten American industry & displace our workforce." Representative Riley Moore demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Riley Moore makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He tweeted: "Carbon mandates are there as a system of control over us!"00https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/05/climate/republican-treasurers-climate-change.html https://x.com/RileyMooreWV/status/1837297496403448143 https://rileymoore.house.gov/media/in-the-news/op-ed-wv-papers-one-big-beautiful-bill-delivers-west-virginia https://www.whitehouse.gov/releases/2026/02/president-trump-delivers-biggest-regulatory-relief-in-history/ https://x.com/RepRileyMoore/status/1905626749691441182 https://x.com/RileyMooreWV/status/1837297496403448143 https://x.com/RepRileyMoore/status/2069763444048355431Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Moore, TimNorth Carolina14RRepresentative Tim Moore does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He does not clearly state his position, but has often critiqued climate action. In 2025, on Twitter he posted: "Biden’s Green New Deal scam just got exposed. His administration buried a study proving U.S. LNG exports don’t harm the environment — just to justify shutting them down. Less American LNG means higher energy costs, fewer jobs, and forces our allies to rely on countries like Russia for natural gas. It was never about science, they only wanted to score points with the radical left." He has also promoted increased infrastructure for fossil fuels. He signed a letter with several other North Carolina Republicans calling for FERC to approve a pipeline."In addition to modernizing the existing natural gas system, the project is expected to generate over 3,000 direct and indirect jobs for North Carolinians... Affordable and dependable energy is a key factor for resource-intensive industries, such as manufacturing, when determining where to locate their operations... This project is critical for securing a prosperous, energy-secure future for North Carolina," the letter read.250Although in the past Representative Moore has supported some bipartisan climate measures, more recently he has become a fierce opponent of climate action. He publicly supported the rescinding of the EPA's greenhouse gas endangerment finding, saying: "We’re allowing more and more job growth, tax cut, capital investment... It’s all a part of the great plan to unleash the American potential." He further defended this position in a letter he wrote, published in GOP News. "In 2009, the EPA issued what’s known as the 'Endangerment Finding,' a legal determination that classified greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide as a threat under the Clean Air Act. That finding became the legal foundation for years of sweeping federal regulations on cars and trucks, including increasingly strict GHG emissions standards and compliance programs that significantly raised manufacturing costs. Over time, those mandates expanded well beyond traditional air pollution controls. They included mechanisms like 'off-cycle credits,' which allowed automakers to meet emissions targets on paper by adding features such as start-stop systems. While framed as climate policy, these layered requirements drove up vehicle prices and limited consumer choice," wrote Moore. In a 2025 tweet, Moore boasted about cutting funding for climate programs: "I just voted to pass President Trump’s $9.4 Billion rescissions package that pulls back funding for propaganda media outlets NPR & PBS, as well as funding for DEI and Green New Scam initiatives in foreign countries. This is just a starting point for putting America’s fiscal house in order." Representative Tim Moore demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Tim Moore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://x.com/RepTimMooreNC/status/1902371323076063323 https://timmoore.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-tim-moore-leads-letter-urging-ferc-support-critical-energy https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/politics/epa-administrator-defends-plan-overturning-obama-era-climate-regulation/275-d3a89a38-af81-4f48-9ad9-9ec82e96e089 https://rutherford.nc.gop/weekly_update_from_congressman_tim_moore_february_15_2026 https://x.com/RepTimMooreNC/status/1933258403880841706 https://www.wunc.org/2023-04-21/n-carolina-speaker-abortion-restriction-consensus-formingOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Moran, NathanielTexas1RCongressman Moran does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Moran demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. He has taken anti-climate action such as cosponsoring several attempts to remove natural gas taxes, and voting for an amendment on H.R.377 which would prevent the bill's funds from being used for climate change executive orders.0Congressman Moran opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://www.congress.gov/member/nathaniel-moran/M001224?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://moran.house.gov/voterecord/?Page=37 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.instagram.com/repnatemoran/p/C8m5XyZJ2AK/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Morelle, JosephNew York25DCongressman Joseph Morelle understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting our Envrionment,' page, it states, "There is no debate here: climate change is real and it’s wreaking havoc all over the globe. Each day our country fails to act on climate change, we threaten the future of our children and grandchildren and the long-term vitality of our planet. I have always stood up to protect our environment by supporting measures that reduce our carbon emissions, protect our critical natural resources, and ensure our planet’s well-being for future generations."100100Congressman Morelle has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman is a supporter of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), stating in a 2019 press release, “Climate change is, without a doubt, the most pressing threat not only to the future of our nation, but our entire planet.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release announcing his sponsorship of the Climate Emergency Resolution (H. Res. 52), which calls for a comprehensive, large-scale approach to address climate change, the Congressman stated, "The science is clear: climate change is real, it is already occurring, and it is a global emergency. We must take action now to protect our planet for future generations. That’s why I’m declaring a climate emergency and strongly supporting the Climate Emergency Resolution to demand immediate and comprehensive action." Rep. Morelle makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman introduced the 100% Clean Economy Act, which sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy by 2050. In a press release on the bill the Congressman stated, "The effects of climate change pose an existential threat to our environment as we know it – we need bold, unprecedented action to combat this crisis and protect our planet for future generations.”100Representative Morelle publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://morelle.house.gov/issues/protecting-our-environment-0 https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-joe-morelle-takes-action-address-climate-change-crisis-protect https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-morelle-takes-action-fight-back-against-climate-change-and-protect https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-morelle-takes-bold-action-address-climate-crisis-and-achieve-clean https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://morelle.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-congressman-joe-morelle-response-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Morrison, KellyMinnesota3DRepresentative Kelly Morrison understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2026, she tweeted: "Minnesota is under an extreme heat warning. The entire Boundary Waters is closing because of forest fires. Climate change is an environmental, public health, and economic crisis we simply can't ignore." On her website, she writes that she is "focused on keeping our kids safe and healthy and has championed efforts to combat gun violence, take on the opioid crisis, strengthen mental health support in schools, fight climate change and protect our lakes and rivers."100100Representative Kelly Morrison has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Representative Morrison introduced the Rural Small Business Resilience Act, which later passed. In her press release, it states: "In Minnesota and across the nation, climate change is increasing the risk of natural disasters. In the last five years, natural disasters have caused up to 20 billion dollars of damage and economic loss to Minnesota – and small businesses are among the most vulnerable to injury." Representative Kelly Morrison also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In response to the EPA rescinding its 2009 greenhouse gas endangerment finding, Morrison joined other health professionals in denouncing the decision. "We are here today because climate change is not a hoax. Climate change is getting worse – and this administration is undermining all the progress we were just beginning to make. This administration is enacting policies that increase emissions at a time when we need to urgently decrease them. And right now, they’re working to take away one of our greatest tools to protect against air pollution and fight climate change by repealing the Endangerment Finding. This would be a disaster for our nation. The reality is that climate change is making our communities less safe and less healthy," Morrison said in her remarks. Representative Kelly Morrison makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Representative Kelly Morrison has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://x.com/KellyMorrisonMN/status/2076782561351643633 https://www.kellyforcongress.org/about https://morrison.house.gov/media/press-releases/us-rep-kelly-morrison-first-freshman-democrat-pass-bill-119th-congress https://morrison.house.gov/media/press-releases/us-rep-kelly-morrison-joins-health-experts-condemning-trump-administrations https://x.com/Morrison4MN/status/1672582900552704007 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Moskowitz, JaredFlorida25DCongressman Moskowitz understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Moskowitz states "We’re living through a climate crisis that threatens our way of life, and we must act quickly to mitigate the effects of climate change. Investing in environmental protection isn’t just a long-term plan towards clean air, clean water, and sustainability, it’s also a way to reinvigorate the economy and create jobs in our community."100100Representative Moskowitz's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. Moskowitz's website says "Jared was a consistent advocate for environmental causes as a State Representative, and he has continued fighting for bold policies in Congress to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, convert to clean energy sources, protect the Everglades, and make our community more resilient against environmental threats." He also has a strong score with the League of Conservation Voters, indicating a strong pro-climate voting record; however, in 2024 he voted anti-climate on H.Con.Res.86).75Congressman Moskowitz opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2575https://jaredforflorida.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/jared-moskowitzSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Moylan, JamesGuam1RDelegate Moylan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Delegate Moylan does not oppose climate action.25Delegate Moylan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5033.3333https://moylan.house.gov/ https://www.facebook.com/kanditnews/videos/breaking-news-moylan-changes-position-on-abortion/1963589564113209/?_rdrSupports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/A
Mrvan, FrankIndiana1DCongressman Frank Mrvan agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his 2022 campaign website, Congressman Mrvan emphasized that "it is past time that the federal government recognizes the value of science and the challenges of pollution and climate change".50100Congressman Mrvan supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. In August 2021, Congressman Mrvan went on a birding trip with Audobon Great Lakes and learned about "climate solutions to protect Indiana's birds and people". In addition, the congressman's campaign website calls for innovation and alternative energies that are necessary to meet" the challenge of climate change".50Congressman Mrvan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5062.5https://mrvanforcongress.com/issues/#protecting-our-environment https://gl.audubon.org/news/congressman-frank-j-mrvan-goes-birding-audubon-great-lakes https://mrvan.house.gov/media/press-releases/mrvan-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Mullin, KevinCalifornia15DCongressman Mullin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he states "The increase in extreme weather events across the nation and in the San Francisco Bay Area over the past few years is no coincidence. Dependence on fossil fuels and other non-renewable forms of energy is causing an increasingly volatile climate crisis."100100Congressman Mullin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his website, it said Mullin "was the architect of a $3.7 billion climate resiliency budget trailer bill focused on addressing the consequences of extreme heat, sea level rise and other climate impacts. In Congress as a member of the Natural Resources Committee, Kevin is committed to keeping offshore drilling away from California’s beautiful coastline, improving air quality, and protecting our nation’s open space and wildlands."100Congressman Mullin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://kevinmullin.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.kevinmullinforcongress.com/prochoiceSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateN/A
Murphy, GregNorth Carolina3RGreg Murphy disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a Fox News interview, he stated “I was thrilled to buy gas for $4.32 last night. Biden and his administration, the progressive left are chasing this dream that if we all go to renewables, world climate change will stop happening. Let's just be real about this. Climate change has happened on this Earth for billions of years.”00Greg Murphy demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to the League of Conservation Voters, Murphy has consistently voted against bills that promote climate action.0Congressman Murphy opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://cnsnews.com/article/washington/melanie-arter/rep-greg-murphy-climate-change-has-happened-earth-billions-years https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/greg-murphy https://murphy4congress.com/issues/pro-life/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeN/AN/AAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Neal, RichardMassachusetts1DCongressman Richard Neal understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment and Climate Change,' page, it states, "One of his top priorities as Chairman of the Ways & Means Committee is making the environment we share cleaner and safer, while also promoting renewable energy that creates thousands of jobs in the process. That’s why he held the first Ways & Means hearing on climate change in over a decade. It's why he cosponsored the Climate Action Now Act, which would enter the US back into Paris Climate accords, and set hard limits on carbon emissions."100100Congressman Richard Neal has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In May 2019 as the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, Congressman Neal hosted the first hearing on climate change in 12 years for that committee. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2017 press release condemning the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Neal stated, "The administration that consistently denies the existence of climate change has now abandoned an international effort to preserve and protect our environment." Congressman Neal makes climate change a top priority issue. "As Chairman, Richie is also a champion of the GREEN Act, which would be Congress’s largest tax investment ever in combating climate change and promoting clean energy. The act extends current renewable energy tax incentives, and creates new models to increase the use of green energy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions." 100Congressman Neal publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In a speech on the House floor in opposition to a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise Expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con Res 119), the Congressman stated, "Listen. If you want to debate a carbon tax, let’s hold some hearings. Let’s find out what it would mean for the economy, for Big Oil, for families in Springfield. Let’s find out what impact it would have on fossil fuel emissions and on economic growth. Let’s think strategically about how it would affect our geopolitics. If you want to have this debate, let’s have this debate." Congressman Neal voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).100100https://www.nealforcongress.com/environment-climate-change https://neal.house.gov/press-releases/neal-opening-statement-hearing-economic-and-health-consequences-climate-change https://neal.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-congressman-richard-e-neal-president-trumps-decision-withdraw https://neal.house.gov/press-releases/rep-richard-neal-opening-floor-statement-h-con-res-119 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://waysandmeans.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/chairman-neal-statement-supreme-court-s-rollback-roe-v-wade Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Neguse, JoeColorado2DCongressman Joe Neguse understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states, "Joe firmly believes climate change is an existential threat, and one that must be addressed with bold action [...] Joe believes in building a brighter future for the next generation, by safeguarding our planet, tackling climate change and investing in a clean energy economy."100100Congressman Neguse has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman introduced the Climate Readiness Act of 2020 (H.R. 6119), which would require the Department of Defense to submit to Congress a report outlining the threats both domestic and abroad of climate change to United States national security. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing the Thirty by Thirty Resolution to Save Nature (H.RES. 835), the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the existential threat of our time, one that cannot be ignored or idled on, but one that must be met with bold and pragmatic solutions that protect our future and our planet.” Rep. Neguse makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2021 Colorado Politics article, "U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse of Lafayette is taking credit for landing more than $50 billion in stimulus money for the proposed 21st Century Climate Conservation Corps. The first $10 billion would go to hire thousands of young people and veterans starting out at $15 an hour, followed by $40 billion for local resilience and wildfire preparedness projects and other work to cut emissions, administered by the Department of Interior and the U.S. Forest Service."100Congressman Neguse publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. In a 2018 interview with the League of Women Voters, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "I believe we should have stronger federal emissions standards, a federal carbon tax, and an end to the massive subsidies currently provided in our tax code to oil and gas companies who contribute so greatly to climate change." The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).100100https://joeforcolorado.com/on-the-issues/ https://neguse.house.gov/media/press-releases/neguse-spanberger-introduce-legislation-to-address-the-national-security-threat-of-climate-change https://neguse.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-neguse-sets-national-goal-of-conserving-30-of-us-lands-and-ocean-by-2030 https://www.coloradopolitics.com/news/neguse-secures-50-billion-for-proposed-climate-conservation-corps/article_08403cee-11ba-11ec-adc1-6b5e265d1994.html https://www.ontheissues.org/Archive/2018_Endorsements_Joe_Neguse.htm https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://neguse.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-rep-neguse-responds-to-supreme-court-decision-overruling-roe-v-wade_Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Norcross, DonaldNew Jersey1DCongressman Norcross understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's 'Environment' page, it states, "We have a responsibility to future generations to leave behind an earth and environment that is clean and sustainable. This responsibility also presents opportunities to create jobs and grow our economy by inventing, manufacturing and installing clean energy technology and other sustainable solutions here in America. Environmentally sustainable policies and investments in renewable energy will reduce America’s dependence on fossil fuels and foreign oil, and help address climate change."100100Congressman Norcross has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In January of 2021, he announced over $233,000 in funding to Rutgers University to research the effects of climate change on ecological diversity. In the News Release, he stated, "Climate change is a serious threat to our communities, with devastating consequences both globally and here in South Jersey...The work being done at Rutgers–Camden is critical to deepening our understanding of how changing temperatures are affecting ecological systems around the world. This funding will advance the vital research being conducted right here to ensure a safe and healthy environment for generations to come.” Rep. Norcross also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In February 2021, in a 2021 News Release regarding that day's vote on Build Back Better, he stated, "Climate change isn’t coming, it’s already here...Last week, tornadoes and flooding caused by Ida devastated portions of New Jersey, underscoring why we must respond to the climate crisis. Today’s vote sends a clear message: to build back better, America needs historic levels of investment in climate monitoring; we need to fund institutions and universities that are on the cutting-edge of climate research; and we need a climate-ready workforce. Climate change and job creation go hand in hand, and by investing in our climate response we are laying the foundation for economic growth and generating good-paying jobs. I am proud to vote for these vital investments in America’s future to ensure our nation is prepared as climate change brings increasingly extreme weather events to our shores." Congressman Norcross makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change."100Congressman Norcross has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.The Congressman did not vote in a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://norcross.house.gov/issues/environment https://norcross.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norcross-announces-more-233k-rutgers-university-camden-climate-change https://norcross.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/norcross-votes-advance-science-space-and-technology-committee-s https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9/cosponsors?r=6&s=3 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Nunn, ZacharyIowa3RCongressman Nunn does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Nunn does not oppose climate action. According to a June 2023 press release on Congressman Mike Gallagher's website, "Reps. Mike Gallagher (R-WI), Jared Huffman (D-CA), and Zach Nunn (R-IA) today introduced the Naturally Offsetting Emissions by Managing and Implementing Tillage Strategies (NO EMITS) Act, a bill that would create incentives for producers to transition their farms to soil health cropping systems. These systems increase farm productivity and reduce net carbon emissions by optimizing the ability to sequester carbon use." However, Nunn also has a very poor record of voting against climate action, and Vote Climate does not consider carbon sequestration to be an effective method of combating climate change.25Congressman Nunn opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-1) that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://zachnunn.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-resolution/447?s=3&r=38 https://gallagher.house.gov/media/press-releases/gallagher-huffman-nunn-introduce-bipartisan-bill-incentivize-use-soil-health https://budzinski.house.gov/posts/budzinski-introduces-bipartisan-legislation-to-support-biofuels-biomanufacturing-innovation https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/86/cosponsors?s=1&r=12Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Obernolte, JayCalifornia23RCongressman Jay Obernolte does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Speaking in regards to natural resources as an issue, Congressman Jay Obernolte states that "We need common-sense policies that will support our communities, protect our environment, and help our economy to grow." Congressman Obernolte does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Obernolte opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Obernolte voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).2518.75https://obernolte.house.gov/issues/natural-resources https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.vvdailypress.com/story/news/2022/06/24/abortion-roe-v-wade-overturn-high-desert-victorville-california/7726230001/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ocasio-Cortez, AlexandriaNew York14DCongresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's official website, she states, "We must treat Climate Change like a serious, existential threat to our planet." When speaking about the large-scale changes that would have to be implemented by the Green New Deal, legislation that would implement economic reforms to cut carbon emissions while boosting the economy, she said that ""Even the solutions that we have considered big and bold are nowhere near the scale of the actual problem that climate change presents to us."100100Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the Congresswoman's, 'Green New Deal,' page, she introduced and sponsored the Green New Deal Resolution (H.R. 109), "to recognize the scale of the climate crisis and provide a roadmap to evaluate policies that can protect our planet and uplift our communities. Rep. Ocasio-Cortez also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a speech introducing the Climate Emergency Resolution (H. Con. Res 52) the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change represents not only our greatest threat but one of our greatest opportunities. Working to solve the climate crisis will create tens of millions of union jobs, empower communities, and improve the quality of life for people across the globe.” The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2019 AP article, when discussing the Green New Deal, the Congresswoman said there is, "no middle ground” when it comes to climate change. 100Congresswoman Ocasio-Cortez publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. According to an article in Politico, "Even some progressives who support a carbon tax, such as Rep.-elect Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), are promoting it as just one possible element of a sweeping 'Green New Deal' that includes pouring huge amounts of money into renewable energy." An article in 'The World,' said, "The Post's Editorial Board recently laid out its own argument for a Green New Deal that, unlike the AOC-Markey plan, includes carbon pricing and stops short of broader progressive goals. Stephen Stromberg of the Post, who authored the editorial, expressed some surprise that the Green New Deal did not include carbon pricing, noting that in 2009, Sen. Markey co-sponsored a carbon-pricing bill that, at the time, was considered 'the premier global warming/climate change legislation' of the Obama era.'” Rep. Ocasio-Cortez was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/legislation/climate https://www.npr.org/2019/02/07/691997301/rep-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-releases-green-new-deal-outline https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/gnd/resolution https://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/sanders-blumenauer-and-ocasio-cortez-announce-introduction-of-climate-emergency-resolution https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/52 https://apnews.com/4359d6588f9740aca1ab24a9745f2c9d https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/09/carbon-tax-climate-change-environmentalists-1052210 https://www.pri.org/stories/2019-04-11/green-new-deal-doesnt-include-carbon-pricing-some-say-thats-big-mistake https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://ocasio-cortez.house.gov/legislation/reproductive-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Olszewski, JohnnyMaryland2DRepresentative Johnny Olszewski understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter in 2025, he wrote: "Today marks 20 years after Hurricane Katrina, and extreme weather disasters are only becoming more frequent. From record flooding here in Maryland to fires in the West, climate change is making storms more dangerous and communities more vulnerable." In 2021, Olszewski wrote a op-ed in the Baltimore Sun, stating: "Among the important lessons from the pandemic, we have learned that we have the ability to act with urgency and on a large scale when faced with a crisis. We need to confront climate change with the same sense of urgency." On Twitter in 2025, he wrote: "I’m committed to tackling the climate crisis while advancing clean energy and creating good jobs."100100Representative Johnny Olszewski has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Olszewski joined other Maryland Democrats in urging the EPA to keep its 2009 greenhouse gas endangerment finding. In a letter, they wrote: "We are deeply concerned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) proposal to eliminate the 2009 Endangerment Finding and what that will mean for Maryland and our constituents’ health and safety. The Endangerment Finding requires the EPA to protect people from the pollution that causes climate change. Denying the danger cannot change the facts: greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels are heating our planet and endangering us all." Representative Olszewski also makes prominent public statements on the issue. While Baltimore County Executive in 2021, Olszewski signed an executive order, setting a goal that the county government will get 100 percent of its energy from renewable sources by 2026. Although they did eventually miss this goal, Olszewski wrote that his six-year administration set an aggressive clean energy agenda that included solar projects, converting landfill gas to energy and tree planting. “We did all of this while facing many challenges, from rising energy costs to infrastructural and regulatory hurdles — still making progress while governing amid a global pandemic,” said Olszewski. The current Baltimore County Chief Sustainability Officer believes that, due to this plan, by early 2027 about two-thirds of the county’s energy needs will be met through renewable energy. Representative Johnny Olszewski makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Johnny Olszewski has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://x.com/RepJohnnyO/status/1961470912223465715 https://www.facebook.com/baltimoresun/posts/john-olszewski-jr-among-the-important-lessons-from-the-pandemic-we-have-learned-/10159327987759712/ https://olszewski.house.gov/media/press-releases/maryland-delegation-members-urge-epa-not-abandon-efforts-combat-climate-change https://x.com/RepJohnnyO/status/1889360802299220028 https://www.wypr.org/wypr-news/2025-07-28/baltimore-county-to-miss-2026-renewable-energy-goal https://x.com/RepJohnnyO/status/1882132021427970559Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Omar, IlhanMinnesota5DCongresswoman Ilhan Omar understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Climate Justice' page, it states, "We are in a climate crisis. With increased natural disasters and a warming planet--we need large scale action to combat climate change and ensure everyone has access to clean air, clean water, and a healthy environment. In Congress, my top environmental priority is addressing climate change and helping our country reduce its carbon footprint by transitioning away from a reliance on fossil fuels and moving towards a 100% clean energy economy."100100Congresswoman Omar has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a House floor speech supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "The United States is responsible for nearly a third of excess carbon dioxide in the atmosphere today and thus bears more responsibility for the climate crisis than any other country." Rep. Omar also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2021 Yahoo News article, Congresswoman Omar attended a hearing by the House Oversight and Reform Committee, where "Omar ended her remarks by saying, 'We’re at a tipping point developing fossil fuels now; given the escalation of the climate crisis and its harm to black and brown communities, it is unconscionable. Given each of your roles in these attacks on humanity, you all should resign. Thank you, and I yield back.'” Congresswoman Omar makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release announcing the introduction of the Zero Waste Act (H.R. 4050), the Congresswoman stated, "Today, we need elected leaders to champion solutions that match the scope of the challenges we face. Addressing the waste crisis is critical to preventing further damage to our climate—it’s integral to racial justice and a clean, equitable future.”100Congresswoman Omar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://omar.house.gov/issues/environmental-justice https://twitter.com/ilhan/status/1123979802250182659?lang=en https://www.yahoo.com/video/congresswoman-omar-blasts-oil-execs-151623183.html https://omar.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-ilhan-omar-introduced-zero-waste-act https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://omar.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-ilhan-omar-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Onder, BobMissouri3RRepresentative Bob Onder disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he reposted an article titled "Scientist Blows Whistle on Climate Industrial Complex," and wrote: "'The Science' of climate alarmism is, as it was with COVID, all about power and control." In another tweet, he stated: "If it’s hot, it’s climate change. If it’s cold, it’s climate change. If it rains, or doesn’t, it’s climate change. Whatever! The prescription in any case is more big government takeover of our economy and more expensive energy."00Representative Bob Onder demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Onder introduced the Curtailing Agency Reach and Bureaucracy Overreach on Net-Zero (CARBON) Act. "For too long, uncertainty over federal greenhouse gas regulation has left farmers, manufacturers, and energy producers guessing whether their operations could be delayed or shut down based on outdated and unclear Obama-era regulations. I have introduced the CARBON Act, alongside the Trump Administration’s repeal of the 'endangerment finding,' to restore common-sense limits on federal authority. The CARBON Act returns the Clean Air Act to Congress’s original intent by clarifying that the EPA cannot regulate carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide as 'air pollutants,'" Onder said in a press release. In 2024, he tweeted that the "SEC is trying to impose Biden’s climate agenda via draconian 'disclosure' rules. These will hurt American consumers. These must be stopped."0Representative Bob Onder makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Onder tweeted: "My point is, progressives rarely stand for freedom of businesses to do what they wish in any other context. Mask mandates, public health shutdowns, green energy mandates, abortifacient coverage mandates, carbon taxes, etc, etc. glad progressives finally discovered #AdamSmith."00https://x.com/BobOnderMO/status/1692998316068352371 https://x.com/BobOnderMO/status/1678221939905626113 https://onder.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-onder-introduces-curtailing-agency-reach-and-bureaucracy-overreach-net https://x.com/BobOnderMO/status/1766538488923472383 https://x.com/BobOnderMO/status/1350843196948049922 https://onder.house.gov/issues/pro-lifeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Pallone Jr., FrankNew Jersey6DCongressman Frank Pallone understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2021 new conference addressing the 'CLEAN Future Act,' legislation that aims for 100% clean electricity by 2035 he stated, "I really believe that the time for slow, marginal change has gone...You can’t just watch from the sidelines as the climate crisis wreaks havoc on Americans’ health and home. The cost of inaction is staggering — it already is."100100Congressman Pallone has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. He is the sponsor of the CLEAN Future Act (H.R.1512), legislation that "establishes an interim goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to at least 50% below 2005 levels by 2030 as well as a national goal to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050," and specifies that "Each federal agency must develop a plan to achieve the goals." Rep. Pallone also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a press release discussing the CLEAN future act and it's role in combating climate change, he stated, "Record wildfires, flooding, heat waves and drought have spelled out a dire reality: the climate crisis is here. New Jersey is on the frontline of this crisis, and we can no longer afford to address climate change along the margins. The CLEAN Future Act provides the kind of serious federal leadership this moment requires...This plan represents our commitment to achieving net-zero greenhouse gas pollution. For the sake of the American people, the long-term sustainability of our economy, and public health, we must act boldly, and that is exactly what we intend to do.” Congressman Pallone makes climate change a top priority issue. He is a co-sponsor of the 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R.5221), legislation that "sets a national goal of achieving a 100% clean economy (i.e., economy-wide, net-zero greenhouse gas emissions) by no later than 2050." 100Rep. Pallone has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). However, when discussing the CLEAN Future Act (of which he is a sponsor), the Congressman made it clear that his bill did not call for a carbon tax as it was futile. He stated, "We don’t have a carbon tax…I think it’s time to try something new. The votes are just not there for a price on carbon.” 5087.5https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/03/house-energy-commerce-climate-legislation-473351 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/1512 https://pallone.house.gov/media/press-releases/pallone-details-plan-combat-climate-change https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5221?s=1&r=8 https://www.politico.com/news/2021/03/03/house-energy-commerce-climate-legislation-473351 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Palmer, GaryAlabama6RCongressman Gary Palmer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a committee hearing, Palmer said “There’s a number of examples that indicates that the science is not completely settled, although I think that the consensus is that the climate is changing, I’m not sure the consensus is that it’s all anthropomorphic— I’m certain the consensus is that it’s not all anthropomorphic.”00During a 2019 Congressional hearing on carbon emissions, Congressman Palmer stated, "Apparently some folks take as the gospel truth whatever these esteemed scientists project and for instance, in his book Farewell to Ice Peter Wadhams, a professor of ocean physics at Cambridge University predicted that the polar ice in the Arctic would be gone by mid decade. Not only is the ice still there but at points between 2012-2016 it actually increased by about 50 percent. I went from 2.2 million square miles to 3.3 million square miles, so my point is, I guess my question is, do each of you believe that the science on climate is settled?" Congressman Palmer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Gary Palmer makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In an April 2021 blog post on Republican Leaders, Representative Palmer states "...the truth behind the carbon tax – it is bad policy that increases costs, mainly on the poorest among us, and will not achieve the global goals its proponents claim it will."00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91fOn6j36d8 https://www.climateofdenial.org/track-climate-change-denial/rep-gary-palmer-r-al-6th-district/ https://www.republicanleader.gov/rep-gary-palmer-the-cost-of-a-carbon-tax/ https://www.rocketcitynow.com/article/news/local/alabama-legislators-respond-leaked-scotus-draft-opinion-roe-v-wade/525-add771b1-3b09-445c-9190-73bb9c21a700Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Panetta, JimmyCalifornia19DCongressman Panetta understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "We must remain committed to protecting our environment for future generations by confronting and attempting to reverse the effects of climate change to support the health of our community, country, and planet. As your Member of Congress, I am working to deliver thoughtful and innovative action on climate change to protect public health, and clean air and clean water; advance our economy and global preeminence in green technology; defend our national security; and to pass on a healthy and sustainable future for our children."100100Congressman Panetta has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "United States leadership was crucial in the widespread adoption of the Paris Climate Agreement. Withdrawing our nation from the agreement undermines U.S. global leadership on combating climate change and threatens the future of our planet." Congressman Panetta makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release introducing The Climate Action Rebate Act (H.R. 4051), the Congressman stated, "Climate change is a severe and serious threat to our coastal communities, agricultural economies, public health, and national security. It’s beyond time for our government to do its part to respond to this crisis by reducing carbon emissions and promoting a financially feasible transition to a clean energy economy.” Rep. Panetta makes climate change a top priority issue. From a June 2020 press release, "the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis unveiled a comprehensive congressional climate action framework, which includes Congressman Jimmy Panetta’s (CA-20) legislation, the Green Bus Tax Credit Act... By tackling climate change through the tax code and incentivizing the adoption of clean energy technologies, these bills will help meet the report’s ambitious but attainable climate goals."100Congressman Panetta publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Panetta, along with Senators Coons and Feinstein, introduced 'The Climate Action Rebate Act' (H.R. 4051) which would put a price on carbon and use the revenue to fund infrastructure and other government programs. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).100100https://panetta.house.gov/issues/environment https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-passes-amendment-congressman-panetta-climate-action-now-act https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-panetta-sens-coons-and-feinstein-introduce-bill-price-carbon-pollution https://panetta.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-panetta-secures-bold-legislation-first-ever-house-climate-crisis https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4051 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepJimmyPanetta/status/1540362490458112001?ref_src=twsrc%5EtfwSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pannill Fletcher, LizzieTexas7DCongresswoman Lizzie Fletcher agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her campaign website, the Congresswoman states, "We know that domestic production of oil and natural gas is critical to our national security, our economy, and our energy future. And we know that renewable energy is an increasingly important part of the energy mix. We also know that climate change represents a real and growing threat. We know we are already experiencing its effects."5075In a 2019 Congresswoman Fletcher co-wrote an op-ed with Congressman Adam Graves (R-LA), they came out in support of offshore drilling, stating, "Opponents of offshore drilling cite the need to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in their calls for a ban on exploration of the OCS. As members of Congress representing districts along the Gulf of Mexico that have been ravaged by storms made worse by a changing climate, we understand all too well the need to address climate change and reduce GHG emissions. In 2016, the Obama administration Bureau of Ocean Energy Management found when analyzing lifecycle GHG emissions that 'in the absence of new OCS leasing,' emissions could actually increase from reliance on foreign sources of oil and gas. In 2018, oil and natural gas supplied 67 percent of the energy Americans used. In other words, our concern is that these bills will result in greater GHG emissions and further threaten the environment due to the risks associated with the transportation of fuels." Congresswoman Fletcher supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congresswoman Fletcher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5062.5https://fletcher.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2068 https://fletcher.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2187 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://fletcher.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3951Supports RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Perry, ScottPennsylvania10RCongressman Scott Perry disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2018 Penn-Live Patriot News article, the Congressman when asked about climate change, stated, "The climate's changing, without a doubt. I think we contribute to it. I don't know exactly how, and that becomes the rub." The article also stated that the Congressman believed reports that "suggest global surface temperature data often used to corroborate climate change over time has been 'adjusted' to make the planet appear cooler in the past." The Congressman was quoted again, stating, "It opens up an opportunity for skepticism... and I think it's right because what we're talking about is the things we do impact peoples' lives. And we want to proceed based on the facts; not based on suppositions or the facts we hope that we have."00In 2016, Congressman Perry introduced the Energy Sovereignty Act (H.R. 4544), which looked to block the Clean Power Plan. The Congressman stated that, "’[Hydropower] only one part of the solution – but it’s much better than this attempt to delegate nearly unlimited power over the energy sector to the unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats at the EPA. Such expansive authority of the EPA would be economically devastating and could threaten the reliability and viability of our Nation’s energy sector." The Congressman sought to cut climate change reporting from the 2018 defense budget according to the York Daily Record, stating that, "My goal with this amendment is to prioritize our limited defense resources on efforts that pose an immediate and direct threat to our national security. A litany of other federal agencies deal with environmental issues." Congressman Perry demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Perry makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. He co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41) and voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 00https://www.pennlive.com/politics/2018/10/where_they_stand_a_look_at_the.html https://perry.house.gov/issues/energy.htm https://perry.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398234 https://www.ydr.com/story/news/2017/07/12/funding-behind-perrys-amendment-cut-climate-change-reporting-defense-budget/472158001/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.pennlive.com/opinion/2022/10/where-do-our-local-representatives-really-stand-on-the-abortion-pennlive-letters.htmlOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Peters, ScottCalifornia50DCongressman Peters understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, "Energy and Environment," page, it states, "I am dedicated to combating climate change and fostering renewable energy. Unfortunately, San Diego is facing some of the consequences of climate change--from droughts, to wildfires, and floods from rising sea levels. Therefore, we must not only work to curb climate change but prepare for the effects it has on our region and nation as well. San Diego is home to many innovative green energy and cleantech companies that are important to our environment and economy. I will work in Congress to make sure these companies, as well as the premier research institutions in our region, get the support they need. We owe it to the next generation to ensure they, too, get a chance to enjoy our great outdoors."100100Congressman Peters has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman published a "Climate Playbook" on his website, stating, "The threat posed by climate change and the cost of inaction are undeniable. Climate change and its effects include: less habitable coastal regions due to rising sea levels, entire cities underwater from floods, homes and centers of commerce destroyed, devastating weather events that worsen every year, and water and food scarcity. Policymakers in the United States must confront this existential crisis head on, and time is of the essence." Congressman Peters also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release announcing the Super Polluters Act (H.R. 4113), which would aim to slow climate change by regulating black carbon, hydrofluorocarbons, the Congressman stated, "As oceans warm, sea levels rise, and droughts sear our world, we must find immediate ways to slow and reverse climate change or face these dire consequences of inaction." Rep. Peters makes climate change a top priority issue. In a press release highlighting his contributions to the House Climate Crisis Action Plan, stated, "The climate crisis requires urgent, comprehensive action. We cannot wait to get to where we need to be without major policy change,” said Rep. Peters. “The Select Committee report published today provides Congress with a pragmatic and substantive agenda that we must act on swiftly, including the bipartisan bills I introduced last year, to protect our environment and public health.” 100Congressman Peters publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 100100https://scottpeters.house.gov/energy-environment https://scottpeters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/reps-peters-gaetz-introduce-bill-to-slow-climate-change-reduce-super https://scottpeters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-peters-bills-highlighted-in-new-house-climate-crisis-action-plan https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://scottpeters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-peters-releases-statement-following-scotus-decision-to-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pettersen, BrittanyColorado7DCongresswoman Pettersen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Her campaign website stated "Brittany knows that climate change is one of the greatest threats we face and is committed to championing legislation to help communities deal with the current impacts of the climate crisis and ensure we mitigate its worst effects." 100100Congresswoman Pettersen has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She said to the League of Conservation Voters "We must enact bold legislation to mitigate the current impacts of climate change and protect against the worst consequences. I look forward to working to protect our environment, public lands, water, and our future, for my son Davis, and all Coloradans." In a 2024 press release, Pettersen announced 11 million dollars for Colorado projects to cut emissions and transition to a green economy, saying "This funding, made possible by the Biden Administration, is a significant investment into our community and will help Colorado stay at the forefront of sustainability and innovation fueled through clean energy."100Congresswoman Pettersen has no known position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://brittanypettersen.com/issues/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.lcv.org/bio/brittany-pettersen/ https://pettersen.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=558Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateN/A
Pfluger, August Texas11RCongressman August Pfluger does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, regarding energy independence, the congressman writes "I’m proud to support the hard-working oil and gas producers that keep our Texas economy strong. In Washington, I’ll fight back against the oil-hating liberals and work to secure total energy independence for our country."250According to a February 2021 press release on his website, "Congressman August Pfluger (TX-11) is proud to announce the introduction of his second piece of original legislation, H. Res. 125, which protects the oil and gas industry from executive overreach by recognizing that any policy-making action taken to address climate change should be undertaken by the legislative branch, not through unilateral executive action—which the Biden administration continues to abuse." From a January 2021 press release on his website, "Congressman Pfluger issued a statement: “The Paris Climate Agreement does nothing to save or clean up the planet. With no mechanism to hold China and India—the two largest global polluters—accountable, this agreement merely shackles the United States with job-killing regulations that cost trillions of dollars and imperil our national security." Congressman August Pfluger demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman August Pfluger makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://www.augustpfluger.com/#issues https://pfluger.house.gov/media/press-releases/pfluger-schumer-its-jobs-emergency https://pfluger.house.gov/media/press-releases/pfluger-moves-block-biden-rejoining-paris-climate-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1&q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22Texas%22%7D https://pfluger.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=524Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Pingree, ChellieMaine1DCongresswoman Chellie Pingree understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her house website, Pingree says "Climate change is real, caused by human activity, and an urgent threat to our way of life. For too long, scientific warnings were ignored and now we’re at a crisis point. To avoid a major, irreversible catastrophe, we must take bold action to become carbon neutral by 2050."100100Congresswoman Pingree has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2020 press release supporting the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, she stated, "I’m proud that after years of inaction, Congress has turned the page on climate denial. As we face our post-coronavirus economic reality, Congress’ work to put our climate at the forefront is more important than ever." Rep. Pingree makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 tweet, the Congresswoman wrote "Climate change isn’t like Santa Claus. It is real whether you believe in it or not." 100Congresswoman Pingreepublicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments.100100https://pingree.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14914 https://pingree.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3428 https://twitter.com/chelliepingree/status/1316527704817180674 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://pingree.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4215Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pocan, MarkWisconsin2DCongressman Pocan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to Pocan's campaign website, the Congressman states, "At a time when we face high energy and gas prices and see the effects of global climate change in our daily lives, I believe that making the country more energy efficient will not only reduce our carbon footprint, but also will position the U.S. to thrive in a twenty-first century economy. As a member of the Safe Climate Caucus, I am committed to preserving our environment through investments in clean energy capabilities. I subscribe to the notion that if we make investments in the short term, we can ultimately make our energy use more efficient in the long term."100100Congressman Pocan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a video from the Safe Climate Caucus, the Congressman stated, "There's no question that increasing levels of CO2 are bad for the planet bad for our country that rising sea levels could have devastating impacts across the globe and that we need to do something about climate change." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is a reality. Period. Pulling the U.S. out of the #ParisAgreement is not only a blatant refusal to participate in a necessary global fight against climate change, but it threatens ALL life across the world. @realDonaldTrump, you're a failure." Rep. Pocan makes climate change a priority issue as well. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congressman Pocan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://pocan.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJ6-qMNpoI0 https://twitter.com/repmarkpocan/status/1191466230600912900 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://pocan.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/pocan-on-scotus-decision-overturning-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pou, NellieNew Jersey9DRepresentative Nellie Pou agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Pou told EDF Action and Latino Victory Project: "From higher utility bills to being on the front lines of climate change, I know all too well the economic burdens that our Latino communities suffer, but those burdens have never deterred us... Today our communities face great challenges. On top of those challenges, climate change is making things worse. Communities across America are paying more and getting less. By investing in green jobs and energy, we ensure every American has a fair shot all while expanding opportunities and investing in our communities. Congress has a responsibility to improve quality of life and ensure no community is left behind." However, Pou does not list climate change as one of her priorities on her campaign website, instead focusing on issues such as affordability and healthcare.50100Representative Nellie Pou supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. On her website, she writes that in her first 100 days she "[h]arshly criticized the Trump administration’s withdrawal from the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement and joined a congressional resolution condemning America’s withdrawal and abdication of leadership to fight climate change." However, Pou has not taken much climate action beyond this. She did help to pass a surface transportation bill, saying: "This bill delivers major wins for New Jersey and our communities by strengthening public transportation, investing in safer roads and bridges, improving rail infrastructure, cutting congestion and pollution, and supporting projects that keep our state economy moving."50Representative Nellie Pou has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5062.5https://www.edfaction.org/news-resources/why-action-on-costs-and-climate-matters-to-hispanic-communities/ https://nelliepoufornewjersey.com/nellies-priorities/ https://pou.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-pou-marks-first-100-days-office https://pou.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-pou-praises-new-jersey-gains-surface-transportation-package https://x.com/NelliePou/status/2069849529512333629Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Pressley, AyannaMassachussetts7DCongresswoman Ayanna Pressley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Speaking on the Road to the Green New Deal tour, the Congresswoman stated, "The impacts of climate change are intersectional on our public health, on our human migration, on national security. And so we come here tonight to advance bold, innovative and, yes, unapologetic, aspirational policy.”100100Congresswoman Ayanna Presley has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On Congresswoman Pressley's campaign site's, 'Issues,' page, it states, "Climate change presents a number of serious threats to public health, including longer heat waves, more frequent extreme weather, and decreased air quality." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a 2022 press release, "Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07)...issued a joint statement on reported delays by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in issuing new disclosure rules regarding climate change risk: 'The climate crisis is here, and it is already having a significant impact on our communities and our economy. We cannot wait for our country’s largest corporations to decide whether they take climate change seriously when extreme floods, heat waves and storms are already devastating our neighborhoods. Just as we must use every tool to prevent climate catastrophe, we must act with strength and urgency to protect our financial system from climate risk. We are alarmed that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s climate-change disclosure rule has been delayed. We urge the Commission to act swiftly and issue a strong rule that holistically accounts for a company’s climate contributions and addresses the urgent need to act on climate-related financial risk.'” Congresswoman Pressley makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2021 press release "Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (MA-07), a member of the House Financial Services Committee, along with Congressman Mondaire Jones (NY-17) and Rashida Tlaib (MI-13), introduced the Fossil Free Finance Act, legislation to require the Federal Reserve (Fed) to mandate large banks and other Systemically Important Financial Institutions (SIFIs) align their financing of greenhouse gas emissions with science-based emissions targets. The Fossil Free Finance Act requires the Fed to acknowledge the existential threat climate change poses to the core tenants of its monetary policy and supervisory mandates and act to mitigate the financial stability threats of climate risk."100Congresswoman Pressley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman did not vote on a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://dailyfreepress.com/blog/2019/04/23/ayanna-pressley-ed-markey-speak-about-green-new-deal-in-dorchester/ https://ayannapressley.com/issues/equity-agenda/?fbclid=IwAR26MJ2CtbTUUivdVWD4keVMWZB1UYqsf6u9pj10f0umX6TmrK6wsPhu-MM https://pressley.house.gov/media/press-releases/statement-reps-pressley-garc-bowman-bush-ocasio-cortez-and-tlaib-regarding https://pressley.house.gov/media/press-releases/pressley-jones-tlaib-unveil-bill-require-federal-reserve-mandate-big-banks https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://pressley.house.gov/2022/05/03/rep-pressley-s-statement-draft-supreme-court-opinion-overturn-roe-v-wade/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Quigley, MikeIllinois5DCongressman Mike Quigley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'The Ticking Clock of Climate Change,' page, it states, "An investment in our environment is an investment in our future. Climate change is an urgent threat to everyone on the planet, threatening lives and livelihoods by jeopardizing clean air, clean water, and healthy and diverse ecosystems. We can’t afford to sit back and continue to do nothing. As President Obama said, 'We’re the first generation to feel the impact of climate change, and the last generation that can do something about it.'"100100Congressman Quigley has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his 'Energy/Environment' page, it states, "We live in a time of unprecedented threat to our environment. From pollution to habitat degradation to the global crisis of man-made climate change, the evidence all around us is clear that we must act to protect our planet and everything living on it...I believe that climate change represents an existential threat to the lives and livelihoods of millions of Americans and billions around the world and that Congress must act with the urgency and ambition that climate science demands. For these reasons, I was an original cosponsor of the Green New Deal, a bold and aspirational proposal to transition our economy away from reliance on fossil fuels." The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. He is a co-sponsor of the America's Clean Future Fund Act (H.R.2451), legislation that "establishes requirements and incentives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and assist industries, communities, and workers transition to a low-carbon economy, including by establishing (1) the Climate Change Finance Corporation (C2FC); (2) the America's Clean Future Fund; and (3) a carbon fee on the use, sale, or transfer of certain fuels by covered entities." Rep. Quigley makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2021 press release, during a floor speech about reentering the Paris Climate Agreement, the Congressman stated "President Biden’s commitment, necessary as it was, will not itself reduce America’s emissions enough to meet our 2015 promise to the world or stem the climate crisis. For that, Congress must act urgently. We must reject the bad faith talking points about a false dichotomy between environmental stewardship and economic growth and openly embrace the idea that a sustainable economy is dependent upon a sustainable environment."100Congressman Quigley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://quigley.house.gov/newsroom/the-ticking-clock-of-climate-change#:~:text=Representative%20Mike%20Quigley%20speaking%20on,on%20climate%20change%20is%20now.&text=Climate%20change%20is%20an%20urgent,and%20healthy%20and%20diverse%20ecosystems. https://quigley.house.gov/issues/energyenvironment https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2451?s=1&r=10 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://quigley.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/quigley-delivers-floor-speech-calling-urgent-congressional-action https://quigley.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/quigley-statement-supreme-court-decision-strike-down-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Ramirez, DeliaIllinois3DCongresswoman Ramirez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. "Delia understands that we are at a crisis point to act on climate change and that we need swift and decisive action to prevent a climate catastrophe. She knows that being on the right side of this issue requires that our values be clear and uncompromised, which is why she has refused to take campaign contributions from the fossil fuel industry and private energy companies. Delia is clear that future generations are depending on our leaders today to take bold and principled stances to end our reliance on fossil fuels, make a full transition to clean energy, and transform our economy to be greener and cleaner."100100While in Congress, the Representative has cosponsored legislation such as the Environmental Justice for All Act and the Green New Deal for Health Act. In a Tweet, Ramirez said "The fossil fuel industry is making us sick, and the Republican Polluters Over People Act would literally kill us. We have a climate catastrophe that is hitting Black and Brown communities hardest. H.R. 1 is a blank check for polluters that must be stopped."100Congresswoman Ramirez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://www.deliaforcongress.com/issues/ https://twitter.com/repdeliaramirez/status/1641485296045895696 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Randall, EmilyWashington6DRepresentative Emily Randall understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release, she stated: "I have the honor of representing one of the most beautiful districts in the nation. From the Hoh Rainforest to Vaughn Bay, Port Townsend to Grays Harbor — Washington’s 6th Congressional District and its diverse communities know the importance of combating the climate crisis." Further, in 2024 she posted on Twitter: "Washington’s 6th has incredible natural beauty - from the Olympics to the South Sound, our communities know we must combat climate change and protect public lands."100100Representative Emily Randall has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Randall Introduced the TERRA Act, which would remove red tape for Tribal Nations to attain federal resources to manage and respond to climate disasters. "Climate change is already impacting all Americans... Right here at home, we have seen rising tides, wildfires and dwindling natural resources as a consequence. No one knows this better than Tribal Nations, who have been stewards of this land since time immemorial. Our promise to safeguard Tribal sovereignty must extend long into the future – which means ensuring Tribal Nations have the resources necessary to navigate the changing climate," said Randall in a press release. Representative Emily Randall also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On her campaign website, she writes about her plan to fight climate change. "We must make a just and fair transition away from fossil fuels and invest in clean energy jobs and infrastructure. The United States has a responsibility to be a leader and innovate new ways for countries to accelerate their transitions to a more green and clean economy. I will work closely with labor and industry to find ways for workers to gain new skills and transition to the jobs that our changing economy and environment needs. I am committed to building an economy that is sustainable, and that protects those among us most vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. We must focus on renewable energy, and climate-neutral industry that protects not only today’s economy, but the ability for our grandchildren to live and work as well," stated Randall. Representative Emily Randall makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Representative Emily Randall has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, Randall did support Washington's Climate Commitment Act, a cap-and-invest program.5087.5https://randall.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-randall-appointed-highly-influential-house-committee https://x.com/EmilyRandallWA/status/1782465285339086848 https://randall.house.gov/media/press-releases/randall-gluesenkamp-perez-simpson-reintroduce-terra-act-streamline-access https://electemilyrandall.com/issues/fighting-climate-change/ https://www.kitsapsun.com/story/news/2024/09/18/washington-6th-congressional-district-candidates-emily-randall-drew-macewen-debate/75269122007/ https://www.facebook.com/RepEmilyRandall/posts/today-marks-three-years-since-the-republican-controlled-supreme-court-overturned/1137831368155862/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Raskin, JamieMaryland8DCongressman Jamie Raskin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a testimony in the Senate Budget Committee, Raskin criticized Big Oil for avoiding climate accountability. Raskin said 'In the 1960s, the science of global warming was well understood by Big Oil. Instead of telling the world about the perils of global warming and working to change their business model, the companies suppressed relevant scientific findings for decades and came to challenge and contradict urgent calls by scientists to take climate change seriously as a global threat. As the experts told us, this pattern of lying and evasion set the country back decades in our ability to seriously address and manage climate change."100100Congressman Raskin has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman co-wrote an editorial for the Baltimore Sun, which stated, "With no time left to debate the delusional dogmas of climate denialism, we must develop policies to break quickly and permanently from the carbon economy and invest in renewable energy and a far more resilient national infrastructure." Rep. Raskin also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a September 2019 press release urging President Trump to prioritize climate change in the renegotiated NAFTA deal, the Congressman stated, "The Paris Agreement represents the type of global cooperation that our trade deals should aspire to, and has the support of 185 countries, including our NAFTA trading partners. This is the most basic lens through which we should negotiate all trade deals.” Congressman Raskin makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal (H.Res 109). 100Congressman Raskin publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On his campaign sites, 'Climate Change,' page, it states, "Jamie will champion a sweeping carbon tax along with market-based solutions to stimulate renewable energy development and steadily and dramatically reduce carbon fuel consumption." Congressman Raskin voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. 100100https://www.budget.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/honjamieraskintestimonysenatebudgetcommittee.pdf http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/oped/bs-ed-op-1010-political-climate-change-20171009-story.html https://raskin.house.gov/media/press-releases/raskin-urges-president-trump-prioritize-climate-renegotiated-nafta https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22party%22%3A%22all%22%7D https://www.huffpost.com/entry/jamie-raskin-rachel-maddow-roe-v-wade-full-on-handmaids-tale_n_62709e42e4b01131b1261271Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Reschenthaler, GuyPennsylvania14RCongressman Guy Reschenthaler does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2020 post on 'Twitter,' the Congressman stated, "The reason the global temp is rising is due to China’s disregard for the environment and emissions standards."250In a 2019 press release supporting the president's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Reschenthaler stated, “This was an unfair deal that put our country at a disadvantage by giving a free pass to the world’s worst polluters while forcing unrealistic demands on our national economy. As our nation reaches its energy dominance and continues to reduce emissions through innovation, House Democrats want us to put our economic growth, jobs, and security at risk by forcing President Trump to implement the Paris Agreement.” According to his website, the Congressman states, "As a member of the House Energy Action Team, I am on the front lines fighting against radical proposals that would kill our coal, oil, and natural gas industries and the family-sustaining jobs in southwestern Pennsylvania that go with them." Congressman Reschenthaler demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Reschenthaler opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://twitter.com/greschenthaler/status/1281664989305151490 https://reschenthaler.house.gov/media/press-releases/reschenthaler-opposes-legislation-cripple-us-energy-sector https://reschenthaler.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Riley, JoshNew York19DRepresentative Josh Riley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2023, Riley wrote on Twitter: "Climate change is an existential threat. Let’s meet the moment by creating good-paying, clean energy jobs in Upstate New York." In a 2023 post on Medium, Riley wrote: "Climate change is an existential threat to my son’s generation and beyond, and it needs to be addressed with urgency and seriousness. We are past time to confront this challenge, and I will fight every day to protect Upstate New York’s environment."100100Representative Josh Riley has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Riley was one of three representatives to introduce the Conservation and Regenerative Optimization Practices for Farming Act, or the CROP for Farming Act, a targeted, bipartisan proposal to strengthen conservation efforts and equip farmers with new tools to improve soil health, enhance productivity, and reduce harmful emissions through voluntary practices. In a press release, Riley stated: "Upstate farmers are leading on climate-smart ag—using cover crops, rotational grazing, and precision fertilizer to cut emissions and rebuild the soil. The CROP for Farming Act makes sure USDA conservation funding supports those efforts. It directs more resources to practices that fight climate change and strengthen rural economies. It’s practical, it’s bipartisan, and I’m proud to sponsor it." Representative Josh Riley also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In an interview with The River, Riley said: "I have a two-year-old son. Part of the reason why I’m running for Congress is I want him to grow up in a democracy that’s functioning, a planet that’s habitable, and an economy that’s fair. I think that climate change is an existential threat to the planet, one of the biggest challenges we are facing. Also for the same reason, I think it is one of the best economic opportunities and job creation opportunities we have in upstate New York. I’ve talked to folks across this district about climate change in the context of economic development and revitalizing the economy. We have endless opportunity and promise across upstate New York to start making and manufacturing the technologies that we need to address climate change." Furthermore, Riley introduce a bill that supports clean energy manufacturing projects across the country by increasing funding transparency. "We’re bringing home good manufacturing jobs to build the batteries, solar panels, and semiconductors the world needs to save the planet, and I’m not going to let a bunch of lackeys for the oil industry undermine us with weak arguments based on bogus data. My bipartisan bill ensures we have transparency and reliable data to assess these projects," Riley wrote in a press release. Representative Josh Riley makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Representative Josh Riley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://x.com/JoshRileyUE/status/1645535624878002176 https://medium.com/@JoshRileyforCongress/icymi-molinaro-says-its-too-soon-to-talk-about-climate-change-as-upstate-new-york-is-blanketed-d8cebd360a8e https://lawler.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4482 https://www.chronogram.com/river-newsroom/on-the-trail-with-josh-riley-18194623/ https://riley.house.gov/2025/05/19/riley-bill-supporting-clean-energy-jobs-passes-house/ https://x.com/RepRileyNY/status/2069834936891396557Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Rivas, LuzCalifornia29DRepresentative Luz Rivas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an op-ed written in Spanish in La Opinión, Rivas writes "We Californians know all too well the very real threats of climate change. Just a year ago, my first days in Congress were marked by the Eaton and Palisades wildfires that ravaged Los Angeles County." (Translated to English). On the House floor in 2026, Representative Rivas said: "Southern California is no stranger to heat especially in the summer. However, due to climate change, periods of extreme heat in Southern California, especially in the San Fernando Valley, are becoming more common, more intense, and more harmful." Representative Rivas attended COP26 in 2021, and said in a press release "Climate change is no longer a future problem waiting for us to act upon – it is already here... Extreme climate events are wreaking havoc across the globe and escalating in severity each year. Millennials and Generation Z have already mobilized as key leaders in climate and environmental activism because they know their generations will have to live with the consequences of a changed climate."100100Representative Rivas has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She introduced a resolution supporting the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. In a press release about the resolution, she stated: "The Trump Administration’s elimination of the GHGRP will leave environmental justice communities without the tools needed to address the harmful environmental, health, and economic impacts of climate change. My resolution protects environmental justice communities and preserves the GHGRP from the Trump Administration’s reckless actions." Representative Rivas also makes prominent public statements on the issue. Upon joining the House Sustainable Energy and Environment Coalition, she is quoted in a press release saying: "Clean energy and the health of environmental justice communities, like mine in the San Fernando Valley, are under attack by the Trump Administration... In this critical moment, it is imperative to champion bold solutions that not only preserves our environment, but ensures future generations have a livable planet with clean air, safe drinking water, and protected public lands. I am excited to... address climate change, protect our environment, and fight for environmental justice communities.” Furthermore in 2023, while the California legislature, Representative RIvas proposed a bill that "would require the science area of study to include an emphasis on the causes and effects of climate change and methods to mitigate and adapt to climate change." Representative Rivas makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Rivas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://laopinion.com/2026/01/23/mientras-los-angeles-ardia-trump-provoco-las-llamas-del-proximo-desastre/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKNGcCD7jfA https://sd15.senate.ca.gov/news/following-cop26-assemblymembers-rivas-calderon-ward-and-senator-cortese-commit-introduce https://rivas.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-luz-rivas-introduces-resolution-supporting-greenhouse-gas https://rivas.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-luz-rivas-joins-influential-house-energy-and-environment https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240AB285 https://theclimatecenter.org/our-work/bill-tracker/ab-285-pupil-instruction-science-requirements-climate-change/ https://x.com/RepLuzRivas/status/2069902447070552496Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Rogers, HaroldKentucky5RCongressman Rogers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Rogers demonstrates a lack of leadership by advocating against the Clean Power Plan. He support an amendment to the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act of 2015 (H.R. 4923) which would have prohibited federal agencies from using funds to do climate action. The Congressman does not mention climate change on his, 'Environment,' or, 'Energy,' pages. Congressman Rogers demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rogers opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5http://wfpl.org/where-do-kentuckys-congressmen-stand-climate-change-hard-tell/ https://halrogers.house.gov/environment https://halrogers.house.gov/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://halrogers.house.gov/press-releases?ID=BF6A6E32-08FA-47F4-9C5E-0061D1ED2F83Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Rogers, MikeAlabama3RCongressman Mike Rogers disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In response to the 2014 U.S. National Climate Assessment which reported that heatwaves and more intense storms would be exacerbated by global warming, the Congressman was quoted in a press release found on Rep. Roby's page, which stated that, "President Obama and his Administration will stop at nothing to push his radical environmental policies onto our economy. This report is another chapter of the EPA's War on Coal, and lays the groundwork for yet another regulatory end run around Congress. These policies, if not stopped, will cost American families in higher electricity rates and hurt good paying jobs." 00According to the Alabama Political Reporter in June 2021, "Alabama Congressman Mike Rogers, R-Alabama, and Rep. Ken Calvert, R-California, wrote an op-ed Tuesday in Defense News" where they state that "... 'the administration redirects nearly $650 million in critically needed military modernization and procurement funding to climate change and to monitor the social media accounts of our servicemembers,” Rogers and Calvert wrote. "These initiatives have nothing to do with ensuring we have a lethal force ready to “fight tonight”. When we dedicate scarce defense funding to global climate change, biofuels initiatives, and social engineering experiments with military personnel you can almost hear the cheers and laughter of our adversaries.'” Congressman Rogers demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rogers makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. According to Oanow.com, during a 2019 town hall, when asked if he supported carbon fee legislation the Congressman said he would not. He also voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://roby.house.gov/roby-news/al-representatives-voice-opinions-new-climate-assessment https://www.alreporter.com/2021/06/25/rogers-says-the-budget-should-be-focused-more-on-china-less-on-climate-issues/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://oanow.com/news/local/congressman-constituents-talk-issues-at-town-hall/article_2833d50c-4aba-11e9-afd5-b71b2f531bb4.amp.html https://mikerogers.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1918Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ross, Deborah North Carolina2DCongresswoman Deborah Ross understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the congresswoman writes, "Climate change is one of the most imminent threats facing our country, and we must take immediate action to address it. I have been a champion on environmental and climate issues, voting repeatedly to protect our land and water for future generations. As a state legislator, I voted to support clean energy, oppose fracking, and address climate change in North Carolina. We must modernize our electric grid to increase the distribution of renewable energy and we need to create incentives to expedite battery storage for intermittent renewable resources. These measures will reduce our need to use fossil fuels for energy."100100Congresswoman Deborah Ross has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 questionnaire from 'Indy Week,' when asked about policies she supports to address climate change, Congresswoman Ross answered "I have been a longtime champion of environmental issues in North Carolina and will continue to be a champion as a member of Congress...I have promoted renewable energy investments in North Carolina and will continue to do so. We must modernize our electric grid to increase the distribution of renewable energy, and we need to create incentives to expedite battery storage for intermittent renewable resources." The congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a tweet posted in July 2021, Congresswoman Ross wrote "Wildfires on the West Coast are spreading smoke all the way to Raleigh. We have to put aside partisan politics and address climate change NOW. We can't wait to act." Congresswoman Deborah Ross makes climate change a top priority issue. According to the 'League of Conservation Voters,' "She understands the urgent need to fight the climate crisis, invest in our clean energy future, and protect the country’s natural beauty. In Congress, Ross will continue this leadership by working to advance the clean energy economy, diversify transportation, and make addressing climate change a top priority."100Congresswoman Deborah Ross publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the 'Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act' (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://deborahross.com/priorities/ https://indyweek.com/news/elections/candidate-questionnaire-deborah-k-ross-u-s-congress/ https://twitter.com/repdeborahross/status/1418250555563065347 https://www.lcv.org/member/deborah-ross/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22North+Carolina%22%7D https://ross.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-ross-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturn-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Rouzer, DavidNorth Carolina7RCongressman David Rouzer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In the posted transcript on PBS for the film, "Climate of Doubt," he states on climate change that, "Well, you know, I don't necessarily listen to any one person. And I can't, you know, tick off a whole list of scientists that are pro-sea level rise and a whole list of scientists that aren't. I'm just coming at it from a common sense standpoint. The earth has been warming and cooling since day one. And you know, the effect on sea level change, what do we know about it?"00Congressman Roouzer supported executive actions by President Trump, which fast tracked the Keystone and Dakota Access Pipelines. According to his website, in a press release, the congressman stated, "He(Trump) is wasting no time in getting down to business and acting on his promises to Make America Great Again. Already, President Trump has made it clear that he will put America first by clearing the path for approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline and the Dakota Access Pipeline, both of which will create good paying jobs, increase our access to affordable energy and make America an even more dominate energy supplier for the world." The Congressman also supported the President's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement stating in a 2017 press release, "It simply isn’t fair for American manufacturers and other businesses to be held to a standard that their competitors in India and China are not. This was a bad deal for America and as promised during his campaign, President Donald Trump is putting American jobs and growth first." Congressman Rouzer demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rouzer makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman co-sponsored a 2019 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res 41). 00https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/climate-of-doubt/transcript/ https://rouzer.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rouzer-statement-trump-executive-actions https://rouzer.house.gov/2017/6/rep-rouzer-trumps-decision-withdraw-paris-agreement https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://rouzer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=318Opposes RoeN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Ruiz, RaulCalifornia25DCongressman Ruiz understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's 'Energy and Environment page,' he states, "Investing in renewable energy is an important part of fulfilling our obligation as stewards of the environment, and it will also help create clean energy jobs in our communities and strengthen the local economy...We need a comprehensive national energy policy that will invest in clean energy and put us on the path to energy independence. This is an environmental, economic, and national security issue." It also states "Dr. Ruiz understands the importance of addressing climate change head-on with commonsense solutions. He advocated and voted for the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act – known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law – to make bold investments in our communities’ infrastructure and to combat the climate crisis."75100On Congressman Ruiz's 'Energy and Environment' page, he states, "In 2013, I joined 75 of my colleagues urging support for the Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy to spur innovation in renewable electricity generation, sustainable transportation, and energy and cost-saving technologies for businesses and homes." Ruiz also discusses bills he has consponsored such as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act and Climate Action Now Act, demonstrating leadership in advocating for climate action.50Congressman Ruiz publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).10081.25https://ruiz.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://ruiz.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/dr-ruiz-celebrates-earth-day https://ruiz.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://ruiz.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/lawmakers-state-positions-possible-end-roe-versus-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Rulli, Michael Ohio6RCongressman Rulli disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.00Congressman Rulli has no known stance on climate action.25Congressman Rulli has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He was not in Congress to vote for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5025https://www.cantonrep.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/06/05/ohio-special-election-2024-6th-district/73842775007/ https://twitter.com/michaelrulli/status/1521291609891037184Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Rutherford, JohnFlorida5RCongressman John Rutherford disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 article by WJCT, when asked about sea level rise, the Congressman stated, "I agree that climate change is happening, and we certainly have sea level rise. I question what part of that is man made and what part of that is natural phenomenon.”00In 2019 Congressman Rutherford criticized the Green New Deal as a "socialist manifesto masquerading as an environmental proposal.” Congressman Rutherford demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Rutherford opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://news.wjct.org/post/how-green-new-deal-could-affect-storms-floods-and-heat-jacksonville https://rutherford.house.gov/issues https://news.wjct.org/first-coast/2019-02-21/rutherford-green-new-deal-a-socialist-manifesto-dressed-as-environmental-proposal https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/JRutherfordFL/status/1219004067118243841Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Ryan, PatNew York18DCongressman Pat Ryan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. He has climate change as a top priority on his website, where he states that he "knows the greatest threat to our future is climate change." 100100Pat Ryan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In 2021, he released a plan for a Green New Deal for Ulster County. The plan, which consisted of over 30 goals and targets for Ulster County to reach, was one of the first of its kind in the country. Ryan also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In June 2022, he tweeted, "Climate change is one of the defining challenges of our time," and listed funding the EPA, restoring the Clean Power Plan, blocking dirty energy projects, and building the clean energy economy of the future, as his priorities. On his website, he has demonstrated his commitment to climate action stating "achieving 100% renewable energy by 2030, putting the county's first electric busses on the road, and starting the Ulster County Green Careers Academy at SUNY Ulster." He makes climate change a top priority issue.100Congressman Ryan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5083.3333https://www.patryanforcongress.com/priorities https://oracle.newpaltz.edu/executive-pat-ryan-welcomes-green-new-deal-to-ulster-county/ https://twitter.com/PatRyanUC/status/1541481493972885506 https://www.prochoiceamerica.org/2022/09/06/naral-endorses-pat-ryan-to-us-house/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Salazar, Maria Elvira Florida27RCongresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, the congresswoman states "Climate change is real, and the evidence is right here in Miami [...] Maria is working to secure federal funding and bring to South Florida the best engineering minds to tackle the threats that we face from climate change and preserve Miami Beach." In a 2021 interview with the Florida Director of the Environmental Defense Fund, Congresswoman Salazar states "...if you're here then you might as well just pay attention to what's surrounding you because you may not be here next time if we don't pay attention..."750A 2021 'Florida Politics' article reported the congresswoman "back[ed] a resolution reinstating federal limits on methane emissions from oil and gas producers." A 2021 Orlando Sentinel article reported “Rep. Salazar said that ‘climate change is a real threat to South Florida’s coastlines and economic development over the long term.’” According to the 'Miami Herald,' in 2021, the congresswoman "supports Biden's decision to re-enter the Paris Climate Agreement." Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar's supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. 50Congresswoman Maria Elvira Salazar has an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2018, the congresswoman "told the Miami Herald she would be open to a carbon tax proposal put forward by U.S. Rep. Carlos Curbelo of Florida’s 26th Congressional District," according to a 'Florida Politics' article. The 'Columbia University Center on Global Energy Policy' states "The Curbelo proposal would impose a tax on carbon dioxide emissions that starts at $24/ton of CO2e in 2020, and it repeals the federal excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuels." Despite this, the Congresswoman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5051https://mariaelvirasalazar.com/issues/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZnJDEXT6SzU https://floridapolitics.com/archives/440088-edf-action-ad-salazar-methane/ https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/guest-commentary/os-op-gop-must-embrace-environmental-issues-20210701-6ntq7iybuzhgbj2jxmafjl7gwi-story.html https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article248674410.html https://floridapolitics.com/archives/277463-salazar-ad-environment-election/ https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/research/report/emissions-energy-and-economic-implications-curbelo-carbon-tax-proposal https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/miami-politicians-react-to-supreme-courts-roe-v-wade-decision-14754648 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Salinas, AndreaOregon6DCongresswoman Salinas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she states "In Congress, Andrea will fight for the urgent action we need to protect our planet and natural resources. She knows we need to address climate change, but also focus on the profound and harmful impacts it has on low-income and BIPOC communities. Andrea wants to ensure that marginalized communities are provided with opportunities to prosper in a new, clean energy economy and not further harmed or marginalized by the impacts of climate change. Her approach to fighting climate change is simple: we must take bold steps, while making sure we create living wage jobs and not leave anyone behind in the process."100100Congresswoman Salinas has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congresswoman has cosponsored climate action legislation such as H.Con.Res.37, expressing the sense of a climate emergency, and the Methane Emissions Research Act (H.R.4072). Responding to two of her bills being unanimously passed through committee, Congresswoman Salinas said in a press conference "These bills will strengthen the collaboration between government agencies to build resiliency to climate change and help ensure that Oregon farmers and communities have access to the latest emerging technologies. I thank Chair Lucas for his partnership and look forward to advocating for this legislation as it advances through Congress.”100Congresswoman Salinas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://salinas.house.gov/media/press-releases/salinas-bills-promote-energy-efficient-technology-help-farmers-adapt-climate https://www.andreasalinasfororegon.com/issues/ https://www.congress.gov/member/andrea-salinas/S001226?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Sánchez, LindaCalifornia41DCongresswoman Linda Sánchez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "We are already witnessing the devastating effects of climate change. The science is clear that if we do nothing to reduce and eliminate greenhouse gas emissions, these effects will continue to worsen. Both current and future generations will pay a heavy price for our inaction."100100In a 2020 tweet, Congresswoman Sanchez states "The threat of climate change is real. Updating our nation’s water infrastructure is critical to making our communities more resilient to its effects." According to Solar Power World Online in 2021, "Congresswoman Linda T. Sánchez (D-CA) introduced the Residential Solar Opportunity Act, which would ensure working families and homeowners have the same access as corporations to tax incentives for deploying solar power generation." The Congresswoman’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Sanchez publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).10093.75https://lindasanchez.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://twitter.com/RepLindaSanchez/status/1233508547389984770 https://www.solarpowerworldonline.com/2021/07/congresswoman-linda-sanchez-residential-solar-tax-credit-extension-bill/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors?q=%7B%22cosponsor-state%22%3A%22California%22%7D https://lindasanchez.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/s-nchez-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Scalise, SteveLouisiana1RCongressman Scalise disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 interview with CBS This Morning, when asked about climate change the Congressman, stated, "First of all, we do know that the earth's temperature changes -- it goes up and down... In the 1970's, they said we were entering a new cooling period." In a quote published by The Times-Picayune, the Congressman stated on climate change that, "While their global warming agenda continues to lose support, it's ironic that radical environmentalists are at it again, less than a month after NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), announced the Great Lakes had the most widespread ice coverage in over 35 years... Thirty years ago liberals were using global cooling to push new radical regulations. Then they shifted their focus to global warming in an effort to prop up wave after wave of job-killing regulations that are leading to skyrocketing food and energy costs." 00According to the The Times-Picayune, the Congressman supported President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, stating, "The radical United Nations Paris Accord on global warming is more about wealth redistribution than protecting the environment. It's a plan to allow the U.N. to take control of America's purse strings and take billions of dollars a year away from the United States and send it to other countries under the veil of a misguided global warming agenda, and I applaud President Trump for pulling out of this disastrous agreement." In a press release on the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "The Obama Administration needs to finally abandon their radical climate change agenda that is killing jobs and increasing costs for American families.” Congressman Scalise demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0The Congressman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy and votes against climate action. He is the lead sponsor of a 2021 resolution that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH). He lead the charge for the same resolution in 2016, 2018, 2019. In a press release supporting the 2018 resolution, he stated, ""I think the case is very clear by anybody who's looked objectively at what a carbon tax would do to the economy. It would be devastating to our manufacturing base, it would kill jobs, and I think most devastating, Mr. Speaker, it would rise in increased cost for families all across this country." He also signed the Americans for Prosperity “No Climate Tax” pledge. In 2013, Rep. Scalise proposed an amendment that would have required Congress's approval before passing a carbon tax (H. Amdt. 448 to H.R. 367). In a press release he stated, "President Obama’s plan to impose a tax on carbon would cause household electricity rates to skyrocket while destroying millions of American jobs. The House sent a strong bipartisan message to President Obama that a tax on carbon would devastate our economy and he needs to drop any idea of imposing this kind of radical regulation." 00https://www.cbsnews.com/news/scalise-sidesteps-climate-change-debate-earths-temperature-goes-up-and-down/ http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/03/un_global_warming_report_says.html http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/06/steve_scalise_paris_climate.html https://www.majoritywhip.gov/news/press_releases_newsroom_scalise-responds-to-reports-of-president-obamas-name-and-shame-climate-agreement/ https://scalise.house.gov/press-release/scalise-anti-carbon-tax-amendment-passed-house https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/24/text https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/89/text https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/41/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://scalise.house.gov/press-release/scalise-carbon-tax-costly-burden-american-families https://scalise.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-republican-leadership-s-statement-dobbs-decisionOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Scanlon, MaryPennsylvania5DCongressman Mary Scanlon understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is one of the most serious threats facing our nation and planet, and it deserves a serious response. Changing weather patterns have immediate and long-term consequences and pose grave risks to our national security and economic stability."100100According to the 'Clean Air Council,' “Methane pollution is the single largest human-controlled contributor to climate change and causes disastrous health and environmental impacts for all Americans. In my district, methane pollution contributes to exceptionally high rates of childhood asthma and related health disorders. Restoring the EPA’s New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for oil and gas facilities will go a long way toward protecting vulnerable communities and ensuring a safe, clean world for generations to come.” Congresswoman Scanlon's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Scanlon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://scanlon.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14979 https://cleanair.org/methanecra/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://scanlon.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=397Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schmidt, DerekKansas2RRepresentative Derek Schmidt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, Schmidt consistently opposes climate action. "When I served as your Kansas attorney general, I went to court time and again to stop Biden's radical climate agenda. I'm running for Congress to keep standing tall against big government policies that fuel inflation and make everything from electricity to gasoline to groceries more expensive," he tweeted in 2024. Schmidt also supports continued reliance on fossil fuels. He wrote in a tweet from 2022: "Gasoline prices are at record highs, but the Biden administration keeps wanting to make it even harder to produce and process oil in the United States. This time, they want to make it more difficult to build and maintain pipelines."250Representative Derek Schmidt demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. While he was the Kansas Attorney General in 2022, he wrote on Facebook: "Today we stopped the Biden administration from implementing its Green New Deal without approval from the people’s elected representatives in Congress. Today’s ruling confirms that unelected Washington bureaucrats cannot write federal law to fit their preferences for energy production and the American economy without congressional authority." In 2025, he wrote in a press release about his support for the rollback of Biden era methane regulations, stating that "the Biden methane fee would cripple the small producer oil and gas production we have in eastern Kansas, hurting thousands of small businesses, workers, and landowners. This week’s votes are a step toward rolling back the intrusion of big government into our lives and making energy more affordable for Kansans." In 2022, Schmidt wrote in a tweet: "Enjoyed visiting with independent oil & gas producers at the Kansas Independent Oil and Gas Association conference in Wichita. America needs domestic energy to meet our needs, grow our economy, bring down gas prices, and help hardworking Kansas families afford their energy bills." Despite consistently favoring fossil fuels, Schmidt claims to be "an all-of-the-above guy when it comes to energy policy," in a 2024 interview with the Emporia Gazette.0Representative Derek Schmidt opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He is a sponsor of the UNtaxed Act, which aims to restrict the United States' involvement in and exposure to global carbon taxes.2512.5https://x.com/DerekSchmidtKS/status/1816846012033483039 https://x.com/DerekSchmidtKS/status/1536823470138458113 https://www.facebook.com/DerekSchmidtKS/posts/kansas-attorney-general-derek-schmidt-issued-the-following-statement-on-todays-u/578185227011637/ https://schmidt.house.gov/media/press-releases/schmidt-house-begin-undo-bidens-war-energy https://x.com/DerekSchmidtKS/status/1559298425782501376 https://www.emporiagazette.com/free/article_1e8393d2-869e-11ef-9834-f7b9e11b2212.html https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1909968 https://x.com/DerekSchmidtKS/status/1540351956023185410Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Schneider, BradIllinois10DCongressman Schneider understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's environment page, it states, "Nothing is more fundamental than the air we breathe and the water we drink. And there is nothing more important for us to do than to protect our planet for the next generation. Climate change is a grave threat to the ecological and environmental health of our nation and planet. While some chose to deny the overwhelming scientific consensus, I recognize that the failure to address this challenge will, with certainty, result in further environmental degradation and incalculable damage to the world we pass on to our children."100100Congressman Schneider has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to a 2021 press release, "Congressman Brad Schneider (IL-10) led 142 original cosponsors in introducing a resolution expressing support for the upcoming 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Glasgow, also known as COP26, as well as reaffirming American support for global cooperation in combatting climate change." Rep. Schneider also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2022 press release responding to SCOTUS's decision to limit the EPA's ability to regulate carbon emissions, he states, "In today's ruling in West Virginia v. EPA, the Supreme Court is fundamentally hampering the EPA's ability to fulfill its mission. Climate change poses an existential threat that requires urgent federal and global cooperation. By restricting the authority of the EPA to regulate dangerous greenhouse gas emissions and protect public health, this decision takes away a critical tool in our fight against climate change. The clock is ticking on our window to take meaningful climate action. We cannot, and I will not, allow this set back to deter our efforts to protect the environment and secure our future from the dangers of climate change." Congressman Schneider makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2020 the Congressman introduced The Greener Transportation for Communities Act (H.R. 7318), stating in a press release, "Our country needs to get serious about transitioning to and ultimately achieving net-zero emissions. Transportation is a key contributor to emissions so we need to rapidly move to electrify our car and truck fleets."100Congressman Schneider publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. When asked on whether he supported a carbon fee (which he called a carbon tax) during a forum hosted by the Tenth Congressional District Democrats, he stated that, “I think a carbon tax is an example of a market mechanism and I think there are ways we can use the market that will create incentives for companies and consumers to lower their emissions. Yes.” Congressman Schneider voted against 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://schneider.house.gov/issues/environment https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/ahead-cop26-climate-change-conference-schneider-leads-resolution-142-house https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/schneider-statement-scotus-decision-curtail-epa-s-authority-regulate-carbon https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/schneider-introduces-bill-promote-cleaner-vehicles-fight-climate-change https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUldDdcuJuQ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://schneider.house.gov/media/press-releases/schneider-statement-scotus-decision-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Scholten, HillaryMichigan3DCongresswoman Scholten understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Scholten said "I am fighting to curb climate change before it’s too late, and I stand firmly in defense of our Great Lakes. I am proud to lead the charge to invest in a new energy economy with tax credits for renewable energy innovations to create good paying jobs while reducing our reliance on foreign oil and lowering the cost of energy for all of us."100100Congresswoman Scholten has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a Tweet, she said "I was so grateful to take part in this weekend’s climate roundtable as we celebrate incredible investments from the Inflation Reduction Act & Michigan’s role as a leader in implementing them." The Congresswoman has also cosponsored climate legislation such as the Clean Water Act of 2023.100Congresswoman Scholten has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://hillaryscholten.com/priorities/ https://twitter.com/RepScholten/status/1703516817577156650 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/member/hillary-scholten/S001221?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7DSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Schrier, KimWashington8DCongresswoman Kim Schrier understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website, it states, "Climate change is real and we need to take immediate action. Dramatic, destructive weather systems and forest fires have grabbed the attention of our nation and the world, while the impacts of climate change run exponentially wider than that. From species extinction to oceanic ecosystems collapse, communities across America deserve to understand how their region’s forests, water resources, agricultural industries, and native species held dear will be impacted. Here in the 8th, we will see more wildfires, earlier growing seasons, reduced snowpack, warmer temperatures in our tributaries, a spike in waterborne infectious diseases affecting fish, and species extinction. We have the unique opportunity to champion policies that will create new, sustainable, clean energy jobs and grow our economy."100100Congresswoman Schrier has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On her campaign website, Rep. Schrier states, "As we face the increasing threat of climate change, significant investments in forest management, wildland firefighting and mitigation, and agriculture research will allow for better wildfire preparedness and help specialty crop farmers. This legislation (The Build Back Better Act) also includes electric vehicle tax credits and other rebates that help save families money while moving our country toward a cleaner, more energy efficient future." The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 op-ed in The Hill, the Congresswoman wrote, "There is no denying it: climate change is one of the biggest public health threats facing our country and planet. From increased air pollution to worsening extreme weather disasters, to greater risks for diseases, climate change impacts every aspect of our health and safety. Americans need action on climate change, and they need it now." Rep. Schrier makes climate change a top priority issue. In a speech on the House floor supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "In order to combat the effects climate change, we are all going to have to work together. Ours is a country that has always banded together to take on the greatest challenges of our times, and this is no exception. This is a time for the U.S. to not just partner, but lead the world in protecting this planet for our children and future generations."100Rep. Kim Schrier publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. In an August 2018 interview with the Seattle Times, Rep. Schrier expressed support for the 2018 Washington State ballot initiative that would have implemented a fee on carbon. Rep. Schrier voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://www.drkimschrier.com/issues/climate-change-and-the-environment/ https://schrier.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-schrier-votes-pass-historic-build-back-better-act https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/energy-environment/447011-to-protect-our-health-we-must-act-on-climate https://schrier.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-climate-bill-passes-rep-schrier-s-amendment https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/podcast-talking-taxes-trump-and-dino-rossi-with-kim-schrier-the-doctor-trying-to-flip-rep-dave-reicherts-seat-for-dems/ https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/3671 https://schrier.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-schriers-statement-draft-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Scott, AustinGeorgia8RCongressman Austin disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with NPR, when asked if he denied the scientific consensus that climate change is human caused, the Congressman responded, "Absolutely." 00On Congressman Scott's energy page, he states, "That is why I believe in an energy policy that includes increased domestic oil exploration, increased refining capacity within the United States and increased production of domestic oil, natural gas and clean coal." Scott has also used his platform to criticize the "woke climate agenda" such as in a 2023 Tweet. Congressman Scott demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Scott opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.npr.org/2013/09/05/219177442/rep-scott-tired-of-the-u-s-getting-involved-in-others-disputes https://austinscott.house.gov/issues/energy https://twitter.com/AustinScottGA08/status/1658879292418162706 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://austinscott.house.gov/2022/6/rep-austin-scott-responds-to-scotus-decision https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Scott, Robert C.Virginia3DCongressman Robert Scott understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's energy and environment page, it states, "Congressman Scott believes that human activity has contributed to climate change and has been a consistent advocate of efforts to mitigate global warming. Scott has co-sponsored legislation in the House of Representatives that would promote investment in renewable energy, and is a supporter of the Green New Deal." 100100Congressman Scott has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "By recommitting the United States to the Paris agreement and calling for the necessary planning to meet our nation’s pollution reduction goals, the House of Representatives has taken an important first step. I look forward to continuing to work with my colleagues to mitigate and adapt to climate change and, by doing so, avoid the worst of its consequences.” Rep. Scott also makes prominent public statements on the issue. While touring flood-prone peninsulas, the Congressman, stated, "If we don’t do something today a lot of the areas that are now populated will be underwater.” Congressman Scott makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2017 press release supporting the Clean Power Plan, he stated, "We have an obligation to reduce the impacts of climate change. That is why I supported the Clean Power Plan to reduce carbon emissions, the Climate Action Plan and other efforts to ensure that climate change is taken into account in federal planning." 100Congressman Scott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://bobbyscott.house.gov/issues/energy-environment https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/scott-statement-on-house-passage-of-legislation-to-combat-climate-change https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/in-the-news/scott-tours-flood-prone-peninsula-neighborhoods-with-house-climate-crisis https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/scott-statement-on-president-trump-s-anti-environment-executive-order https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://bobbyscott.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/scott-statement-on-reported-draft-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Self, KeithTexas3RCandidate Keith Self does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.2525Congressman Self demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a press release, Self said “Climate change extremism has served as the pretext for unrestricted encroachments on American liberty. The Biden administration’s latest proposal to curb emission standards hypocritically ignores the significant environmental harm that EV battery production causes and their toxicity." He has also been involved with anti-climate legislation such as various resolutions disapproving of EPA rules and regulations.0Keith Self opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://keithself.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-keith-self-condemns-biden-administration-proposed-rule-electric https://twitter.com/RepKeithSelf/status/1805354080820232701 https://www.congress.gov/member/keith-self/S001224?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimatePro ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Sessions, PeteTexas17RCongressman Pete Sessions does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the 'Waco Tribune-Herald,' Congressman Sessions states "And I will tell you that you would have to, in my opinion, think long and hard to ignore that there’s change going on."250In a 2020 interview with the 'Waco Herald-Tribune,' Congressman Sessions states "I will tell you that some of the answers [to climate change] that are out there would disable America and our economy." Later in the interview, the congressman says "But I think that there are realistic things to do, but one of them is not killing our economy." Congressman Pete Sessions demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Sessions opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://wacotrib.com/opinion/interviews/negotiating-controversy-while-looking-to-return-to-the-fray-q-a-with-republican-congressional-candidate/article_154f9feb-c958-5bf7-9c9a-f405127f9c76.html https://www.kagstv.com/article/news/politics/national-politics/abortions-are-changing-pharmacists-give-medicine/499-5573966e-634c-41ba-ac15-ed7a3fcdce70 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Sewell, Terri A. Alabama7DCongresswoman Terri Sewell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an August 2021 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, "Extreme tornadoes. Raging wildfires. Unprecedented heat waves. Severe droughts & floods. We’re seeing the disastrous effects of climate change play out before our eyes & we cannot afford to wait. The #ClimateCrisis is urgent and requires bold action. NOW." 100100In a 2019 press release introducing the Carbon Capture and Sequestration Extension Act (H.R. 5156) Congresswoman Sewell stated, “It is critically important that Congress supports innovative approaches to reduce emissions, and carbon capture technology is essential to that fight.” But In a 2014 press release supporting coal, she stated, "Although we must prepare to diversify our energy production, I am committed to supporting coal as a viable source of energy in Alabama until alternatives become more economically feasible.” She also does not list climate change as an issue on her website. Congresswoman Sewell supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it.50Congresswoman Sewell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).7577.5https://twitter.com/repterrisewell/status/1424823378616242182 https://sewell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/statement-congresswoman-sewell-conversion-alabama-power-facility-greene https://sewell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-sewell-introduces-legislation-incentivize-carbon-capture-projects https://sewell.house.gov/issues-legislation https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://sewell.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-sewell-statement-supreme-court-decision-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Sherman, BradCalifornia32DCongressman Sherman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting our Environment,' page, it states, "I co-sponsored the Climate Emergency Act, which will require the President to declare a national climate emergency under the National Emergencies Act, and take active steps to mitigate the climate crisis."100100Congressman Sherman has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. On the Congressman's, 'Protecting Our Environment,' page he advocates for protecting the Environmental Protection Agency, stating, "This administration and the EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt have shown time and time again that they do not fully believe in climate change or man’s contribution to it... It is a dangerous precedent to have an EPA Administrator that ignores decades of scientific research and studies." The Congressman makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 tweet defending the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA) he writes, "Ignoring #ClimateChange won't make it go away. The Trump Admin’s latest effort to undo vital environmental protections would let federal agencies move forward with projects without factoring in the #ClimateCrisis. I joined 140 of my colleagues demanding that we #ProtectNEPA." Rep. Sherman makes climate change a priority issue as well. In a 2019 tweet, the Congressman stated "I’m proud to stand and work with them to solve the #ClimateCrisis by co-sponsoring the #GreenNewDeal, the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019, and many other vital pieces of legislation that will help safeguard our environment."100Congressman Sherman publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 100100https://sherman.house.gov/issues/environment https://twitter.com/bradsherman/status/1220502072283541505 https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/cosponsors?q https://twitter.com/BradSherman/status/1175160489921458176?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://sherman.house.gov/choiceSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Shreve, JeffersonIndiana6RRepresentative Jefferson Shreve does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Although he does not state his opinion on the existence of climate change, he has argued for increased US production of fossil fuels. On his website he writes that he is a cosponsor of the Restoring Executive Authority for Offshore Energy Leasing Act, which would "lower energy prices by repealing President Biden's ban on offshore drilling, establishing US energy independence, and increasing oil and gas production in the US." Shreve visited a coal-fired power plant and wrote on Twitter: "Energy policy will be front and center in Congress next year. America must become more energy independent if we want to drive down inflation. I appreciated the opportunity to learn more about Hoosier energy production while touring @HalladorEnergy's Merom power plant."250Representative Jefferson Shreve demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Shreve boasts of efforts to increase supply of fossil fuels to lower prices, writing on Twitter: "This week, @HouseGOP voted to roll back Biden-era rules that pushed energy costs higher. I’m working to unleash American energy and cut red tape so Hoosier families see lower gas prices and utility bills." Furthermore, Shreve met with representatives from a gas corporation and wrote in a tweet: "Had lunch yesterday with the Ohio Valley Gas team in Randolph Co. At a time when Hoosier families need affordable energy options, Joe Biden has been imposing burdensome regulations, driving up prices. I’ll fight against government overreach, defend Hoosiers’ pocketbooks and support American energy independence."0Representative Jefferson Shreve has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://shreve.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-shreve-delivers-conservative-promise-first-weeks-new-congress https://x.com/JeffersonShreve/status/1828435233722511552 https://x.com/RepShreve/status/1992007408433205557 https://x.com/JeffersonShreve/status/1778405420249329690 https://x.com/JeffersonShreve/status/1937646926616203313 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Simon, LateefahCalifornia12DRepresentative Lateefah Simon understands the importance of action on climate change as a top priority issue. Simon wrote on her campaign website: "The climate emergency is the biggest existential threat to our globe. In CA-12, we are experiencing the harrowing impacts of extreme weather patterns, deadly heat waves, and rising sea levels on our coastal cities, inland communities, and hillside residents. Communities of color, people living in low-income zip codes, and fenceline communities have been hit hardest by the impacts of climate change. Folks who were redlined into neighborhoods with high biohazards, communities dealing with fires at refineries, and people living in housing ill-equipped to deal with unhealthy air quality during wildfire season are still impacted and can’t catch up. As a mother of two, Lateefah fears what her daughters and their kids will face if we don’t act with strong, bold solutions. That is why, once elected to Congress, Lateefah will stand up to the fossil fuel industry and work with colleagues to build on the progress made in the Inflation Reduction Act and pass the Green New Deal. Critical to this work is the transition to net-zero emissions and our continued investment into clean energy alternatives." In a tweet, she stated: "The climate crisis is the single biggest threat to our existence. I'm ready to fight for policies that protect the environment so our children and grandchildren inherit a better planet."100100Representative Lateefah Simon has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action as a top priority issue. In 2025, Simon tweeted: "Yesterday, President Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Accord, the most ambitious climate change agreement in history. The oil and gas industry is the biggest winner, every day Americans and our future generations are the losers. This is not the way." Representative Lateefah Simon also makes prominent public statements on the issue. She stated on Twitter: "Withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement is a betrayal of our duty as stewards of the earth. Californians have suffered wildfires, droughts, and environmental injustice - @POTUS’ decision to throw aside climate goals condemns our planet and children to a future of hardship." Representative Lateefah Simon makes climate change a top priority issue. 100Rep. Simon has no known or an inconsistent public position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://www.lateefahsimon.com/issues/climate-and-environmental-justice?source=e7d135ba-d91e-45a5-adfc-5f4bb48c1b51%23block-82a0faf1-3d8c-41a7-81fe-f458716029b4 https://x.com/lateefahsimon/status/1760087065595625795 https://x.com/RepLSimon/status/1881727455209361820 https://x.com/RepLSimon/status/1883300680338948560 https://simon.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.lateefahsimon.com/priorities/reproductive-freedom Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Simpson, MikeIdaho2RCongressman Mike Simpson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On the Congressman's climate change page, it states, "Many scientists agree that the earth’s climate is changing, and these assertions are backed up by land managers who are witnessing changes in plants and animal behavior as the climate shifts. While scientists cannot explain the climate changes of the past few decades without including the effects of elevated greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations resulting from the use of fossil fuels, there is widespread disagreement as to the magnitude of human influence on the climate and the degree to which any effort by humanity to reduce carbon output would slow or reverse the effects of climate change."00In a 2019 press release opposing the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "Proposed as an economic and environmental transformation, the Green New Deal is an irresponsible ploy that should have our nation green with nausea rather than envy... The crusade against “farting cows” might be considered noble or a bit funny by some in the Bronx, but to the ranchers who are up before the sun feeding cows, this isn’t a joke." Congressman Simpson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Simpson makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. On his climate change page, he states, "I am concerned, however, regarding efforts to tax carbon output or to layer so many regulations on top of carbon-based energy sources that it they become unfeasible. I don’t think this is an answer to the energy crisis facing our nation—not only does it make energy production so expensive that American families will see their energy bills increase to unsustainable rates, but it also forces us to continue depending on foreign sources of energy." Congressman Simpson voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).00https://simpson.house.gov/issuestatements/climatechange.htm https://simpson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=398766 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://simpson.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=399657Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Smith, AdamWashington9DCongressman Adam Smith understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, the 'Energy and Environment' page states, "It is an indisputable fact that the earth’s climate is warming and changing, and poses a grave threat to the entire world. Over the last century, the global temperature has risen and research suggests that the global average temperature today is among the highest since human civilization began flourishing. Over the course of human development, the use of fossil fuels, increased deforestation, agricultural production, and other types of human activity have increased the concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG), such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and tropospheric ozone in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide levels, for example, have risen by almost 40 percent over the last 150 years and are contributing to a 30 percent increase in ocean acidification. Two thirds of global GHG are produced by ten primary emitters: China, the United States, the European Union, India, Russia, Japan, Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, and Iran."100100Congressman Smith has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2020 press release tying climate change to the Great American Outdoors Act (H.R. 1957), the Congressman stated, "As the impacts of climate change increasingly harm communities around the country, this bill is an enormously important investment in our children, our environment, and our quality of life that will help protect the great outdoors for generations to come.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In support of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis climate action plan, the Congressman stated, “The climate crisis is an existential threat that requires a comprehensive and drastic mobilization of resources." Rep. Smith makes climate change a top priority issue. He demonstrated this by becoming a co-sponsor of the Green New Deal.100Congressman Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://adamsmith.house.gov/energy-environment https://adamsmith.house.gov/press-releases?ID=50986B68-C735-46F9-B872-34F558C12322 https://adamsmith.house.gov/press-releases?ID=A677791F-8454-42A7-BBCD-E19139C9856B https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://adamsmith.house.gov/2022/5/rep-smith-statement-on-supreme-court-draft-opinion-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Smith, AdrianNebraska3RCongressman Adrian Smith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250In a May 2019 Newsletter titled, 'Leading the Way,' Congressman Smith wrote, I have long supported an “all of the above” approach to increase American energy production and efficiency, which in turn boosts our economic activity and keeps rates affordable for American families and businesses." An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. 25Congressman Smith makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a June 2019 Newsletter titled, 'Taxing More is not the Answer,' Rep. Bacon wrote, "Americans are being taxed enough already; it is well past time to get serious about reining in spending. Unfortunately, some in Congress have reached a different conclusion... There have been proposals to raise taxes on Social Security, gasoline, firearms, carbon emissions, and even to repeal the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017." The Congressman voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).012.5https://adriansmith.house.gov/newsroom/columns/leading-way https://adriansmith.house.gov/newsroom/columns/reducing-carbon-emissions-right-way https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://adriansmith.house.gov/media/column/restoring-culture-life Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Smith, ChrisNew Jersey4RCongressman Chris Smith understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Issues,' page, it states, "As a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, I believe it is equally imperative that we address environmental issues—such as climate change—on a global scale. Global warming is a real threat and an increasing danger to our environment. All major greenhouse emitting countries need to cooperate in reducing and stabilizing atmospheric concentrations of these gases, and the United States must play a leadership role in bringing nations together for a global solution to climate change."750Congressman Smith supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. The last time the Congressman advocated for a truly productive climate change bill dates back to the 2007 'International Climate Cooperation Re-engagement Act' (H.R. 2420), legislation that reduces fossil fuel dependence and ensures "a healthy environment for future generations."50Congressman Smith opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2537.5https://chrissmith.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=3744 https://chrissmith.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=70883 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Smith, JasonMissouri8RCongressman Jason Smith disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 tweet, featuring a picture of cows, the Congressman wrote, "Saw these Missouri cows this morning. I didn’t have the heart to tell them their gases are the cause of climate change, at least that’s what the radicals in Washington with their Green New Deal think!"00In a 2019 newsletter opposing the Green New Deal, Congressman Smith wrote, "Newly elected radicals in the U.S. House of Representatives say the world will end in twelve years unless we pass their “Green New Deal.” Candidates for President have lined up to endorse the plan, which would completely overhaul our entire economy and ban affordable energy options. They say the climate is “our World War II,” but their plan is a war on working families and the American economy." Congressman Smith demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Smith opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://twitter.com/repjasonsmith/status/1102333032298614784 https://jasonsmith.house.gov/newsroom/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1130 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://jasonsmith.house.gov/newsroom/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4127 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Smucker, LloydPennsylvania11RCongressman Lloyd Smucker disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2018 debate reported on by the York Dispatch, the Congressman attempted to cast doubt on climate science, stating, "there's still some disagreement on how much human activity has led to that." In a 2017 candidate survey published by WGAL, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is too often politicized to advance the agendas of special interests and centralize power within the federal government, this should not be the objective. We must utilize science and be prudent to remain good stewards of our environment by working to achieve measurable environmental and health benefits. I support an 'All-of-the-Above' energy policy. We need a combination of shale, coal, nuclear, wind, solar, etc. to best position our country to not rely on foreign sources of energy."00In a debate reported on by State Impact, Congressman Smucker was quoted supporting pipelines. He said, "If the process has been followed, if landowners have been adequately compensated, then I would support that project.” In a 2019 tweet on the Green New Deal, the Congressman wrote, "The #GreenNewDeal isn’t energy and climate policy. It's a plan for government control over each American’s economic life. #GreenNewDisaster." Congressman Smucker demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Smucker opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.yorkdispatch.com/story/news/local/2018/10/09/jess-king-rep-lloyd-smucker-clash-over-campaign-finances-first-debate/1574335002/ http://www.wgal.com/article/lloyd-smucker-vs-christine-hartman-see-where-the-candidates-in-the-16th-congressional-district-stand-on-the-issues/8050280 https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2016/10/11/congressional-candidates-weigh-in-on-pipeline/ https://twitter.com/RepSmucker/status/1100463395491463169 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Sorensen, EricIllinois17DCongressman Sorensen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Sorensen says "Climate change is not a partisan issue. There is not a single climate communicator in Congress who matches the communication and climate science backgrounds of Eric. Eric’s job was to communicate climate to help YOU in your day-to-day life. Climate change is real and serious. Now is the time to act, and we need an experienced climate communicator to lead."100100Congressman Sorensen's website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. In a Tweet, the Congressman said "The climate disasters we see today are a result of the warming only up to yesterday. We have to continue developing smart technology while broadening limits on emissions."75Congressman Sorensen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5081.25https://www.ericforillinois.com/issues https://twitter.com/ERICSORENSEN/status/1724404965567857020 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Soto, DarrenFlorida9DCongressman Darren Soto understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's campaign website, it states, "America should be at the forefront of the effort to reduce fossil fuel emissions and confront the threat of climate change. That's why I'm fighting in Congress to invest in renewable energy, protect our environment, and reduce the financial burden on students who graduate with degrees in science and technology. We have the opportunity to build a clean energy economy and drastically reduce our fossil fuel emissions; we can't afford to lose the progress we've made."100100Congressman Soto has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. During a 2020 town hall, the Congressman introduced the Climate Leadership and Environmental Action for our Nation’s (CLEAN) Future Act, which would ensure the United States achieves net-zero greenhouse gas pollution no later than 2050. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 Energy & Commerce Committee Hearing on climate change, the Congressman described what needed to be done to protect future generations, stating, "To avoid surpassing 1.5 degrees Celsius global carbon dioxide emissions would have to drop around 45% below 2010 levels by 2030 and reached zero emissions by around 2050... This challenge is not about the folks behind the dais it's not about most of the folks in the audience it's about Lincoln and his generation and what we're gonna do in 2050 we're gonna look back and say did we do what we needed to get done." Rep. Soto makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman introduced the Ban Fracking Act (H.R. 5857), a federal bill to phase out fracking nationwide in the United States. In a 2020 press release introducing the bill, he stated, "We cannot deny the overwhelming scientific consensus any longer—fracking is a threat to our health, safety and environment. If we want to transition from fossil fuel emissions as we work towards building a 100 percent clean economy, pulling back from fracking is a critical first step. Failure to act will only make the crisis at hand even more detrimental for future generations of Americans.”100Congressman Soto has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).7593.75https://www.darrensoto.com/climate-change/ https://soto.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-soto-unveils-clean-future-act-climate-change-town-hall https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1PhYFhApnc&feature=emb_logo https://soto.house.gov/media/press-releases/soto-ocasio-cortez-sanders-merkley-unveil-bill-ban-fracking-nationwide https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://twitter.com/RepDarrenSoto/status/1540348797720481792 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Spartz, VictoriaIndiana5RCongresswoman Victoria Spartz disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2020 interview with the IndyStar, Congresswoman Spartz did not acknowledge the scientific consensus on climate change, saying that "there is real debate among scientists about how much climate change is natural and how much is man-made".00Congresswoman Spartz demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a August 2022 tweet, the congresswoman likened the Inflation Reduction Act's spending to "Russian propaganda calling an invasion - liberation". In August 2021, Representative Spartz criticized additional spending programs, including climate mitigation programs, arguing that "we’re spending so much money right now that we need to have a serious conversation" about overspending.0Congresswoman Spartz opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted in favor a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2020/09/15/indiana-5th-congressional-district-candidate-victoria-spartz-stands-issues/5761497002/ https://twitter.com/RepSpartz/status/1556613675930329095 https://wibc.com/114639/spartz-on-spending-were-already-overspending-how-can-we-promise-more/ https://www.indystar.com/story/news/politics/2022/06/24/supreme-court-roe-vs-wade-indiana-politicians-react-abortion-ruling/7580330001/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Stansbury, MelanieNew Mexico1DCongresswoman Melanie Stansbury understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she wrote, "New Mexico and our planet are facing a climate crisis. Historic drought is amplifying water insecurity throughout our country and more frequent fires are devastating our public and private lands."100100Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the Washington Post, "climate hawks in the House say that Stansbury has earned a reputation as an unusually active freshman on climate and water issues. They describe her as a policy wonk with a staffer-level knowledge of these issues and a determination to tackle pressing environmental problems, from America's aging electric grid to the historic drought gripping the West." The article continues, stating that "In December, Stansbury introduced the WaterSMART Access for Tribes Act, which seeks to help tribes access clean drinking water amid a 'megadrought' that scientists say is fueled by the climate crisis. "100Congresswoman Melanie Stansbury has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://melaniefornm.com/en/issues https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/01/19/this-super-freshman-is-making-mark-climate-policy-house/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Stanton, GregArizona4DCongressman Greg Stanton understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release he said, Making a statement on the CHIPS and Science Act, Stanton said in 2024 "Our CHIPS and Science Act is turbocharging innovation here in the Valley, not just in advanced manufacturing, but in addressing the existential threat of climate change and drought." According to a 2021 Facebook post, the Congressman stated, "As climate change continues to impact the southwest with rising temperatures, forest fires and drought, protecting our water supply remains one of my top priorities.”100100Congressman Stanton has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release in support of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, "Arizona is already experiencing the effects of climate change—extreme heat, prolonged drought, stress on our water sources, dangerous wildfires—we have to do our part and take bold action to reverse this trend.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to a press release supporting The 100% Clean Economy Act of 2019 (H.R. 5221) Congressman Stanton, stated, "Climate change is ravaging the Southwest, and Congress has an obligation to take bold action to combat it." Rep. Stanton makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2018 interview with Green Living when asked about his top priorities in his then-upcoming run for Congress, he stated, "We need to better support cities on the climate change action that they are taking."100Congressman Stanton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://stanton.house.gov/media/press-releases/house-passes-bill-act-climate-change https://stanton.house.gov/media/in-the-news/4-az-dems-back-plan-100-clean-energy-2050 https://www.nytimes.com/video/climate/100000005337296/greg-stanton-on-fighting-climate-change.html https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1273880406368949 https://stanton.house.gov/2022/6/stanton-statement-on-supreme-court-ruling-in-dobbs-v-jackson-women-s-health https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Stauber, PeteMinnesota8RCongressman Pete Stauber does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250In a 2019 press release supporting President Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Stauber stated, "President Trump made the right choice to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. This flawed accord tied the hands of American energy innovation, and ignored the strides made by the United States to reduce emissions without interference, and empowered the worst actors in the world to continue being the biggest polluters with little accountability. Instead of prioritizing foreign nations over our own, I stand with the President’s decision to put our workers and country first." In a written statement from October 2021, according to The Ripon Advance, the Congressman said 'We need a reliable and resilient energy grid that provides low-cost energy to American families. This can only be accomplished by supporting an all-of-the-above approach, not picking winners and losers from Washington, D.C.'" Congressman Stauber demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Stauber makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was not in Congress to vote on a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). Congressman Stauber co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).06.25https://emmer.house.gov/2019/11/au-revoir-paris-climate-accord https://riponadvance.com/stories/stauber-gop-colleagues-urge-democrats-to-drop-carbon-tax-policy-proposal/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.weau.com/2022/06/24/minnesota-lawmakers-react-overturning-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Steil, BryanWisconsin1RCongressman Bryan Steil agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his campaign website, he states, "I believe we can create opportunity, protect the environment, and address climate change at the same time." According to a 2018 E&E News article, during a 2018 forum, the Congressman stated, "I believe that climate change is real and I believe humans are a key component in that."500In a 2019 press release following his vote against the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congressman stated, “Global climate change is real. To reduce carbon emissions, we must hold China and India accountable. We also need a technology-based approach. The Paris Agreement fails to hold China and India accountable, making the Agreement unworkable. Heavy-handed federal regulations drive up energy costs. Instead, we must encourage technology developments to address climate change.” During a 2019 listening session, reported on by the GazetteXtra, "Steil stuck with his support of President Donald Trump on a border wall but seemed to differ from the president slightly on climate change. While Trump has expressed skepticism of climate change theory, Steil said he believes it’s real and that human actions have caused it." Congressman Steil does not oppose climate action.25Congressman Steil opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2525https://steil.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.eenews.net/special_reports/2018_midterms_powershift/stories/1060107423 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/repbryansteil/status/1540348850837258245Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Steube, GregFlorida17RCongressman Steube disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to a 2019 article by the Florida Phoenix, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "I think the climate has been changing since God created the Earth. I don’t think there are solutions that we as legislators can necessarily do. You’re obviously not going to change what’s happening on our climate with changing carbon emissions because there’s other partners in the world that aren’t doing that.”00In a 2021 tweet, the Congressman stated "Liberals want to use deadly weather events to justify their ridiculous climate spending when in fact the evidence shows the opposite. As the climate has been warming, tornadoes have actually dramatically decreased." Congressman Steube demonstrates a lack of leadership with public state'ments, advocacy, or votes against climate action.0Congressman Steube opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.floridaphoenix.com/2019/05/02/with-leadership-by-tampa-u-s-rep-kathy-castor-u-s-house-spurns-trump-on-global-climate-accord/ https://mobile.twitter.com/gregsteube/status/1470769533010989071 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://steube.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-steube-celebrates-the-end-of-roe-v-wade-applauds-courageous-supreme-courtOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Strickland, Marilyn Washington10DCongresswoman Marilyn Strickland understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. According to the 'Suburban Times,' in a 2021 press release, Congresswoman Streickland stated, "As our planet warms and climate change takes hold, these extreme weather events are only becoming more common, costing lives, crippling our infrastructure, and destroying the great state of Washington. We have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to create tens of thousands of jobs and build a brighter, more sustainable future. My state, our country, and our world, depends on it." " On her campaign website, the congresswoman writes, "Climate change is one of the most serious long-term threats to our nation and the world. As Mayor, Marilyn committed Tacoma to the Paris Climate Accord and supported the creation of an Environmental Action Plan. She launched a citywide community gardens initiative, which expanded into a county-wide program now with dozens of community gardens throughout the region."100100Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the 'Suburban Times,' in an October 2021 press release, "Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland (WA-10)...deliver[ed] remarks on the House floor today urging Congress to address the climate crisis with historic investments in sustainable infrastructure, citing the damaging impacts of June and August’s unprecedented heat domes on Washington State. With several consecutive days well into the 100s, temperatures in the region soared to record highs, crippling the Pacific Northwest’s infrastructure and environment and costing hundreds of lives." Congresswoman Strickland also makes prominent public statements on the issue. According to the 'KNKX Public Radio' in 2021, "...Strickland favors...those of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis — that would get to net-zero emissions electricity production in the U.S. in 20 years." The congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. According to a 2020 article from 'The Intercept,' "Strickland, meanwhile, supports reentering the Paris climate agreement, and said in a statement to The Intercept that she 'supports impactful plans to address climate change that are attainable and effective to reduce carbon emissions, while creating and maintaining family-wage jobs, and ensuring a just and equitable transition to clean energy source.' She added that she supports the recommendations of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis..."100Congressman Strickland has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://thesubtimes.com/2021/10/02/strickland-calls-for-transformational-climate-action-on-house-floor/ https://stricklandforwashington.com/priorities/climate-change/ https://www.knkx.org/environment/2020-10-29/contrasting-views-on-climate-action-in-the-race-for-washingtons-10th-congressional-district https://theintercept.com/2020/09/24/congress-marilyn-strickland-beth-doglio-environment-fires-climate-crisis/ https://strickland.house.gov/media/press-releases/strickland-statement-overturning-roe-v-wade https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimateN/APro ClimatePro Climate
Strong, DaleAlabama5RCongressman Strong does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Strong demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a Tweet, Strong voiced opposition to climate action saying "The Biden Admin continues to force its radical green agenda on Americans." Strong lists combatting inflation as a high priority, saying the solution is "more production of fuel and gas here in America.”0Congressman Strong opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://twitter.com/RepDaleStrong/status/1770538771160666347 https://www.waaytv.com/news/waay-31-your-voice-your-vote-dale-strong-5th-congressional-district-republican-candidate/article_7d251832-c67c-11ec-9e42-b369c9c0af03.html https://strong.house.gov/media/in-the-news/alabama-leaders-celebrate-countless-lives-saved-anniversary-roe-v-wade-being https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Stutzman, MarlinIndiana3RRepresentative Marlin Stutzman disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He formerly had a page on his website that stated: "One regulatory threat that our economy faces is the promulgation of a cap and trade system. My concern with these potential new regulations is that they will begin to regulate anthropogenic (man-made) climate change problems that the science community has not officially determined to exist." Representative Stutzman also supports actions that would create increased reliance on fossil fuels. He praised President Trump's actions on foreign policy. "The long-term ramifications would be just remarkable for everybody. There's going to be a new refinery for the first time in my lifetime, I believe, that's going to be built down in Texas. We're seeing expansions of the energy industry," Stutzman said in a pre-recorded video posted on Twitter.00Representative Marlin Stutzman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. Stutzman advocates for an all-of-the-above approach to energy, writing on his former campaign website: "I believe in a full-spectrum approach to energy. From continuing to develop our nation’s traditional fossil fuels such as coal, oil, and natural gas, to encouraging the expansion of renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, bioenergy, hydropower, nuclear, and geothermal, we must make the United States energy self-sufficient." Further, Stutzman voted for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, saying in a press release: "I voted for this bill to counter the Green New Scam that stands in the way of productivity in northeast Indiana’s manufacturing and agricultural sectors."0Representative Marlin Stutzman makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Stutzman signed a pledge stating that he would support no climate taxes that increase government revenue.00https://web.archive.org/web/20161207234122/http://stutzman.house.gov/pages/enviroment https://x.com/RepStutzman/status/2035068863499424192 https://web.archive.org/web/20101014222256/http://gomarlin.com/issues/ https://stutzman.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-stutzman-votes-send-one-big-beautiful-bill-president-trumps-desk https://ontheissues.org/Notebook/Note_10-AFP.htm https://www.gomarlin.com/issues/defending-the-unbornOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Subramanyam, SuhasVirginia10DRepresentative Suhas Subramanyam understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he wrote: "Suhas believes we are facing a climate emergency that poses a grave threat to the future of our planet. Experts report that natural disasters have cost the United States more than $450 billion over the past three years, and are projected to cost $54 trillion globally by 2040. Those numbers fail to convey the devastation from lives lost, and the impacts on communities displaced by increasing climate crises." In 2023, he stated on Twitter: "This #EarthDay we recommit to protecting our green spaces and parks, reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, and tackling the existential crisis of climate change for ours and our children's future."100100Representative Suhas Subramanyam has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. While in the Virginia legislature, he introduced a bill that would require the Department of Education to develop a program of instruction on the causes of and potential solutions for climate change. Representative Subramanyam also makes prominent public statements on the issue. Subramanyam signed a letter urging the EPA not to rescind its greenhouse gas endangerment finding. The letter stated: "It is well-documented how climate change fuels extreme weather. Rising global temperatures due to climate change contribute to stronger hurricanes, extreme heat, and flooding. The threats have never been more dire or clearer to communities across the country, including ours. Extreme weather events impacting Virginia have increased in frequency and cost billions of dollars. In 2024 alone, Virginia experienced 10 extreme weather events that caused $1 billion or more in damage. Hurricane Helene caused immense damage, devastating many farms and was estimated to have caused almost $160 million in agricultural damage." Representative Suhas Subramanyam makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Suhas Subramanyam has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, Subramanyam did support Virginia's participation in RGGI, a cap and trade program.5087.5https://www.suhasforvirginia.com/issues https://x.com/SuhasforVA/status/1649815983219957760 https://legacylis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?221+sum+HB362 https://mcclellan.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/document-media-virginia-delegation-letter-re-endangerment-finding.pdf https://x.com/SuhasforVA/status/1504514561336131588 https://americanbazaaronline.com/2023/12/21/suhas-subramanyam-vows-to-keep-defending-reproductive-rights-456120/Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Suozzi, TomNY3DCongressman Suozzi understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he said "Tom also knows that climate change is real and requires bold solutions to mitigate its impacts on Long Island. He was a leading member of the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, a group of Republicans and Democrats who work together to combat climate change while also protecting our nation’s economic prosperity. When he returns to Congress, Tom will continue his leadership on protecting the Long Island Sound, ensuring we have clean drinking water, and working to address climate change."75100Congressman Suozzi's website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. Suozzi has a strong history of voting for climate action according to the League of Conservation Voters. Suozzi has also been involved with cosponsoring climate legislation such as the Clean Commute for Kids Act, and the Climate Resilience Workforce Act.100Congressman Suozzi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).50108.333https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/thomas-suozzi https://suozziforcongress2024.com/tom-suozzis-10-point-plan/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.congress.gov/member/thomas-suozzi/S001201?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%2C%22sponsorship%22%3A%22cosponsored%22%7DSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Sykes, EmiliaOhio13DCandidate Emilia Sykes understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2020, the candidate stated "As the Democratic Leader of the Ohio House I am committed to fighting for environmental justice, equality, sustainability, and a state where we can live out our American dream. Climate change is one of our greatest threats and combined with systemically racist environmental policies is hindering current and future generations’ ability to fulfill the Ohio Promise," in response to an endorsement from the Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund PAC. 100100Congresswoman Sykes has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. According to the League of Conservation Voters in 2022, "While in the state house, [Candidate Sykes] led efforts to repeal House Bill 6 – a disastrous and corrupt energy bill gutting clean energy and energy efficiency programs – and advocated for a proposed alternative Clean Energy Jobs plan that would establish a 50 percent renewable energy portfolio standard by 2050, encourage wind and solar development, expand weatherization programs for low-income communities and create training programs for clean energy jobs." In a Tweet, Sykes said "During my first term, I’ve made protecting the future of our environment a priority. I’m thrilled to announce @LCVoters has endorsed my reelection campaign and look forward to working with them to defend democracy and tackle climate change."100Congresswoman Sykes has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5http://www.theoecactionfund.org/press-statements/esykesendorsement0920 https://www.lcv.org/article/lcv-action-fund-endorses-emilia-sykes-for-congress/ https://www.emiliasykesforcongress.com/issues https://twitter.com/EmiliaSykesOH/status/1735397226799829074Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Takano, MarkCalifornia39DCongressman Mark Takano understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Congressman Takano's 'Energy and Environment,' page it states, "Climate change is one of the most serious threats we face as a global community. Greenhouse gas emissions have grown significantly since the Industrial Revolution, leading to an unprecedented rise in average global temperatures. From changes in weather patterns, to an unprecedented increase in droughts, floods, and superstorms, we have seen the effects of climate change firsthand. We must do more to combat the effects of climate change."100100Congressman Takano has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his House website, Congressman Takano has also makes prominent public statements on the issue, stating "I am proud to support the Green New Deal, a comprehensive and ambitious proposal to achieve global net-zero emissions by 2050. I am committed to bold, progressive reforms to cut carbon emissions, reduce our dependency on fossil fuels and foreign oil, and invest in green energy alternatives." In a 2019 Facebook post supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), he stated, "Climate change is real — it is hurting our communities and it is threatening our future. There is no time to waste when it comes to fighting climate change, that’s why we are making the #ClimateActionNow Act a legislative priority. As a sponsor of the Green New Deal, I believe that we must rise to the challenge and lead the world in addressing the climate crisis." Rep. Takano makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman demonstrated this by co-sponsoring the Green New Deal, a set of laws meant to "wean the United States from fossil fuels and curb planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions across the economy" while also "(guaranteeing) new high-paying jobs in clean energy industries.100Congressman Takano has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. 87). 7593.75https://takano.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.facebook.com/RepMarkTakano/photos/a.265096313619446/1934117533383974/?type=3&theater https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/cosponsors?searchResultViewType=expanded https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/21/climate/green-new-deal-questions-answers.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://takano.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/rep-takano-statement-on-the-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Taylor, DavidOhio2RRepresentative David Taylor does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He does support the fossil fuel industry, writing on his campaign website: "Part of restoring our economy is easing the burden of inflation on working families by cutting their tax burden and bringing American jobs back to America. Unshackling America’s energy sector will go a long way toward accomplishing both. We need to end the stigma on fossil fuels, and lean into nuclear energy." Also on his campaign website, he criticizes climate education for children: "We must end the woke indoctrination of our kids... It singles out groups based on inherited traits, and terrifies young children with apocalyptic tales of humanity’s imminent demise due to climate change."250Representative Taylor claims that he supports an "all-of-the-above" strategy, but his actions show that he consistently favors fossil fuels and opposes climate action. On his congressional website, he writes: "Congress needs to unleash American energy to further invigorate our economy by utilizing an all of the above approach, including fossil fuel production and investing in nuclear energy." He further showed his support for fossil fuels on Twitter. "It’s time to unleash American energy. Our Nation must utilize the oil we have here at home," posted Taylor. These statements, combined with his anti-climate votes, show a dearth of leadership on climate. Representative David Taylor demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative David Taylor has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://davetaylorforcongress.com/on-the-issues/ https://taylor.house.gov/issues/economy https://x.com/RepDaveTaylor/status/1937275607597088993 https://x.com/davetaylorOH/status/1748370125890244729Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Tenney, ClaudiaNew York24RClaudia Tenney disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.When asked if climate change was a significant threat, she replied, "No, I do not believe that climate change is a significant threat to our planet. The climate has always continuously changed and as of today there are no steps we could take that would reduce the global temperature."00Claudia Tenney does not oppose climate action. In a statement, she said "The fact is, we do not have to choose between clean, affordable energy and protecting our environment. We can and must do both."25Congresswoman Tenney opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://us11.campaign-archive.com/?e=[UNIQID]&u=c733071f6c5cb6b94ca6b76ce&id=a1a6aa62db https://tenney.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment-plan https://tenney.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-tenneys-statement-supreme-courts-decision-dobbs-v-jackson-womens https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Thompson, Bennie G.Mississippi2DCongressman Bennie Thompson understands the importance of climate action but does not see it as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "To create the next generation of clean energy jobs, make our nation more secure and reduce the pollution that causes global warming, Congressman Thompson and Congressional Democrats are committed to investing in our nation’s clean energy future."75100Congressman Thompson supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. In a 2021 Tweet, Thompson expressed his support for any of President Biden's executive actions which would combat climate change. 50Congressman Thompson publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. Rep. Thompson co-sponsored the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019 (H.R. 763). The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 10081.25https://benniethompson.house.gov/issues/energy-and-environment https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/763/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/benniegthompson/status/1540442317231882241?lang=en Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Thompson, Glenn W.Pennsylvania15RCongressman Glenn Thompson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Congressman's website, Thompson states, "...I will remain committed to providing resources and outreach in the community, while continuing to advocate for... increases in domestic production of fossil fuels. Lands onshore and offshore contain significant amounts of natural gas, petroleum, and coal that can fuel our energy needs for centuries."00In a 2020 press release, the Congressman condemned calls to ban fracking, stating, "As we look ahead to future relief and recovery measures, we must continue to stand up against Democrat calls to “ban fracking” or incorporate extreme Green New Deal policies. We should instead support proposals to strengthen our supply chains, enhance our national security, and provide more Americans with access to affordable natural gas.” Congressman Thompson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Thompson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).256.25https://thompson.house.gov/issues/energy https://thompson.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congressman-thompson-quizzes-agriculture-undersecretary-anf https://thompson.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://www.penncapital-star.com/government-politics/pa-s-toomey-eight-gop-u-s-house-lawmakers-urge-supreme-court-to-overturn-roe-v-wade/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Thompson, MikeCalifornia4DCongressman Thompson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "Climate change is the greatest threat we face today. From sea level rise to extreme weather events and rising temperatures, no community will go untouched by the climate crisis. It is clear that climate action must remain a priority to secure a healthy future for generations to come. That's why I wrote the GREEN Act which made the largest investment in climate action that our country has ever seen."100100Congressman Thompson has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9) the Congressman stated, "If we do not address climate change with bold and immediate action, we will not have the same world to pass on to future generations. The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. During a 2019 Congressional hearing discussing climate change, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is real and the consequences are impacting our district. All of the expert witnesses in today’s hearing – Democrats and Republicans – agreed that this crisis is real and worsening. From the more devastating fires, to more frequent flooding, our communities face increased health and economic effects." Rep. Thompson makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release co-sponsoring the Green New Deal, the Congressman stated, "Climate change is the most existential threat we face today. I have long said that if we do not act now nothing else we do matters because there won’t be a planet to pass on to our children. That’s why I am a proud, original cosponsor of the Green New Deal, a resolution stating the steps we must take to address climate change."100Congressman Thompson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. On the Congressman's, 'Energy & Environment,' page, it states, "That’s why I voted for legislation to require the Administration to draw up a plan to reduce emissions and why I support market-based solutions to regulating carbon emissions." Congressman Thompson voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5087.5https://mikethompson.house.gov/issues/environment https://mikethompson.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/thompson-votes-for-climate-action-now-act https://mikethompson.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/thompson-highlights-health-impacts-of-climate-change-and-green-tax-code https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://mikethompson.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/thompson-statement-on-assault-on-womens-rightsSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Timmons, WilliamSouth Carolina4RCongressman William Timmons disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. During a 2018 Congressional debate, when asked about climate change, the Congressman stated, "It is not a United States issue. It is a global issue, and we are not going to be the one to solve it. The planet has to solve it."00In a 2022 Tweet, Timmons voiced his opposition to the Inflation Reduction Act, saying "Calling a tax, spending, and climate change bill the “Inflation Reduction Act” is peak Democrat nonsense. These are the same people who are trying to change the definition of recession, refuse to define “woman”, and believe inflation is currently at 0%." Congressman Timmons demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Timmons opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.greenvilleonline.com/story/news/local/2018/10/26/highlights-4th-congressional-district-candidate-forum/1772435002/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/RepTimmons/status/1558103481264766977 https://timmons.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=148Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Titus, DinaNevada1DCongresswoman Dina Titus understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In 2022, the Congresswoman spoke on the House Floor regarding Build Back Better, saying that "We must wake up to the realities of climate change, and the increasing intensity and cost of natural disasters. This (Build Back Better) will help to make our nation more resilient, and I ask my colleagues to support it."100100Congresswoman Titus has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2021 tweet, she stated, "Climate change is the existential threat of our time...Let's get to work." Rep. Titus also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a letter with other House Dems to President Biden regarding forming better climate provisions in Build Back Better, she stated, "The need to act on the climate crisis while centering environmental justice and creating and sustaining millions of good-paying union jobs has never been more important. In communities across the country, we are already seeing staggering climate damages. Climate change is driving more severe drought and wildfires in the West, larger and more frequent floods in the Midwest, and sea level rise and greater storm damage along our coasts." The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Climate Action Now Act (H.R.9), legislation that "requires the President to develop and update annually a plan for the United States to meet its nationally determined contribution under the Paris Agreement on climate change." Congresswoman Titus makes climate change a top priority issue.100Congresswoman Titus publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. The Congresswoman voted against a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 100100https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvM3PIKXJdw https://twitter.com/repdinatitus/status/1354503844076597252 https://mikelevin.house.gov/imo/media/doc/2022-01-31%20Frontline%20Letter%20on%20BBB%20Climate%20Provisions.pdf https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/9?r=12&s=3 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Tlaib, RashidaMichigan12DCongresswoman Rashida Tlaib understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a 2019 press release, supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), the Congresswoman stated, "Families have been harmed and many have died due to federal government inaction – President Trump must realize this and work on behalf of the American people to create a plan to curb carbon emissions and safeguard the health of people and our environment. The Climate Action Now Act is a needed step to take bold action against climate change and I look forward to working with my colleagues to protect frontline communities and ensure a just transition to a green economy happens swiftly and is as comprehensive as possible.”100100Congresswoman Tlaib has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. During a 2019 House Committee on Financial Services hearing, in which several executives from big banks were in attendance, the Congresswoman stated, "But for the sake of this hearing, I'll say that you are greenwashing your own track record and duping the American people into believing that you are helping address climate change. On the record, will any of your banks make a commitment to phase out your investments in fossil fuels and dirty energy?" Rep. Tlaib also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 interview with Jamal Simmons, when asked about climate change, the Congresswoman stated, "I don't think people understand the true impact of doing nothing." Congresswoman Tlaib makes climate change a top priority issue. During an April 2019 rally in Wayne County, Michigan, the Congresswoman in support of the Green New Deal, stated, "A Green New Deal is not bold or radical. This is our life. If there is anybody who deserves a seat at the table it is us in Wayne County! We can’t sit back and let corporate greed tell us this is not possible!”100Congresswoman Tlaib has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://tlaib.house.gov/media/press-releases/congresswoman-rashida-tlaib-s-statement-passage-climate-action-now-act https://www.newsweek.com/rashida-tlaib-banks-gaslighting-americans-funding-fossil-fuels-1391824 https://www.kolormagazine.com/lifestyle-culture/2019/8/21/krxcms1wsthdgeqhf58x4buaftmgdo https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/439841-tlaib-rallies-in-support-of-green-new-deal-at-detroit-town-hall https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://twitter.com/reprashida/status/1485086013470957568Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Tokuda, JillHawaii2DCongresswoman Tokuda understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Tokuda says "Aggressive action needs to be taken to address climate change impacts and increase renewable energy production. Hawaii is in a climate crisis. Accelerated sea-level rise is threatening our infrastructure, with roads and homes increasingly at risk of oceanic erosion. We’re witnessing continued extreme weather patterns and rising ocean temperatures that are severely impacting our coral reefs and marine life."100100Congresswoman Tokuda's website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. Congresswoman Tokuda maintains a strong record with the League of Conservation Voters indicating a history of voting in favor of climate action. Tokuda has also been involved with legislation such as H.Res.319 calling on the creation of a Green New Deal, and the Clean Water Act of 2023.75Congresswoman Tokuda has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).5081.25https://tokudaforhawaii.com/issues/ https://www.lcv.org/work/congressional-scorecard/?s-zip=96720 https://www.congress.gov/member/jill-tokuda/T000487?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Tonko, Paul D.New York20DCongressman Paul Tonko understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congressman's, 'Climate Change,' page, the Congressman lays out a 'Framework for Climate Action in the U.S Congress,' stating, "We agree that climate change is real. We agree humans are driving it. We agree that we need to build solutions that meet the scale and urgency of the crisis we face. The principles outlined in this document are meant to provide a framework that moves the lines of our agreement forward and helps us build a comprehensive national climate action plan together."100100Congressman Tonko has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. The Congressman voted against the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) due to its failure in addressing climate change, stating in a 2019 press release, "The United States must get serious about the challenge of a changing climate and build international cooperation and commitments through all vehicles available to us, including our trade agreements. Trade negotiations do not happen frequently, but their impact is felt for generations. I cannot support a deal which fails to even acknowledge the global climate crisis that future generations will be left to bear.” The Congressman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Paris Agreement, the Congressman stated, "While the Trump Administration wastes precious time denying the scientific realities of climate change, Americans are fleeing its devastating effects in the form of wildfires, flooding and storms unlike anything we have seen before. Decades of science-based evidence have made clear that bold action is necessary to prevent the deadliest and most costly effects of climate change." Rep. Tonko makes climate change a top priority issue. The Congressman led an amicus brief opposing the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) replacement of the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan (CPP) with the Trump Administration’s Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule. 100Congressman Tonko has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7593.75https://tonko.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15252 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2947 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2923 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=3038 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://tonko.house.gov/news/documentquery.aspx?IssueID=15237Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Torres, NormaCalifornia35DCongresswoman Norma Torres understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "I have demonstrated a commitment to taking on challenges like drought and climate change that are impacting California. I’m proud to work hard to ensure that the land, air, and water are kept clean through supporting sensible legislation aimed at preventing pollution while balancing economic development and environmental conservation. My priorities include promoting energy efficiency, renewable energy sources like solar, as well as increasing investments in water infrastructure and funding development of new technologies that have the capacity to expand water recycling and desalination capabilities." 100100Congresswoman Torres has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release, the Congresswoman announced a legislative proposal that would have prevented President Trump from limiting cities and states, like California, from taking ambitious actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The Congresswoman also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2021 tweet, the Congresswoman stated, "Fighting climate change is about our kids and grandkids. If we don't do our job, they're expected to live through three times as many wildfires, floods, and droughts. We're in a crisis—and we've got to take it seriously." Rep. Torres makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2020 Facebook post the Congresswoman stated, "#ClimateChange is real whether the Trump Administration likes it or not. Inserting false information into environmental reports is dangerously misleading, undermines our government’s credibility, and worst of all, puts the future of younger generations at risk. This all-out attack on our environment for the sake of higher profits must end!."100Congresswoman Torres publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). This bill would put a $15 per metric ton price on carbon emissions. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87). 100100https://torres.house.gov/issue/energy-and-environment https://torres.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/torres-proposal-stop-president-trump-sabotaging-california-s-climate https://twitter.com/Norma4Congress/status/1443421500137115652 https://www.facebook.com/RepNormaTorres/posts/climatechange-is-real-whether-the-trump-administration-likes-it-or-not-inserting/3041103052581266/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://torres.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/torres-statement-overturning-roe-v-wade-supreme-courtSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Torres, Ritchie New York15DCongressman Ritchie Torres understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Under 'justice' on the issues page of his campaign website, Congressman Torres writes "We have to radically restructure the American economy and society around renewable energy. Black and Brown communities are on the frontlines of the environmental crisis, and they must be prioritized in our agenda to fight climate change."75100In response to a 2020, the 'League of Conservation Voters Action Fund' endorsement, Congressman Torres said, "In Congress, I look forward to fighting alongside them to address the greatest global environmental challenges including replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy, limiting carbon emissions, enacting a Green New Deal and righting the wrongs of environmental racism that have hurt Bronx residents.” In response to a tweet regarding a severe rainstorm in September 2021, the congressman replies saying "The climate has changed. And New York needs to change along with it." Under 'justice' on the issues page of his campaign website, Congressman Torres writes "The Green New Deal is not only an agenda for environmental justice, but it is also one for economic justice and racial justice. Severe pollution is lethal in communities like the Bronx, where 20% of children have asthma -- 12% higher than the national average. We have to radically restructure the American economy and society around renewable energy. Black and Brown communities are on the frontlines of the environmental crisis, and they must be prioritized in our agenda to fight climate change." This is the only mention of climate action on his campaign website. Congressman Ritchie Torres’ website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Torres no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5075https://torres.nyc/issues/realizing-justice https://www.lcv.org/article/lcv-action-fund-endorses-ritchie-torres-congress/ https://twitter.com/ritchietorres/status/1175101011389833216?lang=en https://twitter.com/ritchietorres/status/1521296083506417665?lang=en https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Trahan, LoriMassachussetts3DCongresswoman Trahan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a press release the Congresswoman stated, "Climate change is real. It is an existential threat to our country and our planet. Every day that passes without Congress taking swift, bold action to tackle this issue is a day wasted, and a detriment to our children and grandchildren."100100Congresswoman Trahan has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On the Congresswoman's, 'Energy and Environment,' page, it states, "Lori understands that climate change will affect low-income and minority communities, tribal nations, and Alaska Native villages. Lori will work towards comprehensive climate change policies that do not leave any demographic — including former mining communities — behind." Rep. Trahan also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 press release supporting the Climate Action Now Act (H.R. 9), she stated, "Combating the climate crisis is a moral imperative that should compel us – regardless of political party -- to act to create a clean energy economy that can provide good-paying jobs to millions of Americans, cleaner air for everyone, and a sustainable future for our children and grandchildren to grow and thrive." In a 2019 tweet condemning the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, the Congresswoman wrote, "This is a step in the complete wrong direction. Our children, our families, and our communities deserve so much better. Climate change is happening, it’s urgent, and it demands action."100The Congresswoman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. .The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=35 https://loritrahan.com/energy-and-the-environment/ https://trahan.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=91 https://twitter.com/RepLoriTrahan/status/1191490502111182851 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://trahan.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15046 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimateN/APro Climate
Tran, DerekCalifornia45DRepresentative Derek Tran understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a post on Facebook in 2026, Tran wrote that "Climate change is an existential and economic threat to all of us. We must champion policy that protects our world and invests in clean energy... No more harmful offshore drilling projects or reckless cuts to clean energy infrastructure." In a tweet from 2025, Tran wrote: "The impacts of climate change grow more severe every day, making our CA-45 community more vulnerable to devastation by natural disasters." However, Representative Tran focuses more on issues like abortion, education and healthcare, and does not mention climate change as one of his issues on his website.75100Representative Tran supports climate action but is not a strong advocate for it. In 2024, Tran responded in a Q&A in the Orange County Register that "I am proud to refuse donations from oil companies and the fossil fuel industry, and if elected, I would work to lower gas prices by making corporate oil and gas companies pay their fair share." Tran is also a signee on a letter to the EPA calling on the agency to maintain its Endangerment Finding for greenhouse gases. The Endangerment Finding, signed in 2009, establishes that greenhouse gas emissions are a main driver of climate pollution, acknowledges the dangers of climate change, and is the legal foundation that allows the EPA to fulfill its mission to protect human health and the environment. 50Representative Derek Tran has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5068.75https://www.facebook.com/derektranforcongress/posts/its-an-honor-to-receive-the-endorsement-of-the-sierraclub-to-continue-my-work-in/122281798868067546/ https://x.com/RepDerekTranCA/status/1932079648751390938 https://www.derektranforcongress.com/issues http://ocregister.com/2024/01/20/derek-tran-ca-45-candidate-2024-primary-election-questionnaire/ https://levin.house.gov/media/press-releases/rep-mike-levin-leads-california-democratic-congressional-delegation-in-urging-epa-to-maintain-policy-to-combat-climate-pollution https://x.com/RepDerekTranCA/status/1937598467389497757 Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Turner, MichaelOhio10RCongressman Turner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250The Congressman's website says "Congressman Turner has long supported an all-of-the-above approach to domestic energy production." Congressman Turner demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. An “all of the above” strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. 25Congressman Turner opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://turner.house.gov/media-center/columns/more-natural-gas-for-europe-is-good-for-us-alliances-and-jobs https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://turner.house.gov/energy https://www.miketurner.com/issues.phpOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AAnti Climate
Underwood, LaurenIllinois14DCongresswoman Lauren Underwood understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's campaign website, she stated "The climate crisis presents an existential threat to our environment, our national security, our health, and our economy. Lauren supports policies that advance clean energy solutions, support good-paying american jobs, and promotes national security."100100Congresswoman Underwood has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. She introduced the 2021 'Farmers Fighting Climate Change' act, legislation that would "establish region-specific climate change mitigation bundles within CSP to support and promote agricultural practices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase carbon sequestration," which would help "producers expand their climate stewardship practices and empower more farmers to be leaders of America's response to climate change." Rep. Underwood also makes prominent public statements on the issue. In a 2019 testimony in front of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis, the Congresswoman stated, "I am committed to ensuring Congress upholds its responsibility to communities like mine who are demanding meaningful, long-term solutions to climate change." Congresswoman Underwood makes climate change a top priority issue. In a 2019 letter to the Secretary of Agriculture, the Congresswoman wrote, “Ignoring the link between climate change and extreme weather presents a direct threat to our national security, food security, and to the livelihoods of Illinois farmers and farmers throughout the country. Undermining public discourse on climate change by obfuscating research is dangerous.”100Congresswoman Underwood has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5087.5https://www.underwoodforcongress.com/issues/climate https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwood-gallagher-introduce-bipartisan-climate-change-legislation-support https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwood-advocates-climate-change-solutions-house-select-committee-climate https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwood-works-prevent-administration-hiding-climate-change-information https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://underwood.house.gov/media/press-releases/underwoods-statement-supreme-court-overturning-roe-v-wadeSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Valadao, DavidCalifornia22RCongressman David Valadao does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with CNN in September 2021, the congressman acknowledged that "that he “is a person who thinks that the climate is changing” and admitting that his party could do more to push on the issue," but doesn't further elaborate on the cause of climate change.250Congressman Valadao does not oppose climate action. According to his official house website, Representative Valadao believes that "we need a diverse, “all of the above” energy plan that includes nuclear and clean coal power plants as well as oil and natural gas exploration, wind, solar, and hydro energy". In a September 2021 tweet, the congressman lauded the economic benefits of solar energy, writing that "renewable Solar continues to create opportunities for businesses and families in our community to convert to solar, and I look forward to seeing their continued innovation bring more projects like this to the Valley".25Congressman Valadao opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. Congressman Valadao voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H.Con.Res.87).2518.75https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/18/politics/drought-climate-change-california-21-congressional-district/index.html https://valadao.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=10177 https://mobile.twitter.com/RepDavidValadao/status/1437502666041561089 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/2018363 https://www.politico.com/news/2022/07/10/david-valadao-abortion-election-00044719Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Van Drew, JeffNew Jersey2RCongressman Jeff Van Drew agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2019 press release discussing the Green New Deal, he stated, "I believe that climate change is real, is driven mainly by human activity and that it is driving real-world changes such as extreme weather events, hotter temperatures, rising sea levels and ocean acidification. I believe that the United States has a moral and economic imperative to mitigate the impacts of climate change. However, I do not think that H.J. Res. 109, the Green New Deal is the right solution.”500According to a 2020 Insider NJ Article, the Sierra Club revoked their previous endorsement, saying "Van Drew claims that he will protect our lands and is against offshore drilling, but voted in support of Trump’s Executive Order (EO 13817) which would ease safeguards and protections for leasing and mining on public lands. He also claims that he believes in climate change and supports our nation staying in and abiding by the Paris Climate Agreement, but he voted to strip federal funding to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the UN Convention on Climate Change." He demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Van Drew opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted for a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2522.25https://vandrew.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-jeff-van-drew-s-nj-02-statement-green-new-deal https://www.insidernj.com/sierra-club-revokes-van-drew-endorsement-backs-kennedy-cd2/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Van Duyne, Beth Texas24RCongresswoman Beth Van Duyne disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In the 'Dallas Morning News- Voter's Guide,' the congresswoman states "The fact that our climate is changing is undeniable. Indeed it has been changing since the end of the last Ice Age and on a warming trend since the end of the little ice age hundreds of years ago. As a person who believes in conservation... I want our country to continue making advances in technology that reduce emissions, have a smaller footprint for energy generation, and contribute to cleaner air, water, and soil.”250According to a 2020 'Grist' article, "[Congresswoman Van Duyne] is not pro-regulation, calling Environmental Protection Agency rules 'crippling' for Texas’ cities." Congresswoman Beth Van Duyne demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a July 2021 tweet, the congresswoman wrote "Joe and the Socialists say electric vehicles & climate change are 'infrastructure!' Help me stop their unfocused, wasteful, and insane spending spree!" Congresswoman Beth Van Duyne demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congresswoman Van Duyne opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5http://dccc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/200514-Beth-Van-Duyne-Book-ONLINE.pdf https://grist.org/politics/climate-change-could-tip-the-scales-in-these-6-toss-up-house-races/ https://twitter.com/Bethvanduyne/status/1418727882826858496 https://twitter.com/repbethvanduyne/status/1540340622875185152 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Van Epps, MattTennessee7RRepresentative Matt Van Epps does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, Van Epps is a proponent of fossil fuel expansion. On Twitter, he wrote: "The best way to empower the American energy sector is to open federal lands for drilling, approve more permits, advance nuclear projects, and support American coal plant production—all things President Trump has done in his first year." He expressed a similar sentiment on his campaign website, saying: "He will partner with President Trump to rebuild our economy — bringing manufacturing back to America, unleashing American energy, and creating good-paying jobs. Matt's priority is simple: put Tennessee families, workers, and small businesses first."250Representative Van Epps opposes climate action and promotes fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "When Democrats were in charge, they fueled inflation, made homes more expensive to build, and restricted American energy. Now they’re blaming Republicans for the costs their policies helped create—and asking voters to give them the power to do it again." In another tweet, Van Epps stated: "President Biden’s decision to cut off oil and natural gas costs Americans an estimated $1.8 trillion. Under President Trump, the war against energy is over. Now, gas prices are at a 4-year low and new lease sales will generate $12 billion in revenue." Representative Matt Van Epps demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Matt Van Epps has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://x.com/MattForTN/status/2029210778738257924 https://www.mattfortn.com/issues https://x.com/MattForTN/status/2104990315195113794 https://x.com/MattForTN/status/2024585294830301486 https://x.com/MattForTN/status/1937587604137845196Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateN/AN/A
Van Orden, Derrick Wisconsin3RCongressman Van Orden does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250Congressman Van Orden demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a Tweet, Van Orden said "Biden’s radical Anti-Energy policies are not just destroying the American Way of Life, they are crushing the free world", and in another asserted "We have to unleash American energy independence." The Congressman has also repeatedly cosponsored resolutions expressing disapproval of EPA rules and regulations meant to help the environment.0Congressman Van Orden opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://x.com/derrickvanorden/status/1541568362052026379 https://x.com/derrickvanorden/status/1577703289981997062 https://www.congress.gov/member/derrick-van-orden/V000135?q=%7B%22subject%22%3A%22Environmental+Protection%22%7D https://x.com/derrickvanorden/status/1540352952036167684Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Vargas, JuanCalifornia52DCongressman Juan Vargas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Vargas writes "The climate crisis is here, and unless we take action at national and global level, it will only get worse. Underserved communities and people of color are disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change. I support the Green New Deal to introduce green technology, cut carbon emissions, keep contaminants out of our water and soil, and address social inequities caused by climate change. I’m committed to working to protect our planet for the next generation."100100Congressman Vargas has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release introducing the ESG Disclosure Simplification Act of 2019 (H.R. 4329), the Congressman stated, “Access to better ESG disclosures allows investors to direct capital toward more sustainable companies, ultimately encouraging companies to reduce their carbon footprints and address important issues like climate change, diversity, and labor rights.” The Congressman’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congressman Vargas publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman is a co-sponsor of the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 2307). The rate begins at $15 per metric ton of CO2-e in 2021, increases by $10 each year, and is subject to further adjustments. He voted against a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 10093.75https://www.votevargas.com/priorities https://vargas.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-juan-vargas-introduces-esg-disclosure-simplification-act-of-2019 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/2307/cosponsors https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://vargas.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-vargas-votes-to-enshrine-reproductive-rights-into-federal-lawSupports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Vasquez, GabeNew Mexico2DCongressman Vasquez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, Vasquez said "We have a basic responsibility to leave a better world for our kids, but unchecked pollution from dirty and outdated energy sources is putting the health and future of our children at risk. Ninety-nine percent of scientists, NASA, and the Department of Defense all agree that climate change is a threat – and we’re already seeing its impact in the forms of increasingly severe weather, drought, and wildfires."10075Congressman Vasquez has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Vasquez has a strong history of voting for climate action according to the League of Conservation Voters, and has taken action such as supporting increasing climate action funding for the DoD and acquiring $63 million from the government for establishing electric truck charging stations and transitioning to electric vehicles.100Congressman Vasquez opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2575https://gabeforcongress.com/issues/ https://vasquez.house.gov/issues/environment https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/gabe-vasquez https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Supports RoePro ClimateAnti ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Vindman, EugeneVirginia7DRepresentative Eugene Vindman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his campaign website, he wrote: "Eugene believes that confronting climate change is both a moral responsibility and an economic opportunity. He supports bold investments in clean energy, efforts to reduce carbon emissions, transitioning away from fossil fuels, lowering energy bills for Virginians and policies that position Virginia as a leader in the green economy." Vindman has espoused similar opinions on Twitter. "I’m running for Congress to protect against the climate crisis, defend reproductive rights, and save our democracy from extremists hellbent on destroying it," posted Vindman.100100In a debate, Representative Vindman said that he supports an "all-of-the-above energy approach" until a transition to solar, wind and nuclear energy becomes feasible. An "all-of-the-above" strategy includes expanding domestic production of fossil fuels and is counterproductive to reaching zero carbon emissions. However, in the past, Vindman has expressed support for climate action. "For years, my son Max and I spent our weekends cleaning the Neabsco Wetlands. Our family loves outdoor spots like the Neabsco Creek Wetlands, and we want to keep them gorgeous for generations to come. But, that takes work. Fighting the climate crisis must be at the forefront Congress' agenda. This Earth Day (and everyday), it is imperative that we come together to put the future of our planet, and our Commonwealth, first," Vindman wrote in a tweet. Representative Eugene Vindman does not oppose climate action. 25Representative Eugene Vindman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5068.75https://vindmanforcongress.com/issues/ https://x.com/YVindman/status/1734967291144520164 https://wamu.org/story/24/10/03/virginia-7th-congressional-district-debate/ https://x.com/YVindman/status/1782432679990120711 https://x.com/RepVindman/status/2069796213717627267Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Wagner, AnnMissouri2RCongresswoman Ann Wagner disagrees with the scientific consensus that that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Riverfront Times, Rep. Ann Wagner was quoted stating, "The field of climate science is in its relative infancy and it appears that some within the public policy world have made dubious assessments of scientific information in order to further their own political agenda. Our policy response to this dilemma should not be based on inconsistent and unsound science or driven by the fear of a supposed catastrophe."00On Congresswoman Wagner's, 'Energy,' page, it states, "I believe we must fully cultivate our oil resources by ending drilling moratoriums, increasing onshore and offshore production, and approving permits that would assist in transporting oil from North Dakota's Bakken." Congresswoman Wagner demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congresswoman Wagner makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman was a co-sponsor and voted for a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congresswoman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)). 00https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/9a4dyp/missouris-climate-change-deniers https://wagner.house.gov/issues/energy https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-3YK-dI08o Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wahab, AishaCalifornia14DRepresentative Aisha Wahab understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "The climate crisis is serious and it's all of us – every single living creature – that faces the consequences of our changing climate. I’ll continue to be a strong leader and address the threat of #climate change." On her website, she wrote: "As a former environmental consultant, I know the cost of inaction—our planet is in crisis. Climate change is real, and we see it in rising wildfires, droughts, and extreme weather. Climate change is the smoke in our lungs, the fire risk outside our doors, and the rising bills hitting family budgets. As a former environmental consultant, I’ve seen the cost of delay up close: when government waits, families pay."1000Representative Aisha Wahab has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. Her website states that she has: "Planned for a responsible refinery transition that protects public health, prevents supply shocks, and supports workers and local communities. Invested in resilience so communities are better prepared for wildfires, extreme heat, and climate emergencies. As a City Councilmember, I pushed regional wildfire prevention, shoreline protection, and supported a local Green New Deal — because climate action should mean safer communities and good local jobs." Representative Aisha Wahab also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "On council, Aisha pushed bold policies that invested $900 million dollars in the Bay Area Shoreline. She's committed to a sustainable infrastructure that will create jobs and reduce carbon emissions." Representative Aisha Wahab makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Aisha Wahab has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5083.3333https://x.com/aishabbwahab/status/1470485641955786765 https://www.aishawahab.com/issues-1 https://www.aishawahab.com/issues-1 https://x.com/aishabbwahab/status/1582454129976221696 https://x.com/aishabbwahab/status/1618412406723706880Supports RoeN/AN/AN/AN/A
Walberg, TimMichigan5RAccording to a 2017 Time Magazine article, during a town hall when asked his stance on climate change, the Congressman stated, "I believe there’s climate change. I believe there’s been climate change since the beginning of time. Do I think man has some impact? Yeah, of course. Can man change the entire universe? No... Why do I believe that? Well, as a Christian, I believe that there is a creator in God who is much bigger than us. And I’m confident that, if there’s a real problem, he can take care of it.”00In a September 2019 interview on the Steve Gruber Show, the Congressman stated when asked about climate change, "These last several weeks of August it has been a huge issue especially when you see the Democratic candidates talking about it and the Green New Deal, but that is not going to work." In a 2023 press release, Walberg talked about introducing a bill which would greatly reduce the EPA's abilities to enforce emission regulations. Congressman Walberg demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Walberg makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a 2016 press release, after voting to oppose a national carbon tax, the Congressman stated, "For the Michigan families struggling each month to pay their bills, a new $10 oil tax would be yet another blow to their pocketbooks. During a time of sluggish economic growth, the last thing we need is a misguided tax that will increase energy prices and hurt job creation. America's energy policies should encourage more innovation and production, not try at every turn to make energy more expensive for consumers." Congressman Walberg was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). The Congressman co-sponsored a 2021 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 34 (IH)).00https://time.com/4800000/tim-walberg-god-climate-change/ https://stevegruber.podbean.com/e/tim-walberg-climate-change-the-green-new-deal-and-the-bacon-tax/ https://walberg.house.gov/media/press-releases/walberg-opposes-higher-energy-prices-new-oil-tax https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-concurrent-resolution/34/cosponsors?r=1&s=1 https://walberg.house.gov/media/press-releases/walberg-statement-supreme-court-decision-dobbs-case https://walberg.house.gov/media/in-the-news/detroit-news-walberg-bill-would-bar-epa-implementing-strong-new-emission-rulesOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Walkinshaw, JamesVirginia11DRepresentative James Walkinshaw understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "Fighting climate change is one of my top priorities -- I'll work to make the Fairfax County government carbon neutral, advocate for green buildings and solar freedom, and increase the number of hybrid and electric vehicles in our fleet." Furthermore, on his campaign website, he states: "In Congress, I worked with Gerry Connolly to pass legislation addressing climate change. In Fairfax, I’ve led the effort to reduce emissions, improve air quality, and clean up our parks, streams, and green spaces. In Congress, I’ll push for clean-energy investment, strong air and water protections, and Chesapeake Bay restoration."100100Representative James Walkinshaw has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. On his congressional website, he wrote: "Congressman Walkinshaw knows that confronting climate change is a defining challenge, and an opportunity to build a cleaner, healthier, more prosperous future. On the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors, he delivered on his commitment to make Fairfax carbon neutral and helped lead efforts to install solar on County buildings, convert the vehicle fleet to electric, and empower residents and businesses to reduce their carbon footprint. He spearheaded the County’s five-cent plastic bag fee, raising millions for litter prevention while slashing plastic pollution, and advanced the County’s Zero Waste initiative to cut landfill waste and embed sustainability into every part of local government. In Congress, James supports bold federal action to mobilize federal investments in cheap clean energy, climate resilience, and green jobs. He is also fighting to secure expanded funding for the Chesapeake Bay Restoration Program to accelerate cleanup of one of our nation’s most vital waterways. Walkinshaw opposes reckless efforts to expand offshore drilling that threaten our coasts, our environment, and our economy -- which is why he cosponsored the Defend our Coast Act. He is also working to repeal the anti-climate provisions of Trump’s so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' including rollbacks on clean energy tax credits and incentives that will undermine America’s transition to renewable energy and drive up utility costs for hardworking families." Representative James Walkinshaw also makes prominent public statements on the issue. On his campaign website, he wrote: "James ran for the Board of Supervisors with a commitment to addressing the climate crisis and expanding clean energy in Fairfax County. As Chair of the Board’s Environmental Committee, he led the transition of County buildings to solar energy, converted the vehicle fleet to electric, spearheaded Fairfax’s five-cent plastic bag fee — which has raised millions while dramatically cutting plastic pollution — and launched the County’s Zero Waste initiative. The Trump administration is dismantling clean energy investments, canceling projects, and throwing away tens of thousands of American jobs in the process — all while rolling back the environmental protections that keep our air clean, our water safe, and the Chesapeake Bay healthy. James is fighting back." Representative James Walkinshaw makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative James Walkinshaw has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://x.com/JamesWalkinshaw/status/1134104204610613253 https://jameswalkinshaw.org/media-toolkit/ https://walkinshaw.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=14960 https://jameswalkinshaw.org/priorities/ https://x.com/JamesWalkinshaw/status/2014478475285950683Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimateN/A
Wasserman Schultz, DebbieFlorida20DCongresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the Congresswoman's, 'Environment,' page, it states, "As a senior member of the Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, I use my unique position to advocate for South Florida and Everglades restoration, take bold action on climate change and renewable energy, and improve the quality of our air and water. It is imperative, now more than ever, that we adequately fund ecosystem restoration and clean energy initiatives as Florida deals with the full effects of our global climate crisis."100100In 2017 Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz published an op-ed in the Miami Herald condemning the president's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement, writing, "Sadly, the decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement is only the latest anti-science, anti-conservation policy to emerge from the Trump administration. This is a president who appointed a vocal climate science denier to head the Environmental Protection Agency, then removed a majority of scientists from the EPA’s Board of Scientific Counselors. This is an administration that has worked to erode the safeguards protecting clean air and clean water at every opportunity — including gutting key funding for Everglades protection and restoration." Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz’s website and position papers advocate for climate action, but not as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Wasserman Schultz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 7587.5https://wassermanschultz.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=15058 http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/op-ed/article154343914.html https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://wassermanschultz.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2850Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Waters, MaxineCalifornia43DCongresswoman Waters understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In response to the World Bank President David Malpass’s denial of climate change, she stated, "President Malpass’s refusal to accept the overwhelming scientific consensus that human activity, specifically, the burning of fossil fuels, is the main driver of climate change is appalling...President Malpass’s unwillingness to acknowledge the central role that fossil fuel emissions play in climate change calls into question the Bank’s commitment to meeting the climate challenge, including efforts to help ensure a just transition away from fossil fuels in developing countries." In a 2017 press release rebuffing President Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Agreement Congresswoman Waters stated, "If Trump withdraws from the Paris agreement, it could cause the entire agreement to collapse, accelerating climate change and exacerbating its impacts on human communities, impacts which include deadly hurricanes, severe droughts, and rising sea levels."100100Congresswoman Waters has demonstrated leadership on climate change by advocating for climate action. In a 2019 press release condemning President Trump's decision to slash California transportation funding, the Congresswoman stated, "We will continue to resist his heartless, corrupt, and cruel administration. We will win our lawsuit and protect our right to enforce strong emissions standards, fight climate change, and protect public health.” The Congresswoman makes prominent public statements on the issue. During the nomination of Secretary of State, Rex Tillerson, the Congresswoman released a statement stating, "Rex Tillerson’s record of misinformation on climate change is also a reason for grave concern about his ability to be a credible and effective Secretary of State. Recent evidence indicates that Exxon deliberately misled government agencies and the American public regarding the threat posed by climate change." The Congresswoman makes climate change a top priority issue. In 2021, "Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA), Chairwoman of the House Committee on Financial Services, gave the following statement at a Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Financial Institutions hybrid hearing entitled, 'Addressing Climate as a Systemic Risk: The Need to Build Resilience within Our Banking and Financial Institutions.'” The Congresswoman stated "Over the past year, we have witnessed examples of how climate change can disrupt our financial system. Meanwhile, the hundreds of bankruptcies in the oil and gas sector as a result of the economic fallout from COVID-19 has provided a preview of the type of pain our economy will likely face as climate change becomes worse. I am pleased that President Biden, Treasury Secretary Yellen, and policymakers at the Fed and elsewhere have listened to those of us who have raised concerns about urgent financial stability risks of climate change, and that they are beginning to take action."100Congresswoman Waters has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. 87). 7593.75https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=409853 https://waters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-waters-statement-reports-suggesting-president-trump-will-withdraw-us https://waters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-waters-statement-trump-intimidating-california-slashing https://waters.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/congresswoman-waters-statement-nomination-rex-tillerson-secretary-state https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=408104 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://financialservices.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=409591Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Weber, RandyTexas14RCongressman Randy Weber disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an article on 'Vice,' they refer to Congressman Weber as a "climate change denier," and quote him saying, "I may want to get your cell phone, because if we go through cycles of global warming and then back to global cooling, I need to know when to buy my long coat on sale. I just don't know how y'all prove those hypotheses going back fifty, hundred, what you might say is thousands if not millions of years, and then postulate those forward." 00In a 2019 press release supporting the withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, Congressman Weber stated, "This legislation would bind us to the Paris Climate Accord and would be a step backwards. Staying in the Paris Climate Accord could mean losing 2.7 million American jobs and losing over $250 billion in GDP by 2025. Money funneled into the Paris Climate Accord is better spent investing in the private sector, which leads the way in technology and emissions reduction. Withdrawing from the Accord is not about seeking to do harm to the environment. Far from it. Instead, this is about investing in people and innovation. Regulation and false promises serve only to stifle real progress.” Congressman Weber demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. ge leadership.0Congressman Weber makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor and voted in favor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119). 00https://weber.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=526 https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://kfdm.com/news/local/randy-weber-releases-statement-praising-supreme-court-decision-to-overturn-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateN/AAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Westerman, BruceArkansas4RCongressman Westerman agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview with CSPAN, Westerman stated "When we look at what's happening with climate, if you look at what we know from polar ice caps on the amount of carbon in the atmosphere, pre-industrial revolution in the modern period, it didn't get above 300 parts per million [...] now we are over 400 parts per million. Westerman lated added "I think that we can address the climate issue. Long term there are a lot of things that have to happen. It can't happen overnight, just like climate change doesn't happen overnight." In an interview with NC Newsline, Westerman doesn't reject the scientific consnensus on climate change but voices opposition to most climate action targeting fossil fuels saying "The Democrats’ approach is to remove fossil fuels, which maybe someday we can do that, but we’re a long way from getting to that point." 500Congressman Westerman supported President Trump's announcement to leave the Paris Agreement, stating in a 2017 press release, “I applaud the Administration's decision to lead like America has historically led...by example. The United States can be more effective illustrating to the rest of the world what sound environmental stewardship looks like by innovating and continuing to be the best when we lead and set the standard versus signing agreements with foreign governments and allowing others to direct how we operate.” During a 2017 Congressional hearing, Rep. Westerman doubted climate change stating, “I assume if the climate’s changing, it’s changing in Arkansas, as well as other places. So I did a little research and found out the number of forest fires in Arkansas has actually decreased over the past 20 years. It’s either held level or slightly decreased as our management has continued to increase. So apparently the climate change isn’t affecting forest fires in my state. You would think even though it’s a more moderate or temperate climate if climate change was causing more fires we would see a lot more of them than what’s in the baseline.” Congressman Westerman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Congressman Westerman opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2518.75https://www.c-span.org/video/?475897-4/representative-bruce-westerman-climate-change https://ncnewsline.com/briefs/new-u-s-house-natural-resources-chair-opposes-limits-on-fossil-fuel-development/ https://westerman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/western-caucus-members-praise-paris-climate-agreement-withdrawal-potus https://westerman.house.gov/media-center/videos/bruce-westerman-questions-wildfire-prevention-house-subcommittee-federal-lands https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://westerman.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/westerman-reacts-reversal-roe-v-wadeOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Whitesides, GeorgeCalifornia27DRepresentative George Whitesides understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a tweet, Whitesides writes: "It is clear that anthropogenic climate change is real. When I was at NASA we increased the earth science budget to enable scientists to better understand global warming and our planetary climate system." Furthermore, he has spent much of his career talking about the danger of wildfires, especially with the increasing effects of climate change. "This risk is increasing, and if we don't get our act together, we're going to have more Paradises. We're going to have more Santa Rosas. We're going to have more Lahainas. We're going to have more Marshall fires like the one they had in Colorado... Eight of the 10 largest megafires in California history have happened over the last five or six years. Partly that's due to global warming," Whitesides said in an interview with NPR in 2023.100100Representative Whitesides has demonstrated leadership by advocating for climate action. While in Congress, he proposed the Global Climate Resilience Act, legislation that would create a new debt-for-resilience program to improve the United States’ ability to provide climate finance and debt relief to countries in the Global South. "I’ve seen the extreme financial impact that natural disasters like wildfires have on my community and state, and that problem exists at scale across the globe... The Global Climate Resilience Act asserts U.S. leadership in combating climate change, while also addressing widespread debt by creating better pathways for countries in the Global South to invest in resilience measures for natural disasters. By making it easier for countries with developing economies to implement climate resilience initiatives, we can help facilitate a global effort to combat climate change with more nations and international organizations," Whitesides said, according to a press release. Representative Whitesides also makes prominent public statements on the issue. He signed a letter to the California Air Resources Board. The letter sates: "As Members of Congress committed to addressing the climate crisis and protecting the health of Californians, we urge the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to strengthen its regulations on landfill methane emissions and prioritize the wellbeing of frontline communities." However, according to Politico, Whitesides voted to block Governor Newsom’s order phasing out the sale of new entirely gas-powered vehicles by 2035. Overall, Representative Whitesides makes climate change a top priority issue.100Representative Whitesides has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5087.5https://x.com/gtwhitesides/status/1654593256473378816 https://www.npr.org/transcripts/1211882620 https://casten.house.gov/media/press-releases/casten-whitesides-levin-introduce-bill-to-provide-climate-finance-to-countries-in-the-global-south-while-reducing-debt https://juliabrownley.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/11.19.25-Letter-to-CARB-re-Stronger-California-Methane-Emission-Regulations.pdf https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/07/democrats-climate-retreat-california-energy-00439882 https://www.georgewhitesides.com/policies/ Supports RoePro ClimatePro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Wied, TonyWisconsin8RRepresentative Tony Wied does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has argued for increased fossil fuel usage, saying: "I owned and operated gas stations for nearly 30 years in #WI08. The average cost of building a gas station is approximately $2-$4M. Biden’s average cost for 7 EV charging stations? $1,071,428,571.43 Biden’s Green New Deal is a total scam!" Similarly, Wied celebrated lower gas prices. "This is what happens when you unleash American energy. It’s clear: when our country is energy dominant, Americans pay less at the pump," Wied posted on Twitter.250Representative Wied publicly supported the One Big Beautiful Bill, which will increase carbon emissions and is a boon to the fossil fuel industry. "Over the last few months, House Republicans have worked hand in hand with President Trump to craft One Big Beautiful Bill that will extend tax cuts for hard-working families, secure our border, unleash American energy," said Wied in a press release. In an interview with a local Fox station, he further laid out his opinion on energy and fossil fuels. "In my first term in office, we've done amazing things as it relates to being energy dominant in this country. Whether that's pulling back regulations or, you know, at a minimum signaling that we want to be dominant here in the United States, as it relates to energy production, but also in the Western Hemisphere, places like Venezuela and throughout our hemisphere here, we are dominant right now. We have great refining capacity," stated Wied. These statements, combined with his votes against climate action, show a pattern of opposition to progress on climate. Representative Tony Wied demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action.0Representative Tony Wied has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5018.75https://x.com/TonyWied/status/1788604757285728521 https://x.com/RepTonyWied/status/1995607912761491725 https://wied.house.gov/media/press-releases/congressman-wieds-statement-passage-house-republicans-one-big-beautiful-bill https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vhG-q1ACpYs https://wisconsinexaminer.com/race-details/wisconsins-8th-congressional-district/Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Williams, NikemaGeorgia5DCongresswoman Nikema Williams understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, Williams states "If we do not take bold action now to halt the harmful effects of the climate crisis, we are facing irreversible and life threatening changes - especially for those in Black and Brown communities.I fully support the Green New Deal, because as we have seen in Flint, Michigan and countless other instances in our country, environmental justice and the climate crisis are hand-in-hand. We already know what actions we must take as a country, and we must not wait any longer because people’s lives are at stake. With time, air and water pollution will continue to increase, temperatures will continue to rise, and the climate crisis will wreak havoc on our communities."100100On her campaign website, Congresswoman Nikema Williams states that she "support[s] the aggressive target of transitioning to 100% clean energy by 2050, and the bold proposals of affordable public transit, good-paying environmentally friendly jobs, while providing for futures to come." Congresswoman Williams also makes public statements advocating for climate action, such as in a 2022 Tweet saying "I proudly voted YES to make the biggest climate investment in history, create new jobs and save folks money on healthcare." Congresswoman Williams' website and position papers advocate for climate action as a top priority issue. 75Congresswoman Nikema Williams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congresswoman voted against a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 5081.25https://www.nikemaforcongress.com/issues-new https://nikemawilliams.house.gov/issues/environment https://x.com/RepNikema/status/1559156340844630018 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://nikemawilliams.house.gov/posts/congresswoman-nikema-williams-statement-before-voting-for-reproductive-rights-legislative-packageSupports RoeN/APro ClimatePro ClimatePro Climate
Williams, RogerTexas25RCongressman Roger Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 250Congressman Roger Williams demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. According to an article in 'Politi Fact,' Congressman Williams has undermined climate change solutions. The article states, "In a one-minute speech on Oct. 28 in Congress, Rep. Roger Williams, R-Austin, claimed: 'U.S. households are on track to spend $19 billion more on energy by 2030.'" In a press release, Williams said "President Biden's radical efforts to reduce fossil fuel production in order to appease climate change activists continues to have harmful impacts on American consumers and our global national security interests. From his first day in office, President Biden was determined to cripple domestic energy production at home."0Congressman Williams makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman was a co-sponsor of a 2018 resolution by Rep. Steve Scalise that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 119).06.25https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/nov/30/roger-williams/williams-presents-estimate-based-biden-campaign-pr/ https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/115-2018/h363 https://williams.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/rep-williams-statement-on-the-supreme-court-s-decision-to-overturn-roe-v https://williams.house.gov/issues/energy-independenceOpposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wilson, JoeSouth Carolina2RCongressman Joe Wilson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.250On Congressman Wilson 'Energy,' page, it states, "I fully support domestic production of our natural resources. I believe we must continue to explore offshore, in locations where natural resources are abundant, for even more opportunities that may support American efforts to reduce dependency on foreign oil. A key energy project which would directly support our desire to wean ourselves of foreign oil while at the same time adding hundreds of thousands jobs here at home is the Keystone XL Pipeline. The Trump Administration has supported the Keystone XL Pipeline, a project that would transport crude oil from Canadian oil sands to refineries along the Gulf Coast." Congressman Wilson demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Wilson opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 2512.5https://joewilson.house.gov/issues/energy https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497Unclear Position on RoeN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Wittman, Robert J.Virginia1RCongressman Robert Wittman agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, Congressman Wittman states, "We need to focus on ways we can address climate change."500In a press release on the Green New Deal, Congressman Wittman stated, "The Democrats have put forth policies like the Green New Deal. These policies have me gravely concerned. Proponents of this proposals say it would address climate change and economic inequality by getting the United States to zero carbon emissions in 10 years. I see it as a gross abuse of government power that will pose disastrous damage to our economy, impose substantial costs on everyday Americans, and threaten our energy dominance and national security, all for little to no difference on global temperatures." Congressman Wittman demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. 0Congressman Owens opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. The Congressman voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2518.75https://wittman.house.gov/issues/issue/?IssueID=128027 https://wittman.house.gov/forms/form/?ID=112 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://wittman.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=4263Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Womack, SteveArkansas3RCongressman Steve Womack disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2018 article by the Times Record when asked about climate change the Congressman stated, "The climate changes — it has throughout history. The real debate is who or what is causing it?... We have yet to find an exact answer, but there are a range of arguments and research to support varying views. Our goal should always be to put forth novel, market-based solutions that protect our environment and balance economic interests. America has been a leader of innovation in this sector, and it’s important that other countries also do their fair share. By being good stewards and advancing an all-of-the-above energy plan, we can support productivity and sustainability for the future.”00In 2021 Womack criticized the Green New Deal saying "This bill is undeniably more of a vehicle to appease the socialist left rather than a serious attempt to prioritize our nation’s infrastructure needs. The bloated, big-government approach implements more Green New Deal mandates than actual provisions to support roads and bridges." In a 2023 press release, Womack opposed climate action stating "America’s farmers and small businesses have suffered under constricting, hyper-regulatory policies, typical of the left’s agenda. The Interior Appropriations bill releases this chokehold by repealing the flawed WOTUS rule, halting permitting requirements for livestock emissions, and unleashing energy production" and voting to limit the EPA's powers.0Congressman Womack opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86). 256.25https://www.swtimes.com/news/20181028/is-global-climate-change-man-made-or-not-arkansas-3rd-district-congressional-candidates-respond https://talkbusiness.net/2017/06/arkansas-congressional-delegation-applauds-trumps-withdrawal-from-climate-treaty/ https://womack.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=404556 https://womack.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=407395 https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://womack.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=405221Opposes RoeN/AAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate
Yakym, RudyIndiana2RCongressman Yakym does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a 2023 tweet, the Congressman bashed President Biden's budget as he said it, "reflects his far-left priorities. His budget mentions 'climate' 148 times and even 'transgender' 8 times but only mentions 'fiscally responsible' 3 times.250Congressman Yakym demonstrates a lack of leadership with public statements, advocacy or votes against climate action. In a Tweet, he said "Once again, President Biden is putting the Left’s radical climate agenda ahead of American jobs and national security. Now our allies will have to turn to adversaries like China and Russia for their energy needs."0Congressman Yakym opposes or votes against a U.S. fee on carbon. He voted in favor of a 2024 resolution by Rep. Ryan Zinke that would have expressed the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy (H. Con. Res. 86).2512.5https://twitter.com/RepRudyYakym/status/1636004645813248000 https://meetthefreshmen.marathonstrategies.com/meet-the-freshmen/290/rudy-yakym/ https://clerk.house.gov/Votes/202497 https://x.com/RepRudyYakym/status/1750948197378261494Opposes RoeAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti ClimateAnti Climate

2026 U.S. House Challengers

NameStateDistrictPartyPositionPosition ScoreCarbon FeeCarbon Fee ScoreClimate CalculationSourcesSupport/Oppose Roe
Adair, PattiOregon5RPatti Adair understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. She stated: "The climate is always changing, that is for sure... We have changed a lot of our policies. We are using fuel that is making a difference as far as climate change. We’ve bought a lot of different vehicles that are more economical. The county with our half a billion dollar budget, clearly can make better choices for where we need to go in the future."25Patti Adair has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://bendbulletin.com/2022/09/21/patti-adair-morgan-schmidt-discuss-issues-at-candidate-event/ https://dccc.org/the-case-against-patti-adair/Opposes Roe
Adeimy, DeborahFlorida23RDeborah Adeimy agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to The Palm Beach Post, Adeimy has acknowledged that climate change exists and has supported some measures to address it in the past.50Deborah Adeimy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/opinion/2022/07/27/elections-2022-post-endorses-deb-adeimy-gop-nominee-u-s-house-22/10029970002/Unclear Position on Roe
Ager, JamieNorth Carolina11DJamie Ager understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview, he stated that "when the changing… climate is hitting your personal home and your communities like that, it really does change your equation. And from an energy policy standpoint, there’s no question we need an energy policy that encourages renewables. Encourages low-cost renewables, right? Solar’s a terrific, you know, source of energy when we manage it right. And so, to me, We need… we need to figure out how to get climate change under control."75Jamie Ager has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.contrariannews.org/p/this-working-class-farmer-wants-toUnclear Position on Roe
Akin, AmmieAlabama7RAmmie Akin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Ammie Akin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75N/AUnclear Position on Roe
Alfonso, MichaelWisconsin7RMichael Alfonso does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "For too long, conservatives have ceded the conservation movement to the left. We need a new generation of leadership that understands we can lower energy costs, strengthen American energy independence, and still be faithful stewards of the land and resources God has entrusted to us."25Michael Alfonso has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/MikeAlfonsoWI/status/2055035028543815684 https://www.alfonsoforwisconsin.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Allen, MaryIndiana8DMary Allen understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Climate change is driving droughts, storms, and extreme weather, changing the conditions for growing food."75Mary Allen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.maryallenforcongress.com/prioritiesUnclear Position on Roe
Allred, ColinTexas33DColin Allred understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "I’m proud of the work that I’ve done to ensure we take an all-of-the-above energy approach that addresses the climate crisis, creates energy jobs and ensures Texans have a safe and clean environment." In an interview, he stated: "I’m incredibly concerned the state of the climate. I’ve got two young boys. I think about what world we’re going to leave to them. Certainly we’re already experiencing so many of the effects and it’s costing us hundreds of billions of dollars a year in forest fires, storms and droughts. But we are an energy state and we will always be an energy state. And we are leading in renewable energy as well, which is one of the reasons why it’s strange that the legislature is attacking renewable energy in Austin. We’re the Number One wind power state in the country; the Number Two solar power state in the country, and we have the capacity to grow that."75Colin Allred has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/ColinAllredTX/status/1837582974579020280 https://www.kera.org/2023/06/13/north-texas-rep-colin-allred-on-climate-policy-china-ukraine-and-resetting-us-africa-relations/ https://abcnews.com/Politics/ted-cruz-colin-allred-clash-abortion-border-transgender/story?id=114832669Supports Roe
Alvarado, RalphKentucky6RRalph Alvarado does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like inflation.25Ralph Alvarado has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://alvaradoforcongress.com/ https://x.com/AlvaradoForKY/status/1521305373671579649Opposes Roe
Ambrose, BenMichigan2DBen Ambrose does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, he stated: "Michigan should strive for greater energy independence by producing more of our own power and strengthening the reliability of our electric grid. I support an all-of-the-above energy strategy that includes wind, hydroelectric, solar, and other emerging technologies while ensuring energy remains affordable for working families. We should create incentives that encourage clean energy innovation, not mandates that burden consumers. At the same time, we must protect the Great Lakes, address PFAS contamination, and preserve Michigan’s natural resources for future generations." On his website, he writes that a priority of his is a: "Transition to clean energy sources and reduce carbon emissions."25Ben Ambrose has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.mlive.com/politics/2026/09/michigans-2nd-congressional-district-race-moolenaar-ambrose-magoon.html https://ambrose4congress.com/priorities https://ambrose4congress.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Ambrosio, RalphNew York20RRalph Ambrosio disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he stated: "The climate is always changing. The IPCC just confirmed it is not an existential threat. Restrictions on fossil fuel and nuclear while subsidizing non-scalable and inefficient energy sources has driven up energy costs and stifled economic prosperity." On Facebook, Ambrosio wrote: "Paul Tonko has chased climate change for 15 years. That’s why life is unaffordable. He has supported fracking bans, denuclearization, fossil fuel phaseouts, and so on. He cannot run from his record climate change obsession that has devastated household budgets."0Ralph Ambrosio has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.protectadks.org/federal-and-state-candidates-answer-questions-on-environmental-matters-in-adirondack-park/ https://www.facebook.com/ralphambrosioforcongress/posts/paul-tonko-has-chased-climate-change-for-15-years-thats-why-life-is-unaffordable/122251659572262544/Unclear Position on Roe
Anabilah-Azumah, JoelNew York9RJoel Anabilah-Azumah does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he strongly disagreed with the statement "Additional regulations are needed to prevent climate change."25Joel Anabilah-Azumah has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/32217/race/2157/election/626 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/32217/race/2157/election/626Opposes Roe
Andersen, BrentFlorida20RBrent Andersen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on lowering costs, expanding economic opportunity, and defending the constitutional principles.25Brent Andersen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Brent_AndersenUnclear Position on Roe
Angel, GenevieveCalifornia44RGenevieve Angel does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, when asked about climate, she stated: "I support smart regulation. These climate change initiatives created burdens to hard-working Americans and drove high cost-of-living in the first place. The over-regulated fuel/oil/gas refineries worsened our economic state."25Genevieve Angel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://web.archive.org/web/20260603045403/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/genevieve-angel-ca-44-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/Unclear Position on Roe
Arias, VictorFlorida19DVictor Arias does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has focused on infrastructure investment in his campaign.25Victor Arias has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ariasforcongress.us/issues/negotiating https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/meet-congressional-district-19-hopeful-201429990.htmlSupports Roe
Arminio, JosephDelaware1RJoseph Arminio disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he stated: "The government ought to end its overreliance on the UN’s IPCC - UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. It ought to balance its perspective with the follow on to the prestigious NIPCC - Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change. Furthermore, Congress ought to 'follow the money.' Indeed, take a hard look at such wrong-headed, deterministic studies as the 1972 'Limits To Growth' and follow the trail of funding of similar endeavors. Thank goodness President Trump withdrew the US from the Paris Climate Accord.0Joseph Arminio has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://snapcoalition.org/initiatives/stance-on-science/candidates/de/joseph-dr-joe-arminioUnclear Position on Roe
Arriaga, JessicaPennsylvania2RJessica Arriaga does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like public safety.25Jessica Arriaga has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jessforcongress.com/results-for-philadelphia/ https://www.facebook.com/61586313816557/posts/-i-love-my-country-and-im-going-to-fight-for-it-%EF%B8%8Ffearless-fearofgod-fightingforp/122140742847210460/Opposes Roe
Askar, CaseyFlorida22RCasey Askar does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "We must unleash U.S. domestic energy production to power our economy and national security in order to reduce our reliance on foreign oil. Let’s expand oil, natural gas, nuclear, and clean coal production."25Casey Askar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.caseyaskar.com/#issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Auringer, JacquelineNew York18RJacqueline Auringer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She tweeted: "Thank you @epaleezeldin for continuing to highlight the connection between energy policy, affordability, and economic growth. New Yorkers are paying some of the highest energy costs in the country, and families across the Hudson Valley are feeling the impact every month. At the same time, Albany continues to erode local control through ORES, taking decision-making power away from communities and making it harder for local voices to be heard. We need an honest conversation about energy policy that prioritizes affordability, reliability, local input, and keeping costs down for New Yorkers."25Jacqueline Auringer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/winwithjackie/status/2064390476556382506Unclear Position on Roe
Austin, GeorgeConnecticut2RGeorge Austin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "I agree, if you're deforesting for solar farms, that isn't green. If you're actively destroying natural spaces for 'renewable' energy, that isn't green. Let's have a DIVERSE enery portfolio, that eases our dependence on fossil fuels - ABSOLUTELY!! - but don't call it green if it does what I just outlined."25George Austin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/GeorgeforCT2/status/2091108191836733582 https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/george-austin/positionsOpposes Roe
Avila Chevalier, DarializaNew York13DDarializa Avila Chevalier understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "It’s 100 degrees and Democrats are still whispering about climate change 🙄 Thankfully, New Yorkers elected public power champions at the state and federal level to take on the fossil fuel industry and protect us from these deadly heat waves. New Yorkers demand climate action and democratic socialists will deliver." In another post, she stated: "Happy Earth Day! Let’s honor our climate with action: holding polluters accountable and building public power."100Darializa Avila Chevalier has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/DarializaforNY/status/2072399181071696088 https://x.com/DarializaforNY/status/2047051171710353870 https://x.com/DarializaforNY/status/2085510327643373715Supports Roe
Awa, BrentonHawaii2RBrenton Awa does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about climate change in an interview, he mostly avoided the question, instead focusing on disaster response. Later in the interview, he stated: "Hawai’i families are promised cheap energy, yet bills keep climbing. Investing billions to rely on foreign corporations importing another fuel is what I think the youth would call 'sus.' I’m less interested in meeting a renewable energy deadline than building real energy independence." On his website, he writes: "Electric bills keep going up, while outages and rolling blackouts have become common. Clean energy matters, but energy policy cannot move faster than people's ability to pay their bills. Pursue a balanced federal energy approach that maintains reliable, affordable power in Hawaii."25Brenton Awa has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75http://civilbeat.org/2026/09/candidate-qa-us-house-district-2-brenton-awa/ https://www.votebrentonawa.com/issues https://www.hawaiipublicradio.org/local-news/2023-02-02/senate-advances-bill-that-would-protect-out-of-state-patients-seeking-abortionsOpposes Roe
Ayles, LoranOregon3RLoran Ayles does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on creating unity.25Loran Ayles has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.facebook.com/groups/navoforegon/posts/3130170533833827/Unclear Position on Roe
Backemeyer, ChrisNebraska1DChris Backemeyer agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he posted the quote: "The Trump administration's wide-ranging tariffs, climate change and a shortage of agricultural workers in the U.S. are the leading causes of grocery inflation."50Chris Backemeyer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://x.com/chrisbackemeyer/status/1969612555875160209 https://backnebraska.com/making-healthcare-affordable-accessible/Supports Roe
Baker, EthanMichigan11REthan Baker does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "I had the very fortunate opportunity to speak with Krish, James, Kailas, and Zayaan, 7th graders from Larson Middle School about Deforestation and Climate Change as they relate to #TroyMI..." On his website, he wrote that he is a "voice in responsible growth, including thoughtful decisions about energy, water, infrastructure, and a moratorium on data centers."25Ethan Baker has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/EthanBakerMI/status/1130679475144974336 https://www.bakerforcongress.com/issues https://www.facebook.com/EthanBakerMI/posts/right-to-life-of-michigan-endorses-ethan-baker-in-michigans-41st-district-for-st/2237684309592079/Opposes Roe
Barnett, MichaelaTennessee2DMichaela Barnett understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: "But corporate polluters care more about their profits than protecting the places they do business in. They leave our communities to deal with dirty air, contaminated water, and the economic fallout of climate change. We don't have to choose between a clean, healthy environment and an economy that works for the American people – that's a binary that only serves corporate profits, not people. What I’ll work for in Congress to fix it: Hold corporations accountable for the pollution that they and their products cause. Fund vocational training for new workers and transitioning industries. Incentivize clean energy growth and investment in East Tennessee Fight for appropriations that invest in solar, wind, battery storage, and advanced nuclear in East Tennessee. Bring good paying clean energy jobs to the region through grants and tax credits tied to creating union jobs. Protect East Tennesseans from rising utilities bills caused by AI data centers. Set federal clean energy targets to ensure that future generations can enjoy our beautiful home." On Threads, she stated: "In the last 5-10 years, fossil fuel industries realized they couldn’t keep promoting the idea that climate change was a hoax. More people were seeing it with their own eyes and could no longer deny it was happening. So these interests changed strategies - from climate DENIAL to climate DOOM. In other words, it changed from 'it’s not happening' to 'it is happening but there’s nothing you can do about it 😕'"100Michaela Barnett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.michaelafortennessee.com/issues https://www.threads.com/@michaelabfortennessee/post/DZFbUrdDglo https://www.michaelafortennessee.com/issuesSupports Roe
Barr, CallieMichigan1DCallie Barr understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. She stated that she supports clean energy through "working with labor and environmental leaders so that we are ensuring energy reliability and dependence while we’re also moving forward towards cleaner energy that will help us here with climate and the climate change that we’re in right now."75Callie Barr has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5071.25https://michiganadvance.com/2024/08/09/barr-bergman-will-face-climate-and-energy-issues-in-run-toward-november/ https://x.com/CallieMBarr/status/1749557160822951993Unclear Position on Roe
Barringer, PaulNorth Carolina3DPaul Barringer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "From national forests and wildlife refuges to community trails and state parks, public lands provide space to hike, hunt, fish, camp, climb, and connect with nature. They also play a vital role in preserving clean water, healthy ecosystems, and local economies. I believe in protecting and managing our public lands through common-sense conservation, as part of our responsibility to future generations."25Paul Barringer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://paulbarringer.com/priorities#conservation https://paulbarringer.com/priorities#reproductiveSupports Roe
Barrios, DanTexas32DDan Barrios agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Over the past decade, Texans have endured historic droughts, wildfires, repeated '500-year' floods, and one of the deadliest winter storms in state history, which claimed hundreds of lives. We cannot let these disasters catch our state unprepared. I will work to ensure Texas is ready for increasingly severe weather and climate events."50Dan Barrios has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.danbarriosforcongress.com/energyandenvironmentUnclear Position on Roe
Bartie, ThurmanTexas14DThurman Bartie does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In the past, Bartie has publicly defended the natural gas industry.25Thurman Bartie has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/117076/witnesses/HHRG-118-IF03-Wstate-BartieT-20240408.pdfUnclear Position on Roe
Basler, DougWashington9RDoug Basler does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. At a debate, Basler argued that environmental issues were a "red herring" and voters do not care about issues like climate change.25Doug Basler has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He has opposed Washington's CCA, a cap-and-trade policy.5028.75https://www.cascadepbs.org/politics/2022/10/recap-5-key-takeaways-9th-congressional-district-debate/ https://www.dougbasler.com/about/ https://www.federalwaymirror.com/2026/10/02/smith-and-basler-vie-for-us-representative-position/Unclear Position on Roe
Bass, TylerMinnesota3RTyler Bass does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign focuses on issues like healthcare an government transparency.25Tyler Bass has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://bassforcongress.com/morrison-vs-bass/Unclear Position on Roe
Bauman, AdamTexas16RAdam Bauman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like property taxes and border security.25Adam Bauman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.adambaumanforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Bean, MelissaIllinois8DMelissa Bean understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "While the Republican Majority in Congress remains in denial about the most significant threat to the future of humanity, under Democratic control, addressing climate change will be a top priority. The reality is clear and protecting our air, water, planet, and future should not be a partisan issue. Melissa Bean has a strong voting record supporting science-based policies that protect families and strengthen our economy, and she will work to build consensus on necessary action needed now." Furthermore, on Twitter, she stated: "Climate change is the single most pressing crisis facing our global community, and if this decision is allowed to stand, it will drastically hamper our ability to fight back and preserve the planet for future generations."100Melissa Bean has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.melissabeanforcongress.com/issues https://x.com/Melissabeanil08/status/2022402562839003220 https://x.com/Melissabeanil08/status/2014404858959306865Supports Roe
Beck, AndrewWisconsin5DAndrew Beck understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Combat climate change - We must act now to protect our communities & planet." He also has a written plan that includes reducing carbon emissions and investing in clean energy.100Andrew Beck has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.beckforcongress.com/issues https://static1.squarespace.com/static/65ec894f1812f45661bb4481/t/68b710c201629c2f3304b190/1756827842820/Stopping+Climate+Change.2026.1.pdf https://static1.squarespace.com/static/65ec894f1812f45661bb4481/t/68b70a4d5171e6570c7c6956/1756826189617/Womans+Healthcare+Rights.2026.1.pdfSupports Roe
Beck, ChrisOregon2DChris Beck does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Chris Beck has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://chrisbeckforcongress.com/aboutchrisUnclear Position on Roe
Beckwith, DaveVirginia10RDave Beckwith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "America is the world's leading energy producer. We have the resources, the technology, and the workforce to power our country affordably and reliably for generations. And yet Washington continues to pick winners and losers, manipulate markets with subsidies, and layer regulation upon regulation that drives up costs for families and businesses. That stops when Dave Beckwith gets to Congress. Dave believes in a true all-of-the-above energy strategy, one that lets the market, not the government, determine the best mix of sources. That means ending the distorting subsidies that artificially inflate some energy sectors while strangling others, removing the bureaucratic obstacles that slow down domestic production, and giving American innovators the freedom to compete and win. Lower energy costs are not just an economic issue. They are a national security issue, a family budget issue, and a jobs issue all at once." On Twitter, he wrote: "Virginia officially rejoined the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a regional cap-and-trade program that Dominion Energy themselves said will result in an increase to residential electric bills, adding costs to VA families who are already struggling. This is not a climate strategy, and it's certainly not how to make Virginia affordable. It is simply a burden. The real answer to affordable, reliable, clean energy is an all-of-the-above energy strategy. One that includes a long-overdue revival of clean nuclear energy."25Dave Beckwith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He has opposed cap-and-trade programs like RGGI.5028.75https://www.beckwithforcongress.com/unleashing-american-energy https://x.com/Beckwith_VA10/status/2071964503328092186 https://x.com/Beckwith_VA10/status/2071964503328092186 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/66779/race/6820/election/917?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Bell, AshleyNorth Carolina10DAshley Bell understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote that she supports a "Green New Deal. More clean energy jobs, less pollution, and expanded public transit." On Threads, she stated: "Today is Earth Day. It reminds us of the long game of protecting our collective home. I support policies that are good for people and our environment, like the Green New Deal."75Ashley Bell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.ashleybellforcongress.com/issues https://www.threads.com/@ashleybellforcongress/post/DXb8LpXDoVF https://www.ashleybellforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Belle, JeffCalifornia52RJeff Belle does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about mitigating climate impacts in his district, Belle responded: "Reduce regulations regarding energy efficiency — however, my first priority would be to provide sustainable solutions to the Tijuana River sewage crisis. That is the most important environmental issue in California."25Jeff Belle has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://web.archive.org/web/20260508130910/https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2026/05/07/qa-meet-jeff-belle-candidate-for-californias-52nd-congressional-district/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/92432Opposes Roe
Beltran, MikeFlorida14RMike Beltran does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to his website, his campaign focuses on: "Lower costs, better healthcare access, more opportunity, and a congressman who actually answers to the people of this district."25Mike Beltran has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://beltranforcongress.com/about/ https://beltranforcongress.com/platform/Opposes Roe
Benitez-Thompson, TeresaNevada2DTeresa Benitez-Thompson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like affordability.25Teresa Benitez-Thompson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://electteresa.com/policy/Unclear Position on Roe
Bennett, RebeccaNew Jersey7DRebecca Bennett understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: "Rebecca is ready to address the climate crisis by investing in renewable energy, creating jobs, and lowering energy costs in New Jersey. Clean air and clean water are essential to our way of life in New Jersey, but environmental deregulation and defunding threaten our ability to preserve the resources we have. With smart investments in renewable energy and real environmental stewardship, we can create jobs and lower energy costs while also tackling the climate crisis and ensuring New Jersey families have clean air and clean water for generations to come." On Twitter, she wrote: "I’m running for Congress because we need to make sure we leave this country better off for my daughters, your children, and the next generation. That includes tackling and addressing the climate crisis so we all have access to the clean air and water we all cherish across NJ-07."100Rebecca Bennett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://rebeccabennettforcongress.com/priorities/safeguarding-new-jerseys-environment/ https://x.com/RebeccaForNJ07/status/2059663533567004987 https://rebeccabennettforcongress.com/priorities/defending-our-freedoms/Supports Roe
Bennett, TimColorado7RTim Bennett does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He wrote on his website: "We’ve seen it already, the uncertainty of whether a brighter future where American families can thrive without the constant worry of rising bills or flickering lights. That’s why expanding our nation’s energy production, from reliable oil and natural gas to safe nuclear, hydro, geothermal, and practical renewables, feels like common-sense stewardship for the generations ahead. When we focus on abundance rather than rigid mandates that drive up costs or risk blackouts, we’re choosing a path that keeps homes warm in winter, lights on for evening homework, and jobs growing in communities across our land." He also stated on Twitter: "It's worse... Washington did not just borrow money from foreign countries and send it overseas. They funded NGOs, DEI programs, gender ideology, climate activism, and political organizing in other nations. Our children inherit the debt. The Left exports the agenda."25Tim Bennett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://timbennettforcongress.com/platform https://x.com/timbennettforco/status/2070214820478251120 https://x.com/timbennettforco/status/2081833035713114214Unclear Position on Roe
Berman, MitchellWisconsin1DMitchell Berman understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "Climate change is real, and it is affecting our weather, farming, and ecosystems here in Wisconsin. We need to invest in clean energy, build a more resilient grid, protect Lake Michigan and our drinking water from contamination, clean up PFAS, and make the polluters pay for it. Any corporations looking to build data centers in our communities need to pay their own way, ensure that they are not polluting our land, air, or water, be clear and upfront about how much water they will use, and commit to transparency and community buy-in. That includes paying for the new power plants and transmission lines they need, being billed as their own class of customer so those costs don't land on household electric bills, and respecting community decisions on siting and permitting. Companies cannot come in promising jobs and investment and then leave taxpayers and ratepayers holding the bill. I’ll fight to protect our public lands from corporations seeking to drill, mine, or log our pristine wild spaces."75Mitchell Berman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.bermanforcongress.com/priorities https://spectrumnews1.com/wi/milwaukee/news/2025/08/12/democrat-mitchell-berman-challenge-republican-bryan-steilSupports Roe
Berry III, PaulMissouri1RPaul Berry III does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on opposing socialism.25Paul Berry III has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.momadmaga.com/ https://missourilifepac.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/mrl_pac_berry2020.pdfOpposes Roe
Bilger, RayPennsylvania15DRay Bilger does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "The energy economy is changing, and PA-15 workers should be first in line for what comes next. Two-thirds of Pennsylvania’s 104,000 clean-energy workers are in construction and manufacturing—the kinds of jobs this district has always done well. Veterans make up one in ten of that workforce. Those jobs belong here. Nobody should have to leave PA-15 to find them."25Ray Bilger has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://bilgerforcongress.com/priorities/#energy https://bilgerforcongress.com/priorities/#reproductive-rightsSupports Roe
Biss, DanielIllinois9DDaniel Biss understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "Around the world, across the country, and right here in Illinois, we’re already experiencing the catastrophic effects of climate change. Deadly heat waves, flooded neighborhoods, poor air quality, and rising energy costs are now the norm. Just 100 companies are responsible for 71% of greenhouse gas emissions. The big oil companies have known about the risks their products pose – and misled the public about those risks – for decades. But, while working families, small businesses, and local governments are left to pick up the pieces, the corporations responsible for the crisis continue to profit without consequence. In Evanston, I led the charge to pass some of the boldest climate legislation in the country, moving to fully decarbonize large buildings by 2050 and reduce reliance on fossil fuels inside our homes. But far more action is needed... We need to pass a Green New Deal to slash greenhouse gas emissions, create good union jobs, finish the transition to renewable energy, and build infrastructure that can withstand the climate crisis. And we need to make the polluters who caused this mess pay to clean it up." On Twitter, he posted: "Climate change is real, and it’s here. We need to take actions – big and small – to address it immediately."100Daniel Biss has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.danielbiss.com/issues/protecting-our-democracy https://x.com/DanielBiss/status/2080382869176803815 https://x.com/DanielBiss/status/2069897042131103816Supports Roe
Boafo, AdrianMaryland5DAdrian Boafo understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes that he will: "Introduce legislation requiring polluters to pay communities they’ve harmed. Sponsor legislation to create a Climate Superfund, requiring major fossil fuel polluters to pay into a fund that helps communities address climate damage and resilience costs," and "Invest in climate resilience measures. Invest in flood mitigation, shoreline protection, and climate resilience to safeguard our homes, infrastructure, and military installations." In response to the Trump administration altering past climate reports, Boafo tweeted: "The climate crisis is real, but this Administration is actively changing information to prevent the public from knowing the truth. This is a five alarm fire. Congress must investigate it immediately."100Adrian Boafo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.adrianboafo.com/issues https://x.com/AdrianBoafoMD/status/1953496329113436407 https://x.com/AdrianBoafoMD/status/1937520667232284916Supports Roe
Bohannan, ChristinaIowa1DChristina Bohannan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Climate change is also a threat to our children’s future and to Iowa’s economy. Iowa farmers are being hit hard by heat, drought, and extreme weather conditions. Extreme weather is driving up homeowner and business insurance premiums and adding to already unaffordable housing costs. Some insurance providers have reduced policy coverage or chosen to leave the state altogether. Storm damage to homes, farms, and businesses is an increasing burden for our people and economy as well. Supporting our family farms and protecting our environment are not mutually exclusive – when done right, they can work together and reinforce each other." On Twitter, she posted: "owa leads the nation in wind and solar production. My opponent denies that climate change is a real threat requiring immediate action. When in Congress, I will fight to secure our children’s future AND make Iowa a superpower in renewable energy."100Christina Bohannan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://bohannanforcongress.com/priorities/ https://x.com/BohannanIowa/status/1705027873919131834 https://x.com/BohannanIowa/status/1778486617583345732Supports Roe
Bonck, JonTexas38RJon Bonck does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a tweet, Bonck describes his campaign goals: "I’m ready to help President Trump advance his America First agenda, secure our border, and defend our liberties!"25Jon Bonck has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://x.com/TeamBonck/status/1975252189926072457 https://www.jonbonck.com/#IssuesOpposes Roe
Bouchard, MikeMichigan10RMike Bouchard does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Christina Hines is working with a group that wants to end gas powered cars. She says she is proud to. We are the auto manufacturing capital of the world… talk about not backing in district businesses. Christina and this woke group won’t force the green new deal on us. I want our district to keep making cars. The American auto industry is under attack and I will ALWAYS back our incredible auto workers."25Mike Bouchard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/BouchardforMI/status/2104230604334072314 https://gandernewsroom.com/news/elections/hines-vs-bouchard-michigan-cd10/Opposes Roe
Bradstock, AlanPennsylvania14DAlan Bradstock does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like the economic security and universal healthcare.25Alan Bradstock has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.bradstockforcongress.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Brattin, RickMissouri5RRick Brattin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Democrats have waged war on American families and our energy independence in the name of climate control."25Rick Brattin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/RickBrattin/status/1556400611557531652 https://rickbrattin.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Braun, JohnWashington3RJohn Braun does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Braun argues against the fact that climate change is an existential crisis, and wrote an op-ed praising Bill Gates for sharing his viewpoint. On his website, he stated: "Affordable energy = affordable life. I'll champion market-based production including hydropower, solar, oil, natural gas and nuclear power. The need for energy has never been greater with AI data centers and a growing population demanding ever more power. We must never go back to a time when we were dependent on foreign despots for our energy needs."25John Braun has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He has opposed Washington's CCA, a cap-and-trade program.5028.75https://www.thereflector.com/stories/john-braun-commentary-clarity-on-climate-policy-cost-comes-too-late-for-our-state,391252 https://www.votebraun.com/issues https://www.thereflector.com/stories/john-braun-commentary-clarity-on-climate-policy-cost-comes-too-late-for-our-state,391252 https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2026/08/11/gluesenkamp-perez-hits-braun-on-abortion-as-battle-begins-for-wa-house-seat/Opposes Roe
Brignano, HoustonCalifornia36RHouston Brignano does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has often doubted whether wildfires are due to climate change, posting these opinions on Twitter. He has also promoted fossil fuel use, saying: "We’ll put expensive windmills off our coast and import oil from halfway around the globe, but heaven forbid we drill and produce our own energy here at home."25Houston Brignano has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/vote4houston/status/2003206821037977730 https://x.com/wackawacka23/status/1897431119475433710Opposes Roe
Broderick, VictoriaTennessee4DVictoria Broderick does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like lowering the cost of living.25Victoria Broderick has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.victoria4tennessee.org/more-about-my-platform https://www.victoria4tennessee.org/more-about-my-platformSupports Roe
Bronin, LukeConnecticut1DLuke Bronin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue.. On his website, he wrote: "Climate change isn’t some distant future threat. It’s now. And it’s going to get worse, quickly – with extreme weather including droughts, heat waves, floods, and hurricanes. The Trump administration is doubling down on dirty and inefficient fossil fuels, data centers threaten to suck up more and more energy, and our planet is on track to hit dangerous tipping points. We need a massive commitment to more affordable, clean energy. Solar, wind, hydro, fuel cells, nuclear, and building better batteries." He further wrote on Twitter: "Electricity prices are through the roof. And our climate is in crisis. And the answer to both is the same: a massive commitment to renewable energy, of every kind. And we can’t be tentative and cautious about it. We need to go big, fast. And we need a Democratic Party that’s actually making the case that renewable energy investment will bring costs down — AND help keep us from continuing to screw up this planet for our kids."100Luke Bronin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.broninforcongress.com/issues/climate-change https://x.com/LukeBronin/status/2075356357524348967 https://www.broninforcongress.com/issues/safeguarding-reproductive-freedomSupports Roe
Brooks, BobPennsylvania7DBob Brooks understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "We need energy that works for working families, not just big oil companies. That means creating good-paying union jobs in clean energy, protecting our air and water, taking on the climate crisis, and investing in the industries of tomorrow. Pennsylvania can lead the way by building wind, solar, and power projects that put people to work. But we need to be serious about capacity building. Nuclear power is clean, safe and underutilized. I’ll work to approve new nuclear and natural gas power plants while we build up renewables." At a debate, Brooks stated that the climate cuts that President Trump made need to be "put back into legislation."75Bob Brooks has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5071.25https://www.brooksforcongress.com/on-the-issues/ https://politicspa.com/questions-beginning-to-arise-around-brooks-campaign-in-pa-07/146113/ https://www.brooksforcongress.com/on-the-issues/Supports Roe
Brown, TeFlorida24RTe Brown does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on housing affordability and school choice.25Te Brown has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://tebrownforflorida.com/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Bucco, CarmenNew Jersey10RCarmen Bucco disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he disagreed with the statement: "Man-made climate change is a global threat and requires urgent political action."0Carmen Bucco has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/75937/race/6828/election/1218?culture=en-us https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/75937/race/6828/election/1218?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Buck, CarrieNevada1RCarrie Buck does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on helping support President Trump. 25Carrie Buck has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://carriebuckforcongress.com/ https://nevadacurrent.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/IMG_2305.jpgOpposes Roe
Buckhout, LaurieNorth Carolina1RLaurie Buckhout does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, she wrote: "Don Davis just gave his campaign website a woke wipe, and it's about as fake as it gets. He quietly deleted 'priorities' promoting climate change and equity, replacing them with words like "agriculture" and 'affordability.' He made these changes because he knows those ideas don't win elections in Eastern North Carolina. Now he's saying what he thinks voters want to hear, but when he's in Washington, he'll be right back to voting the same way he always has with AOC and the radical Democrats." In an interview, she stated: "I think any efforts to address climate change must be realistic. The Biden administration forcing automobile manufacturers to produce electric vehicles that most folks in NC-1 can’t afford or can’t use is not the answer."25Laurie Buckhout has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/lauriebuckhout/status/2080041700005982245 https://www.dailyadvance.com/perquimans/news/local/buckhout-weighs-in-on-immigration-ukraine-abortion-ending-aca-smith-did-not-respond-to-questions/article_be28f2a0-cc4b-11ee-95b3-639f1f94923d.html https://www.dailyadvance.com/perquimans/news/local/buckhout-weighs-in-on-immigration-ukraine-abortion-ending-aca-smith-did-not-respond-to-questions/article_be28f2a0-cc4b-11ee-95b3-639f1f94923d.htmlOpposes Roe
Buller, KaileeNew York22RKailee Buller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She has heavily criticized New York's climate law, saying: "Utility bills are out of control in New York because Albany politicians like John Mannion and Kathy Hochul have put their pet projects over our pocketbooks by striping us of energy options which have resulted in higher costs, more reliance on foreign energy sources, and weaker grids. Unless we act, the financial strain facing CNY families will only get worse. We don’t want bans and mandates, we want reliable energy options and lower costs. As your representative I will use common sense, honesty, and call out politicians- regardless of party when they are wrong." In a tweet, she stated: "New York’s own energy agency says Albany’s climate law will raise utility bills another $4,000. No half measures. Repeal the climate law!"25Kailee Buller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://kaileebuller.com/standing-at-ny-22-wind-farm-kailee-buller-calls-for-repeal-of-the-new-york-climate-law-which-has-sent-cny-energy-costs-soaring/ https://x.com/BullerforNY/status/2039760668086206873Unclear Position on Roe
Burge, KevinTexas24DKevin Burge understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He stated on Facebook: "We are feeling the effects of climate change around the globe. Congress should lead the country into sustainable energy by investing in Homegrown American Energy." On his website, he wrote: "The rise of AI Data centers threaten our energy infrastructure, water availability, and air quality. Without strong regulations on Data Centers Texas communities will be left reeling from job losses and environmental degradation. I will: Pass strong Data Center building requirements to prioritize water recycling. Pass air and noise pollution laws to ensure healthy peaceful communities. Invest in alternative energy sources to ensure clean American Produced energy props up our electrical grid. Vote Expand National Parks and other options for native carbon sinks to offset AI pollution. Hold AI companies accountable for environmental damage and job losses."75Kevin Burge has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.facebook.com/61576167755506/posts/we-are-feeling-the-effects-of-climate-change-around-the-globe-congress-should-le/122195954786872258/ https://www.burgeforcongress.com/issues https://www.burgeforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Burke, KristiTennessee1DKristi Burke understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Instagram, she wrote: "I recently sat down with the folks from Citizens’ Climate Lobby (@citizensclimate) to talk about how we can work together to bring real solutions to Congress. We spent a lot of time discussing clean energy permitting reform, which is basically a plan to cut through bureaucratic red tape so we can build wind, solar, and modern power grids faster."75Kristi Burke has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5071.25https://www.instagram.com/p/DZ-FiedoI7I/ https://www.votekristiburke.com/non-negotiablesSupports Roe
Burke, RobertMassachusetts8RRobert Burke does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like immigration and voter ID laws.25Robert Burke has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://burke4congress.us/priorities https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2024/10/18/republican-challening-stephen-lynch/Opposes Roe
Burley, BrianCalifornia42RBrian Burley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he wrote: "I do not support stronger regulations on pollution and carbon emissions. Policies like the recent mileage tax proposed by Sacramento Democrats would be devastating to California families. Top-down regulations often drive up energy costs and make it harder for people to afford basic necessities. We need policies that are effective, practical and economically responsible. I support investing in innovation and cleaner technologies that reduce emissions without harming economic growth."25Brian Burley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://web.archive.org/web/20260523125130/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/brian-burley-ca-41-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/48933/race/1277/election/667?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Butierez, DanielArizona7RDaniel Butierez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Butierez has criticized funding for climate programs, writing on Twitter: "Tucson has spent $160 million on climate initiatives, yet we’re still seeing growing homelessness and rising crime."25Daniel Butierez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/Butierez4C/status/2042069056627601546 https://www.kgun9.com/news/local-news/elections/grijalva-butierez-set-for-cd7-showdown-ahead-of-2024-electionOpposes Roe
Byrd, SuzieOklahoma3DSuzie Byrd does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Suzie Byrd has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.facebook.com/suzie3congress/Unclear Position on Roe
Cable, ConradLouisiana4DConrad Cable does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "When he talks about 'energy dominance,' ask who’s cashing the checks, and who’s living next to the pollution. Ask why our coast continues to erode while Washington pats itself on the back."25Conrad Cable has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/Conrad4Congress/status/2026366727559541153 https://www.ktbs.com/meet-the-candidate-conrad-cable/article_be505a9b-f34d-4458-9d13-08b3635aeb82.htmlSupports Roe
Cabrera, RicardoCalifornia51RRicardo Cabrera does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Energy independence lowers your bills and strengthens our nation. I'll fight for domestic production so California families aren't held hostage by foreign oil." He has also argued against fuel taxes on Twitter.25Ricardo Cabrera has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Given his opposition to gas taxes, it is unlikely he would support a fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/Cabrera4CA51/status/2064633673618469192 https://x.com/Cabrera4CA51/status/2052807619547689041Unclear Position on Roe
Cargile, MikeCalifornia35RMike Cargile does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he strongly disagreed that man-made climate change was an urgent threat that required strong action.25Mike Cargile has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/52202/race/1264/election/1078 https://www.cargileforcongress.com/the-environment https://www.cargileforcongress.com/life-1Opposes Roe
Carl, JerryAlabama1RJerry Carl disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to AL.com, he called climate change a "huge hoax" and "huge liberal issue that is very profitable." According to the Hill, in 2023 he said he believes the literal definition of climate change, but questioned the idea that it is a grave threat to the planet.0Jerry Carl has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://web.archive.org/web/20200213162950/https://www.al.com/politics/2020/01/republican-congressional-candidates-differ-on-i-10-financing-during-debate.html https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/3924117-yellen-calls-climate-change-existential-threat-after-gop-lawmaker-labels-it-trojan-horse-for-spending/ https://x.com/CarlForAlabama/status/1293545723800297482Opposes Roe
Casas, PedroCalifornia38RPedro Casas does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about what he plans to do to address climate change, he stated: "I need a thorough brief on both sides of the issue."25Pedro Casas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://web.archive.org/web/20260505155625/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/pedro-antonio-casas-ca-38-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/78417/race/25599/election/1385Opposes Roe
Castillo, LupeIllinois4RLupe Castillo disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, Castillo strongly disagreed with the statement "Man-made climate change is a global threat and requires urgent political action" and said: "Climate change is a natural phenomenon, our impact is not that drastic. What in the world will happen during the next ice age which will eventually occur."0Lupe Castillo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/74473/race/1345/election/1195?culture=en-us https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/74473/race/1345/election/1195?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Chaffee, ChrisMaryland5RChris Chaffee agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Yes climate change is real but at what cost do we push on Marylanders when the average Americans are still climbing out of a pandemic businesses are being beat down by higher prices of everything. When is enough enough???" In a questionnaire, when asked about if climate change was a threat, he stated he was neutral, and said: "All countries need to do equal amounts to improve the overall health of our planet. One nation cannot do enough we all need to do our part. It should not be a political action."50Chris Chaffee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://x.com/ChaffeeUSSenate/status/1491208168042545154 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/21056/race/14456/election/1080?culture=en-us https://x.com/ChaffeeUSSenate/status/1785351822288269736Opposes Roe
Chai, AmyConnecticut1RAmy Chai disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She tweeted: "Because climate change is constant and inevitable. The real ecological disaster is toxins such as glyphosate killing all the pollinators and decimating insects, birds, and amphibians. Warm weather or cold weather is more due to vulcanism and natural cycles." In another tweet, she stated: "Just because climate changes does not mean that our breath is causing it. All life depends on CO2, we will all die without it. Correlation is not causation. I was a Greenpeace girl when I was little. I built my own solar heatpump when I was 12. This man was my inspiration. Things we do NOT have: 1-proof of causation 2-proof of concept studies with estimated effect size for literally any policy 3-conflict of interest transparency 4-cost-benefit analyses."0Amy Chai has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/docchai2022/status/2082143679234400384 https://x.com/docchai2022/status/1873391106194354452Unclear Position on Roe
Chan, ConnieCalifornia11DConnie Chan understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On the climate section of her accomplishments page on her website, Chan writes that she "authored and passed an ordinance banning oil extraction from land that San Francisco owns," as well as serving as "Chair of the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCo), a body that has oversight authority on the implementation of CleanPowerSF, helped negotiate an agreement for independent studies on green bank financing, natural gas decommissioning, battery storage, electric vehicle charging, and emerging clean energy technologies to support CleanPowerSF and meet the City’s climate goals."100 Connie Chan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.conniechansf.com/accomplishments https://www.facebook.com/reel/1785239488812089Supports Roe
Chapin, DougMinnesota6DDoug Chapin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "Climate change is real, and we as a nation need to acknowledge our outsized role in contributing to global warming and its catastrophic effects on our planet. I will fight to get the US back into the Paris Accords - and here at home will resist any effort to halt the transition away from non-renewable energy resources like fossil fuels." Furthermore, he posted on Twitter: "Minnesotans shouldn’t have to check the air quality before deciding whether it’s safe to go outside. As climate change fuels hotter, drier conditions and more severe wildfires, smoke-filled skies are becoming more common across our state. We’re breathing the consequences. I’ll fight to get the U.S. back into the Paris Climate Agreement, continue the transition away from fossil fuels, hold major polluters accountable, and protect the Boundary Waters from foreign-owned mining interests. Minnesota is worth protecting."100Doug Chapin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.chapinforcongress.com/issues https://x.com/ChapinForMN6/status/2077859681511596402 https://www.chapinforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Chavez, JonathanGeorgia13RJonathan Chavez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign focuses on the economy and healthcare. In a questionnaire, he stated: "Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy."25Jonathan Chavez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jonathanchavezforcongress.com/issues/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/64924/race/4006/election/884?culture=en-us https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/64924/race/4006/election/884?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Chiaradio, MichaelMississippi3DMichael Chiaradio does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "In his remarks, he outlined his vision for a more sustainable and competitive economy, centered on environmentally responsible growth and the expansion of Mississippi’s agricultural value chain. His approach focuses on low-input, capital-efficient farming practices that support small businesses while improving long-term economic resilience."25Michael Chiaradio has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://michaelachiaradio.com/chiaradio-attends-earth-day-in-the-park-event-in-starkville/Unclear Position on Roe
Ching, EricCalifornia31REric Ching disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he stated: "I believe there should be a balance between dealing with pollution and the burdens on small businesses or lower-income families. I believe that while protecting our environment is very important, climate change is driven by political ideologies rather than science, which is why the term keeps changing over the decades."0Eric Ching has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://web.archive.org/web/20260505030641/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/04/eric-ching-ca-31-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/ https://web.archive.org/web/20220505012351/https://www.ocregister.com/2022/05/04/roe-v-wade-heres-where-orange-county-house-members-challengers-stand-on-abortion-rights/Opposes Roe
Chou, JosephNew York6RJoseph Chou disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he was given the statement "Man-made climate change is a global threat and requires urgent political action." and replied: "Strongly Disagree. Baloney. Fictional."0Joseph Chou has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/80135 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/80135Opposes Roe
Christian, JerradOhio12DJerrad Christian understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "Today, I remain a software engineer, but my stint in the US Navy as a meteorologist provided me with profound insight into climate and its workings, and transformed me into a staunch advocate for reducing our nation's dependence on oil." On Twitter, he posted: "Some truly inspiring Ohioans walked from Athens, northeast to Cambridge, and west to Columbus - around 200 miles - to raise awareness for climate change and the catastrophes that await us if we don't take action now. I joined them in Columbus this morning to show my appreciation." In another post, he stated: "Thank you to the organizers of the Great Ohio Climate March for inviting me to speak at Salt Fork today. I saw the climate crisis coming when I was a Navy meteorologist, and we have so much work to do to protect our planet and the next generation."100Jerrad Christian has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5092.5https://www.christianforohio.com/about https://x.com/JerradChristian/status/2060117062396084417 https://x.com/JerradChristian/status/2058270958977273989 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/81316/race/30026/election/1452Supports Roe
Chung, ChrisWashington10RChris Chung does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Chris Chung has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ballotpedia.org/Chris_ChungUnclear Position on Roe
Cinquemani, JosephNew York16RJoseph Cinquemani does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "New York’s establishment shut down Indian Point, emissions jumped 35% in a month. Now they lecture us about 'climate' while costs keep climbing. I’m fighting for real change: restart Indian Point with modern SMRs, create high paying union jobs, and actually deliver prosperity, not more green theater."25Joseph Cinquemani has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/CinquemaniNY16/status/2090494410412679248Unclear Position on Roe
Clark, FredWisconsin7DFred Clark understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He stated on a podcast: "Similar to the way that a couple of years ago up north we had a winter with almost no snow and you couldn't ignore climate change then and when everybody, millions of people around us are all breathing the same smoke and their eyes are burning and their throat is sore and they're not going outside when they'd love to. We're all experiencing that and that's creating space for us to share some understanding."75Fred Clark has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://civicmedia.us/shows/kristin-lyerly-show/2026/07/22/fred-clark-on-wildfire-smoke-the-woods-and-winning-wisconsins-7th-district/transcript https://www.clarkforwi.com/issues/supporting-womens-rights-and-womens-health?source=8a9f2128-d73b-4aed-bb43-24f94731a084#block-f200a42f-acf8-4671-999e-2e171d41697dSupports Roe
Clark, JasmineGeorgia13DJasmine Clark understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "Together, we’ll fight to lower energy costs, invest in clean energy, protect our communities from the climate crisis, and defend our democracy." Further, on her website, under a section titled "Stop Environmental Racism and Protect Our Climate," Clark stated: "We need real regulations to hold polluters who come into our communities accountable and I’ll push for real reparations for victims of environmental harm like the BioLab fire. Further, I want to leave behind a planet for my children that’s better and cleaner than the one I was born into. I would push to restore the progress that the Biden administration made that’s been destroyed by Congressional Republicans who side with polluters."100Jasmine Clark has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/jasmineforga/status/2062975871162425786 https://www.jasmine4ga.com/agenda https://x.com/jasmineforga/status/1981424394527461728Supports Roe
Clark, JasonColorado6RJason Clark disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Sentinel, Clark has stated that he does not believe in global warming. This is backed by his tweets. He wrote: "Climate Change = dupping [sic] uninformed, ignorant Americans into thinking we can change 6 billion years of earths history in 4 years. C'mon!" and "Does the Denver post realize that carbon dioxide isn't even 1-3% of earth's atmosphere? That's science!" on the platform.0Jason Clark has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://sentinelcolorado.com/metro/election-14-clark-looks-inside-help-get-outside-shot-governors-office/ https://x.com/clark4cogov/status/4172847721 https://x.com/clark4cogov/status/133663464798429186Unclear Position on Roe
Clemmons, MitchCalifornia41RMitch Clemmons does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, he opposes actions limiting greenhouse gas emissions. In a questionnaire, he states: "I support stronger regulations on actual pollution — clean air, clean water, and protecting our environment for future generations. Southern Californians deserve breathable air and safe communities free from toxic dumping or industrial waste. However, I do not support the climate change agenda or heavy-handed carbon emissions regulations pushed as a solution. These policies often serve as expensive virtue-signaling that punish American families and businesses while doing little for the global environment."25Mitch Clemmons makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In a questionnaire, he stated: "Carbon taxes, strict emissions caps, and green mandates drive up energy and fuel costs, hitting lower-income families hardest through higher grocery, utility, and gas bills. They also crush small businesses with compliance costs that big corporations can absorb but local shops and contractors cannot."021.25https://web.archive.org/web/20260505174727/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/mitch-clemmons-ca-41-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/ https://web.archive.org/web/20260505174727/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/mitch-clemmons-ca-41-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/Unclear Position on Roe
Climer, WesSouth Carolina5RWes Climer disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He stated about climate: "The notion of causation remains in dispute."0Wes Climer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://web.archive.org/web/20250415170003/https://www.thestate.com/news/local/environment/article304223301.html https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/49310Opposes Roe
Codiga, JackNorth Carolina12RJack Codiga does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like lowering the cost of living.25Jack Codiga has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ihatepolitics.com/pages/platform https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/90011/race/24501/election/1371?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Coe Verbica, PeterCalifornia19RPeter Coe Verbica does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Instead, Verbica focuses on issues like affordability by ending taxes on gas.25Peter Coe Verbica has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. It is unlikely that he would support a carbon fee due to his opposition to gas taxes.5028.75https://peterverbica.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Cognetti, PaigePennsylvania8DPaige Cognetti understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. She stated: "Investment in climate-smart agriculture through the IRA is vital for Scranton... In Lackawanna County, where food insecurity affects thousands of households, supporting sustainable farming practices is essential. This funding helps our farmers adopt innovative methods that provide healthy, nutritious food to our community and address the broader challenges of climate change. By focusing on sustainable agriculture, we can strengthen our local food systems and ensure that everyone has access to the food they need." In an op-ed, she wrote: "A newly-released report from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change shows that we are on the verge of being unable to prevent the worst impacts of climate change, and that we need to reduce emissions by 50% by 2030. Widespread adoption of electric vehicle technology will be critical to helping us achieve this goal, and the legislation currently under consideration is likely our final chance to make the kinds of investments we need to secure a cleaner future before it is too late."100Paige Cognetti has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.actonclimate.com/post/scranton-mayor-paige-cognetti-pennsylvania-elected-officials-farmers-and-community-leaders-underscore-continued-need-for-critical-federal-funding-to-combat-climate-change/ https://penncapital-star.com/government-politics/to-build-back-the-keystone-state-congress-needs-to-pass-bidens-domestic-agenda-opinion/ https://fox56.com/news/local/reproductive-freedom-rally-held-in-scrantonSupports Roe
Cohen, SteveCalifornia50RSteve Cohen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On twitter, he wrote: "Just to be clear . If CA is net zero by 2045 it will have less than 1% impact on climate change globally As it crushes all of us . Insane ."25Steve Cohen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/scohenCA50/status/2081514386313912650Unclear Position on Roe
Coleman, CareyOhio13RCarey Coleman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like law and order.25Carey Coleman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://careycoleman.com/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Collier, ScottMaryland7RScott Collier does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like crime and education.25Scott Collier has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75http://scottcollier.org/scott-collier-for-congress-the-issues/ http://scottcollier.org/scott-collier-for-congress-the-issues/Opposes Roe
Conforti, NikiIllinois6RNiki Conforti does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to the Daily Herald, Conforti said she thinks human behavior is among the factors behind climate change. There may also be natural causes, she said. Fully shifting to renewable energy sources isn't feasible, however, she said. Further innovation should be encouraged, she added, and the government should support more than wind and solar energy.25Niki Conforti has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://web.archive.org/web/20240627014013/https://www.dailyherald.com/20220623/news/where-6th-district-republicans-stand-on-climate-change-humanitys-role-in-it/ https://web.archive.org/web/20240930022100/https://www.dailyherald.com/20240929/us-congress-politics/casten-conforti-differ-on-abortion-but-both-oppose-federal-ban/Opposes Roe
Conley, CaitNew York17DCait Conley understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Growing up in the Hudson Valley, environmental threats were ever-present. Climate change has moved beyond academic debate and is now a national security crisis. In her efforts to protect the American people, Cait knows that the same fight we apply to protecting Americans from terrorism and foreign adversaries must now be applied to fighting climate change. In Congress, Cait will fight climate change by: Investing in clean energy, expanding federal investments in solar, wind, and geothermal projects." On Twitter, she wrote: "Climate change is already taking lives, destroying homes, and displacing communities, and I’m the only candidate in this race who recognizes it for the national security crisis it is. In Congress, I’ll invest in clean energy to create good-paying jobs, lower utility bills, and build the resilient, sustainable future the Hudson Valley deserves."100Cait Conley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://caitconley.com/policy/#security https://x.com/CaitforNewYork/status/2077843073812324450 https://caitconley.com/policy/#healthcareSupports Roe
Conroy, CarmelaWashington5DCarmela Conroy understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. At a debate, she said: "We've got to restore funding for climate change. We've got to do what we can to stop our worsening climate and weather." On Twitter, she wrote: "We already feel the impact of climate change: hotter summers, declining snowpack, longer droughts, and devastating wildfires. To continue to grow food, for salmon to survive in the Pacific Northwest, and for our local families to thrive, we must act."100Carmela Conroy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.youtube.com/shorts/m_54asmkE1E https://x.com/CarmelaConroy/status/1788978641466192336 https://www.facebook.com/CarmelaConroyforCongress/posts/honored-to-earn-the-endorsement-of-the-national-womens-political-caucus-in-congr/122252368268118299/Supports Roe
Conroy, EricOhio1REric Conroy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, he stated: "Well, right now we have fossil fuels right and that's the nature of energy is we have fossil fuels to work with right now, and we need to make sure that we're able to promote those and make sure that those are cheap and affordable. And if there are alternative solutions that pop up and evolve and are affordable on the free market, then that's great. But right now we have fossil fuels, and we need to come to that reality and work with it." Later in that interview, he said of renewable energy: "Yeah, of course. And you know, should those solutions come up and survive in a free market, then that's great. But right now, that's not the case, and we need to focus on what works. And what works currently is fossil fuels."25Eric Conroy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.wvxu.org/show/cincinnati-edition/2026-04-09/candidates-oh-1-republican-primary-holly-adams-eric-conroy#conroyUnclear Position on Roe
Constantino, AnthonyNew York21RAnthony Constantino disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Constantino was skeptical of climate in an interview, arguing that universities have made scientists liberal.0Anthony Constantino has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://kentingley.substack.com/p/meet-anthony-constantino-a-candidate https://x.com/constantino/status/1882268307711029252Opposes Roe
Cooke, RebeccaWisconsin3DRebecca Cooke understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: "From roundtables in rural corners of this district to downtown discussions in Eau Claire, La Crosse or Point – it’s clear that climate change and the environment are top of mind for constituents – what kind of legacy are we leaving for our children and grandchildren? In Congress I will: Draw federal funds for investment in green energy projects that harness our natural resources like wind, solar and hydro energy. Ensure that as we build new clean infrastructure, we’re relying on union workers to build our future." On Twitter, she wrote: "Wisconsin is the heartland of America, and it's time for us to lead in the fight against climate change. I'll work tirelessly to promote clean energy, invest in public transportation, and protect our natural resources. Together, let's show the world that Wisconsin is committed to a sustainable future."100Rebecca Cooke has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://cookeforwisconsin.com/priorities/ https://x.com/RebeccaforWI/status/1729277309075505163 https://cookeforwisconsin.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Coover, DonKansas2DDon Coover does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Don Coover has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://doncooverforcongress.com/meet-don/Unclear Position on Roe
Copeland, DardenTennessee7DDarden Copeland does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like affordable health care.25Darden Copeland has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.dardenforcongress.com/home-2Unclear Position on Roe
Costa Honeycutt, JennySouth Carolina1RJenny Costa Honeycutt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like border security.25Jenny Costa Honeycutt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jennycostahoneycutt.com/platform https://www.jennycostahoneycutt.com/platformOpposes Roe
Cowan, JohnGeorgia11RJohn Cowan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He focuses on issues like healthcare and the economy. In a questionnaire he stated: "Unleash American energy — all of the above. The federal government needs to stop picking winners and losers. Cut the red tape, let the market work, and keep energy affordable for Georgia families."25John Cowan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://cowanforcongress.com/issues.html https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/53002/race/26941/election/1409?culture=en-us https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/53002/race/26941/election/1409?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Cox, DrewIndiana4DDrew Cox understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "The New Deal saw the creation of large federal employment programs like the Works Progress Administration and the Civilian Conservation Corps. Drew Cox will push for legislation to revive these programs for the 21st century, ensuring employment for millions of Americans while revitalizing and modernizing America’s infrastructure with projects like developing high speed rail and public transit in our cities - focusing on sustainability and low-cost travel across the country. The proposed Green New Deal recognizes that we will need all hands on deck to transform our country’s infrastructure and economy in a way that meets the threat of climate change while employing millions of Americans."75Drew Cox has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.drewcox.org/unemployment-crisis https://www.drewcox.org/freedom-and-autonomySupports Roe
Croisant, JohnOklahoma1DJohn Croisant does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "Oklahoma has always been a leader in energy production, currently 3rd in wind production, and 6th in oil and gas production. We need to invest in every type of energy to have a diversified, sustainable, and strong energy economy where we aren’t dependent on foreign energy, with a shifted focus onto environmentally friendly energy, to be better stewards of the land."25John Croisant has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.croisantforcongress.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Croley, MikeTennessee6DMike Croley understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "He views climate change as a threat to food, water, energy security, public safety, and rural economies."75Mike Croley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://croleyforcongress.com/meet-mike/ https://www.instagram.com/reels/Ddl7eQileDm/Supports Roe
Crosby, PeterUtah2DPeter Crosby does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues such as affordability ad restoration of the Great Salt Lake.25Peter Crosby has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://petercrosbyforcongress.org/policies#great-salt-lakeUnclear Position on Roe
Crosson, RickWisconsin8DRick Crosson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. He stated: "Climate change is real and significant. This is a subject that has been assessed and studied expansively over time. We need to take an unbiased, objective look at the data and factors affecting our climate, and resolve to do all that is humanly possible to address the problems. The warnings have been sounding for years. It’s time for the government to do whatever it can to mitigate climate change before it's too late."100Rick Crosson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/story/news/politics/elections/2026/10/01/tony-wied-faces-challenge-from-rick-crosson-8th-congressional-district/91778785007/ https://rickcrosson.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Cunningham, GregNew Mexico2RGreg Cunningham does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Oil and gas built New Mexico and it still powers our future. I will always fight to protect our energy workers, strengthen American energy production, and put New Mexico families first. These jobs support our communities, fund our schools, and keep our state moving forward."25Greg Cunningham has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.cunninghamfornm.com/ https://www.abortionfreenm.com/news/2022-primary-election-analysis-pro-life-pledge-signersOpposes Roe
Dalton, BaleFlorida7DBale Dalton agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Speaking on a podcast, Dalton talked about trying to unite people on climate change while also balancing lowering energy costs. On his website, he states: "But for too many politicians in Washington – on both the left and the right – protecting clean air and clean water while meeting our energy needs is seen as a conflict, instead of an opportunity... Endorsing an all-of-the-above energy policy means strengthening our nation’s energy independence and reducing our need for foreign oil and Chinese solar while also lowering costs for American consumers."50Bale Dalton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.therebuild.pub/p/control-what-you-can-control https://baledalton.com/priorities/ https://x.com/BaleDaltonFL/status/2069926339973464122Supports Roe
Dandiya, PiaFlorida22DPia Dandiya does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focusing on affordability and anti-corruption.25Pia Dandiya has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://piaforcongress.com/priorities https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/pia-dandiya/positions/5a6c00dd-a953-4b9e-979f-04532922c179Supports Roe
Davis, JenniferIllinois8RJennifer Davis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign focuses on issues like education and immigration.25Jennifer Davis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.votejenniferdavis.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Dawson, DavidIowa4DDavid Dawson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign focuses on issues like rural access to healthcare.25David Dawson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.iowapublicradio.org/political-news/2026-05-05/democrats-candidate-forum-4th-congressional-districtUnclear Position on Roe
Day, JohnLouisiana3DJohn Day does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "Lower energy costs. Protect jobs. Power the future. Support Louisiana oil and gas jobs. Invest in renewable energy to reduce costs and strengthen the grid. Pursue an all-of-the-above energy strategy. Keep America energy independent. Lower gas and utility bills for families."25John Day has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://johndayforcongress.com/john-day-for-congress-platform/ https://johndayforcongress.com/john-day-for-congress-platform/Supports Roe
Day, MattGeorgia2RMatt Day does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to his website, his "mission is to fight corruption, government waste and government size by standing on Common Sense and Unshakable Truths."25Matt Day has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.votemattday.com/ https://www.votemattday.com/copy-of-matt-s-pledgesOpposes Roe
De La Cruz, CarlosTexas35RCarlos De La Cruz does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Texas powers America, and I will fight to unleash our state's energy potential. Together with President Trump, I'll roll back radical green regulations and put Texans, not foreign dictators, in control of our energy future. Energy independence means lower prices, stronger national security, and more good-paying Texas jobs. That's what I'll deliver in Congress."25Carlos De La Cruz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.carlosforcongress.com/missionUnclear Position on Roe
DeBoer, TerriMichigan3RTerri DeBoer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her energy plan includes items such as: "Support an all-of-the-above energy strategy to keep energy affordable and reliable. Expand clean, dependable nuclear energy production. Oppose costly energy mandates that increase utility bills for families. Strengthen and modernize America's power grid. Balance environmental stewardship with economic growth and energy independence."25Terri DeBoer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.terrideboer.com/Unclear Position on Roe
DeCillis, MichaelNew York11DMichael DeCillis understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "Mike believes we need to get back to a point where we have a federal government that accepts that climate change is real, not refutable, and believes in hard science. Too many elected officials are in the pockets of big oil and special interests... We all saw the devastation of Superstorm Sandy in our district and the damage and flooding each new storm brings to our neighborhoods. Climate change is a national security threat and impacts our economy, health, and safety. It’s time to act now and make sure we prevent further damage and degradation of our environment." On Twitter, he posted: "Climate change is real and we need to invest in our crumbling infrastructure."100Michael DeCillis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.decillisforcongress.com/issues https://x.com/MikeDeCillis/status/1433257958566252544 https://www.decillisforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Decio, JameeIndiana2DJamee Decio understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In her announcement speech, she stated: "Last winter, I watched President Donald Trump’s assault on America—dismantling agencies and killing regulations that I expected would protect my new granddaughter from deadly diseases, natural disasters, and climate change." However, her campaign is more focused on issues like the economy and healthcare.75Jamee Decio has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://decioforcongress.com/decio-announcement-speech/ https://decioforcongress.com/policy/Unclear Position on Roe
DeLancy, PamelaGeorgia10DPamela DeLancy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on healthcare and the economy.25Pamela DeLancy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.votepamdelancy.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Deleon Guerrero, GalvinNorthern Mariana Islands1IGalvin Deleon Guerrero does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "For generations, the CNMI’s environment continues to be our most resilient, distinguishable feature. Before the Spanish, the Germans, the Japanese, and the Americans set foot on our shores, our ancestors were sacred stewards of our islands, relying heavily on traditional fishing and agricultural practices to provide a sustainable living for their families. These practices have become an integral part of our cultural identities, continuing a heritage of responsible stewardship. As a proud native son of the CNMI, I will fight relentlessly to protect our character-defining environment and ensure that it continues to provide current and future generations with the opportunity to provide for themselves and their loved ones."25Galvin Deleon Guerrero has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://galvinforcongress.com/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Dembo, ZachKentucky6DZach Dembo does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like affordable healthcare.25Zach Dembo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://zachdembo.com/ https://zachdembo.com/priority/let-women-make-their-own-healthcare-decisions-and-support-families/Supports Roe
Dennison, KelleyColorado2RKelley Dennison does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she states: "Colorado possesses valuable oil, natural gas, and mineral resources that help strengthen American energy independence and create high-paying jobs. Support responsible domestic energy production with strong environmental accountability instead of increasing dependence on foreign adversaries."25Kelley Dennison has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://kelleyforco.com/issues/environmental-stewardshipUnclear Position on Roe
Desmond, JimCalifornia48RJim Desmond agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Balance is key. California’s climate policies shouldn’t punish families, seniors, and small businesses. By forcing costly energy solutions and electric vehicles on people, we’re driving hardworking Californians out of the state. It doesn’t need to be this way. Common-sense climate solutions can protect our environment, provide clean water, lower costs, and support our communities—without sacrificing livelihoods or our energy independence." However, Desmond has criticized the blocking of natural gas development.50Jim Desmond has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.desmondforcongress.com/energy https://x.com/JimDesmondSD/status/2040075878449689027 https://timesofsandiego.com/politics/2024/04/09/supervisors-fail-to-pass-measure-to-secure-emergency-stockpile-of-abortion-pills/Opposes Roe
DeSpain, MoniqueOregon4RMonique DeSpain agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, under a page titled "Climate Change & Environment," DeSpain stated: "Oregon’s natural-resource industries are the backbone of prosperity and livability in Oregon’s Congressional District 4. After decades of empty promises from career politicians, our timber communities and coastal residents deserve a strong, pragmatic advocate in Congress."50Monique DeSpain has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://moniqueforcongress.com/issues/60-climate-change-and-environment/ https://x.com/MoniqueforOR/status/1837162559549411420Unclear Position on Roe
DiLorenzo, AnthonyNew Hampshire1RAnthony DiLorenzo does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Biden’s reckless energy policies sent electricity prices soaring across New Hampshire. Families and businesses are paying more just to keep the lights on, and that’s unacceptable. We need an all-of-the-above energy strategy that lowers costs, keeps Granite Staters in their homes, and attracts businesses to our great state."25Anthony DiLorenzo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/DiLorenzo4NH/status/2020236121675088205 https://dilorenzoforcongress.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Dittmer, MallorySouth Carolina5DMallory Dittmer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues such as the economy and health care.25Mallory Dittmer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.dittmerforcongress.com/priorities https://www.youtube.com/shorts/iybyMjFC1q4Supports Roe
Douglass, EugeneNorth Carolina2REugene Douglass disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He tweeted: "The comcensus is manufactured by people who agree with one another, like the consensus against Copernicus and Galileo.... Besides, the Great Lakes were carved out by glaciers not a spoon, and those glaciers retreated and man had no direct relation to that climate change either..... Funny, you do a liberal trick and change the subject, away from your comfort zone. Get back on point for this thread linear thinking again." In a questionnaire he strongly disagreed with the statement "Man-made climate change is a global threat and requires urgent political action."0Eugene Douglass has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/efdouglass/status/2024461703371501804 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/77427 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/77427Opposes Roe
Driscoll, JeanineNew York4RJeanine Driscoll does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues such as lowering taxes.25Jeanine Driscoll has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://driscoll4congress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Dueñas, AngelicaCalifornia29DAngelica Dueñas understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. She states: "The transition to clean energy is not complete, and the work of the Green New Deal remains unfinished. While recent legislation invested in renewable power, manufacturing, and infrastructure, it did not fully transform our energy system or meet the scale of the climate crisis. We must continue the fight to move faster and go further." She has also supported shutting down a generating station, arguing that its leaking of methane was fueling the climate crisis.100Angelica Dueñas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/angelica-maria-duenas/positions/b5a3c259-9247-49f7-b8f8-673693b9871a https://angelica4congress.com/shut-it-down/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/41173Supports Roe
Duffie, JamesGeorgia4RJames Duffie does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is more focused on issues like abolishing the IRS.25James Duffie has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jimduffie.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Dulaney, CleophusOhio3RCleophus Dulaney does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like gentrification. Dulaney was one of the January 6 rioters.25Cleophus Dulaney has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.votedulaney.org/issues https://www.yahoo.com/news/columbus-man-former-congressional-candidate-001451507.htmlUnclear Position on Roe
Dunlap, MatthewMaine2DMatthew Dunlap agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He stated: "Right now we’re facing a huge threat with the coronavirus. Obviously climate change is also huge. So is healthcare. But I think one thing the virus is teaching us is that borders are artificial and that everything you thought was important before really is not all that important. It’s hard to say what the future is going to hold for us." On Twitter, he wrote: "4 years ago, the Inflation Reduction Act helped Mainers save on energy costs and prescription drugs. Since then, Republicans have gutted key parts of it. I'll fight to bring those savings back for Maine families."50Matthew Dunlap has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://themainemonitor.org/the-maine-trust-project-maine-secretary-of-state-matthew-dunlap/ https://x.com/dunlap4congress/status/2089019504604889531 https://www.mattdunlapforuscongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Duresky, JohnWashington4DJohn Duresky understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On twitter, he wrote: "Why reverse this decision? Building renewable infrastructure in America led to numerous jobs and economic development. It had the desired impact, why undo that? What is the policy goal? What is the strategic goal? The US could be a world leader in climate change and decarbonization and we would all be richer for it. Instead, we leave the world a worse place."75John Duresky has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/JohnDuresky4/status/2022382695779860756Unclear Position on Roe
Early, JustinTexas31DJustin Early understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview, Early was asked if he supported a green new deal or a similar large scale climate action, and he replied: "Yes. Energy demand is rising, and meeting it with cleaner energy is essential to protecting air and water, public health, and long-term economic stability."75Justin Early has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/meet-the-candidates-justin-earlyUnclear Position on Roe
Echols, MichaelLouisiana5RMichael Echols does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "Energy independence is national security. Louisiana plays a critical role in powering the American economy through oil, natural gas, refining, and petrochemical production. In Congress, I will fight to expand domestic energy production, support LNG exports, protect Louisiana refineries and energy jobs, and reform the federal permitting process that delays critical infrastructure projects. By unleashing American energy, we can lower fuel costs, strengthen our economy, create high-paying jobs, and ensure the United States never again depends on hostile foreign nations for the energy we need." In a tweet, he stated: "One thing is crystal clear after tonight’s speech: President Trump is saving America and putting our country back to work. From securing our border, to rebuilding American infrastructure, to unleashing U.S. energy production, this is the leadership Louisiana has been waiting for. Now it’s our moment as patriots to be the wind at President Trump’s back to move projects from talk to pavement, bring jobs home, protect our energy workers, and finally get Washington working for the people again."25Michael Echols has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.michaelechols.com/issues/ https://x.com/MichaelEchols/status/2026507809559355761 https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/michael-echols/positions/80409343-603e-49fd-90cd-cf25cafd5ca4Opposes Roe
Ehr, PhilFlorida28DPhil Ehr understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. He tweeted: "Florida has experienced the effects of climate change long before the recent heat wave... Unlike Rick Scott, I will always vote to protect our natural environment." In another tweet, he wrote: "With rising ocean temperatures, the coral reefs in the Florida Keys have experienced significant impacts. If we don't take action to fight back against the climate crisis, we will lose some of our most vibrant and important natural life."100Phil Ehr has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/PhilEhr/status/1688612795510673408 https://x.com/PhilEhr/status/1737838359790366751 https://x.com/PhilEhr/status/1749433111958479290Supports Roe
Elijah, RyanFlorida7RRyan Elijah does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He outlined his campaign's focus on Twitter: "Congress must do better. 1) Tax relief 2) Energy dominance 3) Cut wasteful government spending to help lower inflation."25Ryan Elijah has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/RyanElijah/status/2102927998005432654 https://elijahforcongress.com/issues.htmlOpposes Roe
Eller, RonMississippi2RRon Eller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked by the Mississippi Free Press about his views on climate, Eller said that "we need to use all of our resources... Energy is the life blood of the American Economy and a national security issue... Eventually, a clean form of renewable energy will win out. But until that day we should not hamstring the American People and Economy for what at this time is a pie in the sky dream.”25Ron Eller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.mississippifreepress.org/gop-candidates-in-ms-02-offer-policies-on-voting-education-economy/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/59671/race/11608/election/889?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Elleson, JohnIllinois9RJohn Elleson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, he has stated that he wants to "reestablish true American energy independence by expanding domestic oil and gas production, which reduces fuel and transportation costs that drive up grocery prices and household expenses." In a questionnaire, he answered: "Fossil fuels like natural gas, coal, and oil, along with nuclear power, are the most reliable sources to meet growing electricity demand and support energy independence."25John Elleson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://chicago.suntimes.com/elections/2026/candidate-questionnaires/john-elleson-illinois-primary-9th-congressional-district https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/39399/race/23782/election/1346?culture=en-us https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/39399/race/23782/election/1346?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Ellman, AlissaNew York24DAlissa Ellman does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues such as affordability and infrastructure.25Alissa Ellman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.ellmanforcongress.com/priorities https://www.ellmanforcongress.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Enoch, VanessaOhio8DVanessa Enoch understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On a former version of her website, she wrote: "Climate change is one of the great challenges of our lifetime, and the clock is ticking. To avoid irreparable damage, experts tell us that we need to reduce carbon emission 45% (versus 2010 levels) by 2030, and we’re not even close." On twitter, she wrote: "Q5: Climate change A: I am extremely concerned about this issue. We must prioritize the improvement of infrastructure to prepare ourselves for the consequences of global warming."75Vanessa Enoch has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://web.archive.org/web/20221104220501/https://enochforcongress.com/issue/climate-change-the-environment/ https://x.com/DrVEnoch/status/1053066280566165505 https://enochforcongress.com/2024/08/01/i-will-fight-every-day-for-a-womans-right-to-safe-accessible-and-affordable-reproductive-care/Supports Roe
Esti, KellyGeorgia8DKelly Esti does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Kelly Esti has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.kellyesti4congress.com/about-9 https://www.yahoo.com/news/videos/full-interview-kelly-esti-run-152046604.htmlUnclear Position on Roe
Farnham, BethPennsylvania13DBeth Farnham understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: "Climate change is real. As the Earth’s average temperatures continue to rise, our very humanity is threatened by increased drought, severe weather events, sea level rise, acidification of the oceans, increased frequency of wildfires, and disruption of stable agriculture. It becomes imperative then to mitigate the mechanisms that substantially contribute to climate change in the first place – excessive greenhouse gas emissions like methane, hydroflurocarbons (HFCs), and carbon dioxide. As US Representative of Pennsylvania’s 13th Congressional district, I pledge to: Reduce our dependence on fossil fuels such as oil, gasoline, coal, and natural gas." On Threads, she wrote: "Choose Beth Farnham, #ChooseDemocracy, Choose Climate Change Mitigation!"100Beth Farnham has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://bethfarnhamforcongress.com/2025/11/21/the-environment/ https://www.threads.com/@bethfarnhamforcongress/post/DORUp9rER0H https://bethfarnhamforcongress.com/2025/11/04/reproductive-freedom-for-all/Supports Roe
Feely, JayArizona1RJay Feely disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he referred to climate change as "nonsense." He has also said that he supports "President Trump's America-First energy agenda—and I'll work to unleash the full power of American oil, natural gas, clean coal, and the next generation of innovation."0Jay Feely has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/jayfeely/status/1920572207803027790 https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/jay-feely/positions/80cb1fc2-93dc-45c8-8425-83662cc04657 https://x.com/jayfeely/status/1521308331448492034Opposes Roe
Feller, EdwinWashington2REdwin Feller does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Dismantling radical environmental mandates, streamlining energy permits, expanding nuclear and hydroelectric capacity, and repealing federal carbon taxes to deliver affordable, reliable American-made energy."25Edwin Feller makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. On his website, he argues for "repealing federal carbon taxes."021.25https://fellerforcongress.com/ https://fellerforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Ficker, RobinMaryland6RRobin Ficker disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, Ficker strongly disagreed with the statement "Man-made climate change is a global threat and requires urgent political action." Ficker has promoted the use of natural gas, as well as nuclear power. On Twitter, he wrote: "Once again, Joe Biden is putting America last while China and India laugh. Any climate action without China and the other leading polluters is a fools errand and a strategic disadvantage."0Robin Ficker has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/3306/race/14456/election/1080 https://dbknews.com/2022/03/09/umd-maryland-climate-change-gubernatorial-forum/ https://x.com/robin_ficker/status/1783681352967098880 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/3306/race/14456/election/1080Opposes Roe
Fierro, MarthaTexas29RMartha Fierro does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues such as affordability and border security.25Martha Fierro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.fierrofortexas.com/blank-14 https://x.com/FierroforTexas/status/1285706924504354817Opposes Roe
Finnie, ShaunTexas2DShaun Finnie does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "We need to maintain an environment where small and mid-sized businesses can grow without being weighed down by red tape. I am focused on supporting both our traditional energy sector and our local entrepreneurs in the oil and gas sector I will advocate for policies that keep our workforce strong and our business environment friendly."25Shaun Finnie has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/shaunfinnie/status/2067289234491232755 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5_j2BODkFQSupports Roe
Flint, AaronMontana1RAaron Flint disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Turns Out Major Climate Study Peddled By Media Relied On Bunk Data." In another post, he tweeted: "The climate alarmists in Montana are constantly trying to undermine our economy while saying NOTHING about China. Look at China's CO2 emissions compared to the US."0Aaron Flint has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 507.5https://x.com/aaronflint/status/1953781459782615473 https://x.com/aaronflint/status/1991477933744222485 https://montana1stnews.com/2026/05/11/fvcc-gop-forum-aaron-flint-dodges-federal-abortion-ban-question-footage-within/Unclear Position on Roe
Flippo, DavidNevada2RDavid Flippo does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on affordability and anti-transgender issues.25David Flippo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://flippo4nv.com/issues/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/66760/race/26386/election/1400Opposes Roe
Flores, EricTexas34REric Flores does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "President Trump promised American Energy Dominance and today South Texas is seeing it firsthand! A $300 billion refinery project in Brownsville means thousands of jobs and historic economic growth! When I am elected to Congress, TX-34 will BOOM! We will unleash American energy, grow our ports, and turn South Texas/ Coastal Bend into the energy powerhouse of the United States!"25Eric Flores has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/EricDFloress/status/2031486955981275353 https://x.com/EricDFloress/status/2018768153543840181Opposes Roe
Flowers, BerneyMaryland3RBerney Flowers disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he stated: "We must improve human well-being while protecting the environment. Humans have always adapted to climate change. We need secure, reliable, and economic energy systems. Safer Nuclear power and fossil fuels must be considered in our energy mix." On his website, he writes: "America should never be at the mercy of foreign oil. Berney supports unleashing domestic energy production to fuel our economy and secure our future."0Berney Flowers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/62321/race/2053/election/1080?culture=en-us https://flowersformaryland.com/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/62321/race/2053/election/1080?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Forbes, PatLouisiana6DPat Forbes understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He has called climate change an "existential threat" and wants the government to adopt policies to reduce emissions.75Pat Forbes has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://bayouprogressive.com/2026/10/pat-forbes-says-experience-not-ideology-is-his-case-for-louisianas-6th-district/Unclear Position on Roe
Ford, J.D.Indiana5DJ.D. Ford understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. While in the Indiana legislature, Ford co-authored a bill that would have created a climate solutions task force.100J.D. Ford has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.hecweb.org/bill-watch-2023/the-need-for-climate-action/ https://indianasenatedemocrats.org/ford-responds-to-senate-passage-of-sb-1/Supports Roe
Ford, La ShawnIllinois7DLa Shawn Ford understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Trump’s Threat: Environmental protections have already been rolled back, and climate science undermined. Project 2025 would strip agencies of authority and reverse progress. My Plan: I am running to protect our future. I will fight for clean energy standards, invest in environmental justice, and support solutions that create jobs and protect public health." In a Facebook post, he wrote: "At a time when federal protections for our air, water, public lands and climate are being rolled back, we need people in Congress who understand that protecting our environment is also about protecting our health, our communities and the future we leave our children. I have spent my years in public service believing that government has a responsibility to protect people, especially communities that too often carry the greatest burden of pollution and environmental neglect. I will bring that same commitment to Congress. I will stand up for clean air and water, responsible clean-energy investment, strong environmental protections, and federal agencies that have the people and resources they need to do their jobs."100La Shawn Ford has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://fordforcongress.com/trumps-project-2025-vs-fords-project-2027/ https://www.facebook.com/fordforcongress/posts/i-am-proud-to-accept-the-endorsement-of-the-sierra-club-and-today-that-endorseme/122178623810968881/ https://fordforcongress.com/women-for-ford-a-governing-platform/Supports Roe
Forstag, SamMontana1DSam Forstag understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "I've spent years on wildland fire crews. They deserve elected leaders who take the climate crisis seriously and a Congress that actually funds the people protecting our public lands."75Sam Forstag has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/SamForstag/status/2047139666147840429 https://x.com/SamForstag/status/2014464527471869984Supports Roe
Fortier, JulieIllinois12DJulie Fortier understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "I'm a scientist. I believe in facts, evidence, and listening to the data, and the science is clear: climate change is real, and we must act. Coal and energy production have supported families here for generations. The path forward must include the workers & communities who have helped power our state as we strengthen our local economy and move toward responsible solutions that protect our environment for future generations. Saying no to data centers in Southern Illinois is an essential part of that." On Twitter, she wrote: "Investing in new energy production, good union jobs, & lowering energy bills means we don’t have to choose between a healthy planet & affordable energy; we can have both!"100Julie Fortier has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.juliefortier.org/issues https://x.com/FortierforIL12/status/2061963890678706623 https://www.juliefortier.org/issuesSupports Roe
Fox, TeresaWashington6RTeresa Fox disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, she wrote: "Yes. Climate change is real. Been cooling off for 4.2 billion years. Follow the actual science. You are just trying to scam more tax dollars for your NGOs and cronies." In another post, she said: "You doubled down on being disgusting and dishonest! You are sick and the climate has been COOLING for 4.2B years. Follow the science. SMDH. Can’t wait to see you in J A I L Dimslee!"0Teresa Fox has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She has opposed cap-and-trade programs like Washington's CCA.507.5https://x.com/Fox4WA/status/1965479151349203304 https://x.com/Fox4WA/status/1942354487068483725 https://foxforwa.com/mission https://x.com/Fox4WA/status/1987999637538807987Opposes Roe
Frese, JeffCalifornia10RJeff Frese does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Jeff Frese has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://independentjoe.com/candidates/jeff-frese/Supports Roe
Gaines, HoustonGeorgia10RHouston Gaines does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He posted on Twitter: "Democrats are leading early voting by quite a bit in these statewide Public Service Commission races. If you want to stop the Green New Deal from coming to our state then go vote today."25Houston Gaines has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/houstongaines/status/1985795129496490368 https://x.com/houstongaines/status/2047682749985632696Opposes Roe
Galdo, DamonNew Jersey1RDamon Galdo does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like affordability and immigration.25Damon Galdo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He did seemingly oppose a global carbon tax, tweeting: "Trump voices strong opposition to the International Maritime Organization's potential global carbon tax, vowing the U.S. will not adhere to it and will not tolerate increased prices for American consumers."5028.75https://votedamongaldo.com/platform https://x.com/DamonGaldoNJ/status/1979144700255687074 https://x.com/DamonGaldoNJ/status/1962828958950424654Opposes Roe
Gallant, ChrisNew York1DChris Gallant does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like affordability and infrastructure.25Chris Gallant has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://gallantny.com/the-mission-plan-2027/ https://x.com/_gallantny/status/2014479426289811968Supports Roe
Gallrein, EdKentucky4REd Gallrein disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he was asked the following question: Which comes closest to your view? (Select all that apply) A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost. C) Stricter environmental laws undermine U.S. energy independence and deter development of reliable electricity sources. D) Climate change is real and requires urgent policy action. He replied: "A and C." In another portion of the questionnaire, he stated: "I believe in an all-of-the-above strategy. The Biden Administration has followed in the foot steps of President Obama and his War on Coal. We need to maximize our capabilities in everything from coal to natural gas to renewable resources."0Ed Gallrein has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/78753/race/11476/election/1085 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/78753/race/11476/election/1085Opposes Roe
Gallucci, SamCalifornia26RSam Gallucci agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about how he would fight climate change, he stated: "When properly enforced, I believe the pollution emissions laws we currently have on the books are enough to protect Californians and safeguard our beautiful climate and environment. The reality is that burdensome climate regulations that have an almost undetectable impact on our environment and emissions are crushing small businesses and families with unsustainably high prices."50Sam Gallucci has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5050https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/04/sam-gallucci-ca-26-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/Unclear Position on Roe
Ganorkar, MaxNorth Carolina4RMax Ganorkar disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he stated: "The global warming hoax is a man-made disaster and a gateway to implement socialism worldwide."0Max Ganorkar has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/60135/race/11232/election/1090?culture=en-us https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/60135/race/11232/election/1090?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Garcia, JohnnyTexas35DJohnny Garcia does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like lowering costs and regulating congressional stock trading.25Johnny Garcia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.votejohnnygarcia.com/general-5 https://x.com/johnnygarciatx/status/2055312866895409381Supports Roe
Garcia, PattyIllinois4DPatty Garcia understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Patty firmly believes that climate change is very much a real and looming danger to our planet that has started to affect communities at the grassroots level through flooding, increased temperatures, pollution, and higher costs of living. Patty advocates for the strong push towards the adoption of sustainable energy and advanced infrastructure with good-paying union jobs. Patty is in favor of the expansion of clean energy, updating of the current public transportation systems, fixing the issue of lead pipes, spending on flood mitigation efforts, taking down those responsible for the pollution of the environment, and finally moving towards a clean energy economy." On Twitter, she posted: "Happy Earth day! As we celebrate today, we must take urgent action to protect our planet by restoring critical federal regulations and holding bad polluters accountable. We must partner on international climate agreements, address climate change, and build a sustainable future!"100Patty Garcia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://pattyforillinois.com/issues https://x.com/PattyforIL/status/2047082247044427959 https://pattyforillinois.com/issuesSupports Roe
Garrett, JohnnyTennessee6RJohnny Garrett does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "It was an awesome start to another Saturday in the 6th visiting with folks in Crossville at VEC’s annual meeting. With @realDonaldTrump’s leadership, America will be energy dominate once again!"25Johnny Garrett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/JohnnyGarrett/status/1974519692137226560 https://johnnygarrettforcongress.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Gegen, CaitlynGeorgia9DCaitlyn Gegen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on protecting human rights and healthcare.25Caitlyn Gegen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.caitlynforgeorgia.com/pages/solutions.html https://www.caitlynforgeorgia.com/pages/solutions.htmlSupports Roe
Gendebien, BlakeNew York21DBlake Gendebien understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a questionnaire, he stated: "Climate change isn’t a talking point for me, it’s something I’ve lived on my farm for decades, through shifting growing seasons and less predictable weather. That reality extends to the Adirondack Park, a defining feature of this district, where a changing climate threatens forest health, water quality, and the winter recreation economy so many communities depend on. Protecting the Adirondacks has to be part of any serious climate agenda here, alongside real investment in clean energy like our regional hydropower, and real partnership with farmers and rural communities."75Blake Gendebien has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.protectadks.org/federal-and-state-candidates-answer-questions-on-environmental-matters-in-adirondack-park/ https://x.com/BlakeGendebien/status/1937546243779232170Supports Roe
George, VinceWest Virginia1DVince George does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like affordable healthcare and raising the minimum wage.25Vince George has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.vincegeorgeforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Gibbs, JasonCalifornia27RJason Gibbs agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about how he plans to address climate change, he stated: "I would take a practical approach to environmental policy. Here in Santa Clarita, we have established an Open Space Preservation District that has saved over 14,000 acres from being developed and provides natural areas for residents to explore and enjoy, all while having a smart and balanced approach to urban development. As an engineer, I know there are real opportunities to reduce emissions through innovation, cleaner energy, and improved efficiency. At the same time, California needs to do a better job managing its land and infrastructure, especially when it comes to wildfire prevention, as noted in other answers (but worth repeating!). We must have a balance, and that can be achieved — protecting the environment while keeping energy reliable and affordable for families and small businesses. Holding negligent and producers of emissions and pollution accountable while creating avenues of smart and sensitive production of energy and fuel will be critical for our community’s health and energy independence."50Jason Gibbs has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/04/jason-gibbs-ca-27-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/Unclear Position on Roe
Gibson, CurtisFlorida18DCurtis Gibson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He focuses his campaign on property insurance and taxes.25Curtis Gibson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://votecurtisgibson.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Gies, AaronNew York23DAaron Gies understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On twitter, he wrote: "My opponent is Big Mad at Canada today because of wildfire smoke. The Canadians are our neighbors, not our enemies. We have a common problem. It’s not Canada; it’s climate change. It’s time to stop the bluster and finger-pointing and work together to solve it." In another post, he stated: "Rep. Langworthy refuses to take climate change seriously. He ignores the risks while our communities pay the price. I will fight for smart, resilient infrastructure, clean energy jobs, and federal support that protects families and farmers before disaster strikes, not just after. Protecting our future means protecting our communities from floods, storms, and climate chaos."75Aaron Gies has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/AaronGiesNY23/status/2078303150251852061 https://x.com/AaronGiesNY23/status/1975235414144229864 https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/aaron-gies/positions/ab21bcd6-b353-4951-a6b7-2ea8f224f1feSupports Roe
Gilbert, OliverFlorida24DOliver Gilbert understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. While in local government, he supported climate initiatives, but his current campaign is focused on other issues, like healthcare and ICE.75Oliver Gilbert has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.miamidade.gov/govaction/legistarfiles/Matters/Y2024/241826.pdf https://olivergilbert.vote/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Gilbreath, EllieIdaho2DEllie Gilbreath does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she writes that she wants to : "Improve forest management and wildfire prevention. Ensure responsible energy development."25Ellie Gilbreath has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ellieforidaho.com/ https://theneallarsonshow.buzzsprout.com/2390029/episodes/19420094-interview-cd2-candidate-ellie-gilbreath-d-on-resources-abortion-2aSupports Roe
Gillespie, PatrickTexas33RPatrick Gillespie disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he stated: "In nature, the climate cycles like in 1770's, we had a mini ice age. Wolly Mammuthus were in the Artic and being flash frozen with undigested food in their stomachs. China doesn't care about climate change or they would not have built 52 new coal fired electric generating plants last year. India generates about 401 gigawatts of electricity through their coal fired generation plants with an estimated 40% increase in coal fired electric generation in the next 8 years. U.S.A. needs to use gas." On his website, he wrote: "What Measures, if Any, Need to Be Taken at the Federal Level to Address the Impacts of Climate Change? Let’s look at what the countries that pollute the environment are doing. China just completed building 52 coal-burning electric generating plants. India generates 401 gigawatts of electricity through their coal-burning electric generation plants, with an increase of 40% more electric generation from coal-burning plants in the next 8 years. Brazil keeps burning down the rainforest. All these countries have exemptions under the Paris climate accords until the year 2070 because they are 'developing countries'? The U.S. can switch to natural gas for all the electric generation done by coal in the U.S. Plus, get out of the Paris Climate Accords and demand our money back."0Patrick Gillespie has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/60765/race/6591/election/1214?culture=en-us https://patrickgillespie4congress33.com/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/60765/race/6591/election/1214?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Gober, ChrisTexas10RChris Gober does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on supporting President Trump's agenda. 25Chris Gober has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://chrisgober.com/#issues https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/89398/race/23536/election/1343?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Goldstein, MichaelConnecticut4RMichael Goldstein disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Climate change is the narrative to acquire farmland. He who controls the food supply controls the world. We are being duped into feudalism." In another tweet, he stated: "We are being deceived again! Experts have stated there is no climate emergency. The emergency is funding the Green New Deal. The Dems need your money to pay for their frivolity. It’s not about carbon emissions it’s about funding."0Michael Goldstein has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/DrMGoldstein/status/1546713099973148672 https://x.com/DrMGoldstein/status/1566780134375542785 https://x.com/DrMGoldstein/status/1578872633487417348Opposes Roe
Golladay, AnnaTennessee3DAnna Golladay does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she advocates for the expansion of clean energy.25Anna Golladay has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://annagolladay.com/policy/ https://annagolladay.com/policy/Supports Roe
Gonzales-Torres, AngelaCalifornia34DAngela Gonzales-Torres understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Angela believes that the fight for climate justice must begin with the people most affected. That means bold federal action, community-led solutions, and a just transition that creates good-paying jobs while healing our planet." She also supports climate actions like enacting the Green New Deal.100Angela Gonzales-Torres has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.angela4congress.com/issues/climate-action?source=8f659460-5d8f-4ae7-bd44-5db8ea8d8f21#block-5207e2bc-c9fe-4332-888d-6c1da205c9b4Unclear Position on Roe
Grage, RachelFlorida5DRachel Grage understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a Facebook Reel, Grage criticized the Trump Administration's actions leading to increased carbon emissions from power plants. Furthermore, she responded to a questionnaire, saying: "I believe the state should address the impacts of climate change, including sea-level rise, extreme weather events, and environmental degradation. We need to promote clean energy solutions and renewable energy sources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and transition to a more sustainable energy future. Protecting Florida's natural resources from pollution and overdevelopment, including its waterways, wetlands, and coastal ecosystems, is also essential for our environmental and economic health."75Rachel Grage has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.facebook.com/reel/1649354343286187 https://www.wucf.org/watch/wucf-america-250/voterguide/?section=state-house&candidate=rachel-grage https://www.wucf.org/watch/wucf-america-250/voterguide/?section=state-house&candidate=rachel-grageSupports Roe
Gray, ChuckWyoming1RChuck Gray disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "The left-wing media is a clown show that continuously lies about their made up 'climate change' narrative. Secretary Wright continues to stand for the truth!"0Chuck Gray has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/ChuckForWyoming/status/1952441555845058609 https://sos.wyo.gov/Media/2026/SoS_Release_2026-01-06.pdfOpposes Roe
Gray, LeelaFlorida13DLeela Gray agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to Move On, she supports shifting federal energy subsidies toward clean solar, wind, and water power to lower utility bills and combat climate change. In a press release, she stated: "With every voter I talk to in this district, I hear the same thing: insurance costs that keep climbing, utility bills that never seem to go down, and a coastline my neighbors depend on for their livelihoods and their safety... This isn’t an abstract fight about the environment. It’s about whether families here can afford to stay in their homes and whether our tourism and fishing economy survives the next storm."50Leela Gray has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://front.moveon.org/endorsements/candidates/leela-gray-2/ https://floridapolitics.com/archives/809087-nrdc-action-fund-endorses-leela-gray-for-congress/Unclear Position on Roe
Green, AmandaFlorida2DAmanda Green does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She focuses her policy more on environmental protection.25Amanda Green has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.amgforcongress.com/top-priorities https://x.com/AMGforCongress/status/2069812177024807186Supports Roe
Green, DanFlorida9RDan Green does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "We are still paying for the bad policies of the Biden Administration. Dan Green and President Trump will do everything necessary to lower fuel costs, groceries, and the ever rising cost of living."25Dan Green has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://dangreenfl.com/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/77073Opposes Roe
Green, TerriArkansas1DTerri Green does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Terri Green has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75N/AUnclear Position on Roe
Greene-Placentia, BernadetteArizona8DBernadette Greene-Placentia understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter in 2024, she wrote: "Not voting means that local, national, and global events, climate change, and the Freedoms and Rights we enjoy as #AmericanCitizens do not matter to you." However, she has chosen to promote a message of affordability over climate change. In an article in azcentral.com, she said: "I'm sitting there thinking, 'well, hell yeah [voters voted based on affordability], because that's what's right in front of their face...' They're not thinking about, you know, climate change or voting rights at that point. They're thinking about feeding their families and keeping a roof over their heads."75Bernadette Greene-Placentia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/bernadetteaz08/status/1843171335465545835 https://web.archive.org/web/20260829094107/https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2026/08/27/bernadette-greene-placentia-to-appear-at-congressional-forum/91346924007/ https://bgp4az.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Greene-Scott, MarquetteTexas22DMarquette Greene-Scott understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. She stated: "Climate action is an economic and public safety plan. Climate change is currently driving higher energy bills and extreme weather. Doing nothing is not an option. A strong federal climate action plan is about creating good jobs, lowering costs, and protecting our communities. Texas already leads the nation in wind power and energy innovation. A smart federal climate action plan builds on what Texas is doing while lowering costs for families and creating good-paying jobs." However, she does not mention climate as one of her priorities on her website.75Marquette Greene-Scott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/lone-star-left-endorses-marquette https://marquettegreenescott.com/marquette-position-provocative-issues-facts/Supports Roe
Gronli, NikkiSouth Dakota1DNikki Gronli does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like education.25Nikki Gronli has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.nikkigforsd.com/services-8Unclear Position on Roe
Grossi, GaryMassachusetts3RGary Grossi does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, hew writes: "Energy costs are crushing families. Gary will push for affordable, evidence-based energy solutions that lower your bills immediately."25Gary Grossi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.votegarygrossi.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Gruters, SydneyFlorida16RSydney Gruters does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign has focused on promoting less government intervention.25Sydney Gruters has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.wusf.org/politics-issues/2026-09-24/candidates-to-replace-vern-buchanan-in-congress-spar-in-an-online-forum https://floridapolitics.com/archives/802844-sydney-gruters-earns-faith-based-conservative-backing-in-cd-16-race/Opposes Roe
Gutierrez, LeticiaTexas9DLeticia Gutierrez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign focuses on issues like affordability.25Leticia Gutierrez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.leticiaforcongress.com/priorities https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=946916434679398Supports Roe
Guy, TonyPennsylvania17RTony Guy does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes that he believes in "unleashing our energy dominance by capitalizing on the vast natural resources throughout the region."25Tony Guy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://tonyguyforcongress.com/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Hale, AlexanderTexas7RAlexander Hale does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Hale is a large supporter of the fossil fuel industry. On his website, he writes: "Houston's energy economy (and specifically, CD7's energy economy) is not a liability to be apologized for. It is a national asset, and it will be defended and promoted like one. That defense begins with energy exports. American energy exports — crude oil, refined products, LNG, NGLs, and petrochemicals — are a powerful economic and geopolitical tool the United States has, and Houston is the city that finances, engineers, refines, manages, and ships them... An honest energy strategy is all-of-the-above. Alexander will defend the oil and gas industry without flinching, but he will also push hard for the next generation of firm, reliable power: advanced nuclear, modernized natural gas, and a hardened electric grid built for the demand decade we are already living in. And with regards to financing and building our energy future and unfolding demand decade: federal energy subsidies should support American energy production, not pick winners and losers." On Twitter, he wrote: "Houston deserves a representative who will fight for our energy companies, protect the families that depend on them, and reject mandates that punish Houston workers. - Alex will strive to defend Houston’s role as the energy capital of America. - Alex will fight federal mandates that hand jobs to foreign producers. - Alex will champion an all-of-the-above strategy: oil, gas, nuclear, refining, and innovation." 25Alexander Hale has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.halefortexas.com/priorities/energy https://x.com/HaleForTexas/status/2055054529410846775 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/89880/race/28718/election/1433?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Halpin, PatrickNew York2DPatrick Halpin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he voices his support for strengthening climate resilience and states: "Like Lee Zeldin, our former Congressman and now EPA Administrator who's destroying the EPA, Garbarino knows how sensitive the South Shore is to climate change. But his votes that benefit his corporate donors instead of his supposed home are leaving the Long Island out to dry."100Patrick Halpin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.halpinforcongress.com/environment https://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/46083999-0a06-4243-a04c-4ab9f188c16a/contentUnclear Position on Roe
Hamawy, AdamNew Jersey12DAdam Hamawy understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "As a first responder to climate disaster events, tackling the climate crisis is personal to me. For decades, I have gone on medical missions to war and disaster zones. I went to Haiti and Turkey as a first responder to their devastating earthquakes. I have helped refugees in countries like Sudan dealing with drought. As climate change worsens, events like droughts, earthquakes, and superstorms are increasing in frequency and severity. In recent years, we have set records for the number of costly disaster events in New Jersey. This is not abstract for us. We need to both mitigate climate change and protect our communities from extreme weather events by investing in strong resilience policy. An all-of-government, Green New Deal approach to tackling this generation-defining issue is what we need." On Twitter, he stated: "We aren't talking enough about the climate crisis - so I'm glad every time I'm asked what how I'll address it in Congress: We need to pass a Green New Deal, win a just transition, and build resiliency in our communities. And yes, we need to make the polluters pay."100Adam Hamawy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://hamawyfornj.com/priorities https://x.com/HamawyForNJ/status/2053980662365856022 https://hamawyfornj.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Hammer, TrygveNorth Dakota1DTrygve Hammer understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. When asked about climate change, he stated: "It is among the most serious [issues] except what we have to think about it as we go after it, we have to be careful because you can’t do things that are going to destroy jobs."75Trygve Hammer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.wdayradionow.com/news/regional-news/72846-nd-gubernatorial-candidate-trygve-hammer-climate-change-among-most-serious/ https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KdOT8k16KLkSupports Roe
Hannon, DennisNew York26RDennis Hannon does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign focuses on issues like lowering costs.25Dennis Hannon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.hannonforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Hanson, TommyIllinois5RTommy Hanson disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He stated: "I want to go on record – I believe in climate change, Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny."0Tommy Hanson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.chicagotribune.com/2020/02/19/who-is-tommy-hanson-republican-candidate-for-5th-congressional-district/ https://votetommyhanson.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Harden, ChrisGeorgia11DChris Harden does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has stated that he wants to: "Expand affordable clean energy, modernize the electric grid, improve roads and bridges, create good-paying jobs, and support the housing and infrastructure communities need to grow."25Chris Harden has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/chris-harden/positions/d92d2680-5cb9-4f9a-bac8-80c3ead242ff https://www.electharden.com/Supports Roe
Harding, BrinkerNebraska2RBrinker Harding does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "I'm running for Congress to cut red tape, unleash American energy, and back our small businesses. A strong Nebraska is an affordable Nebraska."25Brinker Harding has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/BrinkerHarding/status/2077152591931142300 https://x.com/BrinkerHarding/status/2017402357965893837Opposes Roe
Hardy, KimberlyNorth Carolina7DKimberly Hardy understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "We need to take our lead from those who are on the front lines of the climate crisis and follow their directives. Reducing carbon emissions, increasing use of solar power, etc. - we have the information, we need only to act."75Kimberly Hardy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/KimberlyHardyNC/status/1245058218046500865 https://x.com/KimberlyHardyNC/status/1617275661022040064Supports Roe
Harp, SethFlorida3DSeth Harp agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: '"US breaks its record for hottest month ever' We are the only campaign in this race with an environmental protection platform and plan. That’s why we are proud to be endorsed by the Democratic Environmental Caucus of Florida."50Seth Harp has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://x.com/harpforcongress/status/2087015377385435455 https://x.com/harpforcongress/status/1936932123857842564Supports Roe
Harris, ShawnGeorgia14DShawn Harris does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has promoted the use of clean energy.25Shawn Harris has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/shawn-harris/positions/259626d6-023c-4f44-8db6-7775caf46f0f https://www.shawnforgeorgia.com/on-the-issues/womens-health/Supports Roe
Hart Steinmann, JessicaTexas8RJessica Hart Steinmann does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she wrote: "Reliable, abundant, and affordable energy is the lifeblood of our economy. Growing up in Houston, where my father worked in the oil and gas industry, I know how critical energy independence is for our state and nation. Under President Trump, the U.S. became the world’s leading producer of oil and natural gas. Now, we must end crippling restrictions and unleash American energy to make America the dominant energy producer in the world and protect our national security." On twitter, she wrote: "Honored to have joined Majority Leader Steve Scalise for his Offshore Energy Tour in Louisiana last week. On day one, I had the opportunity to tour Oxy’s Holstein platform, Port Fourchon, and Edison Chouest Offshore and hear directly from the industry leaders powering America’s energy resurgence. America is built to dominate in energy, and it is time we start acting like it again. In Congress, I’ll work to bring Houston’s energy corridor together with Louisiana’s industry to unleash American production, restore energy independence, and keep our nation on top."25Jessica Hart Steinmann has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jessicasteinmann.com/issues https://x.com/jhartsteinmann/status/2044513912872198567 https://x.com/jhartsteinmann/status/1986538587819835441Opposes Roe
Hart, RhondaTexas36DRhonda Hart understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: "I believe in climate change. The Earth is telling us something — and we need to start listening. How many times have we watched Houston flood in ways that used to happen once in a hundred years? The temperatures keep rising. The storms keep intensifying. This isn't a coincidence. This is a crisis. We need to protect our natural resources and invest seriously in renewable energy — solar and wind in particular. I'm not saying we quit fossil fuels overnight. I understand what energy means to the economy of Southeast Texas. But we all know fossil fuels won't last forever, and the time to build toward what comes next is now — not later."100Rhonda Hart has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://hart4congress.com/ https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/rhonda-hart/positions/52dddd80-3545-4682-8ecf-a0ee0375b0fcSupports Roe
Harvie, BobPennsylvania1DBob Harvie does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "This isn’t just about protecting our planet, it’s also about lowering energy costs, creating good-paying union jobs, and ensuring America leads the global economy instead of falling behind. As a teacher and Bucks County Commissioner, I’ve seen that smart investments in modern infrastructure strengthen our communities and leave the next generation better off. That’s why I’ll fight to expand clean energy, modernize our electric grid, and build resilient roads, bridges, and public transit systems that keep our economy moving. In addition, we need to rapidly build homes for our younger generation to start their lives and build for our older generations who want to retire comfortably. Brian Fitzpatrick voted for Trump’s 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which slashed clean energy incentives, including critical solar tax credits that were helping families lower their utility bills, businesses invest in American-made energy, and workers secure thousands of good-paying jobs. We should be investing in America’s future, not turning our backs on one of the fastest-growing industries in the world."25Bob Harvie has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://bobharvieforcongress.com/priorities/ https://levittownnow.com/2023/05/09/bucks-county-government-signs-onto-amicus-brief-in-abortion-court-fight/Supports Roe
Hatcher, CharlieTennessee5RCharlie Hatcher does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Charlie supports an all-of-the-above American energy strategy that includes natural gas, nuclear power, renewables, and other reliable domestic energy sources. Affordable and dependable energy means lower utility bills for families and lower operating costs for farmers, manufacturers, and small businesses."25Charlie Hatcher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://charliehatcher.com/platform/ https://charliehatcher.com/platform/Opposes Roe
Hathaway, JoeNew Jersey11RJoe Hathaway does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "I support a balanced, all-of-the-above energy policy that includes nuclear, natural gas, solar, and land-based wind. Each plays a part in strengthening reliability, lowering costs, and reducing emissions. Picking winners and losers in Washington only raises prices and weakens energy security. And here in New Jersey, we love our Jersey Shore. I will not support policies that build offshore wind turbines or provide foreign companies with billion-dollar contracts."25Joe Hathaway has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.joehathawayforcongress.com/platformUnclear Position on Roe
Hayes, JamesPennsylvania12RJames Hayes does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Western Pennsylvania is central to America’s energy independence. Our region produces the natural gas and coal that keep the lights on and power industry. Just as important are the workers who make it possible - steelworkers, natural gas crews, coal miners, pipeline workers, and the trades that support them. James Hayes will fight for affordable, reliable energy that protects these jobs and strengthens the nation." On his website, he wrote: "Western Pennsylvania has a proud legacy in energy. I support an all-of-the-above energy strategy that keeps our lights on, creates local jobs, and breaks our dependence on foreign powers. We can lead the future—right here at home."25James Hayes has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/JamesHayesforPA/status/2087211187947569299 https://jameshayesforpa.com/policy-vision https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/59502Opposes Roe
Haynes III, FrederickTexas30DFrederick Haynes III understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "Climate change disproportionately impacts impoverished and communities of color. Environmental racism is one reason one’s life expectancy is determined by zip code as opposed to genetic code." On his website, he writes that he will: "Support a just transition to green jobs that provide living wages and local hiring."75Frederick Haynes III has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/fhunscripted/status/1174791549613461517 https://www.haynesforcongress.com/issues/from-the-outside-to-the-insideUnclear Position on Roe
Hernandez, MelissaCalifornia14DMelissa Hernandez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she writes: "Melissa is deeply concerned about the current climate crisis and supports a transition towards a diverse array of renewable energy sources to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. She supports legislation that fully restores the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), the largest piece of climate legislation in modern times. The Trump administration’s rescission of programs created by the IRA set the country back on the progress we’ve made to reduce emissions. It also eliminated programs that seek to make decarbonization more accessible for low-income Americans who already struggle with the high cost of living. Melissa also supports legislation that reverses the staff cuts made to the EPA and the DOT."100Melissa Hernandez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://melissahernandez2026.com/issues/ https://melissahernandez2026.com/issues/Supports Roe
Herrera, BrandonTexas23RBrandon Herrera does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Absolutely, I’m a big believer in the future of nuclear energy. If we could only get past the fear mongering, it would do a lot in continuing to secure not only America’s energy independence, but energy superiority."25Brandon Herrera has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/TheAKGuy/status/1955676368051564575 https://x.com/TheAKGuy/status/1798382002141647125Opposes Roe
Herrera, JordanMissouri4DJordan Herrera does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Environmental justice starts with a simple responsibility. Every American should have access to clean air, clean water, safe land, and affordable and reliable energy regardless of where they live or how much money they make. We can protect those things without forcing farmers, workers, families, and small businesses to carry the entire cost of doing it. I believe the better approach is to help people and businesses reduce waste, lower their operating costs, use less energy and water, and become more competitive in the process."25Jordan Herrera has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jordanjherrera.com/issues/#1787597651913-4f8b8a5e-2108 https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/fact-check-where-candidates-mark-100000399.htmlSupports Roe
Herzig, HillaryNew Jersey6RHillary Herzig does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, she wrote: "Families were left without power during some of the hottest days of the year. Whether you believe climate change is driving stronger storms or not, one thing is obvious: Our infrastructure isn't keeping up."25Hillary Herzig has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/HillaryHerzig/status/2074267917282111845 https://x.com/HillaryHerzig/status/1979055613242986823Opposes Roe
Hesketh, MissiMissouri7DMissi Hesketh understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "Of all the stupid and dangerous lies to let out one's mouth. There's not enough time in the day to fact check and try to undo the damage this administration does every day. The climate is changing! Aside from tariffs, why else do you think coffee's gone up so much in price!?!?" In another post, she stated: "#LeonardoDiCaprio is spot on! Climate change is real and is the most immediate threat to all species."75Missi Hesketh has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/MissiforMO/status/1969085260307505480 https://x.com/MissiforMO/status/704345276404748288 https://www.missiformo.com/reproductive-freedomSupports Roe
Hill, BillAlaska1IBill Hill does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, on his campaign website, he writes: "We heat our homes a bit differently here in Alaska, and we already pay a steep price for it. Nick Begich’s votes shut down new energy projects that would have saved Alaskans money. I’m running to lower our fuel costs and bring energy bills down. I will go to bat for getting the most out of our oil and natural gas, and restore tax credits to bring online new renewable projects."25Bill Hill has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://billhillforalaskans.com/bills-platform/Supports Roe
Hines, ChristinaMichigan10DChristina Hines understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a section titled "Fighting climate change while creating American jobs" on her Substack, Hines wrote: "I support investments in clean energy, advanced manufacturing, and electric vehicle production that reduce pollution while strengthening American industry and creating good-paying jobs. I will support legislation like the Inflation Reduction Act that helps bring clean energy manufacturing back to the United States while reducing carbon emissions and strengthening our domestic supply chains. I’ll fight to bring federal investment back to Macomb County, supporting defense and aerospace innovation, protecting our auto manufacturing plants, and securing funding for environmental restoration and clean infrastructure projects that create high-quality local jobs."75Christina Hines has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://christinahinesforcongress.substack.com/p/my-plan-to-protect-michigans-water https://reproductivefreedomforall.org/news/icymi-reproductive-freedom-for-all-joins-endorsed-candidates-on-the-ground-in-michigan/Unclear Position on Roe
Hockett, ChelseyTexas5DChelsey Hockett understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In an interview, she stated: "I support a Green New Deal. Federal climate policy is economic justice, racial justice, public health, and infrastructure policy all at once... We need large-scale public investment in clean energy, safe water, grid reliability, and climate-resilient infrastructure to strengthen local communities and create good union jobs. A real climate plan must center on environmental justice, public accountability, and public ownership of essential resources instead of privatization and corporate capture. Communities should not be sacrificed so polluters can extract profit." On her website, she writes that she wants to: "Enact a Green New Deal to expand renewable energy initiatives and bring in more jobs. Solar and wind energy are significantly cheaper than fossil fuels. Wind power costs ~$30/MWh, compared to natural gas ($65), coal ($46–$100), and nuclear ($80)."100Chelsey Hockett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/meet-the-candidates-chelsey-hockett https://chelseyhockettforcongress.com/issues.html#environment https://chelseyhockettforcongress.com/issues.html#justiceSupports Roe
Hoelter, CharlesCalifornia15RCharles Hoelter does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has stated that he supports increased energy production to lower prices.25Charles Hoelter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/charles-hoelter/positionsUnclear Position on Roe
Holloway, LaShondaFlorida4DLaShonda Holloway understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. "Not only for our health, but for our future, we have to combat climate change," stated Holloway. On her website, she wrote: "Stable energy prices come from investing in American clean energy, strengthening domestic supply chains, and protecting families from price spikes driven by corporate greed and global instability."75LaShonda Holloway has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://news.wjct.org/first-coast/2019-12-03/lashonda-holloway-running-against-florida-rep-al-lawson https://www.hollowayforcongress.com/platform https://x.com/Lj4CONGRESS/status/1831476021574693072Supports Roe
Hollowell, AmandaGeorgia1DAmanda Hollowell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "We live where others vacation — but we rebuild after every storm. Amanda will champion federal investment in flood protection, resilient infrastructure, and clean energy job creation. She’ll fight to preserve the Okefenokee and protect communities most impacted by pollution and climate change." Further, on Bluesky, she posted: "I’m working to build community, amplify our voices, and put The People First in GA-01. I am fighting for education, jobs, health care, climate resilience, voting rights, and more."100Amanda Hollowell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.amandaforga.com/issues https://bsky.app/profile/amanda4ga.bsky.social/post/3m5bww4pkos2h https://bsky.app/profile/amanda4ga.bsky.social/post/3md2jutlab22gSupports Roe
Hook, KristinTexas21DKristin Hook understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. on her website, she wrote: "As a PhD-trained scientist, I trust the experts and know that the science is irrefutable – the threats and impact of climate change on our planet and our district are real and getting worse. Here in Texas, we are on the front lines of these climate-related issues as we experience intense periods of heat, long periods of drought, and frequent flooding in our area – which devastated Kerr County last summer. We can address the climate and biodiversity crises, but only if our elected leaders take bold action... I will defend the important role of science in our global fight to reverse the trends of climate change and will fight for funding and strengthening key federal agencies and the scientific workforce within them that serve and protect us from climate disaster and carry out critical conservation efforts." On Twitter, she posted: "Hi, I’m a Texan, and what we need is leaders who take the climate crisis seriously. We need to keep the doors open for federal agencies that keep us safe. We need to rehire the federal scientists you fired. And we need to hold Big Oil accountable for these disasters."100Kristin Hook has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.drkristinhook.org/issues https://x.com/Kristin_Hook/status/1942346218643857553 https://www.drkristinhook.org/issuesSupports Roe
Hooper, JamesMichigan12RJames Hooper does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like 2020 election denial and anti-abortion policies.25James Hooper has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jameshooperforcongress.com/about https://jameshooperforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Hubbard, ChuckNorth Carolina5DChuck Hubbard understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "We need a Representative who will take action to bring back good-paying jobs, support our small businesses, and strengthen North Carolina’s agriculture – especially as farmers face increasingly unpredictable weather patterns due to climate change." On Twitter, he stated: "I’m not just the Democrat running to defeat Virginia Foxx. I am running to fight the climate crisis, support our allies overseas, and protect reproductive rights here at home."75Chuck Hubbard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://hubbardforcongress.com/platform https://x.com/ChuckHubbardNC/status/1728544552620007753 https://hubbardforcongress.com/platformSupports Roe
Hulum III, JeffreyMississippi4DJeffrey Hulum III does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like the economy and education.25Jeffrey Hulum III has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jeffreyhulumiiiforcongress.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Hunt, EvanTexas3DEvan Hunt understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He stated in an interview: "I believe we need a serious plan to address climate change, but it has to be balanced and realistic. I do not support rigid, one-size-fits-all mandates that risk driving up costs for families or forcing businesses into unrealistic timelines. Instead, I support a 'Balanced Green New Deal' approach—one that incentivizes businesses to innovate, invest in clean energy, and create good-paying American jobs. We can make significant progress by offering tax credits, research funding, and smart partnerships that reward forward-thinking companies." Furthermore, in a tweet, he wrote: "Conspiratorial and sycophantic nonsense. >97% of climate scientists agree that humans are causing global warming. You are so desperate to praise Trump that you’re willing to sow divide among Americans, ignore global experts and ruin the earth for our children."75Evan Hunt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/meet-the-candidates-evan-hunt-for https://x.com/ElectEvanHunt/status/1950300533073596784 https://x.com/ElectEvanHunt/status/2077535085700534459Supports Roe
Hysenaj, DiamantNew York14RDiamant Hysenaj does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like affordability.25Diamant Hysenaj has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://votefordiamant.com/diamants-plan-for-ny-14Unclear Position on Roe
Irwin, JacquiCalifornia26DJacqui Irwin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "This is an important election and we must all make our voices heard! From ending the pandemic to fighting climate change - there is a lot on the line." Irwin also chairs California's Joint Legislative Committee on Climate Change Policies.100Jacqui Irwin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/jacquiirwin/status/1435018522225037313 https://jacquiirwin.com/about-jacqui https://www.vcstar.com/story/news/2022/05/23/ventura-county-voters-roe-v-wade-election-abortion/9682149002/Supports Roe
Jackley, MartySouth Dakota1RMarty Jackley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has publicly criticized climate reporting requirements in the past.25Marty Jackley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.2525https://x.com/SDAttorneyGen/status/2091979904447381535 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/23081Opposes Roe
Jackson, EverettTexas30REverett Jackson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Everett will advocate for policies that unleash Texas oil production, ensuring America's energy independence, creating jobs, and lowering costs for consumers nationwide."25Everett Jackson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jacksonfortexas.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Jacob, MitchellOklahoma4DMitchell Jacob agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He wrote on his website: "Let this be a new generation that becomes decisive at the polls, because our future depends on it. We can no longer be ignored, sidelined, having our economic futures mortgaged by the generations that have come before us, from everything from the economy to the climate. We must take the reins."50Mitchell Jacob has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.mitchelljacob.com/blog/one-year-later-built-to-lastnbsp https://www.facebook.com/electmitchelljacob/photos/you-have-the-right-to-bodilyautonomy-and-to-make-your-own-medical-decisions-thes/122138266730138258/Supports Roe
James, LindsayIowa2DLindsay James understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. She stated: "I believe in climate change & I will talk about how we need do something about it until I'm blue in the face, but I also care deeply about economic development."75Lindsay James has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/Lindsay4Iowa/status/1162901626547515395 https://bsky.app/profile/lindsay4iowa.bsky.social/post/3mp23kx4ujs2aSupports Roe
Jasser, ZuhdiArizona4RZuhdi Jasser does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, he has often criticized climate activism and weather attribution on Twitter. In 2022, he wrote: "Leftist rules in realtime: 'never let an impending disaster go unexploited for massive power grabs and the climate agenda.'"25Zuhdi Jasser has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/DrZuhdiJasser/status/1575119313744277514Unclear Position on Roe
Jefferson, CyrilNorth Carolina6DCyril Jefferson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign focuses on issues like affordability. In a questionnaire, he stated: "I believe meeting growing electricity demand requires a diverse, reliable energy mix, technologies that can provide dependable, affordable power. By increasing capacity while lowering costs, strengthening grid reliability, and reducing emissions."25Cyril Jefferson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.cyrilforcongress.com/issues https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/92984 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/92984Supports Roe
Jenkins, EricKansas3REric Jenkins does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes that he will "Oppose the Green New Deal and energy policies that raise household costs."25Eric Jenkins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ericjenkinsforkansas.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Jenkins, JenniferFlorida8DJennifer Jenkins understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "So grateful to earn the endorsement of the Democratic Environmental Caucus of Florida as a candidate who, when elected, commits to promoting policies that meet the challenges of the environmental and climate crisis we are facing." In another tweet, she said: "Our Senators should be fighting like hell to stop this by freezing foreclosures, forcing banks to work with families, and dragging insurance CEOs into hearings to explain themselves, and finally confront the climate risks driving this crisis."75Jennifer Jenkins has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/Jenkins4Florida/status/2082172123116695826 https://x.com/Jenkins4Florida/status/1990903408903999847 https://x.com/Jenkins4Florida/status/1841306139524280574Supports Roe
Jewett, LaurenLouisiana1DLauren Jewett understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Our state receives real money for coastal restoration through GOMESA: offshore drilling revenue sharing has funded wetland restoration and flood protection. That funding matters, and this district should keep using every dollar of it well. However, that same revenue stream ties Louisiana's coastal survival to the continued expansion of the very industry accelerating the crisis — deeper drilling, more leases, more emissions — without a serious federal plan for what happens when the oil runs out or the climate makes today's coastline unrecognizable. Our state remains dependent on the same industry driving the crisis we collectively face. Even as drilling revenue has increased, the broader federal commitment to coastal resilience has been cut. In the Fiscal Year 2026 federal budget, NOAA eliminated Coastal Zone Management Grants (-$81.5 million), eliminated National Coastal Resilience Funds (-$32 million), eliminated the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (-$33.3 million), and terminated the Habitat Conservation & Restoration Program (-$56.2 million). This was alongside roughly $280 million in rescinded NOAA climate resilience funds. These are exactly the programs that fund the science, monitoring, and habitat restoration work that drilling revenue alone can't replace." On Bluesky, she posted: "Here in Louisiana, we see the impacts of climate change up close, from stronger storms to coastal erosion that threatens our communities and way of life."100Lauren Jewett has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.laurenjewett.com/issues/clean-energy-coast-environment https://bsky.app/profile/doitjewett.bsky.social/post/3mk3qdf6czc2y https://bayouprogressive.com/2026/02/show-up-lauren-jewett-bets-louisianas-1st-congressional-district-is-ready-for-a-different-kind-of-politics/Supports Roe
Johnson, CliffMississippi1DCliff Johnson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign focuses on issues like inflation and healthcare.25Cliff Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.cliffjohnsonforcongress.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20240914045017/https://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/guest-columns/2024/09/12/mississippi-antiaboriton-prolife-amendment-initiative-26-pennsylvania-swing-stat/stories/202409160001Supports Roe
Johnson, JakeMinnesota1DJake Johnson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "I'm fighting to make life more affordable for working families, and that means lowering utility bills and energy costs across southern Minnesota. We can have clean water and new energy jobs right here if we start investing in our small towns and rural communities again."25Jake Johnson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/JakeJohnsonMN/status/2038628467684585702 https://x.com/JakeJohnsonMN/status/2047768237836783720Supports Roe
Jones Jr., ClydeAlabama1DClyde Jones Jr. does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has called for protecting Alabama's evironment and biodiversity.25Clyde Jones Jr. has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://clydeforcongress.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Jones, ChrisArkansas2DChris Jones understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. He tweeted: "Climate change is here and it's creating chaos for our farmers. Agriculture and Arkansas are inextricably linked. When growing seasons become unpredictable and crop yields fall, it impacts our entire economy. We can't afford to delay. We need climate action now." In another tweet, he said: "Every year, hurricanes get bigger and more destructive. When they hit our neighboring states, they disrupt interstate commerce and have a negative effect on Arkansas's economy. We *literally* cannot afford to keep looking the other way. We need climate action NOW."100Chris Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/JonesForAR/status/1459558677803900928 https://x.com/JonesForAR/status/1438531386139365380 https://x.com/JonesForAR/status/1540801512128905217Supports Roe
Jones, EricCalifornia4DEric Jones agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On a previous version of his campaign website, he stated: "The transition to clean energy is one of the biggest economic opportunities of our generation. Eric supports investing in renewable energy, grid modernization, and climate resilience — creating jobs that can’t be outsourced while lowering energy costs and reducing wildfire risk."50Eric Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://web.archive.org/web/20260528010451/https://www.ericjones.us/jobs https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/eric-jones/positions/aba76dde-bb12-41ac-bf4f-5b8a07518182Supports Roe
Jones, LauraTexas8DLaura Jones understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "While media coverage of climate change lessens, its negative impact increases. With a climate denier as POTUS, Congress definitely needs more climate action advocates." In another tweet, she stated: "Americans would be less pessimistic about climate change if the media & members of Congress treated it like the important issue that it is."100Laura Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/CongressLaura/status/2067279511343833248 https://x.com/CongressLaura/status/2062241831451062488 https://x.com/CongressLaura/status/1752524610665320917Supports Roe
Jones, MicahMassachusetts6RMicah Jones agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to Marblehead Weekly News, Jones said he believes in global warming and supports continued development of renewable power. He also favors expanding natural gas infrastructure and investing in nuclear technology, arguing that Massachusetts needs a diversified energy supply to lower heating and electricity costs. On twitter, he wrote: "I will advocate for a surge in federal dollars to expand Liquified Natural Gas ('LNG') infrastructure between the Marcellus Shale pipelines in Pennsylvania and Upstate New York to New England. This will significantly help lower energy costs in Massachusetts."50Micah Jones has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://marbleheadweeklynews.com/a-conversation-with-micah-jones/ https://x.com/micahqjones/status/2083601163736305704Unclear Position on Roe
Joyce, JamieCalifornia12DJamie Joyce does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Instead, Joyce focuses on AI regulation.25Jamie Joyce has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jamiejoyce.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Jukic, MariaOhio14DMaria Jukic understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her website, she advocates for an all-of-the-above approach to energy, saying: "Maria is not interested in ideological purity on energy and the environment. She is interested in results. That means a pragmatic, all-of-the-above approach that takes climate seriously, invests in clean energy, holds polluters accountable, and does not leave working people behind in the transition."75Maria Jukic has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.mariajukicforcongress.com/environment-climate-change-protecting-whats-ours/Unclear Position on Roe
Kahl, BarbaraOregon1RBarbara Kahl does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She retweeted a video minimizing the severity of climate change, saying: "The truth behind the climate claims by actual scientists in climate change." In another post on Twitter, she wrote: "We all agree that the Pacific Ocean, the Columbia River, our forests, farms, and coastal communities are treasures that must be protected for our kids and grandkids. We all want real solutions to climate challenges, cleaner energy, and a strong economy that works for working families. Those goals are not Republican or Democratic—they are Oregonian. But here is the straight truth: the people of CD-1 must come first, not out-of-state corporations and their federal subsidies."25Barbara Kahl has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/DRKAHL4CONGRESS/status/2046268570993377516 https://x.com/DRKAHL4CONGRESS/status/2034021421152932296 https://x.com/DRKAHL4CONGRESS/status/2102476284278489528Opposes Roe
Keenan, KellieRhode Island1RKellie Keenan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she stated her energy policy: "Lower energy costs for Rhode Island families. Increase transparency and accountability for ratepayers. Diversify our energy mix for long-term stability. Explore next-generation nuclear as part of a balanced energy future."25Kellie Keenan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.kelliekeenanforcongressri.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Keller, MauraGeorgia3DMaura Keller understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: "Maura stands for a cleaner, healthier District 3, where our families, children, and jobs are protected from climate challenges. Storms, floods, and heat threaten our homes, farms, and businesses." In a debate, she stated: "We've got to get rid of the climate deniers in our congress as well as in our government because we cannot move forward without it. We have our -- the scientists are telling us for decades what we need to do, and we have not listened to them. So, we've got to ensure that funding is set forth so we can -- because like right now, the extreme weather, we're talking wildfires, we're talking hurricanes and tornados that's destroying the people, we're spending so much money now with the FEMA that we need the money there but we also need to start finding ways that we are going to bring our district, the whole entire nation, forward for climate change."100Maura Keller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://maurakeller.com/issues#issue8 https://www.pbs.org/video/apc-congressional-district-three-debate-10-13-24-flfjyl/ https://x.com/MauraKellerGA/status/1766162427249344755Supports Roe
Khalifa, ZyonSouth Carolina2DZyon Khalifa understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "1. Climate Change. Transition to Renewable Energy: Advocating for policies that promote solar, wind, and other renewable energy sources to reduce carbon emissions. Net-Zero Emissions: Supporting legislation that aims for net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by a specified target year."75Zyon Khalifa has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.khalifaforcongress.com/platform https://www.khalifaforcongress.com/platformSupports Roe
Killin, JessicaColorado5DJessica Killin understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In a press release, she stated: "I am so grateful for the support of the League of Conservation Voters Action Fund. Growing up here in El Paso County, my family spent summers camping and hiking. Our environment and public lands are critical to this community. I'm grateful to partner with LCV to protect our public lands, combat climate change, and lower energy costs with clean energy options." On Twitter, she wrote: "As wildfires and other extreme weather become more common, we must work to combat climate change and protect vulnerable communities through common-sense and fact-based policies."75Jessica Killin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.killinforcolorado.com/news/league-of-conservation-action-fund-endorses-army-veteran-jessica-killin-for-co-05 https://x.com/killinforco/status/2072050674855272653 https://x.com/killinforco/status/2069980781876011323Supports Roe
King-Young, SandraAmerican Samoa1DSandra King-Young understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "Climate change = rising sea levels. Come visit American Samoa and other Pacific islands and see the devastation of rising sea levels. Yes climate change exists and it needs to be addressed seriously."75Sandra King-Young has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/sanking684/status/1323007953151041536Unclear Position on Roe
Kingston, JimGeorgia1RJim Kingston does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "Sky-high energy prices are crushing families and small businesses. We need to end the left’s war on American energy and restore U.S. energy independence. I support more domestic drilling (responsibly), streamlined permitting and an all-of-the-above strategy to keep gas and electricity affordable while cutting off our reliance on foreign adversaries."25Jim Kingston has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jimkingston.org/issues https://www.jimkingston.org/issuesOpposes Roe
Kinney, LisaWyoming1DLisa Kinney does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she states: "I believe in the Multiple Use mandate. We can have responsible energy development and grazing while protecting our watersheds and wildlife. But we cannot do any of that if we no longer own the land. I will fight every attempt to sell off our public lands. I will stand against the short-sighted politicians who see our mountains and prairies as line items on a ledger. Our public lands are the soul of Wyoming, and I will keep them where they belong: in your hands."25Lisa Kinney has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://lisakinneyforcongress.com/public-lands/ https://www.yourwyominglink.com/news/local/congressional-robin-hood-democrat-lisa-kinney-outlines-u-s-house-bid/article_4b6bb41a-c8d1-4bbb-b569-9d2981c537c2.htmlSupports Roe
Kirchner, MikeOhio11RMike Kirchner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Mike Kirchner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://mikekirchner.com/about/Unclear Position on Roe
Kirkland, KyleCalifornia21RKyle Kirkland agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He stated that "addressing climate change requires worldwide cooperation and practical, well-thought out solutions. Poorly conceived government mandates are not the answer."50Kyle Kirkland has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/78525 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/78525Opposes Roe
Kiros, MelatColorado1DMelat Kiros understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "No generation has faced an existential crisis as urgent and all-encompassing as climate change. The science is undeniable: we are out of time. Wildfires, floods, and extreme heat are already devastating communities across the country — including here in Colorado, where wildfire seasons grow longer every year, our snowpack continues to shrink, and air quality crises have become a fact of summer life. We need to act now, not only to mitigate future damage, but to build resilience where disaster has already struck." Further, she wrote on Twitter: "I’m so grateful to recieve Sunrise Movement Denver’s endorsement! The @sunrisemvmt is crucial for improving the lives of people in Denver and winning real Green New Deal policy. I can’t wait to join them in the fight to represent working people and stopping the climate crisis!"100Melat Kiros has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.kirosforco.com/priorities-2 https://x.com/MelatKirosCO/status/2014045730697286051 https://www.kirosforco.com/priorities-2Supports Roe
Kirrane, SeanNew Jersey5RSean Kirrane does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Sean supports an all-of-the-above approach focused on affordability: Expand domestic energy production."25Sean Kirrane has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.seankirrane.com/platformUnclear Position on Roe
Kirschner, KellyFlorida16DKelly Kirschner does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he focuses more on environmental protection, and does not specifically name climate change as a threat.25Kelly Kirschner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://kellykirschner.com/#prioritiesUnclear Position on Roe
Kirtley, ElizabethOhio6DElizabeth Kirtley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues such as abolishing ICE.25Elizabeth Kirtley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.elizabethforus.com/issues https://www.elizabethforus.com/issuesSupports Roe
Knickerbocker, KristinaOhio10DKristina Knickerbocker does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she writes: "Costs are too high—housing, childcare, groceries, and energy—and families are being forced to make impossible choices to get by. I’ll cut taxes for working families, repeal harmful tariffs that raise prices, build more affordable housing, cap childcare costs, support eldercare, and lower energy bills by making big corporations—not Ohio families—pay for data center infrastructure."25Kristina Knickerbocker has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://kristinaknickerbocker.com/my-priorities/ https://x.com/KnickerbockerOH/status/2069849801298989068Supports Roe
Koh, DanMassachusetts6DDan Koh understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Climate change is one of the greatest threats we face, and coastal communities on the North Shore are already feeling its effects. As the father of a 5 and a 3 year-old, it is personal to me that the District has the resources it needs to face this threat. As a member of Congress, I will introduce legislation that reinstates the vast benefits present in the Inflation Reduction Act." On Twitter, he posted: "4 years ago, the Inflation Reduction Act cut costs, created jobs, and drove real climate progress. Trump started rolling it back the day he got into office — and his own fortune has nearly tripled in the process."100Dan Koh publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. He stated: "I support looking into proposals for a carbon tax at a price that allows for full investment in clean energy and green infrastructure, allowing us to reach 100% clean energy generation by 2035."100100https://www.kohforcongress.com/issues/climate-change https://x.com/dank/status/2088995010175766998 https://www.progressivemass.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2018_CD03_Dan-Koh.pdf https://x.com/dank/status/2014459631070855578Supports Roe
Kolasinski, JoshuaOhio4DJoshua Kolasinski does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like healthcare and government accountability.25Joshua Kolasinski has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.joshuaforohio.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Koppie, ChadIllinois7RChad Koppie does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign focuses on issues like traditional family values and civil liberties.25Chad Koppie has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.chadkoppie.com/issues.php http://x.com/ChadKoppie/status/764224806711623680Opposes Roe
Kozycki, TonyGeorgia7DTony Kozycki understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. At a Democratic primary debate, Kozycki confirmed that he believed climate change was a threat, and that he would support rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement.75Tony Kozycki has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://accessnorthga.com/news/election-preview-congressional-district-7-democrats-hold-debate-in-forsyth-county https://accessnorthga.com/news/election-preview-congressional-district-7-democrats-hold-debate-in-forsyth-countySupports Roe
Kuhn, HeidiTennessee8DHeidi Kuhn does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issue such as affordability.25Heidi Kuhn has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://kuhnforcongress.com/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Kurdian, ArmenCalifornia49RArmen Kurdian does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he has argued that wildfires in California are not due to climate change. Furthermore, in an interview, he was asked about how to mitigate climate change, and said: "Our environment has been negatively impacted by green energy mandates that have driven up costs for everyone, impacting lower-income families the most, making them have to choose between rent, medicine or quality nutrition. Poverty has a negative impact on the environment. Raising our standard of living is the best way to protect our environment. Instead of banning plastic bags, for example, let’s make it easier for farmers to make quality and nutritious food, cut grocery bills and give families more of their money to keep."25Armen Kurdian has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/ArmenKurdian/status/2080423122386477277 https://web.archive.org/web/20260508070145/https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2026/05/07/qa-meet-armen-kurdian-candidate-for-californias-49th-congressional-district/Unclear Position on Roe
Lacore, NancySouth Carolina1DNancy Lacore does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she writes: "Support a permanent ban on east coast offshore drilling. Lower costs by expanding clean energy and modernizing the grid."25Nancy Lacore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.nancylacore.com/priorities https://www.nancylacore.com/prioritiesSupports Roe
Lam, AdrielHawaii1RAdriel Lam disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He stated: "Climate mitigation and adaptation is important to monitor and adjust to the changing conditions around us. Farmers and engineers alike, have observed these 5-, 10-, 20-year even 100-year cycles for centuries and adapted their methods and techniques to these changes. Congress should invest in real, hard sciences, and not fund politically driven research based on dubious claims and questionable results." In a questionnaire, he strongly disagreed with the statement "Man-made climate change is a global threat and requires urgent political action." He wrote: "Climate has always changed, and modern crisis agents are no exceptions to the ancient practitioners in search of influence and power."0Adriel Lam has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://www.civilbeat.org/2024/08/candidate-qa-u-s-senate-adriel-lam/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/79019 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/79019Opposes Roe
Lamb, MarkArizona5RMark Lamb does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has stated that "[e]nergy Independence is essential to unleash the economy and vital to our national security interests. Biden and the Democrats have failed us, jeopardizing both while emboldening our adversaries."25Mark Lamb has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/sherifflamb1/status/1694110855208796161 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gtOWgPtp5F4Opposes Roe
Lambrecht, CarlIllinois10RCarl Lambrecht does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Carl Lambrecht has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://web.archive.org/web/20241003021451/https://www.chicagotribune.com/2024/10/02/state-house-d58-candidates-differ-sharply-on-guns-abortion-and-the-economy/Opposes Roe
Lancia, ChrisConnecticut3RChris Lancia does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Lancia focuses on supporting President Trump's Agenda, according to his website.25Chris Lancia has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://lanciaforcongress2026.org/ https://www.newhavenindependent.org/2026/09/23/cable-guy-runs-shhh-for-congress/Opposes Roe
Lander, BradNew York10DBrad Lander understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. His climate policy states: "The climate crisis is not 'coming,' it is already here. From Superstorm Sandy that stole lives and cost billions, to extreme heat and wildfire smoke, to rising insurance costs, New York’s Tenth Congressional District (like the rest of our city, country, and planet) is already facing the impact of extreme change. New York’s Tenth Congressional District and its extensive waterfront and low-lying housing are deeply vulnerable to more frequent and more powerful storms. In this work, we must remember that climate change does not hit everyone equally. During Superstorm Sandy, we saw homes just a neighborhood apart experience very different outcomes. Vulnerable communities were more likely to flood and struggle to recover. Any serious climate strategy must prioritize those hit first and worst... In Congress, Brad will fight for the Green New Deal, organize to defend frontline waterfront communities most at risk due to the climate crisis, and push for investment in green infrastructure, jobs, and training programs." On Twitter, he wrote: "I'll be so proud to bring the voices of fearless climate activists with me into the halls of Congress. To address the climate crisis with the necessary urgency, we've got to elect better Democrats. It’s just that simple. With our planet burning, climate action can’t wait. I have an extensive climate record and I'm ready to translate it into the boldest possible policy at the federal level."100Brad Lander publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On Twitter, he posted: "Colorado has passed 50+ climate laws since 2019. Liquor stores in Morris MN cools the beer w/solar power. Voters in Athens OH imposed a carbon fee on themselves. @LocalProgress & @stateinnovation alone won’t be enough — but we need every bit of it."100100https://docs.google.com/document/d/1FmvVJSdleXypKukrEu0SL21a5ECHe_wl58EMm7JhSh4/edit?tab=t.0 https://x.com/bradlander/status/2049276519739269222 https://x.com/bradlander/status/1543279474124390402 https://www.bradlanderforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Larsen, JonnyUtah4DJonny Larsen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like affordability and healthcare.25Jonny Larsen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jonnyutah4congress.com/the-commitmentUnclear Position on Roe
Lasher, MicahNew York12DMicah Lasher understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Few areas have been more directly harmed by this Republican Congress than the fight against climate change. Last year’s Big Ugly Bill reversed critical climate advances, ending tax credits for electric vehicles and putting the brakes on efforts to green the energy system. And hostility to renewable energy has been on full display through both Trump administrations—from the president’s incoherent blasts against wind power, to withdrawing the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accord, to erasing terms like “sustainability” and 'decarbonization' from the Department of Energy lexicon. Micah Lasher believes few priorities are as urgent as the battle against climate change. His commitment to the fight goes back to his time in the State Attorney General’s office tackling climate denialism by Big Oil and includes local efforts like initiatives to mitigate flooding and erosion as Chair of the Riverside Park Conservancy." On twitter, he wrote: "The climate crisis is one of the most urgent challenges of our time."100Micah Lasher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://micahlasher.com/platform-and-policies/ https://x.com/MicahLasher/status/2052415567089254591 https://x.com/MicahLasher/status/1795826068894646672Supports Roe
Laubacher, EileenColorado4DEileen Laubacher understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. “We have a water problem, we have a change in climate, but we also have a leadership problem,” Laubacher said. On Twitter, she wrote: "My heart was so happy to see young people at our Castle Rock meet & greet—among so many others! This young lady was so engaged with the issues facing her generation including climate concerns, community violence, and economic opportunities. I can't wait to fight for her future in Congress."75Eileen Laubacher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://web.archive.org/web/20260902041039/https://www.coloradopolitics.com/2026/08/21/democratic-candidate-in-colorados-4th-cd-urges-long-term-water-planning/ https://x.com/EileenforCO/status/1998422637643473344 https://x.com/EileenforCO/status/2003141671282782486Supports Roe
Lawrence, WilliamMichigan7DWilliam Lawrence understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "Climate change is here. It's fueling record wildfires that are causing dangerously bad air quality. Big Oil has spent decades buying off politicians of BOTH parties & stopping climate action. I'm proud to be the only MI07 candidate who's rejecting fossil fuel money." In another tweet, he posted: "Just as anticipated, global warming has accelerated! We are well on our way to 2°C+ in the early 2030s, and 3°C by the mid 2040s. This is a nightmare scenario that the climate movement has been warning about for decades."100William Lawrence has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/WeWill2026/status/2077786812030865474 https://x.com/WeWill2026/status/1881926291072696538 https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/william-lawrence/positions/4bdbceca-7157-472d-9bab-b44a9d81a0b8Supports Roe
Le Roux, JennyCalifornia47RJenny Le Roux agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a tweet, she stated: "You can know climate change is real (as I do) YET not attribute every natural + leadership disaster to climate change (as Newsom does). Humans started the LA fires and they expanded by Santa Ana winds, but the inferno was 1000x worse from brush mismanagement and poor planning." Further, in an interview, she stated: "I support California’s effort to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. I will advance renewable energy, import less foreign fuel, and stop decommissioning of hydro and nuclear power. However, many current initiatives have unintended consequences, and my plan focuses on incentives, not mandates."50Jenny Le Roux has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://x.com/JennyRaeCA/status/1879537011528507675 https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2021-08-27/meet-the-other-recall-candidates-jenny-rae-le-roux https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/58867/race/15066/election/894Opposes Roe
Lee, ElizabethArizona5DElizabeth Lee understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Arizona summers are getting hotter and longer. Climate change isn't coming—it's here. We need leaders who will act." Her plan includes to "Rejoin international climate agreements," and "Invest in climate resilience and disaster preparedness."100Elizabeth Lee has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.nurselee4az.com/issues/water-security-environmental-protection https://www.nurselee4az.com/issues/repro-freedomSupports Roe
Lehmacher, EuniceSouth Carolina3DEunice Lehmacher understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes that in Congress she will: "Make polluters pay for the pollution they make. Increase research in ways to sustain all life given the warming climate. Fund resiliency programs that help people move out of flood-prone areas. End the short-sighted policy of giving federal insurance funds to rebuild where it is likely to flood again. Buy more electric vehicles for federal government use. Incentivize state and county government to buy electric vehicles. Subsidize existing rail transport and increase funding to high-speed rail lines for commuters. Mandate climate reporting that is consistent and transparent for governments and businesses and require participation. Use both carrots and sticks to increase renewable energy projects including grants, tax breaks, fines, taxes, etc." On Bluesky, she stated: "The Climate Crisis is real and we need real government action to turn things around."100Eunice Lehmacher has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.euniceforsc.com/the-environment https://bsky.app/profile/euniceforsc.bsky.social/post/3mquoexyjus2x https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/82864Supports Roe
Leonard, DonOhio15DDon Leonard does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Reject the culture wars. Secure the border. Respect immigrants. Lower costs, raise wages, and build a better future together."25Don Leonard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://donforohio.com/valuesUnclear Position on Roe
LePage, PaulMaine2RPaul LePage disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has stated that he is not convinced by the science behind climate change. Furthermore, he once claimed that climate change was a positive. "What's global warming doing? Everybody looks at the negative part of global warming, but with the ice melting, the northern pass has opened up. The new sea traffic is going across the north, and so rather than Maine being at the end of the pipeline, we're at the beginning of the new pipeline," said LePage.0Paul LePage makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2019, his campaign attacked his opponent for allegedly supporting a carbon tax.00https://perma.cc/798U-42KX https://www.wmtw.com/article/gov-lepage-climate-change-comment-drawing-criticism/1999649 https://www.mainepublic.org/politics/2022-10-25/behind-in-the-polls-lepage-ratchets-up-attacks-on-mills-during-second-televised-debate https://www.mainepublic.org/politics/2022-09-30/mills-runs-safe-lepage-runs-risky-as-maine-race-for-governor-intensifiesUnclear Position on Roe
Lewis, ShaneCalifornia18RShane Lewis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has supported some policies promoting clean energy.25Shane Lewis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.shanelewisforcongress.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Limtiaco, AliciaGuam1DAlicia Limtiaco understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. She has talked about the impact of climate change on women and girls.75Alicia Limtiaco has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://rosalux.nyc/events/voices-of-pacific-women-on-climate-justice/ https://www.guampdn.com/election/2026/limtiaco-torres-share-visions-for-guam-voice-in-congress-at-womens-chamber-of-commerce-forum/article_6476d93c-7b7a-4b22-a47e-3cd9066af51b.htmlUnclear Position on Roe
Lincoln, KevinCalifornia13RKevin Lincoln agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In 2024, he stated "Climate change is a pressing issue, and it’s essential to take steps towards a healthier planet." However, he does not currently have any mention of the issue on his campaign website. Further, he tweeted: "You can always count on me to support policies that unleash the power of American energy and lower our energy prices."50Kevin Lincoln has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://web.archive.org/web/20240226174558/https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/voter-guide/article284830706.html https://x.com/KevinLincolnCA/status/1704935349426831823 https://web.archive.org/web/20240226174558/https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/election/voter-guide/article284830706.htmlUnclear Position on Roe
LiPetri, MikeNew York3RMike LiPetri understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. LiPetri has stated that weather is changing, and advocates for building up resilience. However, on Twitter, he wrote: "The Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act is less about climate and leadership and more about increased costs and unrealistic targets. I voted no to this Act because I believe this bill as written, would do more harm to our community than help it."75Mike LiPetri has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.youtube.com/shorts/VGFh9HFGI-I https://x.com/TheMikeLiPetri/status/1142295643593031680 https://x.com/TheMikeLiPetri/status/1088107306880036865Opposes Roe
Littau, RobinCalifornia2RRobin Littau does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Robin Littau has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75N/AUnclear Position on Roe
Little, MattMinnesota2DMatt Little understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "Climate change not only impacts our seasons, it has already damaged huge industries; from snowmobiles to ski resorts, and drought plagued farms to suffering caused by lyme disease. Climate change is already here, and it’s becoming an economic and environmental threat to our way of life. Similarly, whether it’s toxic waste dumped in our rivers, a local water quality crisis, or companies trying to ship water out of the County, actions like these put the long-term wellbeing of all residents at risk. Those who seek to take advantage of the health and vitality of our community will face no stronger opponent." On Twitter, he posted: "There are no do-overs when it comes to climate change, and it takes all of us to create a sustainable planet for future generations. As a father fighting to create that future for my daughter, being endorsed by a group of passionate climate advocates like the DFL Environmental Caucus means the world to me."100Matt Little has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://littleforcongress.com/key-issues/fighting-for-clean-air-water/ https://x.com/LittleCongress/status/2044176896305344582 https://littleforcongress.com/key-issues/fighting-for-womens-reproductive-rights/Supports Roe
Lloyd, TanyaTexas27DTanya Lloyd understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview, she stated: "I support large-scale federal climate action because I believe the scientific consensus on climate change is real, and we need solutions that fit the scale of the problem. Texas should lead the way in the global energy transition to secure our economic future. I support an 'All of the Above' energy strategy that creates high-paying jobs in solar, wind, hydrogen, and geothermal energy while ensuring our traditional energy sectors remain the cleanest and most efficient in the world." On her website, she writes that she will: "Support regenerative agriculture, soil health, and local food systems to improve health, fight climate change, and keep wealth circulating in rural communities."75Tanya Lloyd has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5071.25https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/meet-the-candidates-tanya-lloyd-for https://www.tanyafortx27.com/issues https://www.tanyafortx27.com/meet_tanyaSupports Roe
Locklin, NicoleFlorida26DNicole Locklin understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Substack, she wrote: "We have to get serious about the climate crisis." Further, she said in a questionnaire: "I am most interested in how corruption and concentrated wealth affect affordability, healthcare, democracy, civil rights, and the ability of ordinary people to live healthy, secure, and free lives. That encompasses... climate resilience and environmental justice."100Nicole Locklin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://substack.com/@locklin2026/note/c-306671542 https://ballotpedia.org/Nicole_Locklin https://locklinforcongress.com/Supports Roe
Luria, ElaineVirginia2DElaine Luria understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: "Hampton Roads often feels the impacts of climate change before anywhere else in the Commonwealth or country. In Congress, I secured funding to mitigate the impacts of sea-level rise, supported legislation to invest in climate resilient infrastructure, and founded the bipartisan Offshore Wind Caucus. I have also been a strong advocate for the Chesapeake Bay, leading the effort to fully fund the EPA’s Chesapeake Bay Program at $85 million — ensuring a clean and healthy Bay for our communities, our economy, and our way of life. Kiggans feigned concern about how the One Big Beautiful Bill slashing clean energy tax credits would raise energy prices and threaten thousands of jobs in VA-02, but voted for the bill anyway. I will continue to lead efforts to combat climate change’s impact on our local community, fight against offshore drilling, restore the Chesapeake Bay, and ensure Hampton Roads has clean air and water." Furthermore, on Twitter, she stated: "I’m joining @SenKaineTeam, @USACEHQ officials and local Tangier Island leaders today to discuss the importance of protecting and restoring the island and how we will continue to combat climate change and invest in our resiliency infrastructure."100Elaine Luria has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://elaineforcongress.com/issues/ https://x.com/ElaineLuria/status/1565009139260088326 https://x.com/ElaineLuria/status/2069807607108231464Supports Roe
Lynn Hodge, TessaCalifornia23DTessa Lynn Hodge agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about what she would do about climate change, Hodge stated: "The 100 largest companies in the world produce 71% of all global emissions. We need to be going after the huge multinational corporations, many of them gas and oil companies, that pollute our earth. I vow to never take a dime of corporate PAC money, so I’m not afraid to take these corporations on by enacting stricter regulations on allowable emissions and waste, as well as stiffer penalties. We must not over-regulate our small businesses, and I will not support policies that will hurt our local small business owners."50Tessa Lynn Hodge has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/tessa-lynn-hodge-ca-23-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/ https://www.facebook.com/NWPC.fb/posts/tessa-lynn-hodge-is-running-to-protect-reproductive-freedom-and-expand-access-to/1410351531136306/Supports Roe
MacAllister, TylerMassachusetts9RTyler MacAllister does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has promoted solar energy in the past, but opposed wind energy.25Tyler MacAllister has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/Macallister2026/status/2092360114980491471Unclear Position on Roe
Macy, BethVirginia6DBeth Macy understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Bluesky, she wrote: "I am honored to have earned the endorsement of the League of Conservation Voters, tireless workers who advocate for clean energy, water and air. When I get to Congress, I will work to return the United States to common-sense climate policy that has been recklessly decimated by Trump and Ben Cline."75Beth Macy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://bsky.app/profile/bethmacy.bsky.social/post/3mnicrxrvy225 https://www.wvtf.org/6th-district-candidate-beth-macy-dSupports Roe
Males, JoeCalifornia25RJoe Males does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about climate change, he stated: "I believe we can protect our environment without relying on heavy-handed federal regulations that hurt businesses and working families.I do not support expanding burdensome mandates on pollution and carbon emissions that often drive up costs, limit growth, and push jobs out of the country. Those policies can end up hurting the very communities they claim to help, especially small businesses and lower-income families who feel the impact of higher energy and living costs the most."25Joe Males has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/joe-males-ca-25-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/Unclear Position on Roe
Malloy, GeraldVermont1RGerald Malloy understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Climate change is an issue we should pursue practical solutions that protect both our environment and our economy. Innovation, cleaner technologies, responsible forestry, and American-made energy solutions can reduce emissions without placing excessive costs on working families or driving jobs overseas." However, at a debate, he stated: "I don't think we should be backing into the Green New Deal and causing financial hardship... It would certainly be great to have that oil and gas independence... I would look for industry to develop capability for future energy. I actually talked about wanting independence for the United States' current energy, future energy, critical technology and food."75Gerald Malloy has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.deploymalloy.com/landing/qanda/ https://www.vermontpublic.org/local-news/2022-10-13/highlights-from-u-s-senate-debate-with-gerald-malloy-and-peter-welch https://vtdigger.org/2022/09/14/in-june-gerald-malloy-said-hed-back-a-nationwide-abortion-ban-now-hed-have-to-look-at-it/Opposes Roe
Manganaro, NicholasPennsylvania5RNicholas Manganaro does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He wrote: "Pennsylvania is blessed to have huge reserves of hydrocarbon-based energy resources. Despite that reality, Gov. Josh Shapiro entered into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) which hampered the ability of Pennsylvania energy companies to sell to the region and nation. It shackled the US to international sources for 'green' energy technology such as fragile imported windmills and China-sourced solar panels. I think America can do better by using its oil reserves wisely in the near-term while developing next-gen nuclear energy plants as recommended under the Reactor Pilot Program to provide a low-carbon source of abundant power for homes and industry, whether thorium fueled reactors (which are safer than those that are uranium-fueled), water-cooled fission reactors with higher enrichment levels than designs approved in the 1960s, reactors cooled with liquid sodium, and to continue development of fusion reactors. SE Pennsylvania needs an all-of-the-above energy policy."25Nicholas Manganaro has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.delawarecountygop.org/nick-manganaro-congress https://manganaro4congress.net/policies/Opposes Roe
Mann, BethanyMissouri3DBethany Mann understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Climate change will impact Missouri’s farmland significantly. We must protect against this environmental threat that shows up as drought, floods, invasive insect and fungal species, more fertilizer and heavy metal contamination in groundwater and soil, and an increase in animal and human diseases... We should adopt green initiatives that foster energy efficiency and reduce waste, which will not only create jobs but also save taxpayer dollars. Simple actions like updating building codes, examining power grids, and shifting to purchasing clean energy vehicles can amount to savings for taxpayers. We will also increase energy efficiency by offering financial incentives for meeting high public construction energy standards." On Twitter, she posted: "I am pleased to announce my endorsement by American Youth for Climate Action for my environmental policies and advocacy to address climate change. We must act urgently to mitigate the impacts of climate change that hurts farmers and Missouri families."100Bethany Mann publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. On Twitter, she wrote: "We must take action to mitigate the damage from climate change and heal the [earth]. Things like a carbon fee with dividends paid to families will help and ease the pain of inflation caused by increasing temps and high energy costs."100100https://www.bethanymannforcongress.com/environment https://x.com/Mann4Congress/status/1551670667459936257 http://x.com/Mann4Congress/status/1554595317286322176 https://x.com/Mann4Congress/status/1546897815472934917Supports Roe
Mannion, NancyPennsylvania11DNancy Mannion does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign focuses on issues such as affordability.25Nancy Mannion has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.nancymannion.com/Priorities/ https://www.nancymannion.com/Priorities/Supports Roe
Manos, SteveCalifornia39RSteve Manos does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He wrote on Twitter: "So tired of reading these 'sky is falling' climate alarmism. The fact that this kind of article appears in [The Economist] tells you all you need to know... follow the money." When asked about how he would address climate and environmental issues, he stated: "I’m in favor of laws that prevent pollution and promote environmental preservation. That said, we’re at a point where environmental regulations aren’t just inconvenient; many work against other priorities that citizens find important. Housing shortages, food cost increases, expensive and inadequate traffic infrastructure, high-speed rail… problems related to these issues and more are in many ways related to the myriad of environmental regulations — many made with no accountability, overarching plan, or follow-up on whether they are actually effective. There has been little to no measure of the actual per capita cost-to-benefit ratio."25Steve Manos has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/smanos1/status/1690841049512734721 https://web.archive.org/web/20260505161818/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/steve-manos-ca-39-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/ https://x.com/smanos1/status/1314066852960587778Opposes Roe
Marques, RhettAlabama2RRhett Marques does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has posted on Twitter arguing for "American energy dominance," which often means increased fossil fuel production.25Rhett Marques has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/RhettforAlabama/status/2074602441765495138 https://www.rhettforalabama.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Marsh, GeorgeNew York5RGeorge Marsh does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like infrastructure.25George Marsh has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://georgemarshforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Marter, JamesIllinois14RJames Marter disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he stated: "There is not specific, concrete evidence of human activity significantly impacting climate. In contrast there is direct evidence implicating those promoting 'theory of man-made climate change' of fabrication and falsification of data to support their claims. Evidence supports climate change occurs naturally and has been from one ice-age to another. Gov. role has a limited role to ensure clean air, water. We need common sense controls on emissions, etc. to ensure a clean, healthy environment." On Twitter, he wrote: "We need to stop calling 'weather' climate change, we do need conservation of resources. Smart, scientific use of all available energy sources, including Nuclear. Stop government subsidies, let sustainable energy compete!"0James Marter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/27946/race/1355/election/1195?culture=en-us https://x.com/marter4congress/status/1225102526560768002 https://x.com/marter4congress/status/1369294381715456003Opposes Roe
Martin, JamesFlorida21DJames Martin understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He posted on Twitter: "Good time to remember Brian Mast is an avowed climate change denier. Record-high ocean temperatures are fueling hurricanes that spawn more—and stronger—tornadoes." However, his campaign focuses more on other issues, like affordability and environmental protection.75James Martin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/MartinforFL/status/1990060293658169769 https://www.jamesmartinforflorida.comUnclear Position on Roe
Martin, KevinGeorgia6RKevin Martin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign focuses on issues like education and the federal budget.25Kevin Martin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://kevinmartinforcongress.com/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Masuda, MichaelCalifornia5DMichael Masuda understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He told KCRA: "We need to look at doing things like maybe raising reservoir heights, possibly building new reservoirs, finding other water sources. Climate change is really throwing a wrench into our expectations of how our water system works. The snowpack is not staying as long as it used to. That was a reservoir of sorts for our farmers to have stable water later into the season and for our communities and that is becoming a problem because the snow is melting sooner. So, we need to make sure that we are adjusting our infrastructure to take into account how climate change is changing our weather patterns, here in California." However, he does not mention climate on his website, instead focusing on wildfire management.75Michael Masuda has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.kcra.com/article/california-june-2-primary-election-congressional-district-5-candidate-interviews/71352001 https://www.votemasuda.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Maxwell, ChristianIllinois1RChristian Maxwell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign focuses on issues like public safety and parental rights.25Christian Maxwell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://christianmaxwellforcongress.com/Issues https://x.com/themodpun/status/2052047499813175614Opposes Roe
Mazzuckelli, JenniferOhio2DJennifer Mazzuckelli does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on reducing division.25Jennifer Mazzuckelli has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jen4oh2.com/aboutUnclear Position on Roe
McAdams, BenUtah1DBen McAdams understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Climate change is an existential threat that demands our immediate attention. I will work in Congress to curb greenhouse gas emissions and address the many other environmental crises facing our state so that our kids can breathe clean air, enjoy nature, and inherit a prosperous future... Utah can lead in clean, affordable American-made energy that strengthens our economy and lowers costs for families. I support expanding clean energy, modernizing the electrical grid, and investing in transportation infrastructure that creates jobs and secures our energy future." OnTwitter, he underscored this position: "The Trump administration is cutting the Clean Air Act off at its knees, in a move that directly harms Utah’s air quality and global climate goals. Congress must stand up and fight to retain these crucial environmental protections. If elected, I'll do just that. I’ve stood up for climate solutions before as Mayor, as a Member of Congress, and in my work since because this isn’t a partisan issue. It’s about clean air, public health, economic opportunity, and the kind of future we leave our kids."100Ben McAdams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://benmcadamsutah.com/platform/protecting-the-environment/ https://x.com/BenMcAdams/status/2022030939677757468 https://x.com/BenMcAdams/status/1991237997518299414Supports Roe
McAuley, PatrickIndiana7RPatrick McAuley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. 25Patrick McAuley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75N/AUnclear Position on Roe
McBride, JohnCalifornia9RJohn McBride disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In 2026, he re-tweeted a video about an underwater volcano eruption and said: "Things that affect climate far more than man!"0John McBride has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. Given his climate obfuscation, it is highly unlikely he would support such a policy.507.5https://x.com/johnmcbrideca9/status/2050599815831290066 https://x.com/johnmcbrideca9/status/2014417953035583778Opposes Roe
McCann, SeanMichigan4DSean McCann understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a newsletter, he wrote: "For years, Michigan citizens have called for decisive action to address concerns about climate change — concerns that have long gone unaddressed. Last year, my legislative colleagues and I took decisive steps to address these concerns, and I was proud to help lead the charge as Chair of the Senate Energy and Environment Committee. The enactment of the Clean Energy Future Plan, comprised of Senate Bills 271, 273, 277, 502, and 519, marks a significant milestone in our efforts to achieve a better, brighter future in Michigan. These new laws are integral to my vision of diversifying Michigan’s economy, supporting workers, farmers, consumers, and positioning our state as a national leader in clean energy. Moreover, it ensures freedom and personal property rights for landowners while maintaining safeguards for local communities. Recognizing the increasing frequency of severe weather events and extreme temperatures due to climate change, the Clean Energy Future Plan represents a substantial effort by the Legislature and Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to create a healthier, more sustainable environment for Michigan." On his website, he writes: "Solar, wind, and nuclear energy here in Michigan will help us support US energy independence, reduce pollution, and create good-paying jobs in our community. In the Michigan Senate, I supported funding to help reopen the Palisades Nuclear Plant to help us move towards a clean energy future. We need solutions that reduce costs for Michigan families—not aging coal and natural gas plants that make energy more expensive for ratepayers."100Sean McCann has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://senatedems.com/mccann/2024/06/21/advocating-for-our-environment/ https://seanmccannforcongress.com/issues/ https://x.com/SeanAMcCann/status/2014429473626607847Supports Roe
McClain, CourtneySouth Carolina4DCourtney McClain does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues such as housing.25Courtney McClain has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.mcclainforsc.com/issues/issue-1?source=9397bc95-d5c0-4f6d-91c3-68e9a003fff5%23block-12831e5f-9ccd-44c8-a897-b07ff7296d89 https://www.instagram.com/reels/DPSR6oLjNiZ/Supports Roe
McDermott, GeorgeMaryland4RGeorge McDermott understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a questionnaire, he strongly agreed with the statement "Additional regulations are needed to prevent climate change." According to the Baltimore Sun, McDermott said he fears the United States has reached the point of no return with climate change. “If we don’t do something very, very soon, we are going to be in a climate crisis we cannot recover from.” The actions listed in the Green New Deal are a start, he said.100George McDermott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/19510/race/2054/election/631?culture=en-us https://web.archive.org/web/20250409004209/https://www.baltimoresun.com/2020/10/17/marylands-4th-district-george-mcdermott-runs-again-for-sixth-time-challenges-rep-anthony-brown/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/19510/race/2054/election/631?culture=en-usSupports Roe
McDonough, MelissaTexas38DMelissa McDonough does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she writes: "Texas prides itself on being the energy capital of the United States. If we want to retain that title, we need to embrace renewable energy innovation. The petroleum industry will always be an integral part of the Texas economy, but we will be left behind if we do not keep up with advances in energy. Using renewables in conjunction with fossil fuels will help keep our grid from failing while mitigating negative environmental impacts."25Melissa McDonough has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://melissaforcongress.com/platform/ https://melissaforcongress.com/platform/Supports Roe
McGowan, ChrisIowa4RChris McGowan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "I’ll join the administration in putting America First and standing up to China, bringing jobs back to America, and restoring energy independence."25Chris McGowan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.mcgowanforiowa.com/vision https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/chris-mcgowan/positionsOpposes Roe
McGuire, MichaelNew Jersey3RMichael McGuire does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "New Jersey families deserve lower energy bills and real energy security. By unleashing American energy production, we can cut costs for working families and reduce our dependence on foreign sources. That’s the practical approach I’ll fight for in Congress."25Michael McGuire has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/MikeMcGuireNJ/status/2078133234714472731 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/92248Opposes Roe
McGuire, MikeCalifornia1DMike McGuire understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes that he "has led the effort to rebuild after wildfires and to double the number of state firefighters protecting our communities from one of the worst impacts of climate change." He also states: "Climate change is here, and Northern California is living with the consequences: wildfire, smoke, drought, flooding, and rising costs. I’ll fight for aggressive climate action, investments in clean energy, forest health, fire prevention, and disaster recovery that actually meet the scale of the crisis. We need to protect our communities, lower emissions, and create good jobs while doing so. I’ve led the successful fight for the strongest clean air, clean water, and climate laws in America. We’ve taken on Big Oil, who keep trying to destroy our coastline with offshore oil drilling, and we’ve won by standing up for our most vulnerable communities."100Mike McGuire has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, while in the California legislature he publicly supported a "cap-and-invest" program.5092.5https://www.votemikemcguire.com/ https://www.votemikemcguire.com/issues/fighting-for-climate-action-and-wildfire-safety?source=72268953-f0a8-447c-a172-3699d136f23b#block-b76efbb5-2362-452a-9530-563952b60381 https://sd02.senate.ca.gov/news/state-senate-senate-leader-mcguire-secure-passage-landmark-cap-and-invest-extension-along-four https://www.votemikemcguire.com/issues/protecting-reproductive-freedom?source=72268953-f0a8-447c-a172-3699d136f23b%23block-b76efbb5-2362-452a-9530-563952b60381Supports Roe
McInnis, LeeAlabama3DLee McInnis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Lee McInnis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75N/AUnclear Position on Roe
McIntyre, VirginiaNew York25RVirginia McIntyre does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues such as lowering energy costs.25Virginia McIntyre has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://virginiamcintyreforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
McKay, DanLouisiana5DDan McKay does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On twitter, he wrote: "Trump threatening war over the Strait of Hormuz isn’t 'tough'—it’s reckless. That’s 20% of the world’s oil. You mess with that → gas prices spike → Louisiana families pay. We need stability, not chaos. Washington drama shouldn’t cost us at the pump."25Dan McKay has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/McKayCongress/status/2041327528594317370Unclear Position on Roe
McKinney, AmandaWashington4RAmanda McKinney disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, she wrote: "Ignorance is personified by your irrational belief that the Earth’s climate never changed prior to human existence and the hubris to assert that humans can control Mother Nature." On her website, she stated: "Energy independence is national security. Amanda McKinney supports American energy dominance through hydropower, nuclear energy, natural gas, and responsible domestic production. She opposes radical energy mandates that raise costs, destabilize the grid, and hurt farmers, families, and small businesses. Amanda believes America should never depend on foreign adversaries for energy. In Congress, she will fight for affordable, reliable energy, protect jobs, and put American workers first."0Amanda McKinney has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/_AmandaMcKinney/status/1942654610503786647 https://www.mckinneyforwashington.com/Unclear Position on Roe
McKinney, DonavanMichigan13DDonavan McKinney understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "It’s time to break the cycle and understand that we need a solution as large as the climate crisis itself. A Green New Deal transitioning to 100% clean and renewable energy, would protect our planet’s future and create millions of good-paying green union jobs in Michigan. It’s also a more efficient and sustainable source of energy that will lower energy requirements and consumer costs, while improving our community’s health and cleaning our air & water. And one critical aspect of that for us in metro Detroit is investment to build and expand public transit, so people have the freedom and mobility to get to work, go to the supermarket, and pick up their kids without having to buy a car and pay some of the highest car insurance rates in the country. We deserve choices that corporations won’t let us have. We’re paying the price for this crisis built by greedy CEOs — but they’re the ones who should be paying to fix it."100Donavan McKinney has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.donavanforcongress.com/priorities https://x.com/DonavanMI13/status/1937639775176970726Supports Roe
Mealer, AlexTexas9RAlex Mealer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, she wrote: "The newly redrawn TX-09 has the bulk of U.S. refinery capacity and U.S. chemical production and my opponent, Leticia Gutierrez, is an environmental lobbyist paid by billionaires from the West and East coasts to shut down oil & gas jobs in our region." In another tweet, Mealer stated: "Spent the morning touring the largest shipyard in our region - Southwest Shipyard's Channelview and Brady Island facilities. The Houston Ship Channel is as important to U.S. energy dominance as the Strait of Hormuz is to international refiners."25Alex Mealer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/AlexMealerTX/status/2107093577478086880 https://x.com/AlexMealerTX/status/2091971449942667339 https://spectrumlocalnews.com/tx/south-texas-el-paso/news/2026/05/13/in-heated-congressional-race-in-houston--alex-mealer-pushes-herself-as-trump-s-choiceOpposes Roe
Mele, GreggNew Jersey12RGregg Mele disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he replied to a tweet asking how Al Gore will be remembered by saying: "Climate hoax." In another post, he stated: "The climate changes every day, back and forth, but mankind is not strong enough to defeat nature. Everything is going to happen in 10 years, that's the justification for all the taxes that haven't made a difference?"0Gregg Mele has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/mele4america/status/1964194724232790383 https://x.com/mele4america/status/1899465890749460756 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/43059/race/6807/election/617?culture=en-usUnclear Position on Roe
Meline, SpencerWashington8RSpencer Meline does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like lowering the cost of living and community safety. In a questionnaire, he stated: "Nuclear power is the most reliable large-scale source for our growing electricity needs. It runs 24/7 no matter the weather. Hydro is great too, it’s clean, reliable, and has powered Washington for decades."25Spencer Meline has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.melineforcongress.com/priorities https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/92992 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/92992Opposes Roe
Mellor, VicRhode Island2RVic Mellor does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Rhode Islanders are paying some of the highest electricity prices in the country. That didn’t happen by accident. It happened because of political decisions. A natural gas pipeline that could have brought affordable American energy from Pennsylvania into New England was blocked. That pipeline would have lowered electricity prices and created jobs across our region. Instead, politicians chose ideology over common sense. They pushed a climate agenda that restricts reliable energy while families and businesses get crushed by higher utility bills. Working families shouldn’t have to choose between heating their homes and paying for groceries because of failed political experiments. In Congress, I will fight to unleash American energy, lower electricity costs, and stop the policies that are making Rhode Island poorer."25Vic Mellor has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/VicMellorForRI/status/2031130155511578799 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/93198Opposes Roe
Mendoza, JoAnnaArizona6DJoAnna Mendoza understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her campaign website, she has a page titled "Climate, Water & Energy Security for Rural Arizona." On it, she writes: "JoAnna will support investments in American-made energy, including clean energy, which will save money for ratepayers. While Ciscomani has sided with utility companies and voted to roll back clean energy investments, JoAnna will stand up and protect local solar projects that bring energy online faster, lower costs, and reduce harmful pollution in our air." Further, on Twitter, she wrote: "In #AZ06, extreme heat is driving up utility bills, and drought/wildfires are putting us at risk. We need to lower costs and real action-oriented leadership on climate security - not more empty promises."100JoAnna Mendoza has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.joannamendoza.com/issues/environment/ https://x.com/Mendoza4AZ/status/2038682917384200671 https://www.tucsonspotlight.org/arizona-advocates-say-prop-139-hasnt-solved-abortion-access/Supports Roe
Mercer, MauriceAlabama6DMaurice Mercer does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Maurice Mercer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.mauricemercer.com/platformSupports Roe
Merrin, DerekOhio9RDerek Merrin does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, he stated: "You unleash America's energy to get energy prices down." On Twitter, he wrote: "Where is HB 79? I was ready to listen to Censured @CincySeitz embrace the Sierra Club & Biden’s climate loyalists on the floor this week. Of course, the free-market & pro-energy Republicans wouldn’t be recognized to speak against it."25Derek Merrin has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfRB0tnnARc&t=718s https://x.com/DerekMerrin/status/1711811373712154821 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfRB0tnnARc&t=771sOpposes Roe
Meyer, BradIndiana9DBrad Meyer understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Today, fossil fuel companies are using the same strategy to discredit climate science. They cast doubt, manipulate public opinion, and flood the media with distractions. The tactics have not changed. The excuses have not changed. The goal has not changed. What has changed is the scale. Today, what is at stake is not just millions of dollars but $8.32 trillion in annual fossil fuel revenue. And as history shows, when someone has that much to lose, they will do everything in their power to keep it."100Brad Meyer publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon.. On his website, he writes: "Carbon taxes and cap-and-trade systems assign a cost to emissions. These approaches encourage cleaner alternatives by making polluters pay. Industry lobbyists and misinformation campaigns have weakened or defeated most of these proposals."100100https://bradmeyer.org/environmental-policy/ https://bradmeyer.org/environmental-policy/ https://bradmeyer.org/brads-faqs/Supports Roe
Meyers, ScottCalifornia30RScott Meyers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. When asked about his plans to address climate change, he stated: "It’s safe to say that every person who has ever lived wants a clean environment, but we have taken regulations way too far, making production of certain materials so costly that other countries — that don’t have our current safeguards — can produce at a cheaper cost, giving them a bigger market share to sell a given product, like coal or heavy metals. This leads to even more stress on the environment."25Scott Meyers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://web.archive.org/web/20260505025321/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/04/scott-alan-meyers-ca-30-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/Unclear Position on Roe
Miguez, BlakeLouisiana6RBlake Miguez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Louisiana’s energy industry is the backbone of too many families and communities to treat it like an afterthought. In Congress, Blake will fight to get LNG export permits approved, stop the slow-walking of Gulf leasing, and push real permitting reform that actually works. He’ll also work to end the government handouts that keep certain energy sources afloat while our people get left behind. It’s time to stand up for the energy that keeps our state running and our neighbors working." Similarly, on Twitter, he wrote: "In order to Make America Great Again, our country must restore its energy dominance. Our new Congress should take swift action on this important issue. The America people sent a very strong message to the Biden administration in November, 'Out with the Old, in with the New.'" 25Blake Miguez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://blakemiguez.com/issues/#issue-defending-louisiana-energy https://x.com/BlakeMiguezLA/status/1877011297541263661 https://blakemiguez.com/issues/#issue-defending-louisiana-energyOpposes Roe
Miller, BrianMontana2DBrian Miller understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "I passed high school chemistry and physics, so I am aware that sustained released of carbon from our fossil fuel energy systems is causing the climate to change... I say that we plan for this contingency. This means cutting down fossil fuel usage in a reasonable manner when we can and replacing it with sources that will reduce the effects of carbon on the weather patterns."75Brian Miller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.miller4congress.com/copy-of-defend-the-right-to-unionize https://www.miller4congress.com/copy-of-address-the-afforability-crisisSupports Roe
Miller, DonnaIllinois2DDonna Miller understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "I’ve sponsored over $100 million in sustainability and renewable energy investments in Cook County and will continue fighting for clean air, safe water and resilient infrastructure to protect future generations. In Congress, I will support rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement and ensuring the United States is at the forefront of environmental justice, climate responsibility and sustainability."100Donna Miller has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5092.5https://donnaforcongress.com/priorities https://x.com/Donna4Congress/status/2069916833742766328Supports Roe
Milleron, NadiaMassachusetts1INadia Milleron understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "[Climate change is] real and it’s man-made. If we are serious about protecting the planet, we can’t ignore the environmental cost of war. There is no climate justice without peace and there is no peace without changing systems that profit from destruction." Also on Twitter, she voiced her support for: "Establishing a climate strike fund to help reduce climate change adaptation costs (w/o placing the burden on local taxpayers)."100Nadia Milleron has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/NadiaMilleron/status/2047400421854265801 https://x.com/NadiaMilleron/status/2047012153086120289 https://theshoestring.org/2024/03/20/nadia-milleron-announces-independent-bid-for-1st-congressional-seat/Unclear Position on Roe
Minton, DannyTexas6DDanny Minton understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In an interview, he stated: "My wife and I both drive union-built Ford EVs made right here in Arlington, so we live these issues every day. Climate action should empower working families, through tax incentives for rooftop solar in fast-growing communities like Mansfield and Midlothian, resilient energy options when the grid fails, and support for farmers and rural landowners so they don’t have to sell their water rights to West Texas billionaires. Instead of telling people what they can’t do, we should focus on practical solutions that protect our environment and lower costs for Texans."75Danny Minton has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/meet-the-candidates-danny-mintonUnclear Position on Roe
Mitchell, JoeIowa2RJoe Mitchell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "We should use every tool our nation has at its disposal including natural gas, oil, nuclear, clean coal, hydro, solar, and wind power to lower costs and strengthen American energy independence. By investing in a diverse energy mix, we can create jobs, reduce reliance on foreign energy sources, and better protect consumers from price volatility and supply disruptions."25Joe Mitchell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.joemitchell.com/issues https://www.kciiradio.com/2020/06/27/iowa-abortion-amendment-awaiting-signature-facing-lawsuit/Opposes Roe
Mizrahi, LewisNew York8RLewis Mizrahi does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Lewis Mizrahi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.linkedin.com/in/lewis-mizrahi-906149296/Unclear Position on Roe
Molder, ChazTennessee5DChaz Molder does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Tennessee can continue to lead the way on energy, but that takes leadership, not passing the buck. I’m proud of Tennessee’s leadership in nuclear energy, and I’ll work to expand reliable, low-carbon power while protecting our communities and environment."25Chaz Molder has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/chazmolder/status/2099674354808160583Unclear Position on Roe
Montavon, MatthewFlorida17DMatthew Montavon understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "We must deal with the very real crisis of climate change, which is particularly problematic for Florida’s Gulf Coast. By utilizing science-based criteria to address this problem we can protect our beaches, homes, and local economy from rising seas, stronger storms, Red Tide, and algae blooms. Rising temperatures have led to rising sea levels in Florida by an inch every decade. Heavy rainfall is causing more flooding and storm damage. Warmer ocean temperatures are damaging coral reefs and harming sea life. Development must be environmentally sensitive." In a questionnaire, he stated: "I believe we need to make choices that will provide for an economy for all, for universal health care, for immigration justice, for combating climate change and protecting the environment, and for a women’s right to choose."100Matthew Montavon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.montavonforcongress.com/platform https://ballotpedia.org/Matthew_Montavon https://ballotpedia.org/Matthew_MontavonSupports Roe
Moore, JenniferNew York10RJennifer Moore does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like public safety and affordability.25Jennifer Moore has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75http://mooreforny.com/#issues https://web.archive.org/web/20231010160823/https://www.nydailynews.com/2023/10/10/nyc-councilman-ari-kagans-campaign-manager-has-trail-of-bigoted-social-media-posts/Opposes Roe
Morales, CristianCalifornia43RCristian Morales agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Enjoy meeting Cornell Alumni in San Francisco Bay Area regarding the challenges facing California from nuclear energy to help address climate change to mitigating Californias wild fires." However, he has also stated that he wants to: "Pursue energy independence. Support an all-of-the-above energy strategy: oil, natural gas, nuclear, hydroelectric, solar, and other reliable energy sources. Expand nuclear energy. Reduce unnecessary regulations that increase energy prices. Protect clean air and water using practical, science-based policies. Hold actual polluters accountable. Invest in American innovation rather than sending manufacturing and jobs overseas to countries with weaker environmental standards."50Cristian Morales has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://x.com/CMoralesCAGov/status/1526064261419520002 https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/cristian-morales/positions/7dad3b32-12e6-4f99-8ade-c4cdff338c5bUnclear Position on Roe
Moss, JeremyMichigan11DJeremy Moss understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "If elected, I would be the youngest member of Michigan’s Congressional delegation – this new generation of leaders has the most urgency to act on climate change. In Michigan, we are experiencing increasingly severe weather, with more intense summer rain storms that overwhelm our infrastructure and more dangerous winter ice storms that put families at risk... We have a moral imperative to make progress towards a clean energy grid, enact strong environmental protections, and better prepare our communities for extreme weather events. During my time in the Michigan Legislature I have worked towards this goal by advancing legislation to protect Michiganders from devastating flooding, hold polluters accountable, and find effective environmental protections. Michigan is doing its part on climate action, and I look forward to working in Congress to continue this progress." On Twitter, he posted: "Our proposed climate resiliency policies will protect Michiganders & create jobs, while preventing the disastrous effects of the extreme climate events we’ve all endured."100Jeremy Moss has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://votejeremymoss.com/priorities/#environment https://x.com/JeremyAllenMoss/status/1425539401677950979 https://x.com/JeremyAllenMoss/status/1937566751832564138Supports Roe
Mota, SamanthaCalifornia37DSamantha Mota understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes that she is a member of "Climate Action Santa Monica, a locally-based, grassroots org. that empowers youth to find and demand solutions to help mitigate and adapt to climate change." Further, in a questionnaire, she wrote: "I fully support stronger regulations on pollution and carbon emissions to move towards a renewable, regenerative, resource-based economy through clean energy, carbon pricing, and quicker permitting processes. To ensure regulations aren’t burdensome on small businesses and families, I’d increase tax cuts, lower credit card fees, and provide grants for green upgrades."100Samantha Mota has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.motaforcongress.com/about https://web.archive.org/web/20260505153752/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/samantha-mota-ca-37-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/ https://santamonicademocrats.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/CC-Samantha-Mota-Questionnaire.pdfSupports Roe
Mullock, ZackNew Jersey2DZack Mullock understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "No other issues matter if we do not protect our environment. As Congressman, science and mathematics will determine policy—not politics and special interests. We have accomplished massive national projects before that brought us out of the Great Depression and helped create the middle class. We can do it again. I Will Fight To: Go full speed on solar energy—install solar on any and all acceptable homes and businesses at cost and massive scale. Federal investments in renewable energy, coastal resiliency projects, wetland and dune restoration. Fund smart infrastructure that protects our communities from climate impacts."100Zack Mullock has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://mullockforcongress.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Murray, RobertVirginia4RRobert Murray does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Petersburg families deserve better than higher power bills and rushed data center deals made without public input. As your GOP nominee for VA-04, I will fight for transparent growth that protects our communities, strengthens local jobs, and keeps energy affordable."25Robert Murray has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/Vote4RMurray/status/2089478129916019029 https://www.wvtf.org/4th-district-candidate-robert-family-man-murray-jr-rOpposes Roe
Nagel, JohnMinnesota5RJohn Nagel disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Democrats need to quit spreading the climate lie for profit. We need a balanced, science-based environmental policy. Not the dangerous game. Democrats are playing for money from their donors." In another tweet, he stated: "Real scientists often discredit the fear-mongering climate change profiteers. The weather in the 1920s was more unstable than it is today."0John Nagel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/Nagel4Congress/status/1949547620675862724 https://x.com/Nagel4Congress/status/2046244976208597371 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/82129/race/12343/election/1249?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Nair, MarkTexas13DMark Nair does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "This congressional district sits on top of the country’s largest fresh water aquifer, and it’s running dry. Global heating is putting enormous strain on the land. Drought is commonplace. Our farmers hope for rain, rely on the aquifer, and watch the soil dry up, all the while watching their bills stack higher and higher. Water is a shared resource that belongs to all of us. Mark will fight to keep water in the hands of the people who depend on it, not the corporations that exploit it. He'll expand federal grants for water desalination and clean water infrastructure. But he knows that solving this crisis long term means investing in the science and infrastructure to replenish our aquifers, not just manage their decline."25Mark Nair has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.marknair.com/platform https://www.threads.com/@marknairtx/post/Dbbxgz3ifBCSupports Roe
Nehls, TreverTexas22RTrever Nehls does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Trever supports President Trump’s agenda to unleash Texas oil, gas, and nuclear energy to restore full U.S. energy dominance. He will fight to end any remaining Biden anti-energy policies while focusing on legislation that expands domestic production and cuts burdensome regulations that drive up gas prices for families. A strong energy sector means a strong America including more jobs and greater national security." On twitter, he posted: "I’m proud to have President Trump’s complete and total endorsement. In Congress, I will stand by President Trump and work to codify his executive orders into permanent law, uphold law and order, secure our border, grow our economy, and unleash American energy."25Trever Nehls has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.trevernehlsforcongress.com/issues/ https://x.com/TreverNehls/status/2023829054693188018Unclear Position on Roe
Nelson, JenaOklahoma5DJena Nelson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like protecting Social Security and Medicaid.25Jena Nelson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jenanelson.com/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Nez, JonathanArizona2DJonathan Nez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes that he will work "with both parties to protect Arizonans from climate change." Furthermore, on his 2024 campaign website, he wrote: "Arizonans are at the forefront of climate change. Drought, wildfires, and rising temperatures worsen every year. Jonathan is committed to securing Arizona’s water future and making sure our state’s environment can continue to support the growth we’re seeing."100Jonathan Nez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.jonathannezforaz.com/issues https://web.archive.org/web/20240722195408/https://www.jonathannezforaz.com/on-the-issues/ https://ballotpedia.org/Jonathan_NezSupports Roe
Noack, MichaelIllinois2RMichael Noack does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "Your electric bill keeps going up while politicians chase energy fads that sound good in press releases but fall apart in the real world. You’re paying the price for policies built on slogans instead of science. Here’s what they won’t tell you: wind turbines carry an enormous carbon footprint to manufacture and can’t be recycled at end of life. They pile up in landfills. That’s not green — that’s greenwashing. Mike supports clean energy that’s proven, reliable, and genuinely clean. Hydroelectric power has been generating cheap, renewable electricity for over a century. It works around the clock. It doesn’t fill landfills. And it keeps your energy costs down while delivering real energy independence — which is a matter of national security, not just your utility bill."25Michael Noack has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://noack4congress.com/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Nolley, PaulIllinois16DPaul Nolley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Environmental threats like pollution, flooding, and extreme weather hit working-class families first and hardest—damaging homes, threatening jobs, and driving up everyday costs. We need practical, common-sense solutions that safeguard our air, water, and land without hurting the workers, farmers, and small businesses who depend on them. By holding polluters accountable and creating good-paying union jobs in clean energy, we can protect our communities and build economic security for everyone."25Paul Nolley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.nolleyforcongress.com/issues https://will.illinois.edu/transcript/tags/democrat-paul-nolleySupports Roe
Nykoriak, T.P.Michigan13RT.P. Nykoriak does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Promote domestic energy production, modern infrastructure, and policies that lower energy costs while strengthening national security and economic independence."25T.P. Nykoriak has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://tp313.org/#agendaUnclear Position on Roe
O'Donnell, MartyNevada3RMarty O'Donnell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Safe travels this Labor Day weekend! Thanks to Susie Lee and her support of Biden's Green New Scam, traveling on Labor Day was a little more expensive in the past. Under President Trump, energy independence is back."25Marty O'Donnell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/MartyTheElder/status/1961437959208518001 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNdgNQ5hmKYOpposes Roe
Oakley, AngelIllinois3RAngel Oakley does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like government transparency.25Angel Oakley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.libertyangel.us/policy https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/angel-oakleyUnclear Position on Roe
Oberacker, PeterNew York19RPeter Oberacker does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He tweeted: "Senate Democrats are doubling down on increasing our already sky-high utility costs! A leaked memo recently revealed the radical Cuomo-Hochul climate law is responsible for dramatically raising energy costs statewide since 2019. Twenty-nine of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle are refusing to acknowledge this and insist New Yorkers need to just bear the burden. Enough is enough. We need to repeal the radical Cuomo-Hochul climate law, pass my Utility Ratepayer Bill of Rights, and cut energy bills, NOW." In another statement, he said: "New York already leads the nation in outmigration and unaffordable energy policies will only send more people fleeing for the border... the costs associated with the ‘all-electric’ proposals floated by Democrats in Albany are astronomical and rural areas that I represent would feel a great deal of pain. Additionally, questions about reliability continue to go unanswered. We need a diverse, affordable energy plan that will protect the environment while also ensuring that residents and business owners are not left in the dark drowning in debt."25Peter Oberacker has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/PeterforNY19/status/2032498845922525378 https://www.nysenate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2023/peter-oberacker/senator-oberacker-calls-affordable-reliable-energyUnclear Position on Roe
Ojeda, RichardNorth Carolina9DRichard Ojeda understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he advocated for: "Build[ing] resilience infrastructure to protect communities from the climate crisis." On Twitter, he wrote: "It’s a fundamental fact that our climate is changing. This blue marble we call home is warming, and it’s up to us to take action. We need to build better infrastructure, invest in clean energy, and support our communities in need."100Richard Ojeda has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://ojedafornc.com/environment/ https://x.com/ojedafornc/status/1914666876069720277 https://ojedafornc.com/ensuring-quality-healthcare/Supports Roe
Okpareke, DidiNew Mexico1RDidi Okpareke does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like affordability.25Didi Okpareke has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.didiforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Ollivant, DougVirginia7RDoug Ollivant agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He tweeted: "This is a good initial orientation on water issues in #Iraq. Bottom line--a(nother) 'perfect storm' of climate change, aggressive damming upstream in Turkey/Syria, and a total lack of water management inside Iraq threatens agriculture, drinking supplies, and the marshes." However, on his website, he writes: "Virginia’s families deserve affordable energy, and our communities need reliable power they can count on. That’s why I support a common sense all-of-the-above approach, with small modular nuclear reactors and natural gas at the center. Nuclear provides safe, carbon-free power around the clock, while natural gas has already lowered bills and cut emissions—proving innovation works better than Washington mandates."50Doug Ollivant has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://x.com/DouglasOllivant/status/966199572228911105 https://www.dougforvirginia.com/issues/ https://www.wvtf.org/7th-district-candidate-doug-ollivant-rOpposes Roe
Osberg, ErikMinnesota7DErik Osberg understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote: "Erik believes we should protect clean air, clean water, public lands, family farms, and the natural places that make Minnesota worth passing on. That means taking climate change seriously, investing in clean energy, keeping public lands public, protecting the Boundary Waters, and supporting farmers as partners in long-term stewardship. We can do better by thinking beyond the next election and making choices that protect the next generation."75Erik Osberg has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.erikosberg4congress.com/priorities/environmental-stewardship/ https://www.erikosberg4congress.com/priorities/reproductive-rights/Supports Roe
Overman, KimberlyFlorida12DKimberly Overman understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her Substack, she writes: "In Florida, climate change is not abstract. It shows up in flooding, stormwater needs, homeowners insurance costs, water quality challenges, public health risks, extreme heat, and threats to coastal and inland communities. Environmental policy is also economic policy because families pay the price when leaders ignore the costs of inaction. Flooding damages homes, roads, schools, local businesses, public infrastructure, and family budgets. Poor water quality affects public health, tourism, fishing, recreation, and the quality of life that makes Florida special. Insurance costs can turn climate risk into a monthly household affordability crisis. The question is not whether Florida should prepare. The question is whether leaders will act early enough, invest wisely enough, and protect communities fairly enough to reduce long-term harm."100Kimberly Overman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://kimberlyoverman.substack.com/p/climate-resilience-is-affordability https://kimberlyoverman.com/issues/Supports Roe
Owen, RileyUtah1RRiley Owen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Riley understands that our planet is not partisan and believes we should use our natural resources while growing and protecting them for future generations to enjoy. Riley is personally invested and has firsthand experience through starting a world-class wildlife foundation leveraging cutting-edge technology to empower those who protect our critical ecosystems."25Riley Owen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.utahriley.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Padilla Stout, KatyTexas23DKaty Stout Padilla understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: "As a mother, I am fighting not only for the children of today but also for the future generations of tomorrow. Our public policies should be based on objective facts and science, not political nonsense. The rest of the industrialized world has recognized the urgency of addressing global climate change. Yet, the United States finds itself in league with third world nations on this issue. We need to rejoin the Paris Climate Accord to do our part as global citizens to protect our planet and all who call it home."100Katy Stout Padilla has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.katyforcongress.com/issues/ https://www.katyforcongress.com/issues/Supports Roe
Pan, DavidCalifornia46RDavid Pan does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, Pan was asked about climate policy, and said: "I support environmental regulations that have an immediate and measurable impact on health and safety. Unfortunately, restrictions on carbon emissions generally do not meet this test and should not be implemented. We should maintain a broad-based energy policy that does not subsidize or penalize particular energy sources."25David Pan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, it is unlikely that he would support such a policy due to his stated opposition to restrictions on carbon emissions.5028.75https://web.archive.org/web/20260603051341/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/david-pan-ca-46-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/Unclear Position on Roe
Pan, RichardCalifornia6DRichard Pan understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. In 2021 he tweeted: "Without facts, we have no shared reality, and it is impossible to tackle the existential problems we face: climate change..."75Richard Pan has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/DrPanMD/status/1447086621405315073 https://x.com/DrPanMD/status/1540370302743375872Supports Roe
Parsi, AceWest Virginia2DAce Parsi does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues such as affordability.25Ace Parsi has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.aceforcongress.com/aceplatform https://www.aceforcongress.com/post/international-woman-s-day-~-march-8-2026-a-father-s-promiseSupports Roe
Patronis, JimmyFlorida1RJimmy Patronis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has repeatedly criticized climate action. On twitter, he wrote: "Banning meat to stop climate change is insane. But 100+ climate groups are pressuring banks to cut off financial services for meat and dairy businesses." In another tweet, he stated: "We CAN reduce premiums. The Left yelling about CLIMATE CHANGE is establishing a permission structure by global elites (within the reinsurance market) who are trying to RAISE YOUR RATES. They're building their own narrative to cash in. Inflation, litigation, fraud play BIG roles."25Jimmy Patronis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/JimmyPatronis/status/1857510151999082796 https://x.com/JimmyPatronis/status/1800210683570815382 https://x.com/JimmyPatronis/status/1466122543086063628Opposes Roe
Peace, RachelNew Jersey4DRachel Peace understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Shore communities bear the brunt of climate change: coastal flooding and extreme weather are becoming more frequent, more intense, and more costly. We must demand accountability from polluters and prioritize clean, job-creating infrastructure."100Rachel Peace has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.peace4shore.com/policy https://open.spotify.com/show/033WqTjZEClrLezsMROAub?si=rWOuHlVdRiubh8-0LWUsdQ&nd=1&dlsi=bac6a6e8e92144b8Supports Roe
Pearce, JasonTexas4DJason Pearce understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He was asked if he supported a green new deal or other large scale action to address climate change, and replied: "Yes, climate change is a direct threat to all of us and must be addressed." On his website, he writes: "I support Texas's renewable energy leadership — Texas is first in the nation in wind-generated electricity and second in solar — while ensuring development is sited responsibly and doesn't come at the cost of the land, water, and wildlife Texans depend on."75Jason Pearce has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.lonestarleft.com/p/meet-the-candidates-jason-pearce https://pearcefortexas.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Pearson, JustinTennessee9DJustin Pearson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On twitter, he wrote: "It's time for America to show our resolve. To show we can tackle big problems. We can create jobs and a secure future for future generations. It's time to go big on funding climate solutions in the budget bill." In another post, he stated: "The environmental and climate devastation caused by the building of gas infrastructure is already wreaking havoc on our communities. It’s disgusting that @Enbridge is blatantly paying for elected TN State leaders to help them steal people’s land and poison our water."100Justin Pearson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon5092.5https://x.com/Justinjpearson/status/1437189888567304201 https://x.com/Justinjpearson/status/1671898316626354176 https://tennesseelookout.com/2023/03/22/pearson-votes-debate-on-hold-for-another-swearing-in/Supports Roe
Peña, LaurenTexas37RLauren Peña does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On her website, she writes that she wants to: "Open federal lands to responsible energy development. Reverse the Biden-era leasing moratoriums and restore full permitting access for oil, gas, and LNG development on federal lands."25Lauren Peña has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.lauren4congress.com/issues/energy-costs https://x.com/pena4ATX/status/2000643682010010092Opposes Roe
People, RobertFlorida15DRobert People understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. His clean energy plan states: "Fossil fuels worsen air quality resulting in negative health impacts for residents and contributing to worsening climate crises." The plan calls to: "Restore and expand clean energy investments for investments in wind, solar, and battery storage, End fossil fuel subsidies, Federal clean energy standards targeting 100% clean grid by 2040."100Robert People has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.peopleforcongress.com/_files/ugd/53c186_b2eda0f7ac7c4e239b72bb8d3ff583f2.pdf https://ballotpedia.org/Robert_People_(Florida)Supports Roe
Pericola, JamesFlorida11DJames Pericola agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He stated: "I’ve spent decades working on access to healthcare, climate change, nuclear waste policy, infrastructure, and a wide range of public policy issues in Washington." However, his campaign is more focused on issues like affordability.50James Pericola has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://floridapolitics.com/archives/803642-james-pericola-launches-bid-to-flip-cd-11-in-sumter-county/ https://jamespericola.com/#issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Perriello, TomVirginia5DTom Perriello understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On twitter, he wrote: "As @POTUS signs this historic law, RT this for everyone you know who knocked a door, cast a vote, and refused to let climate solutions fail. #ThankYou." In another tweet, he stated: "Thank you @RepSpanberger for risking your seat to protect our democracy, our climate, and our schools. And for being so damn good at your job that you still won a #ThirdTerm."75Tom Perriello has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/tomperriello/status/1559629409568563200 https://x.com/tomperriello/status/1590173870090514434 https://x.com/tomperriello/status/2024976599397851311Supports Roe
Peterson, ChristyColorado1RChristy Peterson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign focuses on "energy independence" over renewables.On Twitter, she wrote: "DENVER Voters; It's COMMON SENSE v. COMMUNISM. I support our police, public safety, safe classrooms, opportunity for all, US manufacturing, energy independence, seeing people achieve the American Dream via hard work everyday, like I do!"25Christy Peterson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/Christy74232586/status/2073054224376807739Unclear Position on Roe
Peterson, JohnSouth Carolina6RJohn Peterson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on supported Preseident Trump's agenda.25John Peterson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.johnpeterson.org/new-page-2Unclear Position on Roe
Peterson, KayleeIdaho1DKaylee Peterson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, she wrote: "Things I would sign my name to... - Legislation to combat climate change." In another tweet, she stated: "Also focusing on issues like Climate change, human rights, affordable housing, living wages, employment opportunities and saving the future of democracy wouldn't hurt..." Her website includes the following statement: "American taxpayers cover an unbelievable 36 Billion dollars in direct subsidies for fossil fuel companies every single year. That number skyrockets to a massive 750 Billion dollars if you include indirect subsidies, backroom loopholes, corporate tax breaks, and federal handouts. Gutting clean and renewable energy contracts has stripped lucrative job opportunities away from Idaho trades and made the United States entirely reliant on fossil fuel monopolies who corner markets and jack up prices for everyday people. Utilizing renewable energy sources in ways that fit directly with local stakeholders and landowners to lower utility bills could be life-changing for working Idaho families."100Kaylee Peterson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/kaylee4congress/status/1566268080724262914 https://x.com/kaylee4congress/status/1588681913333862400 https://www.kayleeforcongress.com/platform https://www.kayleeforcongress.com/platformSupports Roe
Pillersdorf, NedKentucky5DNed Pillersdorf agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a tweet, he praised Senator Manchin for supporting a climate bill.50Ned Pillersdorf has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://x.com/pillersdorf/status/1558914714473734145Unclear Position on Roe
Pino, RosieNew Jersey9RRosie Pino does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, she stated: "We need an 'all-of-the-above' energy plan that puts New Jersey families first. I’m all for solar and renewables, but we cannot rely on them alone. Natural Gas and Nuclear are the reliable backbone we need to keep the lights on and the prices down."25Rosie Pino has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/92254 https://rosiepinofornj.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Poindexter, BrianOhio7DBrian Poindexter does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Clean and renewable energy isn't some political gimmick; it's lower energy costs for households, it's good-paying jobs for our trades, and an investment in American manufacturing."25Brian Poindexter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/bpforcongress/status/2062527824313913359 https://www.centredaily.com/news/nation-world/national/article317422264.htmlSupports Roe
Pooley, RayMichigan9DRay Pooley understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "Wildfire smoke isn't just Canada's problem, it's a climate problem. We could ♻️ Push for greener energy 🔥 Support our DNR and local fire depts more and partner with Canada on forest management ⛽️ Hold big oil companies accountable for trashing our planet while hiking up our gas prices." On his website, he stated: "Energy independence shouldn't mean choosing between a healthy planet and a healthy bank account, and it shouldn't mean relying on foreign oil. By harnessing American-made solar, wind, and other innovative technologies, we can produce abundant, cheap, and clean power right here at home. This drives down utility bills for families, creates high-paying jobs, and conserves our planet for future generations. We should not only push for greener energies, but we should hold companies accountable for knowingly polluting our planet and dumping chemicals in our rivers and lakes."75Ray Pooley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/Pooley4Congress/status/1952818312083046410 https://www.pooley4congress.com/copy-of-the-issues https://www.pooley4congress.com/about-2Unclear Position on Roe
Powell, DeniseNebraska2DDenise Powell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like affordability and access to healthcare.25Denise Powell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://deniseforcongress.org/priorities/ https://deniseforcongress.org/priorities/Supports Roe
Powers, JoyVirginia9DJoy Powers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like affordability.25Joy Powers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.joyforva.com/copy-of-priorities https://www.instagram.com/p/DajOIpTIpE5/Supports Roe
Pratt, EricMinnesota2REric Pratt does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He tweeted: "Kudos to @XcelEnergyMN for proposing zero-carbon emmissions by 2050 w/o Green New Deal or new state mandates. To maintain affordable reliability, must pursue carbon sequestration & nuclear power." In another tweet, he stated: "t is Brutally cold! It is -3F (-19C) and will be -14F (-25C) tmrw. No global warming in Minnesota this week."25Eric Pratt has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/EricPrattMN/status/1111290785457209344 https://x.com/EricPrattMN/status/410250469928235010Unclear Position on Roe
Prince, YolandaTexas1DYolanda Prince does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues such as affordability.25Yolanda Prince has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75 https://yolandaprince.com/issues https://yolandaprince.com/issuesSupports Roe
Pulido, BobbyTexas15DBobby Pulido does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues such as the economy.25Bobby Pulido has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.bobbypulidofortexas.com/issues/ https://www.youtube.com/shorts/OdbiOJGZrSkSupports Roe
Purves, ArthurVirginia11RArthur Purves disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "If Democrats win, gas prices will go up again and so will inflation, to combat a global warming crisis for which they have no evidence. Virginia Democrats indexed the state gasoline tax to inflation, so gasoline taxes increase every July 1st. They also force Dominion Energy to buy 'carbon credits' from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Inititative (RGGI), which will be a new $550 million tax on Virginia consumers. Its only purpose is to drive up the cost of fossil fuel." On Twitter, he wrote: "I asked the White House for evidence of a current climate crisis. See reply. The White House has no evidence of a current climate crisis."0Arthur Purves has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He has opposed Virginia's involvement in RGGI, a cap-and-trade program.507.5https://www.votepurves.org/ https://x.com/votepurves/status/1818815834816483714 https://www.votepurves.org/ https://www.votepurves.org/Opposes Roe
Pusczek, AmandaAlabama4DAmanda Pusczek understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she has a policy titled "Mandate Climate Resistance & Environmental Justice" that includes plans for "Clean Energy Job Creation and Home Weatherization." Furthermore, on Threads she wrote: "Today I signed the Green New Deal Pledge. I pledge to use my office to advance the most progressive climate policy available in the U.S. Congress and proactively and publicly push for its swift passage. Let’s work together to protect Alabama’s vibrant ecosystem, make clean water and air a reality, and invest in sustainable infrastructure to support our state for generations to come."100Amanda Pusczek has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.amandaforalabama.com/policy https://www.threads.com/@amandaforalabama/post/DY-4xHujpbM/today-i-signed-the-green-new-deal-pledge-i-pledge-to-use-my-office-to-advance/ https://www.threads.com/@amandaforalabama/post/DZ_XP1CjnhvSupports Roe
Rabb, ChrisPennsylvania3DChris Rabb understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "As we continue to face the increasing impacts of climate change, we need action now. Decarbonizing our economy is not just good for the environment and our health and safety, it will also strengthen economic opportunity for so many of our most vulnerable communities. Passing a strong climate agenda that includes a Civil Climate Corps will help create millions of good-paying jobs and ensure a strong and sustainable transition to renewable energy for every community. Clean water, clean air, clean energy, more green space, and millions of jobs is a vision of the future our families and communities need to survive and thrive." On Twitter, he stated: "I'm running for Philly working families. Universal healthcare, free childcare, debt-free college, fully funded public schools, federal jobs guarantee, real climate action."100Chris Rabb publicly supports and advocates for a U.S. fee on carbon. He introduced a bill to establish a per-ton fee on greenhouse gas emissions for Pennsylvania's biggest corporate polluters.100100https://www.chrisrabb.com/platform https://x.com/chrisrabb/status/2055657778140586383 https://www.palegis.us/house/co-sponsorship/memo?memoID=37249 https://www.pahouse.com/Rabb/Video/?id=126505Supports Roe
Rable, KyleTexas19DKyle Rable does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like the economy and immigration.25Kyle Rable has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.rableforwesttexas.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Rafael Baez, EdgardoTexas20REdgardo Rafael Baez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like education and public safety.25Edgardo Rafael Baez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.drbaezforcongress.com/#CampaignIssues https://www.facebook.com/groups/373205776083271/posts/38430287693281603/Opposes Roe
Recile, RudyCalifornia8RRudy Recile does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, on his website, he argues for increased reliance on fossil fuels to achieve energy independence.25Rudy Recile has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://rudyforuscongress.com/index.php/issues/energy-independence/Unclear Position on Roe
Regnitz, BarbIndiana1RBarb Regnitz does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like immigration and supporting law enforcement.25Barb Regnitz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://barbregnitzforcongress.com/ https://www.chicagotribune.com/2023/07/25/porter-county-commissioners-split-2-1-on-use-of-courthouse-square-for-abortion-rights-group/Opposes Roe
Reichard, ChrisMissouri8DChris Reichard does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like supporting working families.25Chris Reichard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.reichardforrep.com/issues https://reichardforrep.com/issues/defend-our-constitution-and-civil-rightsSupports Roe
Reinhold, LaurenKansas1DLauren Reinhold does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign focuses on issues like rural healthcare.25Lauren Reinhold has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.laurenforkansas.com/prioritiesUnclear Position on Roe
Reynolds, ClaireTexas11DClaire Reynolds understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: " I am a progressive Democrat who believes that climate change is real, but let me be frank: I will not endanger the jobs of the people in my district. Period. However, my interest is in protecting the jobs of my constituents, not catering to the oil and gas billionaires. This means that oil and gas executives (all happily funding the current District 11 Representative) are going to tell you that I’m dangerous and will push for a bunch of impractical regulations that will endanger your jobs. This is a lie. Am I concerned about the use of fossil fuels? Absolutely–for a variety of reasons. The fact is that not only is our heavy reliance on fossil fuels certainly contributing to climate change, but they will run out, and sooner than you think. The industry’s refusal to acknowledge that last part is what always blows my mind."75Claire Reynolds has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.clairereynoldsforcongress.org/energy-production https://www.clairereynoldsforcongress.org/womens-rightsSupports Roe
Riley, CherylMaryland8RCheryl Riley disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, she stated: "Climate change is not a priority as we have many other issues that need attention now. I believe in preserving the environment; however climate change is a natural occurance, [sic] and a topic that has been falsely depicted to allot funding for regulations that have not been proven to make a difference and end up costing Citizens higher prices for electricity and other services." In an interview with Bethesda Magazine, she said: "The environment is important, especially in the long run. But if we don’t address many of our legislative problems now there will be no long run. That is, before Congress can have the luxury of addressing concerns about our climate, it has to address the changes happening right now that are endangering our safety, peace, and prosperity." On Twitter, she wrote: "The so called experts are just know nothing propaganda pushers. Checkmate you climate change, green deal lunatics!"0Cheryl Riley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/79372/race/2058/election/1204?culture=en-us https://bethesdamagazine.com/voters-guide/8th-congressional-district/cheryl-riley/ https://x.com/Cheryl4moco/status/1689625660711448576 https://x.com/Cheryl4moco/status/1945794761975099867 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/79372/race/2058/election/1204?culture=en-usUnclear Position on Roe
Rivera, EdwinVirginia3REdwin Rivera does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Lower energy cost, Edwin support an all-of-the above energy platform."25Edwin Rivera has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://edwinriveraforcongress.com/issues/ https://www.facebook.com/reel/1081671781011549Opposes Roe
Rivera, MelvinNew York7RMelvin Rivera understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he wrote that he supports investment in "Flood resilience, Sewer infrastructure, Climate adaptation."75Melvin Rivera has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://melvinforcongress.com/issues.htmlUnclear Position on Roe
Rodriguez Prilliman, AngelaTexas12DAngela Prilliman Rodriguez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like lowering the cost of healthcare.25Angela Prilliman Rodriguez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.helifortexas.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Rodriguez, EliottFlorida27DEliott Rodriguez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "South Florida is on the frontlines of climate change. Rising seas, stronger storms, and threats to our environment demand real leadership. I’m ready to fight for clean air, clean water, and a sustainable future for all." On his website, he writes that he wants to: "Expand cleaner energy while protecting affordability, reliability, and good-paying American jobs."100Eliott Rodriguez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/ERodforCongress/status/2047019229296136455 https://eliottrodriguez.com/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
Rodriguez, MariaKentucky3RMaria Rodriguez does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like lowering taxes.25Maria Rodriguez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://mariaforuscongress.com/ https://mariaforuscongress.com/Opposes Roe
Rogers, AustinFlorida2RAustin Rogers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a tweet, he wrote: "Protecting our natural resources and growing our economy go hand in hand. In Congress, I’ll champion commonsense, conservative solutions that support American energy, protect clean water, and preserve our outdoors for future generations."25Austin Rogers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/rogersforfl/status/2102476778686275609 https://rogersforflorida.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Rogers, TimWisconsin4RTim Rogers does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like clean water and criminal justice reform.25Tim Rogers has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://www.rogersforwisconsin.com/general-5 https://www.wpr.org/news/4th-congressional-district-rematch-moore-rogersOpposes Roe
Romero, DwayneColorado3DDwayne Romero agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On LinkedIn, he wrote: "And we must preserve and protect the water we have while acknowledging the changing climate is creating less and less water over time." According to Maven's Notebook, Romero said that “the climate is putting new pressure on” water management issues. However, on his website, Romero writes: "I’m a realist when it comes to energy. Turning an aircraft carrier takes energy and time. My approach is practical: we need to focus on using our legacy energy resources that are produced right here in CO-03 as we simultaneously press hard on the advancement and deployment of alternative energies. This transition window isn’t just pragmatic, it’s the only way we meet our ever increasing energy demand. An all-of-the-above approach is the only way we provide the reliable and affordable energy our communities need and deserve."50Dwayne Romero has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dwayne-romero-b01809203_if-you-send-me-to-congress-i-will-tackle-share-7503126780556320769-B823/ https://mavensnotebook.com/2026/08/26/colorado-newsline-what-climate-science-tells-us-about-the-causes-of-the-colorado-river-crisis/ https://www.romeroforcolorado.com/issues/#energyUnclear Position on Roe
Rosado, DeniseDistrict of Columbia1RDenise Rosado does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like property taxes and housing.25Denise Rosado has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://rosadoforcongress.com/platformUnclear Position on Roe
Rourk, CaitlinTexas10DCaitlin Rourk does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues such as lowering healthcare costs.25Caitlin Rourk has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.caitlinrourk.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Russ, DavidOregon6RDavid Russ disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, Russ strongly disagreed with the statement "Man-made climate change is a global threat and requires urgent political action," stating: "NO. That statement is proven to be fictitious." In an interview, he said that "the climate has been changing since there was climate on planet earth."0David Russ has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/59448/race/13079/election/1105?culture=en-us https://tigardtoday.com/articles/david-russ-seeks-oregon-6th-district-seat-as-republican-muoa0ej6 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/59448/race/13079/election/1105?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Russell, JamesArkansas4DJames Russell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He does call for increased clean energy, saying on his website: "We need to invest in a clean energy future that uses multiple sources to stay safe and strong."25James Russell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://russellforar.com/on-the-issues https://www.reddit.com/r/Arkansas/comments/uhnay0/roe_v_wade_response_from_jamesrus_russell/Supports Roe
Russell, RonaldMaine1RRonald Russell agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to Maine Morning Star, Russell agreed that climate change was affecting Maine, but the U.S. has already worked to reduce its carbon emissions, so it should penalize countries like China that continue to put out more carbon dioxide. On his website, he writes: "We should embrace renewable energy technology where it is cost-effective and makes sense. Wind, hydropower, solar and nuclear are all examples of renewable energy that we should embrace. However, current technology will not allow those sources of energy to replace fossil fuels, and we should not deprive consumers of their energy choices. We must continue to develop renewable technologies so they are a cost-effective alternative to fossil fuels, but I will not support any efforts to mandate the energy sources that Mainers’ choose to power their vehicles or heat their homes."50Ronald Russell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://mainemorningstar.com/2024/10/17/maines-cd1-candidates-talk-climate-change-cost-of-living-in-televised-debate/ https://ronrussellforcongress.com/project/energy-and-the-economy/ https://www.wmtw.com/article/maine-candidates-for-federal-office-abortion-stance/62718241Opposes Roe
Rutinel, MannyColorado8DManny Rutinel understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "It's time to put people over polluters. This Earth Day, let's commit to protecting Colorado's vulnerable communities from industrial pollution and ensuring a livable climate for future generations." In another tweet, he stated: "Global warming isn't over. It's getting worse... We need bold action on climate. Now."100Manny Rutinel has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://x.com/MannyRutinel/status/1782446222604718412 https://x.com/MannyRutinel/status/1606342950732140555 https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/manny-rutinel/positions/b97534ae-85c9-45b2-8753-d04825320dacSupports Roe
Ryerse, RobbArkansas3DRobb Ryerse understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. He wrote on his blog in 2025: "Climate change isn’t abstract. It’s already shaping people’s lives. Floods that wipe out homes. Heat that makes it dangerous to work outside. Storms that hit harder and cost more... Here’s what needs to change: We need to move to clean energy like wind and solar that creates jobs and reduces pollution, We need to protect our land and water so communities aren’t left dealing with the consequences, And we need to hold polluters accountable when they put people’s health at risk." He wrote on Twitter: "Climate change must be addressed, and I think we can do it by investing in a green energy economy that protects the planet and creates jobs."100Robb Ryerse has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.robbforcongress.com/post/fight-climate-change https://x.com/RobbRyerse/status/867798639699251200 https://x.com/RobbRyerse/status/864953381256867845 https://x.com/RobbRyerse/status/1433234630761750530 https://time.com/5783257/donald-trump-pro-life-evangelical-voters/Unclear Position on Roe
Sabio, TonyViriginia8RTony Sabio does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he advocates for the expansion of nuclear power. On Twitter, he wrote: "Rep. Don Beyer is once again fear-mongering—this time over the EPA’s rollback of restrictive, ideology-driven climate policies. If he truly cared about the environment, he’d be speaking out against China, the world’s largest polluter. In 2023 alone, China emitted 12.7 billion metric tons of CO₂—far surpassing the U.S.—and is responsible for an estimated 27% to 35% of global greenhouse gas emissions."25Tony Sabio has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://sabioforcongress.com/energy-%26-power https://x.com/tony_sabio/status/1934602441619546473 https://x.com/tony_sabio/status/2101882219547521194Unclear Position on Roe
Salvesen, John "Bongo"Georgia5RJohn "Bongo" Salvesen does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign focuses on issues like government transparency and education.25John "Bongo" Salvesen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.bongo4congress.com/servicesUnclear Position on Roe
Sapaskis, StyloNew York15RStylo Sapaskis does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Stylo Sapaskis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/31346/race/33823/election/1487Opposes Roe
Sarauw, JanelleU.S. Virgin Islands1DJanelle Sarauw understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. Her climate policy states: "The Virgin Islands faces escalating climate threats, including coastal erosion, coral reef degradation, water insecurity, and increased storm intensity. Despite being on the front lines of climate change, the territory faces barriers accessing federal environmental funding due to complex application processes, delayed disbursement, and inequitable treatment in federal programs... Advocate for the designation of the Virgin Islands as a federal pilot site for climate adaptation and renewable energy innovation, unlocking targeted federal investment and technical support."100Janelle Sarauw has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5092.5https://sarauwforcongress.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/Sarauw_Donor_Manifesto-DIGITAL-2.pdf https://www.virginislandsdailynews.com/news/senators-testifiers-praise-anti-discrimination-bill/article_f93f3f63-235e-5fb1-a06f-31d8af93525c.htmlUnclear Position on Roe
Schwartz, DanMaryland1DDan Schwartz does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like consumer protection.25Dan Schwartz has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://schwartzforcongress.com/ https://schwartzforcongress.com/policy/Supports Roe
Schwartzel, JimFlorida19RJim Schwartzel does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Schwartzel applauded Governor DeSantis for blocking net-zero mandates in the state.25Jim Schwartzel makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. On Twitter, he wrote: "The second blocks 'net-zero' mandates and carbon taxes that would raise costs, protecting affordable energy and supporting jobs. These reforms put an end to taxpayer-funded political agendas and refocus government on accountability, fiscal responsibility, and real results. These are the same principles I will bring to the federal government when in Congress."021.25https://x.com/JimSchwartzel/status/2047760059573113321 https://x.com/JimSchwartzel/status/2047760059573113321Unclear Position on Roe
Sell, TomTexas19RTom Sell does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "Tom Sell stands for U.S. energy independence. The energy produced in West Texas fuels our region, our country, and much of the world. The radical left climate extremists are determined to shut down American oil and gas production, which would empower our nation’s enemies around the world, weaken our national security and freedom-loving countries around the world, and drive up costs for hardworking families at home in West Texas and across the United States, undermining the U.S. economy and costing American jobs."25Tom Sell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.selltexastrue.com/issues https://x.com/SellForTexas19/status/2080308850289205637Opposes Roe
Shah, AmishArizona1DAmish Shah understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter in 2025, he wrote: "During my time in the Arizona House, I backed bills to expand solar access, prevent wildfires, and protect our water. As a doctor and legislator, I’ve seen how the climate crisis harms our health and economy—and I’ll keep fighting for a livable Arizona." In 2024, also on Twitter, he posted: "Together, we'll build a fair economy, expand quality health care, tackle climate change, and boost American competitiveness. Let's make it happen for Arizona!"100Amish Shah has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. In 2022, he tweeted: "We have to aggressively fight the problem of climate change. Regulating carbon on a Federal level is important."5092.5https://x.com/DrAmishShah/status/1930668454048125297 https://x.com/DrAmishShah/status/1840803855438586343 https://x.com/DrAmishShah/status/1542703860984139780 https://www.amishforarizona.com/issuesSupports Roe
Shaheen, StefanyNew Hampshire1DStefany Shaheen understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "We can't afford four years of inaction while climate change accelerates and energy prices continue to rise simply because Donald Trump is in the White House. Action is needed now to seriously tackle climate change, increase clean local energy production, and reduce energy costs. These are issues I hear about frequently from voters across the district."100Stefany Shaheen has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://stefanyshaheen.com/priorities/ https://x.com/Stefany4NH/status/2014330220036194581Supports Roe
Shaver, BrianOhio5DBrian Shaver does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He focuses his campaign on issues like affordability.25Brian Shaver has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.brianshaverforcongress.com/issues https://www.brianshaverforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Shea, ChrisConnecticut5RChris Shea does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Joe Biden shut down American energy and drove up electric costs for everyone. President Trump’s all-of-the-above approach to energy is common-sense: Nuclear, Geothermal, Oil & Gas, Wind & Solar. We can harness all of America’s energy potential without compromising our beautiful land and power America’s reindustrialization."25Chris Shea has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/SheaforCongress/status/2076786177126875582Unclear Position on Roe
Shepard, CaseyTexas17DCasey Shepard does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues such as protecting democracy and feeding the hungry.25Casey Shepard has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5028.75https://caseyshepardforcongress.com/caseys-visionUnclear Position on Roe
Sheth, NiravWashington7RNirav Sheth does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Where are all these tax money going to use? Fix the Homelessness or increase the homelessness in the name of climate change instead."25Nirav Sheth has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. He has opposed Washington's CCA, a cap-and-trade program.5028.75https://x.com/_NiravSheth_/status/1678429062384193536 https://shethforcongress.com/issues/affordability-economy-employment/Unclear Position on Roe
Shinkle, CarolineNew York12RCaroline Shinkle does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like lowering taxes.25Caroline Shinkle has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://carolinefornewyork.com/prioritiesUnclear Position on Roe
Shook, StevenTexas26DSteven Shook does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes that he wants to: "Bring federal funding and incentives home to North Texas for grid modernization, weatherization, and energy storage. Advocate for national reliability standards and research that help states plan for extreme weather and demand spikes."25Steven Shook has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://shookforcongress2026.com/#17b945f4-7126-4ae7-b5ce-14b44729811e https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/steven-shook/positions/387a30f5-8dc0-4519-8a3f-9927022de1d5Unclear Position on Roe
Silva, MaryWashington1RMary Silva does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, she wrote: "Look at the numbers: Washington state has some of the highest sales and gas taxes in the entire nation. Democrat leadership gave us a 'Climate Commitment Act' that squeezed family budgets, and now they've pushed through an income tax."25Mary Silva has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/MarySilvaWA/status/2106420230469935439 https://x.com/MarySilvaWA/status/1775000210831540313Unclear Position on Roe
Sims, DioneTexas25DDione Sims does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like affordable healthcare.25Dione Sims has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://dionesimsforcongress.com/platform/healthcareUnclear Position on Roe
Singer, ScottFlorida25RScott Singer understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. As Mayor of Boca Raton, in 2022 Singer supported a commitment to limit the negative impacts of climate change by getting to net zero carbon emissions before 2050. However, his current campaign does not mention climate change, and he wrote on his website: "Scott supports energy independence to advance our economy free from destabilizing foreign influences and to reduce costs for our nation."75Scott Singer has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.myboca.us/m/newsflash/Home/Detail/885 https://www.scottsingerusa.com/prioritiesUnclear Position on Roe
Smead, JoshMissouri6DJosh Smead understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Climate change is real, and Missouri and other states are already experiencing the problems it is causing. It calls for a smarter approach backed by funding. As a builder, I know it’s cheaper in the long run to build things right the first time, and the same goes for environmental policy. We need to have long-term plans for actions as scientists have proved climate change will continue to get worse, and there is no quick fix. Create bipartisan federal action to find preventive and reparative solutions. In Missouri, work on the damage from extreme rainfall for rural and riverfront towns. In Missouri, work on the issues of extreme heat in more populated areas. Federally, reverse the Republican cut of the Environmental Protection Agency. Stop the Republican administration’s prioritization and deregulation of fossil fuel use. Stop the Republican administration’s cuts to climate research. Fight powerful climate-denial groups and major corporations. Disallow these climate-denial organizations from spending millions funding political campaigns and lobbying in Congress."100Josh Smead has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://votesmead.com/the-plan/ https://votesmead.com/the-plan/Supports Roe
Smiley, HeatherMichigan6RHeather Smiley disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She retweeted a video attempting to debunk many aspects of climate science, saying: "And now… The rest of the climate story. It’s refreshing to see someone in the mainstream media actually report the truth - good job!" In a questionnaire, she replied "Strongly Disagree" to the statement "Man-made climate change is a global threat and requires urgent political action."0Heather Smiley has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/Smiley4Congress/status/2098145933489787141 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/81619/race/838/election/1244?culture=en-us https://smileyforcongress.com/?page_id=269Opposes Roe
Smith Jr., RaymondNorth Carolina3DRaymond Smith Jr. does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like affordability and anti-corruption.25Raymond Smith Jr. has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://raymondsmithfornc.com/platform https://choicetracker.org/nc/people/raymond-smith-jr/252641280Unclear Position on Roe
Smith, BobCalifornia24RBob Smith agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He has opposed natural gas due to methane emissions impact on climate. However, he is also an opponent of renewable energy like wind power, instead promoting nuclear power.50Bob Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/bob-smith/positions/496c1c5f-3401-4024-b043-59969b773788 https://bobsmithforcongress.com/gone-with-the-offshore-wind/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/90453Supports Roe
Smith, BradWisconsin6DBrad Smith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. However, on his website, he writes: "I support a serious transition to renewable energy and a cleaner economy. That means growing solar and wind, supporting electrification, expanding electric vehicle adoption, and modernizing our infrastructure so Wisconsin is ready for the future. Done right, this creates jobs, lowers long-term energy costs, and helps keep more of our energy dollars here at home."25Brad Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.bradsmithforcongress.com/priorities-and-positions https://www.facebook.com/BradSmithforCongress/posts/%F0%9D%97%A4%F0%9D%98%82%F0%9D%97%B2%F0%9D%98%80%F0%9D%98%81%F0%9D%97%B6%F0%9D%97%BC%F0%9D%97%BB-%F0%9D%97%B3%F0%9D%97%BF%F0%9D%97%BC%F0%9D%97%BA-%F0%9D%97%BC%F0%9D%98%82%F0%9D%97%BF-%F0%9D%97%9A%F0%9D%97%BF%F0%9D%97%B2%F0%9D%97%B2%F0%9D%97%BB-%F0%9D%97%9F%F0%9D%97%AE%F0%9D%97%B8%F0%9D%97%B2-%F0%9D%97%96%F0%9D%97%BC%F0%9D%98%82%F0%9D%97%BB%F0%9D%98%81%F0%9D%98%86-%F0%9D%97%A7%F0%9D%97%BC%F0%9D%98%84%F0%9D%97%BB-%F0%9D%97%9B%F0%9D%97%AE%F0%9D%97%B9%F0%9D%97%B9q-womens-reproductive-rightsbrad-fu/122144133399035294/Supports Roe
Smith, CerettaGeorgia12DCeretta Smith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like affordability and access to healthcare.25Ceretta Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://cerettaforga.com/#prioritiesUnclear Position on Roe
Smith, ThomasMichigan8RThomas Smith does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his wabsite he writes: "Michigan's energy sector must thrive. Tom supports American energy independence — oil, gas, and nuclear — and opposes job-killing green mandates."25Thomas Smith has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://tomsmithformi.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Sneed, AndrewAlabama5DAndrew Sneed does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website's energy page, he has called to "Restore federal funding for clean, innovative, and sustainable technologies." He also states that he supports restoring clean air and water protections on his website's environment page.25Andrew Sneed has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.sneedforcongress.com/energy https://www.sneedforcongress.com/environmentUnclear Position on Roe
Solis, HildaCalifornia38DHilda Solis understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. She writes on her website: "As President Obama’s Secretary of Labor, as a lawmaker and as County Supervisor, Hilda Solis has been an effective advocate to slow climate change by limiting emissions that cause global warming — and by leading the charge for a green economy." Further, on her personal website, she wrote: "I have advanced initiatives to hold polluters accountable and prepare our communities for a changing climate."100Hilda Solis has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.hildasolis.com/environmental-justice-parks-and-open-space/ https://hildalsolis.org/environmental-justice/ https://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/la-abortion-reproductive-healthcare-california-proposal/2985731/Supports Roe
Soulé, PeterCalifornia16RPeter Soulé does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He instead focuses on issues like affordability. He stated that he wants to make "energy more affordable by removing restrictions on drilling for oil and building refineries in California."25Peter Soulé has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://souleforcongress.com/issues https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/peter-soule/positions/a15bffd7-2f62-429e-b005-333ef9a1ad54Unclear Position on Roe
Stalcup, ThomasMassachusetts4RThomas Stalcup understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Human-induced climate change is real and measurable. This is not a matter of opinion—it is supported by overwhelming evidence. As a physicist and the founder of an environmental monitoring company with systems deployed from the Arctic to Antarctica, I’ve worked directly with the kind of data that makes this clear. We should approach this issue with the same seriousness and rigor we would apply to any other scientific problem—grounded in evidence, not politics. At the same time, maintaining public trust requires honesty and accountability. Politicians have made irresponsible claims and critics are right to question them. That does not invalidate the broader reality of climate change—but it does highlight the importance of transparency and scientific integrity. We should welcome scrutiny, demand high standards, and ensure that policy decisions are based on solid, verifiable evidence. The strength of the science depends on our willingness to hold it to those standards. We also need practical, results-driven solutions. That means investing in technologies that reverse environmental impact without undermining economic stability. It means supporting innovation while ensuring that public resources are used responsibly and effectively. Addressing climate change is not just about recognizing the problem—it’s about solving it in a way that is honest, accountable, and grounded in reality."75Thomas Stalcup has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://tomstalcup.com/environment/Unclear Position on Roe
Stelson, JanellePennsylvania10DJanelle Stelson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. She has publicly supported the Inflation Reduction Act, a bill which included large amounts of funding to address climate change. On Twitter, she wrote: "We need an all-of-the-above policy to lower energy costs. But now Washington Republicans are wasting nearly $1 billion to raise energy costs by reducing wind energy. It’s crazy."25Janelle Stelson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.witf.org/2024/08/15/scott-perry-janelle-stelson-lay-out-tax-and-manufacturing-plan-in-10th-district-race/ https://x.com/JanelleStelson/status/2037609369722913271 https://janellestelson.com/priorities/Supports Roe
Sterbinsky, DaniArizona9DDani Sterbinsky does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Dani Sterbinsky has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75N/AUnclear Position on Roe
Stigall, ChrisMissouri6RChris Stigall disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Everyone believes the climate changes. Idiots blindly believe man controls it." In another tweet, he stated: "Climate cultists don’t talk about things like solar minimums. Does the sun go through inactive periods? Are we in one now? Could we be cooling? Is ice expanding? Lots of data says yes. But, we’re warming - it’s our fault - and you must follow their rules to stop it or...DENIER!"0Chris Stigall has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.507.5https://x.com/ChrisStigall/status/1160528692856205317 https://x.com/ChrisStigall/status/1100139639984349184 https://www.stigallforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Stille, BeckyNebraska3DBecky Stille does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like supporting unions.25Becky Stille has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.beckystille2026.com/issues https://www.beckystille2026.com/issuesSupports Roe
Strada, JoeFlorida11RJoe Strada does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Lower costs, restore energy independence."25Joe Strada has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://votestrada.com/prioritiesUnclear Position on Roe
Strange, MelissaKentucky4DMelissa Strange does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues such as protecting and expanding Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security.25Melissa Strange has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://strangeforky.com/issues/ https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/melissa-strange/positions/67210500-e4fc-42e3-b144-0305d633c33dSupports Roe
Stuski, AuroraPennsylvania4RAurora Stuski does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on lowering costs.25Aurora Stuski has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://aurora4pa.com/ https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1307885202414586Opposes Roe
Swanson, TrinaMinnesota8DTrina Swanson understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Threads, she wrote: "More fires in Northen Minnesota today — this time around Ely. Grateful for the first responders who bring this under control, but I also know: we need stronger emergency support, a strong U.S. Forest Service to manage the lands and federally-funded science research to adapt to the increasing challenges from climate change." On her website, she stated: "We need investment in new industries like clean energy, steel, and batteries to store renewable energy, industries that will create jobs that keep up with the cost of living."75Trina Swanson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.threads.com/@trinaforcongress/post/DZFtzw1oMt_ https://trinaforcongress.com/priorities https://womenwinning.org/press-releases/women-winning-endorses-six-pro-choice-champions-running-for-federal-office-in-2026/Supports Roe
Tandon, RiteshCalifornia17RRitesh Tandon understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been raising alarms about climate change for a while now. The 5th assessment report came out in 2014 and set some sobering warnings on disruptions in weather patterns, ocean level rises, acidification of the oceans, and possibly some unique disasters. The culprit is the total or cumulative CO2 in the atmosphere since the beginning of the last century." However, Tandon opposes stronger climate policies like the Green New Deal.75Ritesh Tandon has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.tandonforcongress.com/policies/climate/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/48900/race/1246/election/894?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Tang Williams, LilyNew Hampshire2RLily Tang Williams disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, she stated: "Climate change is real because it is actually constantly changing." On her website, she writes: "We must declare energy freedom and allow access, with appropriate mechanisms to control pollution, to all of our available resources: nuclear, oil, solar, coal, and wind. We should not be in an either/or political fight amongst ourselves on which energy sources to promote. Artificial energy restrictions not only do not make sense for national security (dependence on other countries), but it further divides and impoverishes the country."0Lily Tang Williams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. However, she has criticized a global carbon tax.507.5https://www.collaborativenh.org/know-your-vote-articles/2024/10/21/lily-tang-williams-on-the-issues-where-the-2nd-cd-gop-candidate-stands https://www.lilytangwilliams.com/congress/issues/ https://x.com/Lily4Liberty/status/1979004864920199565 https://x.com/Lily4Liberty/status/1777766640739880996Opposes Roe
Taylor, BrentTennessee9RBrent Taylor does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "High energy prices continue to squeeze farmers, truckers, manufacturers, and working families across our state. Brent Taylor’s strong conservative record proves he understands the problem and knows how to fix it. In the State Senate, he protected families from higher electric bills by fighting costly mandates, supporting reliable natural gas infrastructure, and making sure big tech data centers pay their own way instead of passing the costs on to everyone else. In Washington, Brent will promote American energy production to lower costs for families and businesses and improve our national security by expanding domestic oil, natural gas, and nuclear power. Brent will promote American Energy that Takes Tennessee to the Top." In a questionnaire, he stated: "I believe fossil fuels currently remain the most reliable energy source. As technology continues to advance, SMRs will become a more reliable industrial source for energy."25Brent Taylor has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://brenttaylorforcongress.com/issues/ https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/4148/race/25005/election/1381 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/4148/race/25005/election/1381Opposes Roe
Taylor, ShannonVirginia1DShannon Taylor understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On twitter, she wrote: "Further proof of why we need an experienced Attorney General who uses their knowledge and years of experience for the good of Virginains [sic] to fight climate change not to help his wealthy, corporate polluter friends." In another tweet, she wrote: "Unfortunately, @JasonMiyaresVA has spent his time in office failing at this charge - attacking reproductive freedom, disparaging LGBTQ Virginians, removing Virginia citizens from the voter rolls, and refusing to combat climate change or hold polluters accountable."75Shannon Taylor has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/ShannonTaylorVA/status/1859307164453699990 https://x.com/ShannonTaylorVA/status/1858631290813325383 https://x.com/ShannonTaylorVA/status/2069786371284177070Supports Roe
Tedford, MarkOklahoma1RMark Tedford does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote that he wants to: "Unleash American energy production." On Twitter, he posted: "'Although drought contributed to the severity of the fires, anthropogenic climate change is not to blame for Maui's drought conditions…' US Drought Monitor."25Mark Tedford has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.tedfordforcongress.com/ https://x.com/MarkTedfordOK/status/1693964821593547251Unclear Position on Roe
Teixeira, MarkTexas21RMark Teixeira does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "Unleash Texas oil, gas, and nuclear to restore U.S. energy dominance and drive down costs for families." On Twitter, he stated:"I’m running for Congress to secure the border, cut wasteful spending, unleash American energy, and stop the woke agenda."25Mark Teixeira has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://teixeiraforcongress.com/issues/ https://x.com/teixeiramark25/status/1971232488241431031 https://teixeiraforcongress.com/issues/Opposes Roe
Thompson, KellyIndiana3DKelly Thompson understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her Substack, she wrote a post about the costs of climate change. In it, she states: "For decades, fossil fuel companies generated significant profits while the scientific consensus on climate impacts became increasingly clear. Today, homeowners, taxpayers, and local governments are absorbing much of the financial cost associated with those long-term impacts. Kelly believes it is reasonable to ask that industries that contributed significantly to the problem also play a role in addressing its consequences."100Kelly Thompson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://kellythompsonforcongress.substack.com/p/paying-the-price-why-hoosier-families-ae6 https://www.newsnowwarsaw.com/speeches-by-beau-bayh-kelly-thompson-highlight-democratic-dinner-in-winona-lake/Unclear Position on Roe
Thompson, LarryCalifornia32RLarry Thompson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website he writes: "CLIMATE CHANGE: I am for allowing all alternate forms of energy and American oil to compete in a free market." He also states: "The solution to Climate Change starts with improving the Political Climate here in the 32nd District."25Larry Thompson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.larrythompsonforcongress.com/issues https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/larry-thompson/positions/052984e6-9573-4df9-ab74-43aad2702e70 https://www.larrythompsonforcongress.com/issuesOpposes Roe
Tijerina, TanoTexas28RTano Tijerina does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Grateful to speak in Corpus Christi as we welcomed our President to the greatest state in the nation. Jobs. Energy. Affordability. South Texas is ready. Let’s hold the House and fight for #TX28."25Tano Tijerina has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/JudgeTano/status/2027906440107610229 https://www.youtube.com/shorts/L98yDirZV88Opposes Roe
Todd, JenniferIllinois15DJennifer Todd does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like affordability.25Jennifer Todd has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jentodd2026.us/issues https://www.jentodd2026.us/news/jennifer-todd-aims-to-challenge-rep-mary-miller-for-congressional-seat-in-2026Supports Roe
Toth, SteveTexas2RSteve Toth disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "The climate is constantly changing. Upstate NY was once a rainforest and no SUV’s weren’t the cause. It was then covered over by a glacier (And no the cooling didn’t happen because of the Paris Climate Accord). Then it warmed up again and the glacier melted leaving Lake Ontario and the Finger Lakes." In another post, he stated: "And even still you have no proof that this change isn’t taking place over that same period of time. Ocean temperatures are now in a cooling period. There is more proof that climate change is tied to solar flares than anything that can be attributed to human activity. The greatest carbon releases today are not attributed to human activities, its volcanic eruptions. A small fraction in comparison is from mankind. There is no credible science that proves anything you’re saying. If it were true, the climate community science wouldn’t have been forced to manipulate their data as it was proven in the 2009 East Anglia Climate Gate."0Steve Toth makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. Toth voted for a bill that banned Texas from ever adopting a carbon tax.00https://x.com/SteveTothTX/status/2003540456034959362 https://x.com/SteveTothTX/status/2003850721939054870 https://index.texastaxpayers.com/votes/2025-house-vote-rv2179 https://x.com/SteveTothTX/status/1434896919877328903Opposes Roe
Trone Garriott, SarahIowa3DSarah Trone Garriott understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she wrote: "Our family farms, open spaces, and rivers are part of what makes Iowa special—and they’re under threat. I’ve worked with conservation groups across the state to protect clean water and expand access to public lands. As the Izaak Walton League’s Legislator of the Year, I’ve seen how bipartisan support can create meaningful change. In Congress, I’ll support investments in clean energy like wind, solar, and biofuels—which already power thousands of Iowa jobs—and I’ll work with farmers to promote sustainable practices that keep our soil healthy and our water safe. We can tackle climate change and strengthen our economy at the same time." Further, she wrote on Twitter: "There are lots of ways to assist in this time—including helping to elect leaders that will address climate change and stand up for the communities most negatively impacted by climate disasters."100Sarah Trone Garriott has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://sarahforiowa.com/issue/protecting-iowas-land-water-and-clean-energy-future/ https://x.com/SarahforIowa/status/1295068363417423872 https://sarahforiowa.com/issue/reproductive-freedom-is-personal-and-non-negotiable/Supports Roe
Tucker, RobbCalifornia3RRobb Tucker does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Instead, Tucker focuses on wildfire management and water policy.25Robb Tucker has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://robbtucker.com/platform/Unclear Position on Roe
Tyndell, KatyKansas4DKaty Tyndell understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue.. In a post on Facebook, Tyndell stated: "Climate change is real.. and we are being left behind on the global stage by failing to invest in renewable energy."100Katy Tyndell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.facebook.com/reel/1061080876823966 https://katyforkansas.substack.com/p/juneteenth-defending-freedom-andSupports Roe
Udell, KentUtah3DKent Udell agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to Utah Public Radio, Udell argued that climate change was affecting water resources in Utah. On his website, he wrote: "America needs reliable, affordable energy, now and in the future. As an engineer, I support an all-of-the-above approach grounded in science, innovation, and economics. We can strengthen energy security, protect water and land, and lead in clean-energy technologies without being distracted by ideological extremes."50Kent Udell has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://www.upr.org/politics/2026-10-05/celeste-maloy-kent-udell-congressional-district-3 https://www.kentudellforcongress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Valdez, ClaireNew York7DClaire Valdez understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Climate change is upon us — across the country, and right here in NY-7. Our energy bills are skyrocketing, our waterfronts are flooding, our kids are inhaling pollution and wildfire smoke, and our apartments are becoming dangerously hot in the summer. And it will only get worse... Americans deserve an economy that is affordable, worker-focused, and climate-friendly. By ushering in a Green New Deal that creates millions of jobs, we can make energy cleaner and more affordable for everyone, all while building the climate-resilient infrastructure that protects our homes and neighborhoods. Claire will advance policies that use the full power of the federal government to drive a just transition to a green, worker-led economy of the future." On twitter, she wrote: "The climate crisis is existential. War and empire only make it worse."100Claire Valdez has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. She has supported a cap-and-invest carbon pricing scheme.5092.5https://clairevaldezforcongress.com/issues/memo/climate https://x.com/claireforny/status/2044051988984332376 https://nysfocus.com/2025/06/06/cap-invest-hochul-carbon-pricing-new-york https://clairevaldezforcongress.com/issuesSupports Roe
Valimont, GayFlorida1DGay Valimont understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue.. She wrote: "Florida is especially vulnerable to the impacts of climate change, including sea-level rise and more frequent hurricanes. Gay will fight to: Invest in clean energy infrastructures, Conserve public lands and natural habitats, Prioritize clean water initiatives and enforce regulations to prevent pollution in rivers, lakes, and coastal areas, Address climate resilience through infrastructure investments, flood control measures, and coastal protections." On Twitter, she posted: "Rising temperatures on land and in the ocean create ideal conditions for hurricanes, and this year is just further proof that climate change is a real issue that requires a serious response."75Gay Valimont has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://ballotpedia.org/Gay_Valimont https://x.com/gayvalimont/status/1696172986347205019 https://x.com/gayvalimont/status/1749538743856308690Supports Roe
Van Scotter, SandraCalifornia20DSandra Van Scotter understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. She states: "According to Wikipedia (I like to start here and see the sources they have in the article), the definition of 'climate change' is: 'Present-day climate change includes both global warming—the ongoing increase in global average temperature—and its wider effects on Earth's climate system. Climate change in a broader sense also includes previous long-term changes to Earth's climate.' I thoroughly support the "Green New Deal" Resolution introduced by Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez."100Sandra Van Scotter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/sandra-van-scotter/positions/f1dc8adc-7c84-4919-8b74-c363bd39ecb5 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/90432Supports Roe
Vancil, DillanIllinois17RDillan Vancil does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. According to WQAD, Vancil believes in the expansion of coal for power generation.25Dillan Vancil has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.wqad.com/article/news/politics/elections/meet-dillan-vancil-republican-primary-candidate-for-illinois-17th-congressional-district/526-17440834-21f8-43b5-98e0-633b236477bfUnclear Position on Roe
Vang, MaiCalifornia7DMai Vang understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "I've seen firsthand how climate disasters ripple through working-class communities — stripping families of coverage, driving up costs, and leaving people with nowhere to turn... I’ll fight to fund a Green New Deal that transitions our economy to clean energy, creates good-paying jobs, and makes sure frontline communities are first in line for investment." She also wrote on Twitter: "Today I am joining thousands of elected officials across the country who've taken the No Fossil Fuel Money pledge! The residents of District 7 see the effects of climate change every day, and I want to make very clear that I am putting the climate - and our health - first."100Mai Vang has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.maiforus.com/platform#climate https://x.com/MaiForUs/status/1982987986129080544 https://www.maiforus.com/platform#healthSupports Roe
Vargas, StephanieCalifornia33RStephanie Vargas does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels.25Stephanie Vargas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.stephanievargas4congress.com/platformOpposes Roe
Verlato, AprilCalifornia28RApril Verlato agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, she wrote: "By modernizing our infrastructure, we not only safeguard our community but also make our region more resilient in the face of climate change." She also said: "I support policies that promote energy independence while protecting our environment. By expanding the use of cleaner energy technologies such as natural gas, nuclear energy, and renewables, we can reduce emissions without harming economic growth. I believe market-driven solutions, like incentivizing businesses to adopt energy-efficient technologies, can lead to a cleaner environment without over-regulating industries. Energy independence and environmental responsibility go hand in hand and should be pursued in a balanced way that ensures job growth and innovation." However, she has also opposed stronger regulation, stating that "we should focus on incentivizing more environmentally friendly energy, such as hydrogen or nuclear power plants. We need clean energy, but we can’t further fuel economic hardships that result in an increase in homelessness."50April Verlato has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. 5050https://web.archive.org/web/20241022222950/https://www.sgvtribune.com/2024/10/14/april-a-verlato-congress-district-28-candidate-2024-election-questionnaire/ https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/04/april-a-verlato-ca-28-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/Unclear Position on Roe
Villegas, RandyCalifornia22DRandy Villegas agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "Take a listen as I discuss how climate change came up for debate within our local school board meeting at Visalia Unified, how I broke the gridlock, and why the Valley needs to be prioritized when discussing policy, and a just transition in California." He also writes on his website: "Ask any farmer and they’ll tell you: we’re seeing record heat, year after year. If nothing changes, our food, water, and livable temperatures are all at risk."50Randy Villegas has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://x.com/Villegas_CA22/status/1515088671698915329 https://www.villegasforcongress.com/issues/environmentUnclear Position on Roe
Vincent, JohnSouth Carolina7DJohn Vincent does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. He is focused on issues such as ending the war with Iran.25John Vincent has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.vincentforcongress.com/policyUnclear Position on Roe
Vo, ChuongCalifornia45RChuong Vo does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, when asked about climate regulation, he stated: "Everyone wants clean air and clean water. The challenge is making sure environmental policies don’t end up punishing hard-working families, small businesses and drive jobs out of California, which has happened. As mayor, I saw how regulations of all sorts can impact local communities. I think the better path is encouraging innovation and cleaner technology while keeping energy affordable. We can protect the environment and grow the economy at the same time if we focus on practical solutions."25Chuong Vo has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://web.archive.org/web/20260603033736/https://www.ocregister.com/2026/05/05/chuong-v-vo-ca-45-candidate-2026-primary-election-questionnaire/ https://dccc.org/on-dobbs-anniversary-chuong-vo-stands-with-anti-abortion-extremists-over-california-women/Unclear Position on Roe
von Wilpert, MarniCalifornia48DMarni von Wilpert understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes: "Climate change is an urgent threat, and meeting it requires action that puts our environment ahead of the corporate polluters bankrolling Donald Trump and his allies." Further, she tweeted: "The Desert communities of #CA48 are on the frontlines of the climate crisis — with record heat, wildfire risk, and water shortages threatening our way of life. I’ve held polluters accountable and championed clean energy. In Congress, I’ll fight for bold climate action."100Marni von Wilpert has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.marnivonwilpert.com/issues https://x.com/marnivonwilpert/status/1969192175423373349 https://x.com/marnivonwilpert/status/2069905178925617465Supports Roe
Vukasovich, ChristianMichigan5DChristian Vukasovich understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "Every nation, military, and industry benefits from having more information, not less. This is completely nonsensical. This kind of monitoring is critical to understanding how climate change is impacting our fisheries and our oceans."75Christian Vukasovich has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://x.com/c4michigan/status/2061984429807960559Unclear Position on Roe
Wade, BrandonOklahoma2DBrandon Wade understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. In a questionnaire, he strongly agreed with the statement "Man-made climate change is a global threat and requires urgent political action," saying: "We must work together to ensure we have a planet for generations to come. We must work to provide cleaner options while working with our energy producers to provide a cleaner way of producing the current energy supply." In a tweet, he wrote: "Call me a Believer, but I don’t think I’m the only one that wants a Living Wage, to address the climate crisis, provide healthcare for all, take care of our Veterans, provide education for everyone, Real Gun reform, the list goes on and on. Join me."100Brandon Wade has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/82319/race/4292/election/1231?culture=en-us https://x.com/Wade4OKCD2/status/1686037604536295424 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/82319/race/4292/election/1231?culture=en-usSupports Roe
Wagner, JustinPennsylvania16DJustin Wagner understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Climate change is not theoretical. We’re living with the floods, the bad air days, and the rising costs associated right here, right now. In Congress, I’ll push for real action to cut emissions, invest in clean energy jobs, and make sure our communities aren’t left behind as the world changes around us. And I’ll do it by following the science, not lobbyists or wishful thinking."100Justin Wagner has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.justinwagnerforcongress.com/platform https://www.justinwagnerforcongress.com/platformSupports Roe
Wallace, DaveMaryland2RDave Wallace disagrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In an interview, he stated: "Restore America’s energy independence. End politicization of science. Bring real science and sanity into our approach to handling COVID-19 and so-called 'Climate Change' policy." On Twitter, he wrote: "Well since [Greta Thunberg's ideology] is a Dogma, not science, if there is any doctorate she would deserve it’s Theology, because it is surely not Science! As not any bit of Climate change is at all about science."0Dave Wallace makes public statements or advocates against putting a U.S. fee on carbon. On Twitter, he wrote: "[W]e will never allow a Carbon tax. We will not allow America to go the way of the EU."00https://web.archive.org/web/20240416211127/https://www.baltimoresun.com/2022/05/18/2022-voter-guide-dave-wallace-candidate-for-us-congress-district-2/ https://x.com/DaveWallaceUS/status/1639483557042171907 https://x.com/DaveWallaceUS/status/844322496866373632 https://x.com/DaveWallaceUS/status/1106545232554983424Opposes Roe
Wallace, RachelPennsylvania9DRachel Wallace does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like lowering cost.25Rachel Wallace has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.wallaceforcongress.com/prioritiesUnclear Position on Roe
Walter, JeffIllinois11RJeff Walter does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "As a businessman and Navy veteran, he knows we must unleash American energy, cut red tape, and bring back good-paying jobs."25Jeff Walter has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.jeffwalterforcongress.com/issues https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/89059/race/23784/election/1346?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Watson, ColbyNorth Carolina8DColby Watson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like housing and the economy.25Colby Watson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.colbyforcongress.com/issuesUnclear Position on Roe
Wellman, FredMissouri2DFred Wellman agrees with the scientific consensus that climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, he stated: "Agriculture is one of Missouri’s greatest economic engines, and our farmers have been innovators long before “agtech” became a buzzword. Done right, new tools can help farmers lower input costs, protect soil and water, improve yields, and keep family farms competitive through a changing climate. Congress should invest in USDA research, land-grant universities, extension offices, community colleges, rural broadband, and training that prepares Missourians for the jobs this industry creates."50Fred Wellman has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5050https://snapcoalition.org/initiatives/stance-on-science/states/mo https://www.wellmanformo.com/endorsements https://x.com/WellmanForMO/status/2047364114658263118Supports Roe
Whipple, CodyNevada4RCody Whipple does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like affodability.25Cody Whipple has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://codyk4congress.com/issues/Unclear Position on Roe
White, RobertDistrict of Columbia1DRobert White understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On Twitter, he wrote: "This plan will reduce violent crime, address the climate crisis, decrease unemployment, benefit our communities and improve our economy. This is the kind of innovative problem solving we need from our mayor." In another, he stated: "My Jobs Guarantee for DC program will bring down violent crime by giving every DC resident the opportunity for a good-paying career fighting the climate crisis and improving our communities."100Robert White has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon. White has called for a "carbon rebate" in the past.5092.5https://x.com/RobertWhite_DC/status/1517221158076178439 https://x.com/RobertWhite_DC/status/1522682686455877632 https://ggwash.org/view/67286/dc-must-put-a-price-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-to-cut-pollution-advocates-say https://x.com/RobertWhite_DC/status/1524007989304246278Supports Roe
Whitfield, RonaldTexas18RRonald Whitfield does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on issues like public safety and civic education.25Ronald Whitfield has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/meet-the-cd-18-candidates-you-may-not-have-heard-about/ar-AA1OeT2qUnclear Position on Roe
Wiener, ScottCalifornia11DScott Wiener understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. On his website, he writes: "Californians know the climate crisis isn’t a distant threat. Devastating wildfires, brutal heat waves, and soaring energy bills and insurance premiums are hitting families right now. Tackling this crisis at the scale science demands requires leaders who pull every lever available and never back down from a fight. Scott has been that leader since his first day in office. Now Washington is next. Scott was named a TIME100 Climate Champion in 2023 after he took on the biggest corporations in the world — particularly the oil industry — and passed first-in-the-nation legislation to hold them accountable by forcing them to publicly disclose their carbon emissions. He also authored a bill to ban fracking in California, and while it fell short, the Legislature ultimately succeeded in cutting most drilling near homes, schools, and other sensitive areas, protecting much of the state." Furthermore, on Twitter, he wrote: "Extreme weather isn’t just randomly happening. It’s being fueled by climate change. Which is being fueled by fossil fuel. All of which is telling us yet again that we must dramatically accelerate the clean energy transition."100Scott Wiener has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://www.scottwiener.com/climate https://x.com/Scott_Wiener/status/2035422701343637618 https://www.scottwiener.com/reproductive-health-freedomSupports Roe
Wikstrom, PaulMinnesota4RPaul Wikstrom does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, Wikstrom was given the following question: Which comes closest to your view? (Select all that apply) A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost. C) Stricter environmental laws undermine U.S. energy independence and deter development of reliable electricity sources. D) Climate change is real and requires urgent policy action. Wikstrom answered with option C, stricter environmental laws undermine U.S. energy independence and deter development of reliable electricity sources. 25Paul Wikstrom has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/82287 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/82287Opposes Roe
Williams, DrewKentucky1DDrew Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign focuses on issues like AI and healthcare.25Drew Williams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.williamsforky.com/policyUnclear Position on Roe
Williams, JomoNew York13RJomo Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on opposing democratic socialism.25Jomo Williams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://jmw4congress.com/Unclear Position on Roe
Williams, PeterLouisiana2RPeter Williams does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. His campaign is focused on traditionally conservative social issues.25Peter Williams has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://peterwilliams4congress.com/ https://peterwilliams4congress.com/Opposes Roe
Wilson, JeffIllinois13RJeff Wilson does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he writes: "He will focus on expanding nuclear energy, oil, and natural gas to power our towns and lower costs." In an interview, he stated: "We need more energy right here in Illinois — even though 50% of our energy is from nuclear, 50% — yet we're still seen to be structurally deficit in energy and we sell it to other places. So we just need more energy. We need more energy, more nuclear power plants, more coal plants that work 24 hours a day, and grid stability, grid modernization here in Illinois."25Jeff Wilson has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.wilsonforcongress.com/issues https://will.illinois.edu/21stshow/story/gop-congressional-candidate-jeff-wilson https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/89061/race/23786/election/1346?culture=en-usOpposes Roe
Wingfield, MeganKentucky2DMegan Wingfield does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. Her campaign is focused on issues like healthcare.25Megan Wingfield has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.wingfieldforcongress.com/ https://www.wingfieldforcongress.com/platform-valuesSupports Roe
Wirth, CindeIndiana6DCInde Wirth understands the importance of climate action as a top priority issue. She stated: "Climate change is real and there is robust scientific evidence linking climate change and increase in greenhouse gases in our atmosphere directly to the burning of fossil fuels." She also writes that she wants to invest in clean energy on her campaign website.100CInde Wirth has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5092.5https://dailyjournal.net/2024/09/04/qa-6th-district-candidates-discuss-energy-israel-palestine-conflict-gun-violence/ https://wirth4congress.com/priorities/protect-the-environment/ https://dailyjournal.net/2024/09/03/qa-6th-district-candidates-talk-priorities-immigration-abortion/Supports Roe
Womack, LaKeshaNorth Carolina14DLaKesha Womack understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. On her website, she writes that she will: "Expand climate adaptation and resilience programs that help prevent food insecurity, displacement, and humanitarian crises." Further, in a questionnaire, she stated: "Meeting growing electricity demand requires a diverse energy mix. I believe nuclear power is the most reliable source of carbon-free baseload electricity, complemented by investments in renewables, grid modernization, energy storage, and efficiency."75LaKesha Womack has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.womack4nc14.com/issues https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/93111 https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/93111Supports Roe
Yarbrough, JaceTexas32RJace Yarbrough does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. In a questionnaire, Yarbrough was given the prompt "Which comes closest to your view? (Select all that apply) A) Stricter environmental laws and regulations cost too many jobs and hurt the economy. B) Stricter environmental laws and regulations are worth the cost. C) Stricter environmental laws undermine U.S. energy independence and deter development of reliable electricity sources. D) Climate change is real and requires urgent policy action." Yarbrough answered A and C. On his website, he wrote: "Texas is the energy capital of America. In Congress, Jace Yarbrough will fight to support President Trump’s expansion of American energy production. As a lawyer, he sued the radical left over implementation of their job-crushing Green New Deal policies and will continue to fight them in Congress as he has done in court."25Jace Yarbrough has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://ivoterguide.com/candidate/78246/race/15117/election/1079?culture=en-us https://www.jaceforcongress.com/priorities https://www.jaceforcongress.com/prioritiesOpposes Roe
Yonce, EricFlorida6DEric Yonce understands the importance of climate action but not as a top priority issue. He wrote: "The climate crisis is real, but it's being made worse by lawmakers and developers who prioritize short-term profits over long-term stability. We see the consequences every time it rains, every time we patch a seawall, and every time a neighborhood floods that never used to."75Eric Yonce has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5071.25https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/eric-yonce/positions/66fcba6e-c3c8-445c-b11c-ac21cf27969f https://www.localcandidates.org/politicians/eric-yonce/positions/aabcc2bd-0c61-4bae-a6d5-4db8a200aa50Supports Roe
Young, MartyPennsylvania6RMarty Young does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On his website, he wrote: "Pennsylvania has the resources and workforce to produce affordable, reliable energy right here at home. We sit on the Marcellus Shale, one of the most productive natural gas formations in the world, and we should be using that advantage to lower costs, support good jobs, and keep our energy supply dependable. I support an all-of-the-above energy approach focused on reliability and affordability. That means using proven sources like natural gas and nuclear alongside responsible renewables, rather than forcing shutdowns that drive up prices and make the grid less reliable. Energy policy should be guided by what works, not by mandates that ignore real-world consequences. Responsible natural gas development has created thousands of good-paying jobs in Pennsylvania and helped keep energy affordable. I support strong environmental standards and the infrastructure needed to move energy efficiently to market, including pipelines and storage, so families and businesses are not hit with unnecessary price spikes."25Marty Young has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://www.voteyoung.com/prioritiesUnclear Position on Roe
Zamora, MartinNew Mexico3RMartin Zamora does not take a clear position on whether climate change is real and human-made, from burning fossil fuels. On Twitter, he wrote: "New Mexico’s working families are getting crushed by inflation, energy costs, and job-killing regulations pushed by the Left. Teresa Leger has voted AGAIN and AGAIN for policies that raise prices and attack our oil & gas workforce. I’ll always defend the energy jobs that keep our rural communities alive. I’ll always fight for American energy independence. And I’ll always put New Mexico workers first."25Martin Zamora has no known or an inconsistent position on a U.S. fee on carbon.5028.75https://x.com/ZamoraforNM/status/1998788744095449379 https://familypolicyalliance.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/NM_Pro-Life-Scorecard.pdfOpposes Roe